Day OneNon-Profit

Federal Program Information: Assistance Listing Number: 93.959 Federal Program Title: Block Grants for Substance Use Prevention, Treatment, and Recovery Services Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Passed Through Entity: County of Los Angeles Public Health Federal Award Number: PH-004383-W2, PH-004383-W1 Federal Award Year: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Assistance Listing Number: 93.531 Federal Program Title: Community Transformation Grants and National Dissemination and Support for Community Transformation Grants Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Passed Through Entity: County of Los Angeles Public Health Federal Award Number: PH-004921 Federal Award Year: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: Per the Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR §200.430(i), charges to federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the actual work performed. Budget estimates may be used for interim purposes, but must be supported by contemporaneous documentation, reconciled to actual time worked, and adjusted as necessary. Additionally, 2 CFR §200.403(d) requires that costs be allocated to federal awards in accordance with the relative benefits received. The OMB Compliance Supplement (Part 6 – Internal Control and Part 3 – Compliance Requirements) reinforces that payroll and nonpayroll costs must be supported by reliable records and allocated using reasonable and consistent methodologies. Condition: During the testing of payroll costs, we noted that for Federal Assistance Listings 93.959 and 93.531, payroll charges in 4 out of 40 samples and 2 out of 11 samples, respectively, were based on budgeted rates rather than actual hours worked. Supporting documentation (e.g., timesheets or equivalent records) was not used to substantiate the final charges, and adjustments to actual time and effort were not made. For nonpayroll costs, we identified that in 3 out of 40 samples (93.959) and 5 out of 18 samples (93.531), costs were not allocated using a consistent and reasonable basis across all benefiting programs. Instead, the Organization either charged costs by maximizing the allowable budget under each program or have inadvertently used an incorrect basis due to oversight. Cause: The deficiencies occurred because the Organization’s internal controls were not sufficiently designed or implemented to ensure compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements. Specifically, payroll costs were charged to federal awards based on budget estimates rather than actual time and effort supported by records such as timesheets, and nonpayroll costs were either maximized to the budget or were allocated using an incorrect basis. These control gaps in review and documentation resulted in costs being charged to federal programs in a manner inconsistent with Allowable Costs/Cost Principles. Effect: As a result of these deficiencies, federal program expenditures reported to the awarding agency were misstated. Our testing identified questioned costs across both programs, consisting of payroll and nonpayroll overallocations. These represent unallowable costs under Uniform Guidance and may be subject to disallowance. Inaccurate cost allocations increase the risk of noncompliance with federal requirements, could lead to repayment of disallowed costs, and may negatively affect future federal funding decisions. Questioned Costs: Known and extrapolated costs for payroll and nonpayroll costs for Federal Assistance Listings 93.959 and 93.531 are summarized below. These amounts represent the overallocation to the programs, representing unallowable costs under Uniform Guidance. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization strengthen its internal controls over payroll and nonpayroll cost allocations by requiring time and effort records to support all payroll charges to federal awards, ensuring nonpayroll costs are allocated using documented and equitable methodologies, and performing regular reconciliations of budgeted amounts to actual costs. In addition, staff responsible for preparing and reviewing cost allocations should receive training on Uniform Guidance requirements to ensure accuracy, compliance, and consistency across all federal programs. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: For payroll, procedures will be implemented to ensure that payroll costs allocated to federal grants are supported by actual time. For nonpayroll, procedures will be enhanced to ensure proper allocation of nonpayroll costs to federal grants. Allocations will be reviewed and monitored on a monthly and quarterly basis to prevent misallocation and ensure compliance with the Uniform Guidance. Personnel responsible for implementation: Executive Director Christy Zamani and Beaulieu Accountancy Corporation. Date of implementation: August 5, 2025

