EIN: 956002272
UEI: G3LMNPHU7K79
Audited by: EIDE BAILLY LLP
Cognizant agency: 84 [Department of Education]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 7, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on December 18, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 18, 2026 (83 days ago).
What is a management decision? →Criteria OMB Compliance Supplement, OMB No. 1845-0035 – Institutions are required to report enrollment information under the Pell grant and the Direct and FFEL loan programs via the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS). Institutions must review, update, and verify student enrollment statuses, program information, and effective dates that appear on the Enrollment Reporting Roster file or on the Enrollment Maintenance page of the NSLDS Professional Access (NSLDSFAP) website which the financial aid administrator can access for the auditor. The data on the institutions’ Enrollment Reporting Roster, or Enrollment Maintenance page, is what NSLDS has as the most recently certified enrollment information. There are two categories of enrollment information: “Campus Level” and “Program Level,” both of which need to be reported accurately and have separate record types. The NSLDS Enrollment Reporting Guide provides the requirements and guidance for reporting enrollment details using the NSLDS Enrollment Reporting Process. Condition Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance – During testing over the NSLDS reporting requirements, the following deficiencies were noted: 9 of 60 students’ effective dates were not accurately reported in NSLDS (date of enrollment status change does not agree to effective date in the student records). o 2 students from Coastline College o 3 students from Golden West College o 4 students from Orange Coast College Questioned Costs There are no questioned costs associated with the condition identified. Context The District disbursed financial aid to approximately 9,812 students that required student enrollment and program enrollment reporting to NSLDS. A significant deficiency is a control weakness, or combination of weaknesses, that is less severe than a material weakness yet still affects federal compliance and is important enough to require the attention of management. Effect The District is not in compliance with the Federal enrollment reporting requirements described in the OMB Compliance Supplement. Cause The effective date of enrollment status change reported to NSLDS was the system process date or report run date, rather than the actual effective date of the student’s enrollment status change as documented in the student’s records. Recommendation The District should implement controls to ensure effective dates of enrollment status changes are accurately captured and reported to NSLDS. Because this is a partially automated process through the District’s information systems, we recommend implementation of system improvements to ensure that the correct effective date, rather than the process or run date, is reported.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria OMB Compliance Supplement, OMB No. 1845-0035 – Institutions are required to report enrollment information under the Pell grant and the Direct and FFEL loan programs via the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS). Institutions must review, update, and verify student enrollment statuses, program information, and effective dates that appear on the Enrollment Reporting Roster file or on the Enrollment Maintenance page of the NSLDS Professional Access (NSLDSFAP) website which the financial aid administrator can access for the auditor. The data on the institutions’ Enrollment Reporting Roster, or Enrollment Maintenance page, is what NSLDS has as the most recently certified enrollment information. There are two categories of enrollment information: “Campus Level” and “Program Level,” both of which need to be reported accurately and have separate record types. The NSLDS Enrollment Reporting Guide provides the requirements and guidance for reporting enrollment details using the NSLDS Enrollment Reporting Process. Condition Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance – During testing over the NSLDS reporting requirements, the following deficiencies were noted: 9 of 60 students’ effective dates were not accurately reported in NSLDS (date of enrollment status change does not agree to effective date in the student records). o 2 students from Coastline College o 3 students from Golden West College o 4 students from Orange Coast College Questioned Costs There are no questioned costs associated with the condition identified. Context The District disbursed financial aid to approximately 9,812 students that required student enrollment and program enrollment reporting to NSLDS. A significant deficiency is a control weakness, or combination of weaknesses, that is less severe than a material weakness yet still affects federal compliance and is important enough to require the attention of management. Effect The District is not in compliance with the Federal enrollment reporting requirements described in the OMB Compliance Supplement. Cause The effective date of enrollment status change reported to NSLDS was the system process date or report run date, rather than the actual effective date of the student’s enrollment status change as documented in the student’s records. Recommendation The District should implement controls to ensure effective dates of enrollment status changes are accurately captured and reported to NSLDS. Because this is a partially automated process through the District’s information systems, we recommend implementation of system improvements to ensure that the correct effective date, rather than the process or run date, is reported.
Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan The District submits the file with the required enrollment information to the National Student Clearinghouse (NSC) two weeks after the start of each term and subsequently on a monthly basis. Part of the reporting process includes running SFRTMST, a baseline process in Ellucian Banner, the District’s Enterprise Resource Planning system, to calculate or update a student’s enrollment time status, which is the date when a change occurred in the enrollment of a student due to either registering in a class(es) or withdrawing from a class(es). The enrollment time status date is included in the enrollment file submitted to NSC. NSC then submits the enrollment information to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS). The discrepancy identified for the nine students was between a withdrawal date in Banner versus the enrollment time status date reported to NSC/NSLDS, which was the Banner calculated date. Because of the timing of when the SFRTMST process was ran, some students’ enrollment time status date did not match the registration activity date/enrollment effective date in Banner. After conducting research using the Ellucian Customer Center, the District identified a resolution to address this issue and has already implemented it for Fall 2025. To ensure that the students’ enrollment time status date reported to NSC/NSLDS matches the students’ effective date of their registration activity in Banner, the District activated the Calculate Time Status (Indicator) in SOATERM, a Banner setup, for Fall 2025 and will do so for all terms moving forward. Per Ellucian, when this indicator is set to “Y” a dynamic time status calculation will take place. The District verified that this process works. The issue has been resolved. In addition, the dates for the nine students were corrected in NSLDS. It is important to note that this issue has had no financial impact on the District. The students have been disbursed the correct amount of financial aid. The calculation of financial aid to be disbursed is not based on the enrollment dates reported to NSC and NSLDS.
FAC accepted this audit on December 9, 2024 — management decision was due June 9, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on January 2, 2024 — management decision was due July 2, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on December 13, 2022 — management decision was due June 13, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on December 7, 2021 — management decision was due June 7, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on February 28, 2021 — management decision was due August 28, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on December 21, 2018 — management decision was due June 21, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on December 17, 2017 — management decision was due June 17, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on January 26, 2017 — management decision was due July 26, 2017.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2015-003
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in California →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.