← Back to home

Windsor Unified School DistrictLocal Government

EIN: 946002635

UEI: JFKDY4FHYAR6

Audited by: Christy White Inc

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

Windsor Unified School District107 audit years9 findings3 repeat
107
Audit Years
9
Total Findings
3
Repeat Findings
$4M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,964,370 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on January 21, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 21, 2026 (45 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$21,323,119 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 5, 2026 — management decision was due July 5, 2026.

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,876,381 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 10, 2026 — management decision was due August 10, 2026.

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,387,290 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 7, 2026 — management decision was due July 7, 2026.

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,089,836 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 9, 2026 — management decision was due July 9, 2026.

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,408,204 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 15, 2025 — management decision was due June 15, 2026.

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,127,923 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 14, 2026 — management decision was due July 14, 2026.

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,396,319 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 15, 2026 — management decision was due July 15, 2026.

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,804,936 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 20, 2026 — management decision was due August 20, 2026.

FY 2024-06-30

$2,838,114 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 9, 2024 — management decision was due June 9, 2025.

2024-001
Cost Allowability
REPEAT OF 2023-001OTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Five of five employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2023-24 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we were able to review alternative documentation to determine that employees charged to the program were allowable. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the District prepares time certification semi‐annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan on following page.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING #2024-001: ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES – TIME AND EFFORT REPORTING (50000) Assistance Listing Number and Title: 84.425 ‐ Education Stabilization Fund Discretionary Grants: Elementary, Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Education; Passed through California Department of Education Criteria: Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, requires an accounting for personnel time on multi‐funded positions by the time spent on each program and to semi‐annually certify positions charged 100% to federal programs. Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: • Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges areaccurate, allowable, and properly allocated; • Be incorporated into the official records of the non‐Federal entity • Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non‐Federal entity, notexceeding 100% of compensated activities • Encompass both federally assisted and all other activities compensated by the non‐Federal entity on anintegrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non‐Federal entity’s writtenpolicy; • Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non‐Federal entity. • Support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if theemployee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non‐Federal award; an indirect costactivity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocationbases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. • Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify assupport for charges to Federal awards but may be used for interim accounting purposes. Condition: Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Five of five employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2023-24 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we were able to review alternative documentation to determine that employees charged to the program were allowable. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the District prepares time certification semi‐annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan on following page.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING #2024-001: ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES TIME AND EFFORT REPORTING (50000) Corrective Action Plan - The district has established specific time accounting procedures to ensure compliance with all federal requirements, These procedures apply to all relevant employees and are designed to maintain accurate and timely documentation of work hours. The Business Services Department will run a POS#l 1 report from Frontline ERP at month end to identify all employees whose salaries arc funded in whole or in part by federal funds and will send reports directly to school site managers to get signatures from employees and site administrators.

Prior Finding References

2023-001

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2024-06-30

$1,986,448 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 11, 2024 — management decision was due June 11, 2025.

2024-001
Cost Allowability
REPEAT OF 2023-001OTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Five of five employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2023-24 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we were able to review alternative documentation to determine that employees charged to the program were allowable. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the District prepares time certification semi‐annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan on following page.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING #2024-001: ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES – TIME AND EFFORT REPORTING (50000) Assistance Listing Number and Title: 84.425 ‐ Education Stabilization Fund Discretionary Grants: Elementary, Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Education; Passed through California Department of Education Criteria: Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, requires an accounting for personnel time on multi‐funded positions by the time spent on each program and to semi‐annually certify positions charged 100% to federal programs. Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: • Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges areaccurate, allowable, and properly allocated; • Be incorporated into the official records of the non‐Federal entity • Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non‐Federal entity, notexceeding 100% of compensated activities • Encompass both federally assisted and all other activities compensated by the non‐Federal entity on anintegrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non‐Federal entity’s writtenpolicy; • Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non‐Federal entity. • Support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if theemployee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non‐Federal award; an indirect costactivity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocationbases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. • Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify assupport for charges to Federal awards but may be used for interim accounting purposes. Condition: Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Five of five employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2023-24 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we were able to review alternative documentation to determine that employees charged to the program were allowable. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the District prepares time certification semi‐annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan on following page.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING #2024-001: ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES TIME AND EFFORT REPORTING (50000) Corrective Action Plan - The district has established specific time accounting procedures to ensure compliance with all federal requirements, These procedures apply to all relevant employees and are designed to maintain accurate and timely documentation of work hours. The Business Services Department will run a POS#l 1 report from Frontline ERP at month end to identify all employees whose salaries arc funded in whole or in part by federal funds and will send reports directly to school site managers to get signatures from employees and site administrators.

Prior Finding References

2023-001

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,481,223 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 18, 2024 — management decision was due June 18, 2025.

