← Back to home

Kay CountyLocal Government

EIN: 736006379

UEI: JZKLWHNKDQA9

Audited by: Oklahoma State Auditor and Inspector

Oversight agency: 20 [Department of Transportation]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

Kay County6 audit years17 findings12 repeat
6
Audit Years
17
Total Findings
12
Repeat Findings
$1.4M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2022)

FY 2022-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$1,440,425 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on November 26, 2024. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by May 26, 2025 (461 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2021-06-30

NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$1,997,744 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 26, 2024 — management decision was due May 26, 2025.

FY 2020-06-30

NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$1,404,876 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 8, 2022 — management decision was due August 8, 2022.

2020-007
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking / Period of Performance / Procurement & Suspension/Debarment / Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

County-wide controls regarding Control Environment, Risk Assessment, Information and Communication, and Monitoring have not been designed. Cause of Condition: Policies and procedures have not been designed and implemented to ensure the County is in compliance with grant requirements. Effect of Condition: This condition could result in noncompliance to grant requirements. Recommendation: OSAI recommends that the County implement a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with grant requirements. Management Response: Chairman, Board of County Commissioners: The County will work to implement a risk assessment plan during our internal control meetings to help make sure we are in compliance with all grant requirements. Criteria: GAO Standards ? Section 1 ?Fundamental Concepts of Internal Control - OV1.01 states in part: Definition of Internal Control Internal control is a process effected by an entity?s oversight body, management, and other personnel that provides reasonable assurance that the objectives of an entity will be achieved. Additionally, GAO Standards ? Section 2 ? Establishing an Effective Internal Control System ? OV2.04 states in part: Components, Principles, and Attributes Control Environment - The foundation for an internal control system. It provides the discipline and structure to help an entity achieve its objectives. Risk Assessment - Assesses the risks facing the entity as it seeks to achieve its objectives. This assessment provides the basis for developing appropriate risk responses. Information and Communication - The quality information management and personnel communicate and use to support the internal control system. Monitoring - Activities management establishes and operates to assess the quality of performance over time and promptly resolve the findings of audits and other reviews.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Lack of County-Wide Controls Over Major Program ? Highway Planning and Construction PASS-THROUGH GRANTOR: Bureau of Indian Affairs - BIA FEDERAL AGENCY: U.S. Department of Transportation CFDA NO: 20.205 FEDERAL PROGRAM NAME: Highway Planning and Construction FEDERAL AWARD NUMBER: A15AC00117, A17AC00043 and A19AC00027 FEDERAL AWARD YEAR: 2020 CONTROL CATEGORY: Activities Allowed or Unallowed; Allowable Costs/Cost Principles; Matching; Period of Performance; Procurement and Suspension and Debarment, and Special Tests and Provisions. QUESTIONED COSTS: $-0- Condition: County-wide controls regarding Control Environment, Risk Assessment, Information and Communication, and Monitoring have not been designed. Cause of Condition: Policies and procedures have not been designed and implemented to ensure the County is in compliance with grant requirements. Effect of Condition: This condition could result in noncompliance to grant requirements. Recommendation: OSAI recommends that the County implement a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with grant requirements. Management Response: Chairman, Board of County Commissioners: The County will work to implement a risk assessment plan during our internal control meetings to help make sure we are in compliance with all grant requirements. Criteria: GAO Standards ? Section 1 ?Fundamental Concepts of Internal Control - OV1.01 states in part: Definition of Internal Control Internal control is a process effected by an entity?s oversight body, management, and other personnel that provides reasonable assurance that the objectives of an entity will be achieved. Additionally, GAO Standards ? Section 2 ? Establishing an Effective Internal Control System ? OV2.04 states in part: Components, Principles, and Attributes Control Environment - The foundation for an internal control system. It provides the discipline and structure to help an entity achieve its objectives. Risk Assessment - Assesses the risks facing the entity as it seeks to achieve its objectives. This assessment provides the basis for developing appropriate risk responses. Information and Communication - The quality information management and personnel communicate and use to support the internal control system. Monitoring - Activities management establishes and operates to assess the quality of performance over time and promptly resolve the findings of audits and other reviews.

