← Back to home

Operation Samahan, Inc.Non-Profit

EIN: 953008798

UEI: DYCWD2XGWRV1

Audited by: Baker Tilly US LLP

Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

Operation Samahan, Inc.10 audit years10 findings7 repeat
10
Audit Years
10
Total Findings
7
Repeat Findings
$3.7M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

$3,733,810 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 18, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 18, 2026 (19 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

$3,798,740 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 31, 2025 — management decision was due October 1, 2025.

2024-002
Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2023-002

Finding – 2024-002 – Special Tests and Provisions – Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: The recipient is required to comply with specific federal regulations and provisions outlined in 2 CFR Part 200, particularly those related to special tests and provisions for the Health Center Program Cluster. This includes maintaining an effective internal control environment to ensure sliding fee discounts are applied to patient charges consistent with the recipients sliding fee discount schedule. Condition/cause: During the audit, it was identified that the sliding fee discounts for health center patients qualifying for reduced charge visits was not consistently applied for patients based on qualification criteria. This was due to turnover in the billing and admitting departments and an overall a lack of appropriate training over the federal program compliance requirements. Effect or potential effect: Certain patients were billed amounts different than the amounts defined by the sliding fee discount schedule. Questioned costs: None identified. Context: We selected a sample of 25 patient visits from a statistically valid population of patients potentially eligible for benefits under the sliding fee schedule during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. In 3 out of 25 samples tested, the Organization’s system limitations resulted in patients being billed less than the amounts defined by the sliding fee discount schedule. Repeat finding: Yes, see Finding 2023-002 Recommendation: We recommend the Organization implement an effective process and a comprehensive training of the process to ensure that the sliding fee scale is accurately applied to all qualifying program participants. Additionally, we would recommend the Organization perform regular reviews to ensure there are no issues with the system. Views of responsible officials: Management is in agreement with this finding. See corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding – 2024-002 – Special Tests and Provisions – Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: The recipient is required to comply with specific federal regulations and provisions outlined in 2 CFR Part 200, particularly those related to special tests and provisions for the Health Center Program Cluster. This includes maintaining an effective internal control environment to ensure sliding fee discounts are applied to patient charges consistent with the recipients sliding fee discount schedule. Condition/cause: During the audit, it was identified that the sliding fee discounts for health center patients qualifying for reduced charge visits was not consistently applied for patients based on qualification criteria. This was due to turnover in the billing and admitting departments and an overall a lack of appropriate training over the federal program compliance requirements. Effect or potential effect: Certain patients were billed amounts different than the amounts defined by the sliding fee discount schedule. Questioned costs: None identified. Context: We selected a sample of 25 patient visits from a statistically valid population of patients potentially eligible for benefits under the sliding fee schedule during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. In 3 out of 25 samples tested, the Organization’s system limitations resulted in patients being billed less than the amounts defined by the sliding fee discount schedule. Repeat finding: Yes, see Finding 2023-002 Recommendation: We recommend the Organization implement an effective process and a comprehensive training of the process to ensure that the sliding fee scale is accurately applied to all qualifying program participants. Additionally, we would recommend the Organization perform regular reviews to ensure there are no issues with the system. Views of responsible officials: Management is in agreement with this finding. See corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

2024-002 – Special Tests and Provisions (repeat of Finding 2023-002) Corrective action planned: Management will implement a series of corrective actions to address the findings to ensure consistent application of sliding fee discount. Actions to be taken are as follows: * Review of the sliding fee application to facilitate data collection for sliding fee discount program. * Implement a self-declaration or attestation for patients who cannot provide proof of income * Comprehensive training on the sliding fee program for all relevant staff * Implement monthly internal audits for sliding fee claims and provide feedback to staff based on findings and observations. Anticipated Completion Date: June 2025 Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Elizabeth David, CFO

Prior Finding References

2023-002

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2023-06-30

$3,949,962 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on April 1, 2024 — management decision was due October 1, 2024.