2024-001
Cost Allowability
REPEAT OF 2023-001OTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Five of five employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2023-24 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we were able to review alternative documentation to determine that employees charged to the program were allowable. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the District prepares time certification semi‐annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan on following page.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING #2024-001: ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES – TIME AND EFFORT REPORTING (50000) Assistance Listing Number and Title: 84.425 ‐ Education Stabilization Fund Discretionary Grants: Elementary, Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Education; Passed through California Department of Education Criteria: Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, requires an accounting for personnel time on multi‐funded positions by the time spent on each program and to semi‐annually certify positions charged 100% to federal programs. Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: • Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges areaccurate, allowable, and properly allocated; • Be incorporated into the official records of the non‐Federal entity • Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non‐Federal entity, notexceeding 100% of compensated activities • Encompass both federally assisted and all other activities compensated by the non‐Federal entity on anintegrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non‐Federal entity’s writtenpolicy; • Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non‐Federal entity. • Support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if theemployee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non‐Federal award; an indirect costactivity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocationbases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. • Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify assupport for charges to Federal awards but may be used for interim accounting purposes. Condition: Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Five of five employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2023-24 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we were able to review alternative documentation to determine that employees charged to the program were allowable. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the District prepares time certification semi‐annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan on following page.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING #2024-001: ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES TIME AND EFFORT REPORTING (50000) Corrective Action Plan - The district has established specific time accounting procedures to ensure compliance with all federal requirements, These procedures apply to all relevant employees and are designed to maintain accurate and timely documentation of work hours. The Business Services Department will run a POS#l 1 report from Frontline ERP at month end to identify all employees whose salaries arc funded in whole or in part by federal funds and will send reports directly to school site managers to get signatures from employees and site administrators.

Prior Finding References

2023-001

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$24,664,900 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 19, 2024 — management decision was due June 19, 2025.

2024-001
Cost Allowability
REPEAT OF 2023-001OTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Five of five employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2023-24 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we were able to review alternative documentation to determine that employees charged to the program were allowable. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the District prepares time certification semi‐annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan on following page.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING #2024-001: ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES – TIME AND EFFORT REPORTING (50000) Assistance Listing Number and Title: 84.425 ‐ Education Stabilization Fund Discretionary Grants: Elementary, Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Education; Passed through California Department of Education Criteria: Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, requires an accounting for personnel time on multi‐funded positions by the time spent on each program and to semi‐annually certify positions charged 100% to federal programs. Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: • Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges areaccurate, allowable, and properly allocated; • Be incorporated into the official records of the non‐Federal entity • Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non‐Federal entity, notexceeding 100% of compensated activities • Encompass both federally assisted and all other activities compensated by the non‐Federal entity on anintegrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non‐Federal entity’s writtenpolicy; • Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non‐Federal entity. • Support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if theemployee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non‐Federal award; an indirect costactivity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocationbases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. • Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify assupport for charges to Federal awards but may be used for interim accounting purposes. Condition: Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Five of five employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2023-24 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we were able to review alternative documentation to determine that employees charged to the program were allowable. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the District prepares time certification semi‐annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan on following page.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING #2024-001: ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES TIME AND EFFORT REPORTING (50000) Corrective Action Plan - The district has established specific time accounting procedures to ensure compliance with all federal requirements, These procedures apply to all relevant employees and are designed to maintain accurate and timely documentation of work hours. The Business Services Department will run a POS#l 1 report from Frontline ERP at month end to identify all employees whose salaries arc funded in whole or in part by federal funds and will send reports directly to school site managers to get signatures from employees and site administrators.

Prior Finding References

2023-001

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,365,156 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 8, 2025 — management decision was due July 8, 2025.

2024-001
Cost Allowability
REPEAT OF 2023-001OTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Five of five employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2023-24 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we were able to review alternative documentation to determine that employees charged to the program were allowable. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the District prepares time certification semi‐annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan on following page.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING #2024-001: ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES – TIME AND EFFORT REPORTING (50000) Assistance Listing Number and Title: 84.425 ‐ Education Stabilization Fund Discretionary Grants: Elementary, Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Education; Passed through California Department of Education Criteria: Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, requires an accounting for personnel time on multi‐funded positions by the time spent on each program and to semi‐annually certify positions charged 100% to federal programs. Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: • Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges areaccurate, allowable, and properly allocated; • Be incorporated into the official records of the non‐Federal entity • Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non‐Federal entity, notexceeding 100% of compensated activities • Encompass both federally assisted and all other activities compensated by the non‐Federal entity on anintegrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non‐Federal entity’s writtenpolicy; • Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non‐Federal entity. • Support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if theemployee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non‐Federal award; an indirect costactivity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocationbases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. • Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify assupport for charges to Federal awards but may be used for interim accounting purposes. Condition: Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Five of five employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2023-24 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we were able to review alternative documentation to determine that employees charged to the program were allowable. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the District prepares time certification semi‐annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan on following page.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING #2024-001: ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES TIME AND EFFORT REPORTING (50000) Corrective Action Plan - The district has established specific time accounting procedures to ensure compliance with all federal requirements, These procedures apply to all relevant employees and are designed to maintain accurate and timely documentation of work hours. The Business Services Department will run a POS#l 1 report from Frontline ERP at month end to identify all employees whose salaries arc funded in whole or in part by federal funds and will send reports directly to school site managers to get signatures from employees and site administrators.

