← Back to home

Duarte Unified School DistrictNon-Profit

EIN: 956006390

UEI: CCWKCJKCLZM1

Audited by: Christy White Inc

Oversight agency: 10 [Department of Agriculture]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 31, 2026

Duarte Unified School District9 audit years2 findings
9
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$3.4M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,362,441 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on February 18, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 18, 2026 (14 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSEDLOW-RISK AUDITEE$9,954,290 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 10, 2025 — management decision was due September 10, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

$6,259,363 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 28, 2024 — management decision was due September 28, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

$8,788,506 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 24, 2023 — management decision was due November 24, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

$7,284,504 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on April 24, 2022 — management decision was due October 24, 2022.

2021-002
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

Program Name: COVID-19 Coronavirus Relief Fund Federal Financial Assistance Listing/Federal CFA Number: 21.019 Pass-Through Entity: California Department of Education Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Criteria or Specific Requirements Section 110(d) of SB 98, as amended by Section 59 of SB 820, as amended by Section 4 of AB 86, and as assured to by the District prior to receipt of funds requires the District to complete quarterly expenditure reports for the Coronavirus Relief Funds (CRF). The report is required to be completed using the ten categories of allowable uses of the funds. The submission of the report should be supported by the data in the District?s accounting system. Condition During our testing over reporting of the CRF awards, we noted that the District completed the required reports; however, the District was not able to provide general ledger detail that supports the expenditures reported for each of the ten allowable categories. Questioned costs There were no questioned costs identified. Context The condition was identified as a result of inquiry with the District's Business Services personnel and through review of supporting documents. Effect The District did not comply with the reporting requirements as specified by the California Department of Education. Cause The condition identified appears to have materialized due to turnover in management in the Business Services department. The required reports were completed by previous management in the Business Services department and the District was unable to provide the supporting documentation prepared by the previous management. Repeat Finding (Yes or No) No. Recommendation The District should review the procedures related to required reporting requirements of federal awards and ensure detailed documentation is retained that supports the completed reports. Corrective Action Plan and Views of Responsible Officials The District will require source documentation for reports be saved on the District shared file server. This will allow the Business Services department to research and verify the correct completion of reports.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Program Name: COVID-19 Coronavirus Relief Fund Federal Financial Assistance Listing/Federal CFA Number: 21.019 Pass-Through Entity: California Department of Education Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Criteria or Specific Requirements Section 110(d) of SB 98, as amended by Section 59 of SB 820, as amended by Section 4 of AB 86, and as assured to by the District prior to receipt of funds requires the District to complete quarterly expenditure reports for the Coronavirus Relief Funds (CRF). The report is required to be completed using the ten categories of allowable uses of the funds. The submission of the report should be supported by the data in the District?s accounting system. Condition During our testing over reporting of the CRF awards, we noted that the District completed the required reports; however, the District was not able to provide general ledger detail that supports the expenditures reported for each of the ten allowable categories. Questioned costs There were no questioned costs identified. Context The condition was identified as a result of inquiry with the District's Business Services personnel and through review of supporting documents. Effect The District did not comply with the reporting requirements as specified by the California Department of Education. Cause The condition identified appears to have materialized due to turnover in management in the Business Services department. The required reports were completed by previous management in the Business Services department and the District was unable to provide the supporting documentation prepared by the previous management. Repeat Finding (Yes or No) No. Recommendation The District should review the procedures related to required reporting requirements of federal awards and ensure detailed documentation is retained that supports the completed reports. Corrective Action Plan and Views of Responsible Officials The District will require source documentation for reports be saved on the District shared file server. This will allow the Business Services department to research and verify the correct completion of reports.

Corrective Action Plan

The District will require source documentation for reports be saved on the district shared file server. This will allow the Business Services department to research and verify the correct completion of reports.