2023-002
Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONREPEAT OF 2022-004

2023-002 Special Tests and Provisions Program Information Federal Organization U.S Department of Health and Human Services Assistance Listing Numbers 93.224 & 93.527 Health Center Program Cluster Award Numbers H80CS26623, H8FCS41667, H8DCS35811, H8HCS45016, H8GCS48510, C14CS39779 Criteria OMB 2 CFR 200, Subpart F Compliance Supplement, Part 4, Compliance Requirement N, Special Tests and Provisions states, “Health Centers must prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule so that the amounts owed for health center services by eligible patients are adjusted (discounted) based on the patients ability to pay.” [X] Compliance Finding [ ] Significant Deficiency [X] Material Weakness Condition During our testing of sliding fee discounts for health center patients qualifying for reduced charge visits, we identified several incidents in which the sliding fee applied was not consistent with the entities policies based on the patient’s level of income. Context This finding appears to be a systemic problem. A sample size of 25 patients included 15 who did not have the correct sliding fee applied. In addition, 3 of the 15 misapplied sliding fees were due to lack of application on file or incomplete application and 8 of the 15 misapplied sliding fees were due to the sliding fees scales not being correctly calculated by the billing software after changes to the scale were made. Cause Due to turnover in the billing and admitting staff, there was lack of appropriate training relating to the requirements of the sliding fee system to properly administer the sliding fee program. In addition, the billing software was not properly updated for changes in the sliding fee scale to apply the sliding fees correctly based on the levels supported by the patient applications. Effect Patients may have been granted the incorrect sliding fee adjustment. Questioned Costs None identified. Recommendation We recommend continued effort in training personnel on applying the appropriate sliding fee discount based on the Organization’s approved policy and in compliance with the OMB Compliance Supplement requirements. An appropriate level of review should be conducted on patient accounts to ensure proper document retention, application of sliding fee discounts, and third-party insurance billing. In addition, we recommend that after sliding fee scales are updated sufficient testing of billing software is performed to ensure that sliding fees scales are being properly applied. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action Management …

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2023-002 Special Tests and Provisions Program Information Federal Organization U.S Department of Health and Human Services Assistance Listing Numbers 93.224 & 93.527 Health Center Program Cluster Award Numbers H80CS26623, H8FCS41667, H8DCS35811, H8HCS45016, H8GCS48510, C14CS39779 Criteria OMB 2 CFR 200, Subpart F Compliance Supplement, Part 4, Compliance Requirement N, Special Tests and Provisions states, “Health Centers must prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule so that the amounts owed for health center services by eligible patients are adjusted (discounted) based on the patients ability to pay.” [X] Compliance Finding [ ] Significant Deficiency [X] Material Weakness Condition During our testing of sliding fee discounts for health center patients qualifying for reduced charge visits, we identified several incidents in which the sliding fee applied was not consistent with the entities policies based on the patient’s level of income. Context This finding appears to be a systemic problem. A sample size of 25 patients included 15 who did not have the correct sliding fee applied. In addition, 3 of the 15 misapplied sliding fees were due to lack of application on file or incomplete application and 8 of the 15 misapplied sliding fees were due to the sliding fees scales not being correctly calculated by the billing software after changes to the scale were made. Cause Due to turnover in the billing and admitting staff, there was lack of appropriate training relating to the requirements of the sliding fee system to properly administer the sliding fee program. In addition, the billing software was not properly updated for changes in the sliding fee scale to apply the sliding fees correctly based on the levels supported by the patient applications. Effect Patients may have been granted the incorrect sliding fee adjustment. Questioned Costs None identified. Recommendation We recommend continued effort in training personnel on applying the appropriate sliding fee discount based on the Organization’s approved policy and in compliance with the OMB Compliance Supplement requirements. An appropriate level of review should be conducted on patient accounts to ensure proper document retention, application of sliding fee discounts, and third-party insurance billing. In addition, we recommend that after sliding fee scales are updated sufficient testing of billing software is performed to ensure that sliding fees scales are being properly applied. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action Management …

Corrective Action Plan

2023-002 Special Tests and Provisions (repeat of Finding 2022-004) Corrective action planned: Regular training is scheduled of front staff and call center agents on the clinic’s Sliding Fee Discount Program. We developed a Sliding Fee Tracker to identify gaps in the process and reinforce workflow and/or retrain staff as needed. Anticipated completion date: Implemented in October 2023 Contact person responsible for corrective action: Michael Page, Operations Director

Prior Finding References

2022-004

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2022-06-30

$4,597,570 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2023 — management decision was due September 29, 2023.