Prior Finding References

2023-001

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,245,796 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 20, 2024 — management decision was due June 20, 2025.

2024-001
Cost Allowability
REPEAT OF 2023-001OTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Five of five employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2023-24 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we were able to review alternative documentation to determine that employees charged to the program were allowable. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the District prepares time certification semi‐annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan on following page.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING #2024-001: ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES – TIME AND EFFORT REPORTING (50000) Assistance Listing Number and Title: 84.425 ‐ Education Stabilization Fund Discretionary Grants: Elementary, Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Education; Passed through California Department of Education Criteria: Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, requires an accounting for personnel time on multi‐funded positions by the time spent on each program and to semi‐annually certify positions charged 100% to federal programs. Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: • Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges areaccurate, allowable, and properly allocated; • Be incorporated into the official records of the non‐Federal entity • Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non‐Federal entity, notexceeding 100% of compensated activities • Encompass both federally assisted and all other activities compensated by the non‐Federal entity on anintegrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non‐Federal entity’s writtenpolicy; • Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non‐Federal entity. • Support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if theemployee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non‐Federal award; an indirect costactivity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocationbases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. • Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify assupport for charges to Federal awards but may be used for interim accounting purposes. Condition: Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Five of five employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2023-24 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we were able to review alternative documentation to determine that employees charged to the program were allowable. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the District prepares time certification semi‐annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan on following page.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING #2024-001: ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES TIME AND EFFORT REPORTING (50000) Corrective Action Plan - The district has established specific time accounting procedures to ensure compliance with all federal requirements, These procedures apply to all relevant employees and are designed to maintain accurate and timely documentation of work hours. The Business Services Department will run a POS#l 1 report from Frontline ERP at month end to identify all employees whose salaries arc funded in whole or in part by federal funds and will send reports directly to school site managers to get signatures from employees and site administrators.

Prior Finding References

2023-001

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,429,645 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 20, 2024 — management decision was due June 20, 2025.

2024-001
Cost Allowability
REPEAT OF 2023-001OTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Five of five employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2023-24 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we were able to review alternative documentation to determine that employees charged to the program were allowable. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the District prepares time certification semi‐annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan on following page.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING #2024-001: ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES – TIME AND EFFORT REPORTING (50000) Assistance Listing Number and Title: 84.425 ‐ Education Stabilization Fund Discretionary Grants: Elementary, Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Education; Passed through California Department of Education Criteria: Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, requires an accounting for personnel time on multi‐funded positions by the time spent on each program and to semi‐annually certify positions charged 100% to federal programs. Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: • Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges areaccurate, allowable, and properly allocated; • Be incorporated into the official records of the non‐Federal entity • Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non‐Federal entity, notexceeding 100% of compensated activities • Encompass both federally assisted and all other activities compensated by the non‐Federal entity on anintegrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non‐Federal entity’s writtenpolicy; • Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non‐Federal entity. • Support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if theemployee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non‐Federal award; an indirect costactivity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocationbases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. • Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify assupport for charges to Federal awards but may be used for interim accounting purposes. Condition: Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Five of five employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2023-24 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we were able to review alternative documentation to determine that employees charged to the program were allowable. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the District prepares time certification semi‐annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan on following page.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING #2024-001: ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES TIME AND EFFORT REPORTING (50000) Corrective Action Plan - The district has established specific time accounting procedures to ensure compliance with all federal requirements, These procedures apply to all relevant employees and are designed to maintain accurate and timely documentation of work hours. The Business Services Department will run a POS#l 1 report from Frontline ERP at month end to identify all employees whose salaries arc funded in whole or in part by federal funds and will send reports directly to school site managers to get signatures from employees and site administrators.

Prior Finding References

2023-001

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2024-06-30

$2,180,134 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 22, 2024 — management decision was due June 22, 2025.

