← Back to home

EMORY VALLEY CENTER, INCNon-Profit

EIN: 620762198

UEI: F81VC1Q2MYW3

Audited by: PARSONS & WRIGHT CPAS

Oversight agency: 20 [Department of Transportation]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 31, 2026

EMORY VALLEY CENTER, INC5 audit years2 findings
5
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$1.2M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

$1,209,160 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 10, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 10, 2026 (8 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
2025-002
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Cash Management / Equipment & Real Property / Procurement & Suspension/Debarment / Subrecipient Monitoring
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

The organization did not initially prepare the SEFA using the full accrual method of accounting. Cause: The design of internal control did not properly allow for changes in grant amount received and awarded. Effect: The improperly designed internal control caused grant award changes to not be recognized in accordance with proper accounting principles and the overall revenue of the organization to be understated. Recommendation: It is our recommendation that the VP of Finance and the President of the organization review the internal control process to ensure that updated grant awards and all applicable invoices sent to the organization are documented and recorded in the general ledger on a monthly basis. Response: VP of Finance and President will review the internal control structure to allow needed adjustments

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: OMB Guidance (2CFR Part 200) requires that the accounting records follow generally accepted accounting principles which require accrual accounting. Condition: The organization did not initially prepare the SEFA using the full accrual method of accounting. Cause: The design of internal control did not properly allow for changes in grant amount received and awarded. Effect: The improperly designed internal control caused grant award changes to not be recognized in accordance with proper accounting principles and the overall revenue of the organization to be understated. Recommendation: It is our recommendation that the VP of Finance and the President of the organization review the internal control process to ensure that updated grant awards and all applicable invoices sent to the organization are documented and recorded in the general ledger on a monthly basis. Response: VP of Finance and President will review the internal control structure to allow needed adjustments

Corrective Action Plan

The grant process is being reviewed and updated to be sure to incorporate any changes that impact the accounting function of the Center.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Cash Management, Equipment and Real Property Management, Procurement and Suspension and Debarment, Subrecipient Monitoring →
2025-003
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Cash Management / Equipment & Real Property / Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking / Period of Performance / Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTS

The organization charged bonus payments and a portion of cell phone costs to Federal Grant ALN 84.181 that management determined were unallowable or not properly allocable to this program under OMB Guidance (2 CFR part 200). Cause: The payroll and reimbursement processes and related controls for employees receiving bonuses and cell phone reimbursements did not clearly direct or adequately review the allocation of these amounts by department or grant, resulting in miscoding to ALN 84.181. Effect: As a result, unallowable or improperly allocated costs were included in reimbursement requests under ALN 84.181, increasing the amount of federal reimbursement claimed. Questioned Costs: Known Questioned Costs from all sources: $13,600 Known Questioned Costs from federal sources: $3,400 Additional questioned costs may exist, but were not specifically identified. Recommendation: It is our recommendation that the VP of Finance and the President of the organization review the payroll processes to ensure that bonus pay and other payroll items are allocated appropriately across all departments. Response: VP of Finance and President will review the payroll processes and implement needed adjustments.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: OMB Guidance (2CFR Part 200) requires that federal awards be charged only for allowable, reasonable, and allocable costs in accordance with the terms and conditions of the federal award. Condition: The organization charged bonus payments and a portion of cell phone costs to Federal Grant ALN 84.181 that management determined were unallowable or not properly allocable to this program under OMB Guidance (2 CFR part 200). Cause: The payroll and reimbursement processes and related controls for employees receiving bonuses and cell phone reimbursements did not clearly direct or adequately review the allocation of these amounts by department or grant, resulting in miscoding to ALN 84.181. Effect: As a result, unallowable or improperly allocated costs were included in reimbursement requests under ALN 84.181, increasing the amount of federal reimbursement claimed. Questioned Costs: Known Questioned Costs from all sources: $13,600 Known Questioned Costs from federal sources: $3,400 Additional questioned costs may exist, but were not specifically identified. Recommendation: It is our recommendation that the VP of Finance and the President of the organization review the payroll processes to ensure that bonus pay and other payroll items are allocated appropriately across all departments. Response: VP of Finance and President will review the payroll processes and implement needed adjustments.

Corrective Action Plan

The payroll process is being reviewed and updated to be sure to incorporate any changes that impact the accounting function of the Center.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Cash Management, Equipment and Real Property Management, Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking, Period of Performance, Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$865,926 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$880,782 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 15, 2019 — management decision was due July 15, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,096,197 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 15, 2018 — management decision was due July 15, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

$1,044,771 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 21, 2017 — management decision was due September 21, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Tennessee

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.