2022-003
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONREPEAT OF 2021-003

2022-003 Reporting (repeat of Finding 2021-003) Program Information Federal Organization U.S Department of Health and Human Services Assistance Listing Numbers 93.224 & 93.527 Health Center Program Cluster Award Numbers H80CS26623, H8FCS41667, H8DCS35811, H8HCS45016, C8ECS44852, C14CS39779 Criteria Based on the standards of documentation of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards Subpart D requires the Organization to retain adequate records and other supporting documentation for reports submitted to awarding agencies under the compliance requirements for reporting. [X] Compliance Finding [ ] Significant Deficiency [X] Material Weakness Condition The Organization did not maintain sufficient supporting records for the information reported in its calendar year 2021 Uniform Data System (UDS) report. Context This finding appears to be a systemic problem. Cause The Organization?s internal controls over compliance did not include adequate controls over the retention of supporting documentation for UDS reports submitted to awarding agencies. Effect The Organization submitted UDS reports for federal awards that may lack supporting documentation. Questioned Costs None identified Recommendation We recommend the Organization maintain documentation supporting reports filed with awarding agencies. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action Management agrees with this finding. Management is working on improving controls and procedures to ensure appropriate records and supporting documentations. The UDS reporting is made accurate by using not only ECW reporting capabilities, but also by getting an i2i population health data tool as a secondary verification platform for UDS data. See planned corrective actions in the next section of the Schedule of Audit Findings and Questioned Costs.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2022-003 Reporting (repeat of Finding 2021-003) Program Information Federal Organization U.S Department of Health and Human Services Assistance Listing Numbers 93.224 & 93.527 Health Center Program Cluster Award Numbers H80CS26623, H8FCS41667, H8DCS35811, H8HCS45016, C8ECS44852, C14CS39779 Criteria Based on the standards of documentation of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards Subpart D requires the Organization to retain adequate records and other supporting documentation for reports submitted to awarding agencies under the compliance requirements for reporting. [X] Compliance Finding [ ] Significant Deficiency [X] Material Weakness Condition The Organization did not maintain sufficient supporting records for the information reported in its calendar year 2021 Uniform Data System (UDS) report. Context This finding appears to be a systemic problem. Cause The Organization?s internal controls over compliance did not include adequate controls over the retention of supporting documentation for UDS reports submitted to awarding agencies. Effect The Organization submitted UDS reports for federal awards that may lack supporting documentation. Questioned Costs None identified Recommendation We recommend the Organization maintain documentation supporting reports filed with awarding agencies. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action Management agrees with this finding. Management is working on improving controls and procedures to ensure appropriate records and supporting documentations. The UDS reporting is made accurate by using not only ECW reporting capabilities, but also by getting an i2i population health data tool as a secondary verification platform for UDS data. See planned corrective actions in the next section of the Schedule of Audit Findings and Questioned Costs.

Corrective Action Plan

2022-003 Reporting (repeat finding of 2021-003) Corrective action planned: The UDS reporting is made more accurate by using not only ECW reporting capabilities, but also by getting an i2i population health data tool as a secondary verification platform for UDS data, alongside a competent data analyst. the finance department and our project coordinator. The team will oversee gathering all pertinent demographics and financials needed from the clinic?s patient management software (ECW) and accounting software (Sage Intacct). The team attended the 2022 UDS Reporting and Technical Assistance Webinar series sponsored by Department of Public Health Care/Health Resources and Services Administration to ensure the team has the latest update and changes to the 2022 UDS Reporting. The Clinic has also upgraded the patient management software (ECW) to the latest version and is now UDS + (UDS modernization Initiative) ready. Anticipated completion date: December 31, 2022 Contact person responsible for corrective action: Archie Bella, CEO; Roberto Bautista, Data Analyst; Elizabeth David, Finance Director

