← Back to home

District Health Department No. 2Local Government

EIN: 381911267

UEI: NBUPML1KFHZ1

Audited by: Stephenson & Company, P.C.

Oversight agency: 97 [Department of Homeland Security]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 7, 2026

District Health Department No. 210 audit years1 findings
10
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$2.3M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-09-30

$2,301,062 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 4, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 4, 2026 (4 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
Funder? Track this deadline →

FY 2024-09-30

$3,026,766 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 19, 2025 — management decision was due September 19, 2025.

FY 2023-09-30

$2,187,611 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 22, 2024 — management decision was due September 22, 2024.

FY 2022-09-30

$1,850,682 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 22, 2023 — management decision was due September 22, 2023.

2022-005
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTS

Condition and Criteria: ?2 CRF Part 200 Subpart E ? Cost Principals? requires that all indirect costs be applied on a consistent basis, while considering the reasonableness and equitability of such treatments. Effect: Various federal grants were over or under charged for their equitable portion of the indirect costs. Cause: Management believed that because certain grants did not allow for indirect costs to be drawn down off the grant, that they did not need to be part of the total calculation for determining the portion of indirect costs that should be charged to each grant, thus overcharging the grants that allow for indirect costs to be drawn. Context: All grant activity is tracked separately, with administrative and facility costs being tracked in a separate program. Those administrative and facility costs are then allocated to all of the grant programs, based on square footage being used as well as time charged to each program. The time spent on the programs that did not allow for indirect costs to be drawn down, were fully removed from the calculation, charging 100% of the administrative and facility costs to only those grants that allowed for indirect costs to be drawn. Questioned Costs: $1,721.86 for ALN 10.557 and $7,556.69 for ALN 93.323. Auditor's Recommendation: We recommend that management allocates indirect costs to all programs, regardless of whether or not the program allows for the indirect costs to be drawn down off the grant. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Health Officer and Finance Team understand the issue and have already implemented procedures to ensure that all programs are charged their portion of the indirect costs.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Condition and Criteria: ?2 CRF Part 200 Subpart E ? Cost Principals? requires that all indirect costs be applied on a consistent basis, while considering the reasonableness and equitability of such treatments. Effect: Various federal grants were over or under charged for their equitable portion of the indirect costs. Cause: Management believed that because certain grants did not allow for indirect costs to be drawn down off the grant, that they did not need to be part of the total calculation for determining the portion of indirect costs that should be charged to each grant, thus overcharging the grants that allow for indirect costs to be drawn. Context: All grant activity is tracked separately, with administrative and facility costs being tracked in a separate program. Those administrative and facility costs are then allocated to all of the grant programs, based on square footage being used as well as time charged to each program. The time spent on the programs that did not allow for indirect costs to be drawn down, were fully removed from the calculation, charging 100% of the administrative and facility costs to only those grants that allowed for indirect costs to be drawn. Questioned Costs: $1,721.86 for ALN 10.557 and $7,556.69 for ALN 93.323. Auditor's Recommendation: We recommend that management allocates indirect costs to all programs, regardless of whether or not the program allows for the indirect costs to be drawn down off the grant. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Health Officer and Finance Team understand the issue and have already implemented procedures to ensure that all programs are charged their portion of the indirect costs.

Corrective Action Plan

Condition: ?2 CRF Part 200 Subpart E ? Cost Principals? requires that all indirect costs be applied on a consistent basis, while considering the reasonableness and equitability of such treatments. Management believed that because certain grants did not allow for indirect costs to be drawn down off the grant, that they did not need to be part of the total calculation for determining the portion of indirect costs that should be charged to each grant, thus overcharging the grants that allow for indirect costs to be drawn. Corrective Action: The Health Officer and Finance Team understand the issue and have already implemented procedures to ensure that all programs are charged their portion of the indirect costs. Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Denise Bryan, Health Officer and Connie Shaw, Finance Administrator Anticipated Completion Date: Immediately

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2021-09-30

$1,864,601 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 6, 2022 — management decision was due September 6, 2022.

FY 2020-09-30

$1,337,612 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 16, 2021 — management decision was due September 16, 2021.

FY 2019-09-30

$1,208,162 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 3, 2020 — management decision was due September 3, 2020.

FY 2018-09-30

$1,027,539 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 14, 2019 — management decision was due August 14, 2019.

FY 2017-09-30

$1,164,340 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 14, 2018 — management decision was due September 14, 2018.

FY 2016-09-30

$1,049,228 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 20, 2017 — management decision was due August 20, 2017.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Michigan

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.