LOS ANGELES HOMELESS SERVICES AUTHORITYLocal Government

EIN: 954498834

UEI: HAW8D5MS9JE4

Audited by: CliftonLarsonAllen LLP

Cognizant agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

LOS ANGELES HOMELESS SERVICES AUTHORITY10 audit years8 findings2 repeat
10
Audit Years
8
Total Findings
2
Repeat Findings
$54.4M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$54,440,785 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on May 19, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by November 19, 2026 (82 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
2025-002
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

During our testing, we noted that LAHSA’s internal control designed to ensure payroll transactions were allowable was not consistently implemented. Questioned Costs: None Context: During our testing, it was noted that three out of forty timesheets were not approved prior to commencement of the audit. Cause: Appropriate personnel did not approve timesheets supporting payroll costs charged to the Continuum of Care program in a timely manner. Effect: LAHSA is not in compliance with maintaining an internal control over compliance for payroll costs charged to the Continuum of Care program. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that LAHSA implement procedures to ensure that timesheet approval is documented timely. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Name: Continuum of Care Assistance Listing Number: 14.267 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Multiple for FY2024-25 Award Period: July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2025 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed (2 CFR 200.430(g)). In addition, under 2 CFR 200.303, the non‑Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: During our testing, we noted that LAHSA’s internal control designed to ensure payroll transactions were allowable was not consistently implemented. Questioned Costs: None Context: During our testing, it was noted that three out of forty timesheets were not approved prior to commencement of the audit. Cause: Appropriate personnel did not approve timesheets supporting payroll costs charged to the Continuum of Care program in a timely manner. Effect: LAHSA is not in compliance with maintaining an internal control over compliance for payroll costs charged to the Continuum of Care program. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that LAHSA implement procedures to ensure that timesheet approval is documented timely. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Corrective Action Plan

Continuum of Care Assistance Listing No. 14.267 Payroll Disbursements Recommendation: We recommend that LAHSA implement procedures to ensure that timesheet approval is documented timely. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement withthe audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: LAHSA has enhanced its internal controls over timesheet approvals to ensure timely documentation. Timesheet approval status reports are reviewed on a weekly basis during Chief level meetings to monitor compliance. Timesheets not approved within two days of the established deadline are escalated to the respective Chief and Deputy Chief for immediate follow-up. If timesheets remain unapproved after an additional two days, the matter is further escalated to the CEO, for prompt resolution. These procedures establish clear accountability and escalation protocols to ensure timely approval of timesheets Names of the contact persons responsible for corrective action: Gita O'Neill, Keshia Douglas, Christopher Williams, and Paul Rubenstein. Planned completion date for corrective action plan: Implemented

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2024-06-30

$114,272,250 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 31, 2025 — management decision was due October 1, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

$131,829,242 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 1, 2024 — management decision was due October 1, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

$217,694,060 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on April 23, 2023 — management decision was due October 23, 2023.

2022-001
Subrecipient Monitoring
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2021-002OTHER MATTERS

During our testing, we noted LAHSA did not have adequate internal controls designed to properly monitor its? subrecipients. Questioned costs: Unable to determine. Context: During our testing of subrecipient monitoring, it was noted that LAHSA did not monitor 1 out of 8 subrecipients tested. The subrecipient received $169,035 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. Cause: LAHSA's new subrecipient monitoring process was not implemented until January 2022. At that time, the subrecipients that were not monitored did not have an active contract with federal funding. As such, they were deemed to be low risk. LAHSA does not have a policy in place to ensure that the subrecipient monitoring plan and risk assessment is revisited throughout the year to ensure new contracts are assessed and monitored appropriately. Effect: LAHSA did not perform required monitoring over subrecipients of federal funding. The lack of internal controls over this compliance requirement provides an opportunity for noncompliance by subrecipients of the grant. Repeat Finding: Yes. Recommendation: We recommend LAHSA implements controls to ensure that the subrecipient monitoring plan is revisited at the time contracts are entered into in order to ensure proper coverage. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2022 ? 001 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus Relief Fund Assistance Listing Number: 21.019 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: SLT0198 Pass-Through Agency: County of Los Angeles Pass-Through Number: Unknown Award Period: March 1, 2020 through December 31, 2021 Type of Finding: ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance ? Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: A pass-through entity (PTE) must monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals (2 CFR sections 200.332(d) through (f)). In addition to procedures identified as necessary based upon the evaluation of subrecipient risk or specifically required by the terms and conditions of the award, subaward monitoring must include the following: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the PTE. ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. Condition: During our testing, we noted LAHSA did not have adequate internal controls designed to properly monitor its? subrecipients. Questioned costs: Unable to determine. Context: During our testing of subrecipient monitoring, it was noted that LAHSA did not monitor 1 out of 8 subrecipients tested. The subrecipient received $169,035 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. Cause: LAHSA's new subrecipient monitoring process was not implemented until January 2022. At that time, the subrecipients that were not monitored did not have an active contract with federal funding. As such, they were deemed to be low risk. LAHSA does not have a policy in place to ensure that the subrecipient monitoring plan and risk assessment is revisited throughout the year to ensure new contracts are assessed and monitored appropriately. Effect: LAHSA did not perform required monitoring over subrecipients of federal funding. The lack of internal controls over this compliance requirement provides an opportunity for noncompliance by subrecipients of the grant. Repeat Finding: Yes. Recommendation: We recommend LAHSA implements controls to ensure that the subrecipient monitoring plan is revisited at the time contracts are entered into in order to ensure proper coverage. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Corrective Action Plan

