EIN: 946002661
UEI: XTQSUXHAJR97
Audited by: Crowe LLP
Cognizant agency: 84 [Department of Education]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 2, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on January 22, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 22, 2026 (44 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on January 28, 2025 — management decision was due July 28, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on January 7, 2025 — management decision was due July 7, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on April 2, 2024 — management decision was due October 2, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2023 — management decision was due September 30, 2023.
The District entered into an agreement with a third-party vendor for products and services but did not follow applicable written internal control procedures over bidding and board approval or obtain prior approval from the California Department of Education, as required for equipment and real property purchases by the COVID-19 ? ESF Programs. The Uniform Guidance compliance also require internal control procedures to be in place and followed in order to demonstrate compliance with the requirements. As a result, the District did not have appropriate internal control procedures in place, nor was the agreement compliant with Uniform Guidance requirements. Effect: The District did not comply with the necessary requirements for entering into the agreement for the purchase of equipment and real property, therefore resulting in risk of loss of funding for amounts paid under the third-party vendor agreement. Cause: The District did not follow necessary internal controls for ensuring compliance with the specific program requirements of the Education Stabilization Fund grants it received and expended during the year ended June 30, 2022. Questioned Cost: $6,604,857 Recommendation: The District?s management team should implement necessary internal controls to ensure compliance with all Federal program requirements. The internal controls should include (1) a procedure identifying which attributes apply to each Federal program operated by the District, and (2) steps to ensure compliance with each attribute identified as applicable. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management concurs with findings. District management will continue to provide staff members internal control procedure training specifically in the areas of federal procurement. This will ensure adherence to Federal program requirements. Management staff received procurement training in October 2022. Subsequently, in February and March 2023, management provided procurement trainings to sites and departments.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2022-002 ? MATERIAL WEAKNESS ? FEDERAL COMPLIANCE (50000) Federal Programs: COVID-19 - Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund (AL#84.425), COVID-19 - Elementary and Secondary School Relief II Fund (AL#84.425) ? collectively referred to herein as ?COVID-19 -ESF Programs?. Criteria: Per the Uniform Guidance Compliance Supplement, established in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F: Sections A. Activities Allowed or Unallowed, and F. Equipment/Real Property Management require that recipients of Federal funds follow applicable specific requirements in connection with the expenditure of the grant fund Condition: The District entered into an agreement with a third-party vendor for products and services but did not follow applicable written internal control procedures over bidding and board approval or obtain prior approval from the California Department of Education, as required for equipment and real property purchases by the COVID-19 ? ESF Programs. The Uniform Guidance compliance also require internal control procedures to be in place and followed in order to demonstrate compliance with the requirements. As a result, the District did not have appropriate internal control procedures in place, nor was the agreement compliant with Uniform Guidance requirements. Effect: The District did not comply with the necessary requirements for entering into the agreement for the purchase of equipment and real property, therefore resulting in risk of loss of funding for amounts paid under the third-party vendor agreement. Cause: The District did not follow necessary internal controls for ensuring compliance with the specific program requirements of the Education Stabilization Fund grants it received and expended during the year ended June 30, 2022. Questioned Cost: $6,604,857 Recommendation: The District?s management team should implement necessary internal controls to ensure compliance with all Federal program requirements. The internal controls should include (1) a procedure identifying which attributes apply to each Federal program operated by the District, and (2) steps to ensure compliance with each attribute identified as applicable. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management concurs with findings. District management will continue to provide staff members internal control procedure training specifically in the areas of federal procurement. This will ensure adherence to Federal program requirements. Management staff received procurement training in October 2022. Subsequently, in February and March 2023, management provided procurement trainings to sites and departments.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management concurs with findings. District management will continue to provide staff members internal control procedure training specifically in the areas of federal procurement. This will ensure adherence to Federal program requirements. Management staff received procurement training in October 2022. Subsequently, in February and March 2023, management provided procurement trainings to sites and departments.
The District was unable to provide supporting documentation for payroll for one employee charged to the Head Start program. The Uniform Guidance compliance also require internal control procedures to be in place and followed in order to demonstrate compliance with the requirements. As a result, the District did not have appropriate internal control procedures in place, nor was the expenditure compliant with Uniform Guidance requirements. Effect: The District did not comply with the necessary requirements for maintaining supporting documentation for payroll expenditures charged to the program, therefore resulting in risk of loss of funding for amounts paid. Cause: The District did not follow necessary internal controls for ensuring compliance with the specific program requirements of the Head Start grants it received and expended during the year ended June 30, 2022. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs are $12,614 and likely questioned costs are $15,623, totaling $28,237. Recommendation: The District?s management team should implement necessary internal controls to ensure compliance with all Federal program requirements. The internal controls should include (1) a procedure identifying which attributes apply to each Federal program operated by the District, and (2) steps to ensure compliance with each attribute identified as applicable. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management concurs with findings. District management will continue to provide staff members internal control procedure training specifically in the areas of federal procurement. This will ensure adherence to Federal program requirements.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2022-003 ? DEFICIENCY ? FEDERAL COMPLIANCE (50000) Federal Programs: SJCOE Head Start Cluster (AL#93.600) ? collectively referred to herein as ?Head Start?. Criteria: Per the Uniform Guidance Compliance Supplement, established in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F: Sections A. Activities Allowed or Unallowed, and B. Allowable Costs require that costs charged be supported by appropriate documentation, and correctly charged as to account, amount and period. Condition: The District was unable to provide supporting documentation for payroll for one employee charged to the Head Start program. The Uniform Guidance compliance also require internal control procedures to be in place and followed in order to demonstrate compliance with the requirements. As a result, the District did not have appropriate internal control procedures in place, nor was the expenditure compliant with Uniform Guidance requirements. Effect: The District did not comply with the necessary requirements for maintaining supporting documentation for payroll expenditures charged to the program, therefore resulting in risk of loss of funding for amounts paid. Cause: The District did not follow necessary internal controls for ensuring compliance with the specific program requirements of the Head Start grants it received and expended during the year ended June 30, 2022. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs are $12,614 and likely questioned costs are $15,623, totaling $28,237. Recommendation: The District?s management team should implement necessary internal controls to ensure compliance with all Federal program requirements. The internal controls should include (1) a procedure identifying which attributes apply to each Federal program operated by the District, and (2) steps to ensure compliance with each attribute identified as applicable. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management concurs with findings. District management will continue to provide staff members internal control procedure training specifically in the areas of federal procurement. This will ensure adherence to Federal program requirements.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management concurs with findings. District management will continue to provide staff members internal control procedure training specifically in the areas of federal procurement. This will ensure adherence to Federal program requirements.
FAC accepted this audit on July 12, 2022 — management decision was due January 12, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on May 4, 2021 — management decision was due November 4, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on April 19, 2020 — management decision was due October 19, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on March 20, 2019 — management decision was due September 20, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on January 29, 2018 — management decision was due July 29, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on January 22, 2017 — management decision was due July 22, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in California →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