Prior Finding References

2021-003

About Reporting →
2022-004
Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

2022-004 Special Tests and Provisions Program Information Federal Organization U.S Department of Health and Human Services Assistance Listing Numbers 93.224 & 93.527 Health Center Program Cluster Award Numbers H80CS26623, H8FCS41667, H8DCS35811, H8HCS45016, C8ECS44852, C14CS39779 Criteria OMB 2 CFR 200, Subpart F Compliance Supplement, Part 4, Compliance Requirement N, Special Tests and Provisions states, ?Health Centers must prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule so that the amounts owed for health center services by eligible patients are adjusted (discounted) based on the patients ability to pay.? [X] Compliance Finding [ ] Significant Deficiency [X] Material Weakness Condition During our testing of sliding fee discounts for health center patients qualifying for reduced charge visits, we identified several incidents in which the sliding fee applied was not consistent with the entities policies based on the patient?s level of income. Context This finding appears to be a systemic problem. A sample size of 25 patients included 10 who did not have the correct sliding fee applied. In addition, 7 of the 10 misapplied sliding fees were due to lack of application on file. Cause Due to turnover in the billing and admitting staff, there was lack of appropriate training relating to the requirements of the sliding fee system to properly administer the sliding fee program. Effect Patients may have been granted the incorrect sliding fee adjustment. Questioned Costs None identified. Recommendation We recommend continued effort in training personnel on applying the appropriate sliding fee discount based on the Organization?s approved policy and in compliance with the OMB Compliance Supplement requirements. An appropriate level of review should be conducted on patient accounts to ensure proper document retention, application of sliding fee discounts, and third-party insurance billing. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action Management agrees with this finding. Management has already taken steps and has updated the clinic?s Sliding Fee Discount Program, the clinic?s fee schedule, and retraining of staff. See planned corrective actions in the next section of the Schedule of Audit Findings and Questioned Costs.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2022-004 Special Tests and Provisions Program Information Federal Organization U.S Department of Health and Human Services Assistance Listing Numbers 93.224 & 93.527 Health Center Program Cluster Award Numbers H80CS26623, H8FCS41667, H8DCS35811, H8HCS45016, C8ECS44852, C14CS39779 Criteria OMB 2 CFR 200, Subpart F Compliance Supplement, Part 4, Compliance Requirement N, Special Tests and Provisions states, ?Health Centers must prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule so that the amounts owed for health center services by eligible patients are adjusted (discounted) based on the patients ability to pay.? [X] Compliance Finding [ ] Significant Deficiency [X] Material Weakness Condition During our testing of sliding fee discounts for health center patients qualifying for reduced charge visits, we identified several incidents in which the sliding fee applied was not consistent with the entities policies based on the patient?s level of income. Context This finding appears to be a systemic problem. A sample size of 25 patients included 10 who did not have the correct sliding fee applied. In addition, 7 of the 10 misapplied sliding fees were due to lack of application on file. Cause Due to turnover in the billing and admitting staff, there was lack of appropriate training relating to the requirements of the sliding fee system to properly administer the sliding fee program. Effect Patients may have been granted the incorrect sliding fee adjustment. Questioned Costs None identified. Recommendation We recommend continued effort in training personnel on applying the appropriate sliding fee discount based on the Organization?s approved policy and in compliance with the OMB Compliance Supplement requirements. An appropriate level of review should be conducted on patient accounts to ensure proper document retention, application of sliding fee discounts, and third-party insurance billing. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action Management agrees with this finding. Management has already taken steps and has updated the clinic?s Sliding Fee Discount Program, the clinic?s fee schedule, and retraining of staff. See planned corrective actions in the next section of the Schedule of Audit Findings and Questioned Costs.

Corrective Action Plan

2022-004 Special Tests and Provisions Corrective action planned: In December 2022, the clinic reviewed and updated the clinic?s Sliding Fee Discount Program as well as the clinic?s fee schedule for 2023. We have trained staff and will be doing regular monitoring. We have made income and family size mandatory fields in the demographics field and requested that ECW to make sliding fee a mandatory field with a hard stop. Our data analyst is running regular reports to check if sliding fee is being done correctly with the billing liaison?s regular check of patient charts and billing, Policies and Procedures include monitoring of the Sliding Fee Discount Program. The billing liaison will randomly choose five charts from each clinic site to test patients? discount application, patient eligibility (income and family size), proof of income, and application of the appropriate sliding fee discount. Anticipated completion date: December 2022 Contact person responsible for corrective action: Elizabeth David, Finance Director

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2022-005
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

