← Back to home

Blanco CountyLocal Government

EIN: 746001460

UEI: UPWQPPK7D9V8

Audited by: Neffendorf and Blocker, P.C.

Oversight agency: 21 [Department of the Treasury]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

Blanco County1 audit years2 findings
1
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$2.3M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2023)

FY 2023-09-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$2,289,559 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on June 27, 2024. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by December 27, 2024 (611 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2023-002
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

The County failed to implement and monitor suspension and debarment procedures to comply with the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200.214). Cause: Procedures were not put in place to monitor the procurement procedures conducted by the independent contractor to assure compliance with the Uniform Guidance standards. Effect: Contracts may have been awarded to ineligible vendors. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Procedures should be put in place to monitor and comply with the Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action:

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Type of Finding: Material Weakness - Internal Control Criteria: Uniform Guidance states recipients of Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CLFRF) are responsible for ensuring any procurement using CLFRF funds are consistent with the procurement standards set forth in the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200.214). Condition: The County failed to implement and monitor suspension and debarment procedures to comply with the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200.214). Cause: Procedures were not put in place to monitor the procurement procedures conducted by the independent contractor to assure compliance with the Uniform Guidance standards. Effect: Contracts may have been awarded to ineligible vendors. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Procedures should be put in place to monitor and comply with the Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action:

Corrective Action Plan

Finding Summary: County should comply with Uniform Guidance regarding procurement Responsible Individuals: County Attorney and County Judge Corrective Action Plan: Recent developments have resulted in a change in personnel. Individuals now involved in any grant funded procurement will be tasked with monitoring our procurement procedures for compliance with Uniform Guidance principles. Additionally, a follow up with the project contractor revealed that no ineligible vendors were, in fact, selected or used. Anticipated Completion Date: Ongoing

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2023-003
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

The County failed to comply with the Uniform Guidance procurement standards (2 CFR 200.214) regarding suspension and debarment. Cause: The County's procurement procedures did not include procedures for vetting vendors with regard to suspension and debarment from participating in federal assistance programs. Effect: Contracts may have been awarded to vendors ineligible to participate in the federal assistance program. Questioned Cost: None Recommendation: Procedures should be put in place to comply with the Uniform Guidance procurement standards regarding suspension and debarment. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action:

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Type of Finding: Material Non-compliance Criteria: Uniform Guidance procurement standards (2 CFR 200.214) state recipients of Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds are prohibited from entering into subawards and contracts with parties that are debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal Assistance programs. Condition: The County failed to comply with the Uniform Guidance procurement standards (2 CFR 200.214) regarding suspension and debarment. Cause: The County's procurement procedures did not include procedures for vetting vendors with regard to suspension and debarment from participating in federal assistance programs. Effect: Contracts may have been awarded to vendors ineligible to participate in the federal assistance program. Questioned Cost: None Recommendation: Procedures should be put in place to comply with the Uniform Guidance procurement standards regarding suspension and debarment. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action:

Corrective Action Plan

Finding Summary: The County's procurement procedures do not include procedures for vetting vendors with regard to suspension and debarment from participating in federal assistance programs. Responsible Individuals: County Attorney and County Judge Corrective Action Plan: Any future relevant procurement will include vetting procedures to prevent those who are suspended and/or debarred from participating in the project. Anticipated Completion Date: Ongoing

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Texas

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.