THE CHRYSALIS CENTERNon-Profit

AL title: Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Employment & Training (SNAP E&T) Name of federal agency: Department of Agriculture Name of pass-through entity: Los Angeles County Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) and Foundation for Community Colleges California Employment Development Department Repeat finding: No Criteria: Under the Uniform Guidance, specifically 2 CFR 200.430, charges to Federal awards for compensation must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that costs are allocated appropriately and accurately. Per 2 CFR §200.403, allowable costs must be "necessary, reasonable, and adequately documented." Condition: During our testing of payments charged to the federal major program, we noted that employee timesheets lacked evidence of review and approval. Federal regulations require that expenditures charged to Federal awards be properly reviewed, approved, and documented to ensure allowability and compliance with grant terms. Cause: Due to the size of the Organization's programmatic operations, the implementation of controls over the program is still in progress, as the Federal program is relatively new to the Organization. As a result, controls were not consistently applied to all personnel charged to the program. Effect: Management provided documentation on personnel costs allocated to the program, but was unable to consistently provide evidence of review. Lack of review increases the risk of unauthorized or unallowable costs being charged to the Federal award, potentially leading to questioned costs and noncompliance with Federal grant requirements. Context: This issue applied to compensation costs for four salaried employees charged to the grant, with expenditures of approximately $138,000 out of the total award expenditures of $4,569,611. Questioned cost: None. Recommendation: Management should review the requirements of CFR 200.430 and ensure that current processes, whether digital or hard-copy driven, are consistent with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. In addition, management should consider adding additional resources to its payroll approval process. Views of responsible officials: The Organization has made significant progress in strengthening its timekeeping processes over the past 18 months. In 2025, the agency transitioned approximately 800 weekly transitional workers from a paper-based timekeeping process to an electronic timekeeping system. In 2026, the agency implemented an upgraded workforce management system that provides enhanced scheduling, monitoring, and supervisory oversight capabilities. Management recognizes the importance of full compliance with timekeeping requirements. Given the size and complexity of the Organization's operations, including a large workforce distributed across multiple programs and locations, implementation of system and process changes requires substantial planning, training, and operational coordination. To support these efforts, the agency has dedicated additional resources and established clearly defined responsibilities to drive implementation and oversight. The agency continues to refine procedures, provide training, and leverage system capabilities to strengthen controls and ensure consistent compliance across the Organization.

AL title: Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA Cluster) Name of federal agency: Department of Labor Name of pass-through entity: California Employment Development Department Repeat finding: Yes Criteria: Under the Uniform Guidance, specifically 2 CFR 200.430, charges to Federal awards for compensation must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that costs are allocated appropriately and accurately. Per 2 CFR §200.403, allowable costs must be "necessary, reasonable, and adequately documented." Additionally, 2 CFR §200.302(b)(3) requires non_x0002_Federal entities to maintain records that sufficiently detail financial transactions to support Federal expenditures. Condition: During our testing of payments charged to the federal major program, we noted that employee timesheets lacked evidence of review and approval. Certain employees charged to the grant did not prepare timesheets and a separate tracking system was used. Federal regulations require that expenditures charged to Federal awards be properly reviewed, approved, and documented to ensure allowability and compliance with grant terms. Cause: The Federal program was new to the organization and controls over the program had not been fully established. Turnover in the accounting department contributed to the lack of resources for tracking these costs. Effect: Management provided documentation on personnel costs allocated to the program, but was unable to provide evidence of review. Lack of review increases the risk of unauthorized or unallowable costs being charged to the Federal award, potentially leading to questioned costs and noncompliance with Federal grant requirements. Context: This issue applied to approximately 50% of the compensation costs charged to the grant expenditures. Management performed time studies on some of the employees whose costs were shared among programs, and the local granting organization did not cite this as a finding in their review of their subrecipient's activities. Questioned cost: Unable to be determined. Recommendation: Management should review the requirements of CFR 200.430 and ensure that current processes, whether digital or hard-copy driven, are consistent with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. In addition, management should consider adding additional staff to its accounting and/or grants management team. Views of responsible officials: The Organization has made significant progress in strengthening its timekeeping processes, as described in finding number 2025-002. This program ended in March 2025, and therefore management was unable to complete full remediation of the processes before completion of the grant.

