← Back to home

OAK CREST INSTITUTE OF SCIENCENon-Profit

EIN: 954680961

UEI: Z8RML1KGTYG4

Audit also covers EIN: 842011667 · unlinked EINs have no separate FAC filing

Audited by: LAWRENCE R MITCHELL & CO, CPAS

Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 7, 2026

OAK CREST INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE9 audit years2 findings
9
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$5.9M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2024)

FY 2024-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,943,897 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on August 29, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by March 1, 2026 (196 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
Funder? Track this deadline →

FY 2023-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,986,828 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 10, 2024 — management decision was due January 10, 2025.

FY 2022-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,245,272 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 13, 2023 — management decision was due March 13, 2024.

FY 2021-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,122,047 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 21, 2022 — management decision was due March 21, 2023.

FY 2020-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,705,224 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 7, 2021 — management decision was due March 7, 2022.

FY 2019-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,520,358 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 4, 2020 — management decision was due June 4, 2021.

2019-001
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTS

The Organization inadvertently billed the federal contract more than the subrecipient?s invoice for the month of February 2019 by $31,545. Criteria: In accordance with the cost-reimbursement contract, only costs incurred, whether already paid or to be paid, are to be billed to federal contracts. Cause: The Organization does not have sufficient controls in place to properly detect any incorrect input errors in costs incurred and to be billed to federal contracts. Possible effect: Expenditures of federal awards reported will not be accurate. Accordingly, the schedule of federal awards will not be properly presented; and Federal agencies can be overbilled. Questioned costs: $31,545 Context: During the audit, we noted that one invoice from a subrecipient was inadvertently recorded in the accounting system as $35,050.38 instead of $3,505.38. As such, the monthly expenditure report prepared by the Accountant and submitted to the CEO, which is used for billing federal contracts, was also incorrect. Recommendation: The Organization should include copies of expenditure documentation in addition to the expenditure report provided by the Accountant to the CEO, in order to check the accuracy of the amounts included in the expenditure report. Views of responsible officials: Management?s response is reported in the ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action Plan? and is considered part of this report.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2019-001 ? Allowable costs U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Systematic Sustained Release Delivery for Antiretroviral Agents for HIV Prevention 5R01AAI120748; CFDA No. 93.855; year ending December 31, 2019 Condition: The Organization inadvertently billed the federal contract more than the subrecipient?s invoice for the month of February 2019 by $31,545. Criteria: In accordance with the cost-reimbursement contract, only costs incurred, whether already paid or to be paid, are to be billed to federal contracts. Cause: The Organization does not have sufficient controls in place to properly detect any incorrect input errors in costs incurred and to be billed to federal contracts. Possible effect: Expenditures of federal awards reported will not be accurate. Accordingly, the schedule of federal awards will not be properly presented; and Federal agencies can be overbilled. Questioned costs: $31,545 Context: During the audit, we noted that one invoice from a subrecipient was inadvertently recorded in the accounting system as $35,050.38 instead of $3,505.38. As such, the monthly expenditure report prepared by the Accountant and submitted to the CEO, which is used for billing federal contracts, was also incorrect. Recommendation: The Organization should include copies of expenditure documentation in addition to the expenditure report provided by the Accountant to the CEO, in order to check the accuracy of the amounts included in the expenditure report. Views of responsible officials: Management?s response is reported in the ?Management?s Response and Corrective Action Plan? and is considered part of this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Management?s Response: Management agrees with the finding. Name of Contact Person: Dr. Marc Baum, President Corrective Action Plan: The Organization will implement more controls in the preparation of the monthly expenditure report. Additionally, the Organization will include a $31,545 credit in the October 2020 billing to the federal contract, to fully compensate for the error. Completion Date: November 2020

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2018-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,223,102 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 18, 2019 — management decision was due March 18, 2020.

2018-001
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2017-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,051,953 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 29, 2018 — management decision was due March 29, 2019.

FY 2016-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,663,693 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 14, 2017 — management decision was due March 14, 2018.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in California

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.