Condition: For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023, we requested that Day One prepare and send us a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. Requested that the expenditures reported in the SEFA be reconciled to Day One’s accounting records. We reviewed the SEFA and compared them to the accounting records; we noted that the expenditures reported were inaccurate. Criteria: Recipients of federal awards are subject to requirements documented in section of the Uniform Guidance Sections 200.510, 200.502, and 200.302. The criteria for each are as follows: § 200.510 Financial statements (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards. The auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with § 200.502.” § 200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended (a) Determining Federal awards expended. The determination of when a federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Generally, the activity pertains to events that require the non-Federal entity to comply with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of Federal awards, such as: expenditure/expense transactions associated with awards including grants, cost-reimbursement contracts under the FAR, compacts with Indian Tribes, cooperative agreements, and direct appropriations; the disbursement of funds to subrecipients; the use of loan proceeds under loan and loan guarantee programs; the receipt of property; the receipt of surplus property; the receipt or use of program income; the distribution or use of food commodities; the disbursement of amounts entitling the non-Federal entity to an interest subsidy; and the period when insurance is in force.§ 200.302 Financial management (a) Each state must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state's own funds. In addition, the state's and the other non-Federal entity's financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements…..” Questioned Costs: None Cause: The Organization has not implemented policies and procedures requiring that the Schedule of Federal Awards to complete and accurate. Effect and Context: The Organization reported expenditures that exceeded $750,000 for 2022. In determining the major program to be audited for 2022, the auditor could not rely on the SEFA provided because the SEFA was not complete and expenditures reported were inaccurate. Which could have lead to an inaccurate reporting of federal expenditures for the Organization for 2022. Recommendation: We recommend that management implement policies and procedures requiring all federal expenditures be accurately reported in the year end Schedule of Federal Awards. Management’s Response and Corrective Action Plan: See management’s responses documented on page 46-47.

Condition: For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022, we requested that Day One prepare and send us a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. Requested that the expenditures reported in the SEFA be reconciled to Day One’s accounting records. We reviewed the SEFA and compared them to the accounting records; we noted that the expenditures reported were inaccurate. Criteria: Recipients of federal awards are subject to requirements documented in section of the Uniform Guidance Sections 200.510, 200.502, and 200.302. The criteria for each are as follows: § 200.510 Financial statements (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards. The auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with § 200.502.” § 200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended (a) Determining Federal awards expended. The determination of when a federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Generally, the activity pertains to events that require the non-Federal entity to comply with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of Federal awards, such as: expenditure/expense transactions associated with awards including grants, cost-reimbursement contracts under the FAR, compacts with Indian Tribes, cooperative agreements, and direct appropriations; the disbursement of funds to subrecipients; the use of loan proceeds under loan and loan guarantee programs; the receipt of property; the receipt of surplus property; the receipt or use of program income; the distribution or use of food commodities; the disbursement of amounts entitling the non-Federal entity to an interest subsidy; and the period when insurance is in force. § 200.302 Financial management (a) Each state must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state's own funds. In addition, the state's and the other non-Federal entity's financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements…..” Questioned Costs: None Cause: The Organization has not implemented policies and procedures requiring that the Schedule of Federal Awards to complete and accurate. Effect and Context: The Organization reported expenditures that exceeded $750,000 for 2022. In determining the major program to be audited for 2022, the auditor could not rely on the SEFA provided because the SEFA was not complete and expenditures reported were inaccurate. Which could have lead to an inaccurate reporting of federal expenditures for the Organization for 2022. Recommendation: We recommend that management implement policies and procedures requiring all federal expenditures be accurately reported in the year end Schedule of Federal Awards. Management’s Response and Corrective Action Plan: See management’s responses documented on page 46-47.

Condition: We selected a sample of payroll cost allocations and tested whether the employees’ time were allocated in accordance with Day One’s cost allocations by program. As a result of our test, we noted that one employee’s hours were did not match the allocation guidelines provided by the Organization and hours were improperly charged to the Substance Abuse Prevention and Control program. Criteria: § 200.405 Allocable costs. (a) A cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received. This standard is met if the cost: (1) Is incurred specifically for the Federal award; (2) Benefits both the Federal award and other work of the non-Federal entity and can be distributed in proportions that may be approximated using reasonable methods; and (3) Is necessary to the overall operation of the non-Federal entity and is assignable in part to the Federal award in accordance with the principles in this subpart.Cause: The Organization has not implemented policies and procedures requiring management review the accuracy of the costs allocations to each program prior to being recording in the accounting records. Questioned Costs: $1,282.83 Effect and Context: By improperly allocating payroll costs to the Substance Abuse Prevention and Control-CPS program, the amount of costs reported for this program are overstated at June 30, 2022. Recommendation: We also recommend management review allocation percentages and application of allocations prior to recording the costs in the accounting records. Management’s Response and Corrective Action Plan: See management’s responses documented on page 46-47.

GSA_MIGRATION

GSA_MIGRATION