About Reporting →
2021-003
Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

Program Name: COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund Federal Financial Assistance Listing/Federal CFA Number: 84.425C, 84.425D, and 84.425U Pass-Through Entity: California Department of Education Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Criteria or Specific Requirements Per Title 34, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 200, Subpart A, Section 200.63(a), local education agencies (LEAs) must provide timely and meaningful consultations with appropriate officials of private schools. For programs under Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER I) and Governor?s Emergency Education Relief (GEER I), a LEA that receives funds under one or both of those programs must provide equitable services in the same manner as provided under section 1117 of Title I, Part A of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) (20 USC 6320) to students and teachers in private schools as determined in consultation with private school officials (section 18005(a) of the CARES Act). Condition Through inquiry with District personnel, it appears that the District did perform the necessary procedures to ensure that equitable services were provide the private schools. Questioned costs There were no questioned costs identified. Context The condition was identified as a result of the auditor's inquiry with District personnel and review of supporting documents. Effect The District was not in compliance with Title 34, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 200, Subpart A, Section 200.63(a). Cause The condition identified appears to have materialized due to District personnel being unaware that equitable services were required to be provided to private schools under ESSER I and GEER I programs. Repeat Finding (Yes or No) No. Recommendation It is recommended that the District perform the proportionate share of funding for equitable services for private schools to demonstrate compliance with provisions under Title 34, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 200, Subpart A, Section 200.63(a). Corrective Action Plan and Views of Responsible Officials The District acknowledges it neglected to perform procedures to ensure that equitable services were provided to private schools regarding ESSER I and GEER I funds. In the future, District staff responsible for oversight and administration of federal programs will review program guidelines for all Federal funds received to ensure compliance with all requirements.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Program Name: COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund Federal Financial Assistance Listing/Federal CFA Number: 84.425C, 84.425D, and 84.425U Pass-Through Entity: California Department of Education Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Criteria or Specific Requirements Per Title 34, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 200, Subpart A, Section 200.63(a), local education agencies (LEAs) must provide timely and meaningful consultations with appropriate officials of private schools. For programs under Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER I) and Governor?s Emergency Education Relief (GEER I), a LEA that receives funds under one or both of those programs must provide equitable services in the same manner as provided under section 1117 of Title I, Part A of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) (20 USC 6320) to students and teachers in private schools as determined in consultation with private school officials (section 18005(a) of the CARES Act). Condition Through inquiry with District personnel, it appears that the District did perform the necessary procedures to ensure that equitable services were provide the private schools. Questioned costs There were no questioned costs identified. Context The condition was identified as a result of the auditor's inquiry with District personnel and review of supporting documents. Effect The District was not in compliance with Title 34, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 200, Subpart A, Section 200.63(a). Cause The condition identified appears to have materialized due to District personnel being unaware that equitable services were required to be provided to private schools under ESSER I and GEER I programs. Repeat Finding (Yes or No) No. Recommendation It is recommended that the District perform the proportionate share of funding for equitable services for private schools to demonstrate compliance with provisions under Title 34, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 200, Subpart A, Section 200.63(a). Corrective Action Plan and Views of Responsible Officials The District acknowledges it neglected to perform procedures to ensure that equitable services were provided to private schools regarding ESSER I and GEER I funds. In the future, District staff responsible for oversight and administration of federal programs will review program guidelines for all Federal funds received to ensure compliance with all requirements.

Corrective Action Plan

The District acknowledges it neglected to perform procedures to ensure that equitable services were provided to private schools regarding ESSER I and GEER I funds. In the future, District staff responsible for oversight and administration of federal programs will review program guidelines for all Federal funds received to ensure compliance with all requirements.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2020-06-30

GOING CONCERNLOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,906,110 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 2, 2021 — management decision was due September 2, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

GOING CONCERNLOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,709,786 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 6, 2020 — management decision was due July 6, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,258,918 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 9, 2019 — management decision was due July 9, 2019.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,287,250 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 19, 2016 — management decision was due June 19, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in California

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.