EIN: 954800735
UEI: XEWZHNUTSVL4
Audited by: GREEN HASSON & JANKS LLP
Oversight agency: 17 [Department of Labor]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 28, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on July 14, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by January 14, 2027 (138 days from today).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on July 24, 2025 — management decision was due January 24, 2026.
FAC accepted this audit on July 24, 2024 — management decision was due January 24, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on September 28, 2023 — management decision was due March 28, 2024.
For the Community Development Block Grant Program for Entitlement Communities (CDBG) (Assistance Listing Number 14.218), the grant was erroneously identified as a city (or local government) grant and therefore, total expenditures of $589,466 incurred during the year were not initially properly identified and reported on the SEFA. Cause: Homeboy Industries was initially unaware that the funds granted by the City of Los Angeles were pass-through federal funds. Effect or Potential Effect: As a result, until the SEFA was corrected, it did not report the complete activity under the loan program for the year ended December 31, 2022. Questioned Costs: N/A. Recommendation: Homeboy Industries should establish a thorough internal review process to ensure amounts reported on the SEFA represent complete and accurate expenditures incurred in the applicable fiscal year. Repeat Finding: Not Applicable
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 2, Part 200, section 510(b) Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards requires recipients of federal awards to prepare a schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA) for the period covered by the auditee?s financial statements to accurately reflect federal awards expended for individual federal programs during the auditee?s fiscal year. The determination of when a Federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Condition: For the Community Development Block Grant Program for Entitlement Communities (CDBG) (Assistance Listing Number 14.218), the grant was erroneously identified as a city (or local government) grant and therefore, total expenditures of $589,466 incurred during the year were not initially properly identified and reported on the SEFA. Cause: Homeboy Industries was initially unaware that the funds granted by the City of Los Angeles were pass-through federal funds. Effect or Potential Effect: As a result, until the SEFA was corrected, it did not report the complete activity under the loan program for the year ended December 31, 2022. Questioned Costs: N/A. Recommendation: Homeboy Industries should establish a thorough internal review process to ensure amounts reported on the SEFA represent complete and accurate expenditures incurred in the applicable fiscal year. Repeat Finding: Not Applicable
Management will hold monthly meetings with Government Director and Grants Manager to discuss any new grants received, status changes of existing grants, and review agreements to ensure all federal granted dollars are recognized and included in the SEFA.
FAC accepted this audit on August 7, 2022 — management decision was due February 7, 2023.
Criteria: A comprehensive system of internal control requires all expenditures be properly approved and supported by appropriate documentation. In addition, in accordance with Part 2 CFR 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, section 200.403 all expenditures charged to federal programs are required to be allowable costs under the program and need to be adequately documented and recorded based on the actual cost incurred and/or approved for the program. Condition and Context: During our testing of costs charged to the Federal program, we identified 2 instances of costs totaling $9,554 being charged to the grant that did not have the appropriate supporting documentation and were incorrectly billed to the grant. In addition, the Organization?s indirect costs were charged based on an indirect cost rate that was higher than the approved indirect cost rate, which resulted in charging the grant an additional $5,579 during the year ended December 31, 2021. Cause: Policies and procedures either did not exist or were not appropriately implemented to ensure that expenses billed were reconciled to supporting documentation before billing such amounts. Effect or Potential Effect: Because of the absence of appropriate internal controls, amounts that were not properly supported and reviewed were billed to the program.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: A comprehensive system of internal control requires all expenditures be properly approved and supported by appropriate documentation. In addition, in accordance with Part 2 CFR 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, section 200.403 all expenditures charged to federal programs are required to be allowable costs under the program and need to be adequately documented and recorded based on the actual cost incurred and/or approved for the program. Condition and Context: During our testing of costs charged to the Federal program, we identified 2 instances of costs totaling $9,554 being charged to the grant that did not have the appropriate supporting documentation and were incorrectly billed to the grant. In addition, the Organization?s indirect costs were charged based on an indirect cost rate that was higher than the approved indirect cost rate, which resulted in charging the grant an additional $5,579 during the year ended December 31, 2021. Cause: Policies and procedures either did not exist or were not appropriately implemented to ensure that expenses billed were reconciled to supporting documentation before billing such amounts. Effect or Potential Effect: Because of the absence of appropriate internal controls, amounts that were not properly supported and reviewed were billed to the program.
The finding was remediated during the year ended December 31, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on August 3, 2021 — management decision was due February 3, 2022.
Criteria: Homeboy Industries is required to comply with certain allowable cost requirements per section 200.300 of the Uniform Guidance. Appropriate documentation must be retained to support expenditures incurred in the execution of federally funded programs. Per the Coronavirus Relief Fund program guidance released by the U.S. Department of the Treasury, for a cost to be considered to have been incurred, performance or delivery must occur during the covered period but payment of funds need not to be made during that time. Condition and Context: We tested 303 food voucher selections and noted that for 152 of those selections, there was no signature evidencing that the recipient received the food voucher. As noted above, for a cost to be considered to have been incurred, performance or delivery must occur, which we are not able to verify as the signatures of the recipients were not present. Cause: Policies and procedures either did not exist or were not appropriately implemented to ensure that supporting documentation was maintained correctly. Effect or Potential Effect: Because of the absence of appropriate documentation, we were unable to confirm the allowability, validity, and completeness of the amounts noted above. Questioned Costs: We noted $38,000 of questioned costs as a result. Recommendation: We recommend Homeboy Industries revisit its procedures to ensure adequate supporting documentation be retained to support federal expenditures. We also recommend that accounting and designated management staff members review such underlying support prior to submission for reimbursement.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: Homeboy Industries is required to comply with certain allowable cost requirements per section 200.300 of the Uniform Guidance. Appropriate documentation must be retained to support expenditures incurred in the execution of federally funded programs. Per the Coronavirus Relief Fund program guidance released by the U.S. Department of the Treasury, for a cost to be considered to have been incurred, performance or delivery must occur during the covered period but payment of funds need not to be made during that time. Condition and Context: We tested 303 food voucher selections and noted that for 152 of those selections, there was no signature evidencing that the recipient received the food voucher. As noted above, for a cost to be considered to have been incurred, performance or delivery must occur, which we are not able to verify as the signatures of the recipients were not present. Cause: Policies and procedures either did not exist or were not appropriately implemented to ensure that supporting documentation was maintained correctly. Effect or Potential Effect: Because of the absence of appropriate documentation, we were unable to confirm the allowability, validity, and completeness of the amounts noted above. Questioned Costs: We noted $38,000 of questioned costs as a result. Recommendation: We recommend Homeboy Industries revisit its procedures to ensure adequate supporting documentation be retained to support federal expenditures. We also recommend that accounting and designated management staff members review such underlying support prior to submission for reimbursement.
Our contract with the CARES ACT funder did not require Homeboy to obtain signatures from the recipients of food vouchers. Homeboy instituted this additional control to obtain signatures from the voucher recipients. Of the 553 vouchers we were able to obtain signatures from 86% of the recipients receiving vouchers. We will endeavor to obtain 100% of the signatures in the future.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.