2024-001
Cost Allowability
REPEAT OF 2023-001OTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Five of five employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2023-24 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we were able to review alternative documentation to determine that employees charged to the program were allowable. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the District prepares time certification semi‐annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan on following page.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING #2024-001: ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES – TIME AND EFFORT REPORTING (50000) Assistance Listing Number and Title: 84.425 ‐ Education Stabilization Fund Discretionary Grants: Elementary, Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Education; Passed through California Department of Education Criteria: Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, requires an accounting for personnel time on multi‐funded positions by the time spent on each program and to semi‐annually certify positions charged 100% to federal programs. Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: • Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges areaccurate, allowable, and properly allocated; • Be incorporated into the official records of the non‐Federal entity • Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non‐Federal entity, notexceeding 100% of compensated activities • Encompass both federally assisted and all other activities compensated by the non‐Federal entity on anintegrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non‐Federal entity’s writtenpolicy; • Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non‐Federal entity. • Support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if theemployee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non‐Federal award; an indirect costactivity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocationbases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. • Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify assupport for charges to Federal awards but may be used for interim accounting purposes. Condition: Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Five of five employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2023-24 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we were able to review alternative documentation to determine that employees charged to the program were allowable. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the District prepares time certification semi‐annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan on following page.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING #2024-001: ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES TIME AND EFFORT REPORTING (50000) Corrective Action Plan - The district has established specific time accounting procedures to ensure compliance with all federal requirements, These procedures apply to all relevant employees and are designed to maintain accurate and timely documentation of work hours. The Business Services Department will run a POS#l 1 report from Frontline ERP at month end to identify all employees whose salaries arc funded in whole or in part by federal funds and will send reports directly to school site managers to get signatures from employees and site administrators.

Prior Finding References

2023-001

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,546,182 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 23, 2024 — management decision was due June 23, 2025.

2024-001
Cost Allowability
REPEAT OF 2023-001OTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Five of five employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2023-24 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we were able to review alternative documentation to determine that employees charged to the program were allowable. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the District prepares time certification semi‐annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan on following page.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING #2024-001: ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES – TIME AND EFFORT REPORTING (50000) Assistance Listing Number and Title: 84.425 ‐ Education Stabilization Fund Discretionary Grants: Elementary, Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Education; Passed through California Department of Education Criteria: Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, requires an accounting for personnel time on multi‐funded positions by the time spent on each program and to semi‐annually certify positions charged 100% to federal programs. Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: • Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges areaccurate, allowable, and properly allocated; • Be incorporated into the official records of the non‐Federal entity • Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non‐Federal entity, notexceeding 100% of compensated activities • Encompass both federally assisted and all other activities compensated by the non‐Federal entity on anintegrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non‐Federal entity’s writtenpolicy; • Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non‐Federal entity. • Support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if theemployee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non‐Federal award; an indirect costactivity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocationbases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. • Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify assupport for charges to Federal awards but may be used for interim accounting purposes. Condition: Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Five of five employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2023-24 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we were able to review alternative documentation to determine that employees charged to the program were allowable. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the District prepares time certification semi‐annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan on following page.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING #2024-001: ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES TIME AND EFFORT REPORTING (50000) Corrective Action Plan - The district has established specific time accounting procedures to ensure compliance with all federal requirements, These procedures apply to all relevant employees and are designed to maintain accurate and timely documentation of work hours. The Business Services Department will run a POS#l 1 report from Frontline ERP at month end to identify all employees whose salaries arc funded in whole or in part by federal funds and will send reports directly to school site managers to get signatures from employees and site administrators.

Prior Finding References

2023-001

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,152,365 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 21, 2025 — management decision was due August 21, 2025.

2024-001
Cost Allowability
REPEAT OF 2023-001OTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Five of five employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2023-24 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we were able to review alternative documentation to determine that employees charged to the program were allowable. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the District prepares time certification semi‐annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan on following page.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING #2024-001: ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES – TIME AND EFFORT REPORTING (50000) Assistance Listing Number and Title: 84.425 ‐ Education Stabilization Fund Discretionary Grants: Elementary, Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Education; Passed through California Department of Education Criteria: Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, requires an accounting for personnel time on multi‐funded positions by the time spent on each program and to semi‐annually certify positions charged 100% to federal programs. Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: • Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges areaccurate, allowable, and properly allocated; • Be incorporated into the official records of the non‐Federal entity • Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non‐Federal entity, notexceeding 100% of compensated activities • Encompass both federally assisted and all other activities compensated by the non‐Federal entity on anintegrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non‐Federal entity’s writtenpolicy; • Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non‐Federal entity. • Support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if theemployee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non‐Federal award; an indirect costactivity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocationbases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. • Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify assupport for charges to Federal awards but may be used for interim accounting purposes. Condition: Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Five of five employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2023-24 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we were able to review alternative documentation to determine that employees charged to the program were allowable. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the District prepares time certification semi‐annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan on following page.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING #2024-001: ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES TIME AND EFFORT REPORTING (50000) Corrective Action Plan - The district has established specific time accounting procedures to ensure compliance with all federal requirements, These procedures apply to all relevant employees and are designed to maintain accurate and timely documentation of work hours. The Business Services Department will run a POS#l 1 report from Frontline ERP at month end to identify all employees whose salaries arc funded in whole or in part by federal funds and will send reports directly to school site managers to get signatures from employees and site administrators.