2022-005 Allowable Costs Program Information Federal Organization U.S Department of Health and Human Services Assistance Listing Numbers 93.224 & 93.527 Health Center Program Cluster Award Numbers H80CS26623, H8FCS41667, H8DCS35811, H8HCS45016, C8ECS44852, C14CS39779 Criteria Entities receiving Health Center Program funds must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. [ ] Compliance Finding [X] Significant Deficiency [ ] Material Weakness Condition During our testing of payroll expenditures, it was noted several employees were paid at rates in excess of the approved rate of pay per the respective employee?s personnel file. Context This finding appears to be a systemic problem. A sample size of 34 employees included 7 that were paid at a rate greater than the most recent approved rate per the employee?s personnel file and 2 additional employees who did not have documentation of the approved rate in their personnel file. Cause Due to high turnover in all departments, the human resources department was not able to properly file and retrieve all required documentation relating to the approved rates of pay for new hires and rate increases approved by management and the Board during the year. Effect Rates of pay being paid to employees are not supportable by the Organization?s personnel files. Questioned Costs None identified. Recommendation We recommend each employee?s personnel file be complete and kept up to date to include all rate increases whether due to performance or cost of living increases in order to support the amounts being paid to employees. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action HR is keeping track and documenting all salary raises and as part of procedure, filling out form (Personnel Action Form) prepared by HR and signed by the CEO every time a raise is given. The form will be put in the employee file. See planned corrective actions in the next section of the Schedule of Audit Findings and Questioned Costs.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2022-005 Allowable Costs Program Information Federal Organization U.S Department of Health and Human Services Assistance Listing Numbers 93.224 & 93.527 Health Center Program Cluster Award Numbers H80CS26623, H8FCS41667, H8DCS35811, H8HCS45016, C8ECS44852, C14CS39779 Criteria Entities receiving Health Center Program funds must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. [ ] Compliance Finding [X] Significant Deficiency [ ] Material Weakness Condition During our testing of payroll expenditures, it was noted several employees were paid at rates in excess of the approved rate of pay per the respective employee?s personnel file. Context This finding appears to be a systemic problem. A sample size of 34 employees included 7 that were paid at a rate greater than the most recent approved rate per the employee?s personnel file and 2 additional employees who did not have documentation of the approved rate in their personnel file. Cause Due to high turnover in all departments, the human resources department was not able to properly file and retrieve all required documentation relating to the approved rates of pay for new hires and rate increases approved by management and the Board during the year. Effect Rates of pay being paid to employees are not supportable by the Organization?s personnel files. Questioned Costs None identified. Recommendation We recommend each employee?s personnel file be complete and kept up to date to include all rate increases whether due to performance or cost of living increases in order to support the amounts being paid to employees. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action HR is keeping track and documenting all salary raises and as part of procedure, filling out form (Personnel Action Form) prepared by HR and signed by the CEO every time a raise is given. The form will be put in the employee file. See planned corrective actions in the next section of the Schedule of Audit Findings and Questioned Costs.

Corrective Action Plan

2022-005 Allowable Costs Corrective action planned: HR is keeping track of and documenting all salary raises and as part of procedure, filling out form (Personnel Action Form) prepared by HR and signed by the CEO every time a raise is given. The form will be put in the employee file. Anticipated completion date: July 2022 Contact person responsible for corrective action: Lita Santos, HR Director

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2021-06-30

$3,238,511 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on June 26, 2022 — management decision was due December 26, 2022.

2021-003
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

Program Information Federal Organization U.S Department of Health and Human Services Assistance Listing Numbers 93.224 & 93.527 Health Center Program Cluster Award Numbers H80CS26623, H8FCS41667, H8DCS35811, H8ECS38608, C14CS39779 Criteria [X] Compliance Finding [ ] Significant Deficiency [X] Material Weakness Based on the standards of documentation of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards Subpart D requires the Organization to retain adequate records and other supporting documentation for reports submitted to awarding agencies under the compliance requirements for reporting. Condition The Organization did not maintain sufficient supporting records for the information reported in its calendar year 2020 Uniform Data System (UDS) report. Context This finding appears to be an isolated problem. Cause The Organization?s internal controls over compliance did not include adequate controls over the retention of supporting documentation for UDS reports submitted to awarding agencies. Effect The Organization submitted UDS reports for federal awards that may lack supporting documentation. Questioned Costs None identified Recommendation We recommend the Organization maintain documentation supporting reports filed with awarding agencies. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action Management is in agreement with this finding. Management has policies relating to documentation and is working on improving controls and procedures to ensure appropriate records and supporting documentation is maintained for the required length of time.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Program Information Federal Organization U.S Department of Health and Human Services Assistance Listing Numbers 93.224 & 93.527 Health Center Program Cluster Award Numbers H80CS26623, H8FCS41667, H8DCS35811, H8ECS38608, C14CS39779 Criteria [X] Compliance Finding [ ] Significant Deficiency [X] Material Weakness Based on the standards of documentation of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards Subpart D requires the Organization to retain adequate records and other supporting documentation for reports submitted to awarding agencies under the compliance requirements for reporting. Condition The Organization did not maintain sufficient supporting records for the information reported in its calendar year 2020 Uniform Data System (UDS) report. Context This finding appears to be an isolated problem. Cause The Organization?s internal controls over compliance did not include adequate controls over the retention of supporting documentation for UDS reports submitted to awarding agencies. Effect The Organization submitted UDS reports for federal awards that may lack supporting documentation. Questioned Costs None identified Recommendation We recommend the Organization maintain documentation supporting reports filed with awarding agencies. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action Management is in agreement with this finding. Management has policies relating to documentation and is working on improving controls and procedures to ensure appropriate records and supporting documentation is maintained for the required length of time.

