EIN: 966000814
UEI: GSA_MIGRATION
Audited by: HUDSON HENDERSON & COMPANY, INC.
Cognizant agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 7, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on December 22, 2022. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 22, 2023 (1174 days ago).
What is a management decision? →While performing audit procedures over the County?s subrecipient monitoring, we noted that the County did not include all of the required information at the time of the subaward as required by federal guidelines. Cause: The County has not updated its contracts/agreements between the County and its subrecipients to comply with the changes made to the single audit requirements by the implementation of the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Continued noncompliance with federal guidelines can jeopardize future federal and state funding. Recommendation: We recommend that the County update their subrecipient contracts to include all of the requirements of 24 CFR ? 200.331.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Reference: 2021-002 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Category of Finding: Sub-Recipient Monitoring Federal Program Title & CFDA Number: 21.019 ? COVID-19 - Coronavirus Relief Fund Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Passed-Through: California Department of Finance Award Number: 606125051 Award Year: 2021 Criteria: Per 24 CFR ? 200.331, when the County passes money through to subrecipients, the County must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes certain information at the time of the subaward. Among other items, the County must include: - Subrecipient name - Subrecipient DUNS number - Federal award identification number - Federal award date - Subaward period of performance - Amount of federal funds obligated by the agreement - Total amount of the federal fund - Federal award project description - Name of federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official - CFDA number and name - Identification that the project is for R&D - Indirect cost rate for the federal award Condition: While performing audit procedures over the County?s subrecipient monitoring, we noted that the County did not include all of the required information at the time of the subaward as required by federal guidelines. Cause: The County has not updated its contracts/agreements between the County and its subrecipients to comply with the changes made to the single audit requirements by the implementation of the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Continued noncompliance with federal guidelines can jeopardize future federal and state funding. Recommendation: We recommend that the County update their subrecipient contracts to include all of the requirements of 24 CFR ? 200.331.
Management Response and Corrective Action Plan: We agree with this finding and will have the Corrective Action Plan completed and Subrecipient Monitoring policies and procedures in place no later than July 1, 2023. The County?s Corrective Action Plan will ensure adherence to all of the requirements of 24 CFR ? 200.331 including, but not limited to: - Subrecipient Fiscal Risk Assessment - Subrecipient Monitoring Plan - Subaward Cover Sheet to include the following: o Subrecipient name o Subrecipient DUNS number o Federal award identification number o Federal award date o Subaward period of performance o Amount of federal funds obligated by the agreement o Total amount of the federal fund o Federal award project description o Name of federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact information for awarding official o CFDA number and name o Identification if project is for R&D o Indirect cost rate for the federal award - Subaward Closeout Checklist - Subaward Closeout Notice
FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2021 — management decision was due September 29, 2021.
Per testing performed over the County?s Adoption Assistance Program eligibility requirements, we noted that of the twenty-five cases selected for testing, one case was not utilizing the appropriate monthly rate. That case was utilizing the initial rate when services began and was not updated after a new All County Letter was issued by the State which required all previous cases to be updated. Cause: It appears that the late issuance of the All County Letter which stated an effective date months before the letter, caused the case to not be updated. The case noted consisted of an agreement entered into shortly after the new rate was effective, but prior to the All County Letter issued by the California Department of Social Services establishing guidelines for the new implementation. Effect: Because the incorrect rate was utilized, the County must now correct the situation by issuing a supplemental payment to the participant as they were paid a lower rate than they were entitled to based on the case factors. Questioned Costs: Unknown Recommendation: We recommend that the County perform review services over eligibility criteria as new guidance is issued and include older cases to ensure full compliance in addition to timely adoption.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Reference: 2020-002 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Category of Finding: Eligibility Federal Program Title & CFDA Number: Adoption Assistance Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services Passed-Through: State Department of Social Services Award Number: County 16 Award Year: Fiscal Year 2019/20 Criteria: The California Department of Social Services issues rates for the Adoption Assistance Program through All County Letters. In this particular case, the All County Letter changed the way rates were determined and required that all previously issued cases were updated to the new system and rates. Condition: Per testing performed over the County?s Adoption Assistance Program eligibility requirements, we noted that of the twenty-five cases selected for testing, one case was not utilizing the appropriate monthly rate. That case was utilizing the initial rate when services began and was not updated after a new All County Letter was issued by the State which required all previous cases to be updated. Cause: It appears that the late issuance of the All County Letter which stated an effective date months before the letter, caused the case to not be updated. The case noted consisted of an agreement entered into shortly after the new rate was effective, but prior to the All County Letter issued by the California Department of Social Services establishing guidelines for the new implementation. Effect: Because the incorrect rate was utilized, the County must now correct the situation by issuing a supplemental payment to the participant as they were paid a lower rate than they were entitled to based on the case factors. Questioned Costs: Unknown Recommendation: We recommend that the County perform review services over eligibility criteria as new guidance is issued and include older cases to ensure full compliance in addition to timely adoption.