Prior Finding References

2023-001

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,785,143 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 3, 2025 — management decision was due July 3, 2025.

2024-001
Cost Allowability
REPEAT OF 2023-001OTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Five of five employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2023-24 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we were able to review alternative documentation to determine that employees charged to the program were allowable. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the District prepares time certification semi‐annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan on following page.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING #2024-001: ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES – TIME AND EFFORT REPORTING (50000) Assistance Listing Number and Title: 84.425 ‐ Education Stabilization Fund Discretionary Grants: Elementary, Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Education; Passed through California Department of Education Criteria: Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, requires an accounting for personnel time on multi‐funded positions by the time spent on each program and to semi‐annually certify positions charged 100% to federal programs. Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: • Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges areaccurate, allowable, and properly allocated; • Be incorporated into the official records of the non‐Federal entity • Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non‐Federal entity, notexceeding 100% of compensated activities • Encompass both federally assisted and all other activities compensated by the non‐Federal entity on anintegrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non‐Federal entity’s writtenpolicy; • Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non‐Federal entity. • Support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if theemployee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non‐Federal award; an indirect costactivity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocationbases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. • Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify assupport for charges to Federal awards but may be used for interim accounting purposes. Condition: Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Five of five employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2023-24 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we were able to review alternative documentation to determine that employees charged to the program were allowable. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the District prepares time certification semi‐annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan on following page.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING #2024-001: ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES TIME AND EFFORT REPORTING (50000) Corrective Action Plan - The district has established specific time accounting procedures to ensure compliance with all federal requirements, These procedures apply to all relevant employees and are designed to maintain accurate and timely documentation of work hours. The Business Services Department will run a POS#l 1 report from Frontline ERP at month end to identify all employees whose salaries arc funded in whole or in part by federal funds and will send reports directly to school site managers to get signatures from employees and site administrators.

Prior Finding References

2023-001

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2023-06-30

$1,901,599 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 18, 2023 — management decision was due June 18, 2024.

2023-001
Cost Allowability
OTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Six of six employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we were able to review alternative documentation to determine that employees charged to the program were allowable. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the District prepares time certification semi‐annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan on following page.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING #2023-001: ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES – TIME AND EFFORT REPORTING (50000) Assistance Listing Number and Title: 84.425 ‐ Education Stabilization Fund Discretionary Grants: Elementary, Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Education; Passed through California Department of Education Criteria: Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, requires an accounting for personnel time on multi‐funded positions by the time spent on each program and to semi‐annually certify positions charged 100% to federal programs. Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: • Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; • Be incorporated into the official records of the non‐Federal entity • Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non‐Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities • Encompass both federally assisted and all other activities compensated by the non‐Federal entity on an integrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non‐Federal entity’s written policy; • Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non‐Federal entity. • Support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non‐Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. • Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards but may be used for interim accounting purposes. Condition: Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Six of six employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we were able to review alternative documentation to determine that employees charged to the program were allowable. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the District prepares time certification semi‐annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan on following page.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING #2023-001 - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles - Time and Effort Reporting Corrective Action Plan: The District will prepare time certifications semi-annually for single-funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2023-001
Cost Allowability
OTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Three of three employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Three of three employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees.

Corrective Action Plan

In regards to the referenced finding in the final 2022-23 Fiscal Audit, we acknowledge that our record keeping was not in compliance with the ESSER funds provided to our District. This record keeping was completed in the past in regards to federal funding using PAR forms. Unfortunately, with the change of personnel in the 22-23 SY, this was overlooked. Now that this has been brought to our attention, we will provide training to the proper personnel. Going forward, we will provide PAR forms to the federally funded employees for signature. In turn, we will provide these signed forms to the auditors when requested. It is certainly our intent to always be in compliance with all funding sources. Please contact our district office for any further information

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,234,516 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 6, 2024 — management decision was due September 6, 2024.

