← Back to home

COAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICTHigher Education

EIN: 956002272

UEI: G3LMNPHU7K79

Audited by: EIDE BAILLY LLP

Cognizant agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 7, 2026

COAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT10 audit years3 findings1 repeat
10
Audit Years
3
Total Findings
1
Repeat Findings
$58.2M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$58,215,124 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on December 18, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 18, 2026 (83 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
Funder? Track this deadline →
2025-001
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Criteria OMB Compliance Supplement, OMB No. 1845-0035 – Institutions are required to report enrollment information under the Pell grant and the Direct and FFEL loan programs via the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS). Institutions must review, update, and verify student enrollment statuses, program information, and effective dates that appear on the Enrollment Reporting Roster file or on the Enrollment Maintenance page of the NSLDS Professional Access (NSLDSFAP) website which the financial aid administrator can access for the auditor. The data on the institutions’ Enrollment Reporting Roster, or Enrollment Maintenance page, is what NSLDS has as the most recently certified enrollment information. There are two categories of enrollment information: “Campus Level” and “Program Level,” both of which need to be reported accurately and have separate record types. The NSLDS Enrollment Reporting Guide provides the requirements and guidance for reporting enrollment details using the NSLDS Enrollment Reporting Process. Condition Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance – During testing over the NSLDS reporting requirements, the following deficiencies were noted: 9 of 60 students’ effective dates were not accurately reported in NSLDS (date of enrollment status change does not agree to effective date in the student records). o 2 students from Coastline College o 3 students from Golden West College o 4 students from Orange Coast College Questioned Costs There are no questioned costs associated with the condition identified. Context The District disbursed financial aid to approximately 9,812 students that required student enrollment and program enrollment reporting to NSLDS. A significant deficiency is a control weakness, or combination of weaknesses, that is less severe than a material weakness yet still affects federal compliance and is important enough to require the attention of management. Effect The District is not in compliance with the Federal enrollment reporting requirements described in the OMB Compliance Supplement. Cause The effective date of enrollment status change reported to NSLDS was the system process date or report run date, rather than the actual effective date of the student’s enrollment status change as documented in the student’s records. Recommendation The District should implement controls to ensure effective dates of enrollment status changes are accurately captured and reported to NSLDS. Because this is a partially automated process through the District’s information systems, we recommend implementation of system improvements to ensure that the correct effective date, rather than the process or run date, is reported.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria OMB Compliance Supplement, OMB No. 1845-0035 – Institutions are required to report enrollment information under the Pell grant and the Direct and FFEL loan programs via the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS). Institutions must review, update, and verify student enrollment statuses, program information, and effective dates that appear on the Enrollment Reporting Roster file or on the Enrollment Maintenance page of the NSLDS Professional Access (NSLDSFAP) website which the financial aid administrator can access for the auditor. The data on the institutions’ Enrollment Reporting Roster, or Enrollment Maintenance page, is what NSLDS has as the most recently certified enrollment information. There are two categories of enrollment information: “Campus Level” and “Program Level,” both of which need to be reported accurately and have separate record types. The NSLDS Enrollment Reporting Guide provides the requirements and guidance for reporting enrollment details using the NSLDS Enrollment Reporting Process. Condition Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance – During testing over the NSLDS reporting requirements, the following deficiencies were noted: 9 of 60 students’ effective dates were not accurately reported in NSLDS (date of enrollment status change does not agree to effective date in the student records). o 2 students from Coastline College o 3 students from Golden West College o 4 students from Orange Coast College Questioned Costs There are no questioned costs associated with the condition identified. Context The District disbursed financial aid to approximately 9,812 students that required student enrollment and program enrollment reporting to NSLDS. A significant deficiency is a control weakness, or combination of weaknesses, that is less severe than a material weakness yet still affects federal compliance and is important enough to require the attention of management. Effect The District is not in compliance with the Federal enrollment reporting requirements described in the OMB Compliance Supplement. Cause The effective date of enrollment status change reported to NSLDS was the system process date or report run date, rather than the actual effective date of the student’s enrollment status change as documented in the student’s records. Recommendation The District should implement controls to ensure effective dates of enrollment status changes are accurately captured and reported to NSLDS. Because this is a partially automated process through the District’s information systems, we recommend implementation of system improvements to ensure that the correct effective date, rather than the process or run date, is reported.

Corrective Action Plan

Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan The District submits the file with the required enrollment information to the National Student Clearinghouse (NSC) two weeks after the start of each term and subsequently on a monthly basis. Part of the reporting process includes running SFRTMST, a baseline process in Ellucian Banner, the District’s Enterprise Resource Planning system, to calculate or update a student’s enrollment time status, which is the date when a change occurred in the enrollment of a student due to either registering in a class(es) or withdrawing from a class(es). The enrollment time status date is included in the enrollment file submitted to NSC. NSC then submits the enrollment information to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS). The discrepancy identified for the nine students was between a withdrawal date in Banner versus the enrollment time status date reported to NSC/NSLDS, which was the Banner calculated date. Because of the timing of when the SFRTMST process was ran, some students’ enrollment time status date did not match the registration activity date/enrollment effective date in Banner. After conducting research using the Ellucian Customer Center, the District identified a resolution to address this issue and has already implemented it for Fall 2025. To ensure that the students’ enrollment time status date reported to NSC/NSLDS matches the students’ effective date of their registration activity in Banner, the District activated the Calculate Time Status (Indicator) in SOATERM, a Banner setup, for Fall 2025 and will do so for all terms moving forward. Per Ellucian, when this indicator is set to “Y” a dynamic time status calculation will take place. The District verified that this process works. The issue has been resolved. In addition, the dates for the nine students were corrected in NSLDS. It is important to note that this issue has had no financial impact on the District. The students have been disbursed the correct amount of financial aid. The calculation of financial aid to be disbursed is not based on the enrollment dates reported to NSC and NSLDS.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$49,874,278 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 9, 2024 — management decision was due June 9, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$75,690,461 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 2, 2024 — management decision was due July 2, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$86,794,903 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 13, 2022 — management decision was due June 13, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$68,697,372 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 7, 2021 — management decision was due June 7, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$56,754,804 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 28, 2021 — management decision was due August 28, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

$49,201,994 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

$50,249,170 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 21, 2018 — management decision was due June 21, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

$52,234,278 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 17, 2017 — management decision was due June 17, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

$57,552,825 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 26, 2017 — management decision was due July 26, 2017.

2016-002
Activities Allowed or Unallowed
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2015-003OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-003

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed →
2016-003
Activities Allowed or Unallowed
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed →

Browse other Single Audit organizations in California

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.