Corrective Action Plan

Kay County is currently working on a risk assessment plan during our internal control meeting to help make sure we are in compliance with all grant requirements and to ensure federal funds are expended in accordance with grant agreements in a timely manner.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking, Period of Performance, Procurement and Suspension and Debarment, Special Tests and Provisions →
2020-008
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking / Period of Performance / Procurement & Suspension/Debarment / Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

During the process of documenting the County?s internal controls regarding federal disbursements, we noted that Kay County has not established procedures to ensure compliance with the following compliance requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed; Allowable Costs/Cost Principles; Matching; Period of Performance; Procurement and Suspension and Debarment, and Special Tests and Provisions. Cause of Condition: Policies and procedures have not been designed and implemented to ensure federal expenditures are made in accordance with federal compliance requirements. Effect of Condition: This condition could result in noncompliance to grant requirements and loss of federal funds to the County. Recommendation: OSAI recommends the County implement a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with grant requirements. Management Response: Chairman, Board of County Commissioners: Kay County officials will implement procedures to ensure federal expenditures are made in accordance with federal compliance requirements. Criteria: GAO Standards ? Section 2 ? Establishing an Effective Internal Control System ? OV2.23 states in part: Objectives of an Entity ? Compliance Objectives Management conducts activities in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. As part of specifying compliance objectives, the entity determines which laws and regulations apply to the entity. Management is expected to set objectives that incorporate these requirements. 2 CFR ? 200.303(a) Internal Controls reads as follows: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Lack of Internal Controls Over Major Federal Program ? Highway Planning and Construction PASS-THROUGH GRANTOR: Bureau of Indian Affairs FEDERAL AGENCY: U.S. Department of Transportation CFDA NO: 20.205 FEDERAL PROGRAM NAME: Highway Planning and Construction FEDERAL AWARD NUMBER: A15AC00117, A17AC00043 and A19AC00027 FEDERAL AWARD YEAR: 2020 CONTROL CATEGORY: Activities Allowed or Unallowed; Allowable Costs/Cost Principles; Matching; Period of Performance; Procurement and Suspension and Debarment, and Special Tests and Provisions. QUESTIONED COSTS: $-0- Condition: During the process of documenting the County?s internal controls regarding federal disbursements, we noted that Kay County has not established procedures to ensure compliance with the following compliance requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed; Allowable Costs/Cost Principles; Matching; Period of Performance; Procurement and Suspension and Debarment, and Special Tests and Provisions. Cause of Condition: Policies and procedures have not been designed and implemented to ensure federal expenditures are made in accordance with federal compliance requirements. Effect of Condition: This condition could result in noncompliance to grant requirements and loss of federal funds to the County. Recommendation: OSAI recommends the County implement a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with grant requirements. Management Response: Chairman, Board of County Commissioners: Kay County officials will implement procedures to ensure federal expenditures are made in accordance with federal compliance requirements. Criteria: GAO Standards ? Section 2 ? Establishing an Effective Internal Control System ? OV2.23 states in part: Objectives of an Entity ? Compliance Objectives Management conducts activities in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. As part of specifying compliance objectives, the entity determines which laws and regulations apply to the entity. Management is expected to set objectives that incorporate these requirements. 2 CFR ? 200.303(a) Internal Controls reads as follows: The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

Corrective Action Plan

Kay County officials are currently working to implement procedures to ensure federal expenditures are made in accordance with federal compliance requirements.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking, Period of Performance, Procurement and Suspension and Debarment, Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2018-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$1,845,608 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on May 19, 2021 — management decision was due November 19, 2021.

2014-014
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Period of Performance / Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2017-014

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2017-014

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Period of Performance, Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2017-017
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
REPEAT OF 2017-017OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2017-017

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2018-012
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Period of Performance / Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2017-012

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2017-012

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Period of Performance, Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2018-013
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Period of Performance / Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2017-013

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2017-013

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Period of Performance, Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2018-014
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Period of Performance / Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2017-014

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2017-014

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Period of Performance, Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2018-015
Activities Allowed or Unallowed
OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed →
2018-017
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
REPEAT OF 2017-017OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2017-017

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2017-06-30

NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$3,577,768 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on May 19, 2021 — management decision was due November 19, 2021.

2017-012
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Period of Performance / Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2016-012

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-012

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Period of Performance, Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2017-013
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Period of Performance / Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2016-013

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-013

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Period of Performance, Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2017-014
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Period of Performance / Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2016-014

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-014

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Period of Performance, Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2017-015
Activities Allowed or Unallowed
MATERIAL WEAKNESSOTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed →
2017-017
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2016-06-30

NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$911,389 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on May 19, 2021 — management decision was due November 19, 2021.

2016-012
Activities Allowed or Unallowed
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2015-006

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-006

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed →
2016-013
Activities Allowed or Unallowed
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2015-007

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-007

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed →
2016-014
Activities Allowed or Unallowed
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2015-008

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-008

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Oklahoma

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.