City of AtwaterLocal Government

EIN: 946002854

UEI: FFMEDABPXQM7

Audited by: Badawi & Associates

Oversight agency: 21 [Department of the Treasury]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

City of Atwater5 audit years1 findings
5
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$2.7M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2024)

FY 2024-06-30

$2,728,160 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on October 3, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by April 3, 2026 (148 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2024-001
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

SA2024-001: Lack of Documentation for Suspension or Debarment Verification Criteria Per 2 CFR section 180.300, when a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at SAM.gov (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity. Condition The City failed to provide evidence demonstrating the verification of vendor’s eligibility before entering into a procurement contract. Cause The absence of documented proof regarding the verification of vendor’s eligibility for participation in the transaction is attributed to inadequate record-keeping practices rather than a failure to conduct the verification process. It appears that while the verification may have been conducted, the City did not retain sufficient documentation to demonstrate compliance with the requirement. Effect Without proper documentation, the City's procurement process lacks transparency and accountability, leading to challenges in demonstrating compliance with federal regulations. Recommendation The City should enhance its record-keeping practices to ensure that documentation of suspension or debarment verification is consistently maintained for all procurement transactions. Management Response The City has taken action by updating the procedures to now include a requirement for attaching the suspension and debarment verifications as part of the documentation process.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

SA2024-001: Lack of Documentation for Suspension or Debarment Verification Criteria Per 2 CFR section 180.300, when a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at SAM.gov (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity. Condition The City failed to provide evidence demonstrating the verification of vendor’s eligibility before entering into a procurement contract. Cause The absence of documented proof regarding the verification of vendor’s eligibility for participation in the transaction is attributed to inadequate record-keeping practices rather than a failure to conduct the verification process. It appears that while the verification may have been conducted, the City did not retain sufficient documentation to demonstrate compliance with the requirement. Effect Without proper documentation, the City's procurement process lacks transparency and accountability, leading to challenges in demonstrating compliance with federal regulations. Recommendation The City should enhance its record-keeping practices to ensure that documentation of suspension or debarment verification is consistently maintained for all procurement transactions. Management Response The City has taken action by updating the procedures to now include a requirement for attaching the suspension and debarment verifications as part of the documentation process.

Corrective Action Plan

The City will enhance its record-keeping practices to ensure that documentation of suspension or debarment verification is consistently maintained for all procurement transactions. The City has taken action by updating the procedures to now include a requirement for attaching the suspension and debarment verifications as part of the documentation process.

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2023-06-30

$2,028,117 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 18, 2024 — management decision was due January 18, 2025.

FY 2022-06-30

$2,183,201 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2023 — management decision was due September 30, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

$953,225 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 28, 2022 — management decision was due March 28, 2023.

FY 2017-06-30

$797,072 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2018 — management decision was due September 27, 2018.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.