EIN: 956006039
UEI: SXXNSFNDTU64
Audited by: CliftonLarsonAllen LLP
Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 7, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on March 13, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 13, 2026 (1 day from today).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2025 — management decision was due September 27, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on March 25, 2024 — management decision was due September 25, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on February 13, 2023 — management decision was due August 13, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on July 31, 2022 — management decision was due January 31, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on May 3, 2021 — management decision was due November 3, 2021.
The City's purchasing policy is less restrictive than the Uniform Guidance in that the policy only requires quotes for expenditures in excess of $25,000, which is higher than the $3,500 limit required by the Uniform Guidance. No issues were noted as a result of testing only that the policies have not been updated for the Uniform Guidance. The City did not have the above written policies. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: The City?s procurement policy is subject to Uniform Guidance standards. Cause: The City did not realize written procedures were required for the Uniform Guidance. Effect: The City was not in compliance with requirements of the Uniform Guidance for written procedures. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding of 2019-003 and 2019-004. Recommendation: We recommend that the City establish written policies and procedures in line with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Federal agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal program title: Highway Planning and Construction, Highway Planning and Construction Cluster CFDA Number: 20.205 Pass-Through Agency: California Department of Transportation Pass-Through Number(s): ATPL-5351(032), HSIPL-5351(035), ER-32L0(531) Award Period: July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Financial Reporting and Other Matter Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform Guidance section 200.320 requires the following for procurement: (a) micro-purchases ($3,500 or less) may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations, (b) small purchases ($3,500 to $150,000) require price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources, and (c) sealed bids required for purchases in excess of $150,000. Condition: The City's purchasing policy is less restrictive than the Uniform Guidance in that the policy only requires quotes for expenditures in excess of $25,000, which is higher than the $3,500 limit required by the Uniform Guidance. No issues were noted as a result of testing only that the policies have not been updated for the Uniform Guidance. The City did not have the above written policies. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: The City?s procurement policy is subject to Uniform Guidance standards. Cause: The City did not realize written procedures were required for the Uniform Guidance. Effect: The City was not in compliance with requirements of the Uniform Guidance for written procedures. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding of 2019-003 and 2019-004. Recommendation: We recommend that the City establish written policies and procedures in line with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance.
U.S. Department of Transportation 2020 ? 003 Highway Planning and Construction ? CFDA No. 20.205 Recommendation: The City's purchasing policy is less restrictive than the Uniform Guidance in that the policy only requires quotes for expenditures in excess of $25,000, which is higher than the $3,500 limit required by the Uniform Guidance. No issues were noted as a result of testing only that the policies have not been updated for the Uniform Guidance. The City did not have the above written policies. We recommend that the City establish written policies and procedures in line with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Management agrees with these recommendations. Management is reviewing the City?s current Purchasing Policy and will be amending it as needed to comply with the Uniform Guidance in any instance that it does not clearly spell out the guidelines. The City does comply with the Uniform Guidance for all grant requirements.
2019-003, 2019-004
FAC accepted this audit on March 25, 2020 — management decision was due September 25, 2020.
Major Program United States Department of Housing and Urban Development: Direct Assistance, Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program, CA117 (CDFA No. 14.871) Criteria Uniform Guidance section 200.320 requires the following for procurement: (a) micro-purchases ($3,500 or less) may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations, (b) small purchases ($3,500 to $150,000) require price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources, and (c) sealed bids required for purchases in excess of $150,000. Questioned Costs None noted. Condition The City's purchasing policy is less restrictive than the Uniform Guidance in that the policy only requires quotes for expenditures in excess of $5,000, which is higher than the $3,500 limit required by the Uniform Guidance. Cause The City did not realize written procedures were required for the Uniform Guidance. Effect The City was not in compliance with requirements of the Uniform Guidance for written procedures. Recommendation We recommend that the City establish written policies and procedures in line with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Major Program United States Department of Housing and Urban Development: Direct Assistance, Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program, CA117 (CDFA No. 14.871) Criteria Uniform Guidance section 200.320 requires the following for procurement: (a) micro-purchases ($3,500 or less) may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations, (b) small purchases ($3,500 to $150,000) require price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources, and (c) sealed bids required for purchases in excess of $150,000. Questioned Costs None noted. Condition The City's purchasing policy is less restrictive than the Uniform Guidance in that the policy only requires quotes for expenditures in excess of $5,000, which is higher than the $3,500 limit required by the Uniform Guidance. Cause The City did not realize written procedures were required for the Uniform Guidance. Effect The City was not in compliance with requirements of the Uniform Guidance for written procedures. Recommendation We recommend that the City establish written policies and procedures in line with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance.
Management is reviewing the City?s current Purchasing Policy and will be amending it as needed to comply with the Uniform Guidance in any instance that it does not clearly spell out the guidelines. The City does comply with the Uniform Guidance for all grant requirements.
FAC accepted this audit on March 28, 2019 — management decision was due September 28, 2019.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
FAC accepted this audit on March 28, 2018 — management decision was due September 28, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2017 — management decision was due September 27, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in California →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
