EIN: 486020988
UEI: GSA_MIGRATION
Audited by: LINDBURG VOGEL PIERCE FARIS CHARTERED
Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 2, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on August 11, 2021. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by February 11, 2022 (1666 days ago).
What is a management decision? →The terms, conditions, and requirements of the subaward were not documented by written agreements at the time of the subaward with subrecipients. Memorandums of Agreement (MOA?s) were not timely obtained from the County?s nine subrecipients, with the earliest MOA received on February 9, 2021 and the last MOA received April 11, 2021. Cause: County personnel did not understand the importance of the obtaining the written agreements with subrecipients at the time of the subaward. Effect: Subrecipients may not be aware the award is a subaward, or the requirements and information necessary for the subrecipient to comply with the conditions and requirements of the subaward. Recommendation: In the future if the County is in the situation where it is a pass-through entity, they should document subawards made to subrecipients with written agreements at the time of the award. Views of Responsible Officials: In the future, we will receive a receipt of agreement for each subaward sent to the subrecipient. We were not aware that it had to be done. We were instructed to have a MOA after all subawards were distributed.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Coronavirus Relief Fund ? Assistance Listing No. 21.019 For the year ended December 31, 2020 Significant Deficiency Criteria: A pass-through entity must clearly identify to the subrecipient the award as a subaward at the time of the subaward and any applicable requirements, including information described in 2 CFR section 200.331(a)(1). Condition: The terms, conditions, and requirements of the subaward were not documented by written agreements at the time of the subaward with subrecipients. Memorandums of Agreement (MOA?s) were not timely obtained from the County?s nine subrecipients, with the earliest MOA received on February 9, 2021 and the last MOA received April 11, 2021. Cause: County personnel did not understand the importance of the obtaining the written agreements with subrecipients at the time of the subaward. Effect: Subrecipients may not be aware the award is a subaward, or the requirements and information necessary for the subrecipient to comply with the conditions and requirements of the subaward. Recommendation: In the future if the County is in the situation where it is a pass-through entity, they should document subawards made to subrecipients with written agreements at the time of the award. Views of Responsible Officials: In the future, we will receive a receipt of agreement for each subaward sent to the subrecipient. We were not aware that it had to be done. We were instructed to have a MOA after all subawards were distributed.
Recommendation: In the future if the County is in the situation where it is a pass-through entity, they should document subawards made to subrecipients with written agreements at the time of the award. Views of Responsible Officials: In the future, we will receive a receipt of agreement for each subaward sent to the subrecipient. We were not aware that it had to be done. We were instructed to have a MOA after all subawards were distributed.
Periodic financial reports were not complete; additional expenditures not included on original reports filed were added to the actual column of the ?Monthly Spending Planning Estimation Tool? monthly totals and in the detail of subsequent reports filed. This occurred for the reporting periods from March 1, 2020 to September 30, 2020, from October 1, 2020 to October 31, 2020 and from November 1, 2020 to November 30, 2020. None of these additional expenditures were documented on the ?CRF County Change Memo? required to be filed with the Kansas Office of Recovery. Cause: Documentation was not timely submitted to the individual responsible to include all expenditures in the report for the period. Effect: Periodic financial reports were not complete, which could effect the ability of the grantor to timely monitor expenditures reported. Recommendation: The County should contact the grantor, the Kansas Office of Recovery, and determine any action required, such as filing of a ?CRF County Change Memo? to document the additional expenditures for each period. Views of Responsible Officials: The project manager, Laura Leite, filed ?CRF County Change Memos? for changes between months and at the end of the project except for the very last change where a school found they had been over reimbursed and returned the funds.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Coronavirus Relief Fund ? Assistance Listing No. 21.019 For the year ended December 31, 2020 Significant Deficiency Criteria: Complete and accurate periodic financial reports were required to be filed with the grantor, the Kansas Office of Recovery. Condition: Periodic financial reports were not complete; additional expenditures not included on original reports filed were added to the actual column of the ?Monthly Spending Planning Estimation Tool? monthly totals and in the detail of subsequent reports filed. This occurred for the reporting periods from March 1, 2020 to September 30, 2020, from October 1, 2020 to October 31, 2020 and from November 1, 2020 to November 30, 2020. None of these additional expenditures were documented on the ?CRF County Change Memo? required to be filed with the Kansas Office of Recovery. Cause: Documentation was not timely submitted to the individual responsible to include all expenditures in the report for the period. Effect: Periodic financial reports were not complete, which could effect the ability of the grantor to timely monitor expenditures reported. Recommendation: The County should contact the grantor, the Kansas Office of Recovery, and determine any action required, such as filing of a ?CRF County Change Memo? to document the additional expenditures for each period. Views of Responsible Officials: The project manager, Laura Leite, filed ?CRF County Change Memos? for changes between months and at the end of the project except for the very last change where a school found they had been over reimbursed and returned the funds.
Recommendation: The County should contact the grantor, the Kansas Office of Recovery, and determine any action required, such as filing of a ?CRF County Change Memo? to document the additional expenditures for each period. Views of Responsible Officials: The project manager, Laura Leite, filed ?CRF County change Memos? for changes between months and at the end of project except for the very last change where a school found that they had be over reimbursed and returned the funds.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Kansas →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.