2023-001
Cost Allowability
OTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Six of six employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we were able to review alternative documentation to determine that employees charged to the program were allowable. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the District prepares time certification semi‐annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan on following page.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING #2023-001: ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES – TIME AND EFFORT REPORTING (50000) Assistance Listing Number and Title: 84.425 ‐ Education Stabilization Fund Discretionary Grants: Elementary, Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Education; Passed through California Department of Education Criteria: Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, requires an accounting for personnel time on multi‐funded positions by the time spent on each program and to semi‐annually certify positions charged 100% to federal programs. Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: • Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; • Be incorporated into the official records of the non‐Federal entity • Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non‐Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities • Encompass both federally assisted and all other activities compensated by the non‐Federal entity on an integrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non‐Federal entity’s written policy; • Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non‐Federal entity. • Support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non‐Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. • Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards but may be used for interim accounting purposes. Condition: Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Six of six employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we were able to review alternative documentation to determine that employees charged to the program were allowable. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the District prepares time certification semi‐annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan on following page.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING #2023-001 - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles - Time and Effort Reporting Corrective Action Plan: The District will prepare time certifications semi-annually for single-funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2023-001
Cost Allowability
OTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Three of three employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Three of three employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees.

Corrective Action Plan

In regards to the referenced finding in the final 2022-23 Fiscal Audit, we acknowledge that our record keeping was not in compliance with the ESSER funds provided to our District. This record keeping was completed in the past in regards to federal funding using PAR forms. Unfortunately, with the change of personnel in the 22-23 SY, this was overlooked. Now that this has been brought to our attention, we will provide training to the proper personnel. Going forward, we will provide PAR forms to the federally funded employees for signature. In turn, we will provide these signed forms to the auditors when requested. It is certainly our intent to always be in compliance with all funding sources. Please contact our district office for any further information

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,033,109 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 4, 2024 — management decision was due September 4, 2024.

2023-001
Cost Allowability
OTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Six of six employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we were able to review alternative documentation to determine that employees charged to the program were allowable. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the District prepares time certification semi‐annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan on following page.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING #2023-001: ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES – TIME AND EFFORT REPORTING (50000) Assistance Listing Number and Title: 84.425 ‐ Education Stabilization Fund Discretionary Grants: Elementary, Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Education; Passed through California Department of Education Criteria: Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, requires an accounting for personnel time on multi‐funded positions by the time spent on each program and to semi‐annually certify positions charged 100% to federal programs. Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: • Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; • Be incorporated into the official records of the non‐Federal entity • Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non‐Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities • Encompass both federally assisted and all other activities compensated by the non‐Federal entity on an integrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non‐Federal entity’s written policy; • Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non‐Federal entity. • Support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non‐Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. • Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards but may be used for interim accounting purposes. Condition: Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Six of six employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we were able to review alternative documentation to determine that employees charged to the program were allowable. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the District prepares time certification semi‐annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan on following page.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING #2023-001 - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles - Time and Effort Reporting Corrective Action Plan: The District will prepare time certifications semi-annually for single-funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2023-001
Cost Allowability
OTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Three of three employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Three of three employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees.

Corrective Action Plan

In regards to the referenced finding in the final 2022-23 Fiscal Audit, we acknowledge that our record keeping was not in compliance with the ESSER funds provided to our District. This record keeping was completed in the past in regards to federal funding using PAR forms. Unfortunately, with the change of personnel in the 22-23 SY, this was overlooked. Now that this has been brought to our attention, we will provide training to the proper personnel. Going forward, we will provide PAR forms to the federally funded employees for signature. In turn, we will provide these signed forms to the auditors when requested. It is certainly our intent to always be in compliance with all funding sources. Please contact our district office for any further information

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$20,599,151 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 17, 2024 — management decision was due July 17, 2024.

2023-001
Cost Allowability
OTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Six of six employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we were able to review alternative documentation to determine that employees charged to the program were allowable. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the District prepares time certification semi‐annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan on following page.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING #2023-001: ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES – TIME AND EFFORT REPORTING (50000) Assistance Listing Number and Title: 84.425 ‐ Education Stabilization Fund Discretionary Grants: Elementary, Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Education; Passed through California Department of Education Criteria: Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, requires an accounting for personnel time on multi‐funded positions by the time spent on each program and to semi‐annually certify positions charged 100% to federal programs. Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: • Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; • Be incorporated into the official records of the non‐Federal entity • Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non‐Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities • Encompass both federally assisted and all other activities compensated by the non‐Federal entity on an integrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non‐Federal entity’s written policy; • Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non‐Federal entity. • Support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non‐Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. • Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards but may be used for interim accounting purposes. Condition: Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Six of six employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we were able to review alternative documentation to determine that employees charged to the program were allowable. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the District prepares time certification semi‐annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan on following page.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING #2023-001 - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles - Time and Effort Reporting Corrective Action Plan: The District will prepare time certifications semi-annually for single-funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2023-001
Cost Allowability
OTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Three of three employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Three of three employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees.