Repeat finding: There was a simialr finding in the prior year, but it related to a different program and was assessed to be a significant deficiency. Condition: During our testing of payments charged to the federal major program, we noted that employee timesheets lacked evidence of review and approval. Certain employees charged to the grant did not prepare timesheets and a separate tracking system was used. Federal regulations require that expenditures charged to Federal awards be properly reviewed, approved, and documented to ensure allowability and compliance with grant terms. Criteria: Under the Uniform Guidance, specifically 2 CFR 200.430, charges to Federal awards for compensation must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that costs are allocated appropriately and accurately. Per 2 CFR §200.403, allowable costs must be "necessary, reasonable, and adequately documented." Additionally, 2 CFR §200.302(b)(3) requires non- Federal entities to maintain records that sufficiently detail financial transactions to support Federal expenditures. Cause: The Federal program was new to the organization and controls over the program had not been fully established. Turnover in the accounting department contributed to the lack of resources for tracking these costs. Effect: Management provided documentation on personnel costs allocated to the program, but was unable to provide evidence of review. Lack of review increases the risk of unauthorized or unallowable costs being charged to the Federal award, potentially leading to questioned costs and noncompliance with Federal grant requirements. Context: This issue applied to approximately 50% of the compensation costs charged to the grant expenditures. Management performed time studies on some of the employees whose costs were shared among programs, and the local granting organization did not cite this as a finding in their review of their subrecipient’s activities. Recommendation: Management should review the requirements of CFR 200.430 and ensure that current processes, whether digital or hard-copy driven, are consistent with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. In addition, management should consider adding additional staff to its accounting and/or grants management team. Views or reponsible officials: Management will evaluate systems and processes to ensure time tracking procedures meet the standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance.

Criteria: Under the Uniform Guidance, specifically 2 CFR 200.430, charges to Federal awards for compensation must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that costs are allocated appropriately and accurately. Per 2 CFR §200.403, allowable costs must be "necessary, reasonable, and adequately documented." Additionally, 2 CFR §200.302(b)(3) requires non-Federal entities to maintain records that sufficiently detail financial transactions to support Federal expenditures. Condition: During our testing of payments charged to the federal major program, we noted that employee timesheets lacked evidence of review and approval. Certain employees charged to the grant did not prepare timesheets and a separate tracking system was used. Federal regulations require that expenditures charged to Federal awards be properly reviewed, approved, and documented to ensure allowability and compliance with grant terms. Cause: The Federal program was new to the organization and controls over the program had not been fully established. Turnover in the accounting department contributed to the lack of resources for tracking these costs. Effect or potential effect: Management provided documentation on personnel costs allocated to the program, but was unable to provide evidence of review. Lack of review increases the risk of unauthorized or unallowable costs being charged to the Federal award, potentially leading to questioned costs and noncompliance with Federal grant requirements. Context: This issue applied to less than 10% of the grant expenditures, $54,505 out of the $897,736 of total expenditures charged to the grant. Recommendation: Management should review the requirements of CFR 200.430 and ensure that current processes, whether digital or hard-copy driven, are consistent with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. In addition, management should consider adding additional staff to its accounting and/or grants management team. Views of responsible officials: Management will evaluate systems and processes to ensure time tracking procedures meet the standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance.

Criteria: The Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards is required to include all expenditures of Federal funds. Condition: Management originally prepared an incomplete Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). Cause: The State funder indicated that no Federal Single Audit was required. Management had not implemented a formal process for preparation of the SEFA. Effect of potential effect: Management’s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards was incomplete, resulting in lack of identification of the need for a Single Audit and the delay in its completion. Questioned costs: N/A Recommendation: Management should prepare a master tracking schedule for government grants which includes the source of funding and audit and reporting requirements. The schedule should be prepared by someone with knowledge of the grant agreements and reviewed by a leader in the accounting department to ensure completeness. Views of responsible officials: Management has implemented a master tracking schedule for government grants that includes the source of funding and audit and reporting requirements. This tracker is a joint effort between finance and grants management teams.