EIN: 952241453
UEI: MN5GADR8B2D5
Audited by: Baker Tilly US, LLP
Oversight agency: 97 [Department of Homeland Security]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 28, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on February 11, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 11, 2026 (20 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on December 18, 2024 — management decision was due June 18, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on March 4, 2024 — management decision was due September 4, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on December 18, 2022 — management decision was due June 18, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on December 12, 2021 — management decision was due June 12, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on December 16, 2020 — management decision was due June 16, 2021.
In performing testwork on the Reporting compliance requirement, MGO noted that the District submitted a semi-annual progress report for the six months ended December 31, 2019 on July 30, 2020, which is six months past the required due date of January 30, 2020 based on the criterion above.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴In performing testwork on the Reporting compliance requirement, MGO noted that the District submitted a semi-annual progress report for the six months ended December 31, 2019 on July 30, 2020, which is six months past the required due date of January 30, 2020 based on the criterion above.
District staff will take the following immediate actions: * Ensure all relevant staff are aware of required reporting due dates. * Update the Grants Management system to reflect all relevant due dates and prompt automatic notification to project managers of upcoming due dates. * Develop transition plans as necessary to manage through personnel changes when grant-funded programs are likely to be impacted.
In performing testwork on the Procurement compliance requirement, MGO noted that the District did not run a suspension and debarment check for two different vendors on or before the time the agreements were signed and executed.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴In performing testwork on the Procurement compliance requirement, MGO noted that the District did not run a suspension and debarment check for two different vendors on or before the time the agreements were signed and executed.
The single audit found two instances wherein the debarment check was not conducted. In the first case, a sole source agreement was negotiated between department operational staff and the consultant. While the negotiation was conducted within established District process and proceeded according to requirements for non-grant funded sole-source solicitations, however because it was conducted outside of the procurement team, staff was unaware of the debarment requirements. The Grants team has alerted the operational department involved that future grant-funded solesource procurements do require debarment. A reminder to staff has also been added to the relevant project notes in the Grants Management System. In the second case, the subject agreement was a continuation of support provided to a multi-year project that had incurred a project delay. The District?s SAP system requires a confirmation of grant funding, however because this was determined to be an extension of an ongoing project, and debarment had been completed for previous contracts with this vendor, the step was skipped in this instance. The relevant department directors have been notified of the oversight. A process improvement that requires a debarment check for all agreements will be implemented, regardless of any previous contracts with the vendor in question. The ?must fill? grant-funding indicator in SAP?s procurement module remains the primary mitigation measure, however a reminder to specify grant funding requirements when working across departments has also been added to the relevant project notes and in the Grants Management system.
FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on December 18, 2018 — management decision was due June 18, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on December 20, 2017 — management decision was due June 20, 2018.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
FAC accepted this audit on November 29, 2016 — management decision was due May 29, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in California →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