Corrective Action Plan

In regards to the referenced finding in the final 2022-23 Fiscal Audit, we acknowledge that our record keeping was not in compliance with the ESSER funds provided to our District. This record keeping was completed in the past in regards to federal funding using PAR forms. Unfortunately, with the change of personnel in the 22-23 SY, this was overlooked. Now that this has been brought to our attention, we will provide training to the proper personnel. Going forward, we will provide PAR forms to the federally funded employees for signature. In turn, we will provide these signed forms to the auditors when requested. It is certainly our intent to always be in compliance with all funding sources. Please contact our district office for any further information

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2023-06-30

$3,821,656 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 15, 2024 — management decision was due August 15, 2024.

2023-001
Cost Allowability
OTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Six of six employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we were able to review alternative documentation to determine that employees charged to the program were allowable. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the District prepares time certification semi‐annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan on following page.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING #2023-001: ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES – TIME AND EFFORT REPORTING (50000) Assistance Listing Number and Title: 84.425 ‐ Education Stabilization Fund Discretionary Grants: Elementary, Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Education; Passed through California Department of Education Criteria: Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, requires an accounting for personnel time on multi‐funded positions by the time spent on each program and to semi‐annually certify positions charged 100% to federal programs. Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: • Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; • Be incorporated into the official records of the non‐Federal entity • Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non‐Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities • Encompass both federally assisted and all other activities compensated by the non‐Federal entity on an integrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non‐Federal entity’s written policy; • Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non‐Federal entity. • Support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non‐Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. • Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards but may be used for interim accounting purposes. Condition: Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Six of six employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we were able to review alternative documentation to determine that employees charged to the program were allowable. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the District prepares time certification semi‐annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan on following page.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING #2023-001 - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles - Time and Effort Reporting Corrective Action Plan: The District will prepare time certifications semi-annually for single-funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2023-001
Cost Allowability
OTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Three of three employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Three of three employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees.

Corrective Action Plan

In regards to the referenced finding in the final 2022-23 Fiscal Audit, we acknowledge that our record keeping was not in compliance with the ESSER funds provided to our District. This record keeping was completed in the past in regards to federal funding using PAR forms. Unfortunately, with the change of personnel in the 22-23 SY, this was overlooked. Now that this has been brought to our attention, we will provide training to the proper personnel. Going forward, we will provide PAR forms to the federally funded employees for signature. In turn, we will provide these signed forms to the auditors when requested. It is certainly our intent to always be in compliance with all funding sources. Please contact our district office for any further information

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,721,189 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 26, 2024 — management decision was due August 26, 2024.

2023-001
Cost Allowability
OTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Six of six employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we were able to review alternative documentation to determine that employees charged to the program were allowable. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the District prepares time certification semi‐annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan on following page.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING #2023-001: ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES – TIME AND EFFORT REPORTING (50000) Assistance Listing Number and Title: 84.425 ‐ Education Stabilization Fund Discretionary Grants: Elementary, Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Education; Passed through California Department of Education Criteria: Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, requires an accounting for personnel time on multi‐funded positions by the time spent on each program and to semi‐annually certify positions charged 100% to federal programs. Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: • Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; • Be incorporated into the official records of the non‐Federal entity • Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non‐Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities • Encompass both federally assisted and all other activities compensated by the non‐Federal entity on an integrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non‐Federal entity’s written policy; • Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non‐Federal entity. • Support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non‐Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. • Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards but may be used for interim accounting purposes. Condition: Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Six of six employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we were able to review alternative documentation to determine that employees charged to the program were allowable. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the District prepares time certification semi‐annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan on following page.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING #2023-001 - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles - Time and Effort Reporting Corrective Action Plan: The District will prepare time certifications semi-annually for single-funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2023-001
Cost Allowability
OTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Three of three employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Three of three employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees.

Corrective Action Plan

In regards to the referenced finding in the final 2022-23 Fiscal Audit, we acknowledge that our record keeping was not in compliance with the ESSER funds provided to our District. This record keeping was completed in the past in regards to federal funding using PAR forms. Unfortunately, with the change of personnel in the 22-23 SY, this was overlooked. Now that this has been brought to our attention, we will provide training to the proper personnel. Going forward, we will provide PAR forms to the federally funded employees for signature. In turn, we will provide these signed forms to the auditors when requested. It is certainly our intent to always be in compliance with all funding sources. Please contact our district office for any further information

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,286,322 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 15, 2024 — management decision was due September 15, 2024.