The Department concurs with this finding and has since reviewed all cases that were authorized between the date of the effective rate change and the date the ACL was received. Due to the late issuance of All County Letter (ACL 17-69) for direction regarding Cost Necessities Index (CNI) increases for Adoption Assistance Program (AAP) cases, there was a significant gap (approximately 6 months) between the effective date and the date the ACL was issued. As a result a case was missed during this time period. The Department has since reviewed the case, issued payment corrections to the recipient and has corrected the payment amount going forward. In addition the Department has reviewed all cases during the time frame to ensure the CNI increases were issued correctly for all eligible cases. Moving forward, the lead eligibility worker will review for CNI increases or other rate changes to double check that no cases have been missed and to ensure that the cases are updated to the new rate as to the effective date and not the date the ACL is received from the State.
FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2020 — management decision was due September 30, 2020.
Per audit procedures performed over the Youth Activities Sub-Grants, it was noted of the total program expenses spent on Youth Activities, 13.38% was spent on paid and unpaid work experiences. Cause: Cause is due to the lack of total expenditures on Youth Activities for paid and unpaid work experiences not meeting the required 20 percent threshold. Effect: The County is out-of-compliance with the earmarking requirement of the WIOA in that 20 percent of Youth Activity Funds allocated were not expended on paid and unpaid work experiences. Questioned Costs: N/A Recommendations: We recommend that management review the expenditures and perform measures to ensure that earmarking expenditure requirements are being met throughout the year for each grant. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Compliance with all Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (?WIOA?) Title I statutory guidelines, as well as state and federal directives, is critical to the operations of the Kings County Job Training Office. Internal reviews and monitoring of the Title I Youth subrecipient identified an issue with compliance and immediate action was taken during FY 2019/20. Specifically, the 20% work experience requirement was not being met, and the contract with the subrecipient was terminated mid-term. All Title I Youth operations were brought in-house as of January 16, 2019, and the program is currently meeting its 20% work experience requirements. Fiscal review to ensure program compliance has been scheduled on an ongoing monthly basis.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Reference: 2019-001 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Category of Finding: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Federal Program Title(s) & CFDA Number(s): 17.259 ? WIOA Youth Service Federal Agency: United States Department of Labor Passed-Through: State of California - Department of Employment Development Award Number: K8106180, K9110015 Award Year: Fiscal Year 2018/19 Criteria: Per Section 129(c)(4), WIOA, 128 Stat. 1510, not less than 20 percent of Youth Activity funds allocated to the local area, except for the local area expenditures for administration, must be used to provide paid and unpaid work experiences. Condition: Per audit procedures performed over the Youth Activities Sub-Grants, it was noted of the total program expenses spent on Youth Activities, 13.38% was spent on paid and unpaid work experiences. Cause: Cause is due to the lack of total expenditures on Youth Activities for paid and unpaid work experiences not meeting the required 20 percent threshold. Effect: The County is out-of-compliance with the earmarking requirement of the WIOA in that 20 percent of Youth Activity Funds allocated were not expended on paid and unpaid work experiences. Questioned Costs: N/A Recommendations: We recommend that management review the expenditures and perform measures to ensure that earmarking expenditure requirements are being met throughout the year for each grant. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Compliance with all Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (?WIOA?) Title I statutory guidelines, as well as state and federal directives, is critical to the operations of the Kings County Job Training Office. Internal reviews and monitoring of the Title I Youth subrecipient identified an issue with compliance and immediate action was taken during FY 2019/20. Specifically, the 20% work experience requirement was not being met, and the contract with the subrecipient was terminated mid-term. All Title I Youth operations were brought in-house as of January 16, 2019, and the program is currently meeting its 20% work experience requirements. Fiscal review to ensure program compliance has been scheduled on an ongoing monthly basis.
March 23, 2020 Reference: 2019-001 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Category of Finding: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Federal Program Title(s) & CFDA Number(s): 17.259 ? WIOA Youth Service Federal Agency: United States Department of Labor Passed-Through: State of California - Department of Employment Development Award Number: K8106180, K9110015 Award Year: Fiscal Year 2018/19 Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Actions: Compliance with all Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (?WIOA?) Title I statutory guidelines, as well as state and federal directives, is critical to the operations of the Kings County Job Training Office. Internal reviews and monitoring of the Title I Youth subrecipient identified an issue with compliance and immediate action was taken during FY 2019/20. Specifically, the 20% work experience requirement was not being met, and the contract with the subrecipient was terminated mid-term. All Title I Youth operations were brought in-house as of January 16, 2019, and the program is currently meeting its 20% work experience requirements. Fiscal review to ensure program compliance has been scheduled on an ongoing monthly basis. Contact: Lance Lippincott, Director Lance.lippincott@co.kings.ca.us (559) 852-4960
FAC accepted this audit on March 28, 2019 — management decision was due September 28, 2019.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in California →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.