Corrective Action Plan

2021-003 Reporting Corrective action planned: The UDS report will be prepared by the Finance Department. Part of the problem is that no one was trained to get accurate office visit counts as defined by HRSA. From the Eclinicalworks EHR unbillable visits were counted and included in the UDS reports which should not have been included. To correct this situation a Super-User will be trained by ECW so we can get among other things accurate reports of billable office visits for UDS reporting. Anticipated completion date: June 30, 2022 Contact person responsible for corrective action: Elizabeth David, Finance Director

About Reporting →

FY 2020-06-30

$2,626,787 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 2, 2021 — management decision was due September 2, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

$2,187,426 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 8, 2020 — management decision was due August 8, 2020.

2019-002
Special Tests & Provisions
REPEAT OF 2018-002OTHER MATTERS

2019-002 Application of Sliding Fee Adjustments (repeat of Finding 2018-002) Program Information Federal Organization U.S Department of Health and Human Services CFDA 93.224 & 93.527 Health Centers Cluster Award Numbers H80CS26623 Criteria [X] Compliance Finding [ ] Significant Deficiency [ ] Material Weakness OMB 2 CFR 200, Subpart F Compliance Supplement, Part 4, Compliance Requirement N, Special Tests and Provisions states, ?Health Centers must prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule so that the amounts owed for health center services by eligible patients are adjusted (discounted) based on the patients ability to pay.? Condition During our testing of sliding fee discounts for health center patients qualifying for reduced charge visits, we identified two incidents in which the incorrect sliding fee was applied. Context This finding appears to be an isolated incident. A sample size of 25 patients included 2 which did not have the correct sliding fee applied. Cause While many improvements from prior audits were noted, there was still weakness in the training and review system to properly administer the sliding fee program. Effect Patients may have been granted the incorrect sliding fee adjustment. Questioned Costs None identified

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2019-002 Application of Sliding Fee Adjustments (repeat of Finding 2018-002) Program Information Federal Organization U.S Department of Health and Human Services CFDA 93.224 & 93.527 Health Centers Cluster Award Numbers H80CS26623 Criteria [X] Compliance Finding [ ] Significant Deficiency [ ] Material Weakness OMB 2 CFR 200, Subpart F Compliance Supplement, Part 4, Compliance Requirement N, Special Tests and Provisions states, ?Health Centers must prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule so that the amounts owed for health center services by eligible patients are adjusted (discounted) based on the patients ability to pay.? Condition During our testing of sliding fee discounts for health center patients qualifying for reduced charge visits, we identified two incidents in which the incorrect sliding fee was applied. Context This finding appears to be an isolated incident. A sample size of 25 patients included 2 which did not have the correct sliding fee applied. Cause While many improvements from prior audits were noted, there was still weakness in the training and review system to properly administer the sliding fee program. Effect Patients may have been granted the incorrect sliding fee adjustment. Questioned Costs None identified

Corrective Action Plan

2019-002 Application of Sliding Fee Adjustments Corrective action planned: Training of personnel in applying the appropriate sliding fee discount based on updated/approved policy and procedures consistent with OMB and HRSA requirement is ongoing. Monthly review and progress reports for correcting gaps are being implemented. Anticipated completion date: January 27, 2020 and Ongoing Contact person responsible for corrective action: Ritzel Ragudo (Billing Manager); David Moser (Senior Accountant); Elidoro Primero (Executive Director/Finance Director)

Prior Finding References

2018-002

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2018-06-30

GOING CONCERN$2,828,583 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 21, 2019 — management decision was due August 21, 2019.

2018-002
Special Tests & Provisions
REPEAT OF 2017-003OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2017-003

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2017-06-30

$2,499,427 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 19, 2018 — management decision was due August 19, 2018.

2017-003
Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONREPEAT OF 2016-005

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-005

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2016-06-30

$2,553,165 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2017 — management decision was due September 29, 2017.

2016-005
Program Income
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONREPEAT OF 2015-008

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-008

About Program Income →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.