2022-001 Coronavirus Relief Fund ? Assistance Listing No. 21.019 Recommendation: We recommend LAHSA implements controls to ensure that the subrecipient monitoring plan is revisited at the time contracts are entered into in order to ensure proper coverage. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: LAHSA acknowledges that there is an opportunity to enhance its current subrecipient monitoring procedures. LAHSA conducts risk-based monitoring reviews of our subrecipients. Our FY 21- 22 Annual Monitoring Plan describes how LAHSA oversees the monitoring selection of our subrecipients, depending on the complexity of their activity, subrecipients? monitoring could be more frequent. It should be noted that LAHSA?s monitoring plan is inclusive of multiple LAHSA funding streams and programs. Additionally, the annual monitoring plan endeavors to alleviate any duplication of efforts. Subrecipients are selected for review based on Monitoring Priorities established each Fiscal Year. Moreover, since the onset of COVID-19, Monitoring and Compliance (M&C) now Grants Management and Compliance (GMC) shifted our monitoring efforts to help stand up Project Room Key, our compliance responsibilities were bifurcated between our grants management side of the house, whose core focus/activities were remote, and the compliance side of the house which implements more intensive monitoring which include onsite visits. During FY 21-22, monitoring was reduced to cover high risk and urgent priorities. All agencies selected for monitoring will have analysis conducted to review agencies risk assessment results, spending trends, and performance data on an on-going basis throughout the FY. This analysis will help identify if the risk assessment was accurate and if the activities of the agency need additional review. Moving forward, LAHSA acknowledges the opportunity to enhance monitoring and will conduct 100% monitoring of subrecipients that receive federal funds. We will bring the monitoring plan to a future Audit and Risk committee meeting. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Jeffrey Samson, Deputy Chief Financial & Administrative Officer, jsamson@lahsa.org; Amy Williams, Director ? Grants Management & Compliance, awilliams@lahsa.org Planned completion date for corrective action plan: To be implemented effective in FY 22-23.

Prior Finding References

2021-002

About Subrecipient Monitoring →

FY 2021-06-30

$135,666,859 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 29, 2022 — management decision was due June 29, 2023.

