← Back to home

Legal Aid Society of HawaiiNon-Profit

EIN: 990076020

UEI: G4JVM7225SA8

Audited by: Beasley, Mitchell, & Co.

Oversight agency: 09 [Legal Services Corporation]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

Legal Aid Society of Hawaii10 audit years2 findings1 repeat
10
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
1
Repeat Findings
$4.4M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

$4,354,064 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on May 6, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by November 6, 2026 (67 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$4,059,546 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on April 1, 2025 — management decision was due October 1, 2025.

2024-002
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2023-002

During our audit, we noted that salaries and wages were incorrectly allocated and charged to the Legal Services Corporation grant. Of the twenty-five (25) payroll samples selected for testing, there was one instance in which the employee records in the Society’s time entry system did not match the employee records in the accounting system. This resulted in salaries and wages being allocated based on an outdated default calculation determined by the system. There were no questioned costs as the Society subsequently recorded correcting entries to revise the allocations. Cause: Data entered into the accounting system was not properly reviewed and validated prior to being imported. Effect: The lack of effective internal controls over the preparation of payroll data resulted in salaries and wages for time spent by employees on non-LSC grants or contracts being charged to the LSC grant.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: 45 CFR 1630(a)(3) provides that expenditures are allowable under a Legal Services Corporation (LSC) grant or contract only if the recipient can demonstrate that the cost was allocable to the grant or contract. Further, 45 CFR 1630.5(c)(3) requires that recipients maintain accounting systems sufficient to demonstrate the proper allocation of costs to each of their funding sources. Condition: During our audit, we noted that salaries and wages were incorrectly allocated and charged to the Legal Services Corporation grant. Of the twenty-five (25) payroll samples selected for testing, there was one instance in which the employee records in the Society’s time entry system did not match the employee records in the accounting system. This resulted in salaries and wages being allocated based on an outdated default calculation determined by the system. There were no questioned costs as the Society subsequently recorded correcting entries to revise the allocations. Cause: Data entered into the accounting system was not properly reviewed and validated prior to being imported. Effect: The lack of effective internal controls over the preparation of payroll data resulted in salaries and wages for time spent by employees on non-LSC grants or contracts being charged to the LSC grant.

Corrective Action Plan

LASH disagrees that this finding rises to the level of a "material weakness," but will proceed to address this finding through manual corrections and Legal Server improvements. From the prior fiscal year, significant progress was made to ensure the accuracy of the allocation of LSC work hours. This FY23 finding is related to an automatic allocation in Legal Server that occurs during a pay period when an exempt employee works more than the requisite hours and has charged a portion of time to LSC. The Legal Server system then automatically reallocates the time among the grants worked such that LSC may end up being charged a nominally less percentage of the total salary expense than it otherwise would have been These reallocations are deminimus, and result in less time, not more, being allocated to LSC. Therefore, LASH disagress that this finding is a "material weakness." LASH is committed to improving its performance in this area. In FY24, LASH employed a temporary Accountant who worked with staff to develop a process to indentify these misallcations and to correct them. While this manual process corrected the misallocation of LSC expenses, it did not correct the problem of employee numbers not matching up. There was one incident of employee numbers not matching in the sample of FY24. In FY25, LASH will continue to utilize the process it has proven will fix the misallocation of expenses for periods that have closed but will also attempt to move the process from after the distribution process to before and thus solve the problem up front. This move will not only identify any excess hours that triggers the problem and allow for fixing the allocations up front, but will identify mismatches in employee numbers and solve the problem identified in FY24.

Prior Finding References

2023-002

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2023-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$4,333,149 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on April 1, 2024 — management decision was due October 1, 2024.

