← Back to home

ANDERSON VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTLocal Government

EIN: 946003771

UEI: JG2BNCVTWPJ8

Audited by: NIGRO & NIGRO, PC

Oversight agency: 10 [Department of Agriculture]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

ANDERSON VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT10 audit years2 findings
10
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$1.5M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSEDLOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,511,207 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on December 17, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 17, 2026 (79 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2025-002
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

During our testing of procurement, we sampled two contracts that would qualify as “small purchases.” The district could not provide evidence that multiple quotes had been obtained prior to selecting the vendors. Cause: Due to turnover at the District, there has been a lack of oversight to ensure all appropriate documentation is maintained to demonstrate that the District is in compliance with Public Contract Code and that purchases are awarded after a reasonable number of quotes have been obtained. Context: Deficiency was noted in two of two vendors tested. Questioned Cost/Effect: This resulted in roughly $138,594 dollars awarded in contracts, without following proper procedures. Recommendation: We recommend that the District train and implement the required federal procurement procedures to ensure that the District is in compliance. Views of Responsible Officials: The District corrected this procedure for fiscal year 2025-26 and has the process in place going forward for each fiscal year.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2025-002: Procurement (50000) Assistance Listing # 10.553, 10.555 U.S. Department of Agriculture Passed Through: California Department of Education (pass through numbers 13526, 13523, 13391, 15655) Child Nutrition Cluster Repeat Finding? No Criteria: Code of Federal Regulations, CFR 200.320, requires the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. For “small purchases,” those where the aggregate dollar amount is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). Condition: During our testing of procurement, we sampled two contracts that would qualify as “small purchases.” The district could not provide evidence that multiple quotes had been obtained prior to selecting the vendors. Cause: Due to turnover at the District, there has been a lack of oversight to ensure all appropriate documentation is maintained to demonstrate that the District is in compliance with Public Contract Code and that purchases are awarded after a reasonable number of quotes have been obtained. Context: Deficiency was noted in two of two vendors tested. Questioned Cost/Effect: This resulted in roughly $138,594 dollars awarded in contracts, without following proper procedures. Recommendation: We recommend that the District train and implement the required federal procurement procedures to ensure that the District is in compliance. Views of Responsible Officials: The District corrected this procedure for fiscal year 2025-26 and has the process in place going forward for each fiscal year.

Corrective Action Plan

The District Cafeteria Manager, Melanie Pardini, corrected this procedure for fiscal year 2025-26 and has the process in place going forward for each fiscal year.

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2025-003
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

During our testing of reporting, we sampled two months of submitted claims for reimbursement and traced meals served to backup documentation. We noted the District uses a point of sale (POS) system to track meals served and an excel spreadsheet to reconcile actual meals served to the POS report. The submitted claims are based on the numbers reported on excel spreadsheet reconciliation and the District was unable to provide support for the differences between the POS report and the spreadsheet. Cause: Due to turnover at the District, there has been a lack of oversight to ensure all appropriate documentation is maintained to demonstrate accuracy of the submitted reports. Context: Deficiency was noted in two of two months tested. Questioned Cost/Effect: This resulted in roughly $187 dollars questioned cost. Recommendation: We recommend that the District train and implement procedures to ensure that the District is reporting accurate claim numbers. Views of Responsible Officials: The cafeteria manager will reconcile meals served monthly to verify that the numbers match and are verified to actual meals served.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2025-003: Reporting (50000) Assistance Listing # 10.553, 10.555 U.S. Department of Agriculture Passed Through: California Department of Education (pass through numbers 13526, 13523, 13391, 15655) Child Nutrition Cluster Repeat Finding? No Criteria: Code of Federal Regulations, 7 CFR sections 210.8, 220.11, 215.10, and 225.15(c), require the non-Federal entity to submit monthly claims for reimbursement for meals and snacks served to eligible students within 60 days following the last day of the month covered by the claim. Each month’s claim for reimbursement and all data used in the claims review process must be maintained on file. Accurate records must be maintained justifying all meals claimed and documenting that all Program funds were spent only on allowable Child Nutrition Program costs. Condition: During our testing of reporting, we sampled two months of submitted claims for reimbursement and traced meals served to backup documentation. We noted the District uses a point of sale (POS) system to track meals served and an excel spreadsheet to reconcile actual meals served to the POS report. The submitted claims are based on the numbers reported on excel spreadsheet reconciliation and the District was unable to provide support for the differences between the POS report and the spreadsheet. Cause: Due to turnover at the District, there has been a lack of oversight to ensure all appropriate documentation is maintained to demonstrate accuracy of the submitted reports. Context: Deficiency was noted in two of two months tested. Questioned Cost/Effect: This resulted in roughly $187 dollars questioned cost. Recommendation: We recommend that the District train and implement procedures to ensure that the District is reporting accurate claim numbers. Views of Responsible Officials: The cafeteria manager will reconcile meals served monthly to verify that the numbers match and are verified to actual meals served.

Corrective Action Plan

The cafeteria manager will reconcile meals served monthly to verify that the numbers match and are verified to actual meals served starting in the 2025-26 School Year.

About Reporting →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,545,564 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 7, 2025 — management decision was due July 7, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,852,344 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 17, 2024 — management decision was due July 17, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,313,583 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 4, 2023 — management decision was due July 4, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,501,432 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 17, 2022 — management decision was due July 17, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$768,210 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 27, 2021 — management decision was due July 27, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$905,042 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 7, 2020 — management decision was due July 7, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$884,630 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 27, 2018 — management decision was due June 27, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,022,401 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 18, 2017 — management decision was due June 18, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,081,283 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 11, 2016 — management decision was due June 11, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in California

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.