2021-002
Subrecipient Monitoring
MATERIAL WEAKNESSOTHER MATTERS

During our testing, we noted LAHSA did not have adequate internal controls designed to properly monitor its? subrecipients. Questioned costs: Unable to determine. Context: During our testing of subrecipient monitoring, it was noted that LAHSA did not monitor 2 out of 8 subrecipients tested. Cause: LAHSA developed their subrecipient monitoring plan at the beginning of the fiscal year. At that time, the subrecipients that were not monitored did not have an active contract with federal funding. As such, they were deemed to be low risk. LAHSA does not have a policy in place to ensure that the subrecipient monitoring plan and risk assessment is revisited throughout the year to ensure new contracts are assessed and monitored appropriately. Effect: LAHSA did not perform required monitoring over subrecipients of federal funding. The lack of internal controls over this compliance requirement provides an opportunity for noncompliance by subrecipients of the grant. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend LAHSA implements controls to ensure that the subrecipient monitoring plan is revisited at the time contracts are entered into in order to ensure proper coverage. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2021 ? 002 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus Relief Fund Assistance Listing Number: 21.019 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: SLT0198 Pass-Through Agency: County of Los Angeles Pass-Through Number: Unknown Award Period: March 1, 2020 through December 31, 2021 Type of Finding: ? Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance ? Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: A pass-through entity (PTE) must monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals (2 CFR sections 200.332(d) through (f)). In addition to procedures identified as necessary based upon the evaluation of subrecipient risk or specifically required by the terms and conditions of the award, subaward monitoring must include the following: ? Reviewing financial and programmatic (performance and special reports) required by the PTE. ? Following-up and ensuring that the subrecipient takes timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE detected through audits, on-site reviews, and other means. ? Issuing a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the federal award provided to the subrecipient from the PTE as required by 2 CFR section 200.521. Condition: During our testing, we noted LAHSA did not have adequate internal controls designed to properly monitor its? subrecipients. Questioned costs: Unable to determine. Context: During our testing of subrecipient monitoring, it was noted that LAHSA did not monitor 2 out of 8 subrecipients tested. Cause: LAHSA developed their subrecipient monitoring plan at the beginning of the fiscal year. At that time, the subrecipients that were not monitored did not have an active contract with federal funding. As such, they were deemed to be low risk. LAHSA does not have a policy in place to ensure that the subrecipient monitoring plan and risk assessment is revisited throughout the year to ensure new contracts are assessed and monitored appropriately. Effect: LAHSA did not perform required monitoring over subrecipients of federal funding. The lack of internal controls over this compliance requirement provides an opportunity for noncompliance by subrecipients of the grant. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend LAHSA implements controls to ensure that the subrecipient monitoring plan is revisited at the time contracts are entered into in order to ensure proper coverage. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Corrective Action Plan

2021-002 Coronavirus Relief Fund ? Assistance Listing No. 21.019 Recommendation: We recommend LAHSA implements controls to ensure that the subrecipient monitoring plan is revisited at the time contracts are entered into in order to ensure proper coverage. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: LAHSA acknowledges that there is an opportunity to enhance its current subrecipient monitoring procedures. LAHSA conducts risk-based monitoring reviews of our subrecipients. Our FY 20-21 Annual Monitoring Plan describes how LAHSA oversees the monitoring selection of our subrecipients, depending on the complexity of their activity, subrecipients? monitoring could be more frequent. It should be noted that LAHSA?s monitoring plan is inclusive of multiple LAHSA funding streams and programs. Additionally, the annual monitoring plan endeavors to alleviate any duplication of efforts. Subrecipients are selected for review based on Monitoring Priorities established each Fiscal Year. Moreover, since the onset of COVID-19, Monitoring and Compliance (M&C) now Grants Management and Compliance (GMC) shifted our monitoring efforts to help stand up Project Room Key, our compliance responsibilities were bifurcated between our grants management side of the house, whose core focus/activities were remote, and the compliance side of the house which implements more intensive monitoring which include onsite visits. During FY 20-21, monitoring was reduced to cover high risk and urgent priorities. All agencies selected for monitoring will have analysis conducted to review agencies risk assessment results, spending trends, and performance data on an on-going basis throughout the FY. This analysis will help identify if the risk assessment was accurate and if the activities of the agency need additional review. Moving forward, LAHSA acknowledges the opportunity to enhance monitoring and will conduct 100% monitoring of subrecipients that receive federal funds. We will bring the monitoring plan to a future Audit and Risk committee meeting. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Jeffrey Samson, Deputy Chief Financial & Administrative Officer, jsamson@lahsa.org; Amy Williams, Director ? Grants Management & Compliance, awilliams@lahsa.org Planned completion date for corrective action plan: To be implemented effective in FY 22-23.

About Subrecipient Monitoring →

FY 2020-06-30

$50,261,438 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2021 — management decision was due September 29, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$40,095,264 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 23, 2020 — management decision was due March 23, 2021.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$46,043,010 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2019 — management decision was due September 27, 2019.

2018-001
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2017-002OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2017-002

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2018-002
Special Tests & Provisions
OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2018-003
Reporting
OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Reporting →

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$41,606,088 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on April 3, 2018 — management decision was due October 3, 2018.

2017-002
Activities Allowed or Unallowed
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed →
2017-003
Reporting
OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Reporting →

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$39,300,112 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2017 — management decision was due September 29, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.