2023-002
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

During our audit, we noted that salaries and wages were incorrectly allocated and charged to the Legal Services Corporation grant. Of the twenty-five (25) payroll samples selected for testing, there were nine (9) instances in which salaries and wages were overcharged to LSC. There were four (4) instances in which the Organization’s accounting system allocated salaries and wages based on an improper calculation. For three (3) instances the employee records in the Organization’s time entry system did not match the employee records in the accounting system. This resulted in salaries and wages being allocated based on an outdated default calculation determined by the system. For two (2) instances, time entries prepared by employees were not properly reviewed prior to being recorded in the accounting system to ensure that valid time codes were used. There were no questioned costs as the organization subsequently recorded correcting entries to revise the allocations. Cause: The Organization’s accounting system is not properly configured to allocate time charged by personnel based on actual hours spent on each of the grants or contracts. In addition, data entered into the accounting system was not properly reviewed and validated prior to being imported. Effect: The lack of effective internal controls over the preparation of payroll data and a properly configured accounting system resulted in salaries and wages for time spent by employees on non-LSC grants or contracts being charged to the LSC grant. Identification as a Repeat Fidning, if applicable: Not applicable. Recommendation: that modifications are made to properly allocate time charged by employees to the various funding sources based on actual time spent. Management should also evaluate internal controls over the payroll transaction cycle to ensure that entries prepared by employees are accurate. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding and the recommendation. See Part V Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: 45 CFR 1630(a)(3) provides that expenditures are allowable under a Legal Services Corporation (LSC) grant or contract only if the recipient can demonstrate that the cost was allocable to the grant or contract. Further, 45 CFR 1630.5(c)(3) requires that recipients maintain accounting systems sufficient to demonstrate the proper allocation of costs to each of their funding sources. Condition: During our audit, we noted that salaries and wages were incorrectly allocated and charged to the Legal Services Corporation grant. Of the twenty-five (25) payroll samples selected for testing, there were nine (9) instances in which salaries and wages were overcharged to LSC. There were four (4) instances in which the Organization’s accounting system allocated salaries and wages based on an improper calculation. For three (3) instances the employee records in the Organization’s time entry system did not match the employee records in the accounting system. This resulted in salaries and wages being allocated based on an outdated default calculation determined by the system. For two (2) instances, time entries prepared by employees were not properly reviewed prior to being recorded in the accounting system to ensure that valid time codes were used. There were no questioned costs as the organization subsequently recorded correcting entries to revise the allocations. Cause: The Organization’s accounting system is not properly configured to allocate time charged by personnel based on actual hours spent on each of the grants or contracts. In addition, data entered into the accounting system was not properly reviewed and validated prior to being imported. Effect: The lack of effective internal controls over the preparation of payroll data and a properly configured accounting system resulted in salaries and wages for time spent by employees on non-LSC grants or contracts being charged to the LSC grant. Identification as a Repeat Fidning, if applicable: Not applicable. Recommendation: that modifications are made to properly allocate time charged by employees to the various funding sources based on actual time spent. Management should also evaluate internal controls over the payroll transaction cycle to ensure that entries prepared by employees are accurate. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding and the recommendation. See Part V Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Management concurs with the finding listed above. Corrective Action Plan: Management will continue its ongoing process of hiring one new full-time Accountant with solid accounting and GAAP knowledge. Management will also continue to utilize the expertise provided by the current temporary Accountant in areas of MIP internal operations to reconcile monthly account balances, especially the Cash accounts, to ensure that timely reconciliation of all account balances happen on a monthly basis and then at year end. Individuals responsible: Jim Gagne, Director of Finance. Anticipated completion date: June 30, 2024.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2022-06-30

$4,092,625 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 20, 2022 — management decision was due June 20, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

$3,868,363 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 28, 2021 — management decision was due June 28, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

$3,831,292 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 21, 2021 — management decision was due September 21, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

$3,406,448 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 21, 2020 — management decision was due July 21, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

$3,508,144 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 8, 2019 — management decision was due July 8, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,481,757 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 26, 2017 — management decision was due June 26, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,955,982 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 12, 2017 — management decision was due July 12, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Hawaii

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.