2023-001
Cost Allowability
OTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Six of six employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we were able to review alternative documentation to determine that employees charged to the program were allowable. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the District prepares time certification semi‐annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan on following page.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING #2023-001: ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES – TIME AND EFFORT REPORTING (50000) Assistance Listing Number and Title: 84.425 ‐ Education Stabilization Fund Discretionary Grants: Elementary, Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Education; Passed through California Department of Education Criteria: Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, requires an accounting for personnel time on multi‐funded positions by the time spent on each program and to semi‐annually certify positions charged 100% to federal programs. Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: • Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; • Be incorporated into the official records of the non‐Federal entity • Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non‐Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities • Encompass both federally assisted and all other activities compensated by the non‐Federal entity on an integrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non‐Federal entity’s written policy; • Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non‐Federal entity. • Support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non‐Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. • Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards but may be used for interim accounting purposes. Condition: Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Six of six employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we were able to review alternative documentation to determine that employees charged to the program were allowable. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the District prepares time certification semi‐annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan on following page.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING #2023-001 - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles - Time and Effort Reporting Corrective Action Plan: The District will prepare time certifications semi-annually for single-funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2023-001
Cost Allowability
OTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Three of three employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Three of three employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees.

Corrective Action Plan

In regards to the referenced finding in the final 2022-23 Fiscal Audit, we acknowledge that our record keeping was not in compliance with the ESSER funds provided to our District. This record keeping was completed in the past in regards to federal funding using PAR forms. Unfortunately, with the change of personnel in the 22-23 SY, this was overlooked. Now that this has been brought to our attention, we will provide training to the proper personnel. Going forward, we will provide PAR forms to the federally funded employees for signature. In turn, we will provide these signed forms to the auditors when requested. It is certainly our intent to always be in compliance with all funding sources. Please contact our district office for any further information

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,707,910 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 7, 2024 — management decision was due September 7, 2024.

2023-001
Cost Allowability
OTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Six of six employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we were able to review alternative documentation to determine that employees charged to the program were allowable. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the District prepares time certification semi‐annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan on following page.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING #2023-001: ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES – TIME AND EFFORT REPORTING (50000) Assistance Listing Number and Title: 84.425 ‐ Education Stabilization Fund Discretionary Grants: Elementary, Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Education; Passed through California Department of Education Criteria: Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, requires an accounting for personnel time on multi‐funded positions by the time spent on each program and to semi‐annually certify positions charged 100% to federal programs. Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: • Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; • Be incorporated into the official records of the non‐Federal entity • Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non‐Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities • Encompass both federally assisted and all other activities compensated by the non‐Federal entity on an integrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non‐Federal entity’s written policy; • Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non‐Federal entity. • Support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non‐Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. • Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards but may be used for interim accounting purposes. Condition: Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Six of six employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we were able to review alternative documentation to determine that employees charged to the program were allowable. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the District prepares time certification semi‐annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan on following page.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING #2023-001 - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles - Time and Effort Reporting Corrective Action Plan: The District will prepare time certifications semi-annually for single-funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2023-001
Cost Allowability
OTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Three of three employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Three of three employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees.

Corrective Action Plan

In regards to the referenced finding in the final 2022-23 Fiscal Audit, we acknowledge that our record keeping was not in compliance with the ESSER funds provided to our District. This record keeping was completed in the past in regards to federal funding using PAR forms. Unfortunately, with the change of personnel in the 22-23 SY, this was overlooked. Now that this has been brought to our attention, we will provide training to the proper personnel. Going forward, we will provide PAR forms to the federally funded employees for signature. In turn, we will provide these signed forms to the auditors when requested. It is certainly our intent to always be in compliance with all funding sources. Please contact our district office for any further information

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$20,599,151 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 16, 2024 — management decision was due August 16, 2024.

2023-001
Cost Allowability
OTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Six of six employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we were able to review alternative documentation to determine that employees charged to the program were allowable. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the District prepares time certification semi‐annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan on following page.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING #2023-001: ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES – TIME AND EFFORT REPORTING (50000) Assistance Listing Number and Title: 84.425 ‐ Education Stabilization Fund Discretionary Grants: Elementary, Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Education; Passed through California Department of Education Criteria: Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, requires an accounting for personnel time on multi‐funded positions by the time spent on each program and to semi‐annually certify positions charged 100% to federal programs. Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: • Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; • Be incorporated into the official records of the non‐Federal entity • Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non‐Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities • Encompass both federally assisted and all other activities compensated by the non‐Federal entity on an integrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non‐Federal entity’s written policy; • Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non‐Federal entity. • Support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non‐Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. • Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards but may be used for interim accounting purposes. Condition: Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Six of six employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we were able to review alternative documentation to determine that employees charged to the program were allowable. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the District prepares time certification semi‐annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan on following page.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING #2023-001 - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles - Time and Effort Reporting Corrective Action Plan: The District will prepare time certifications semi-annually for single-funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2023-001
Cost Allowability
OTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Three of three employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Three of three employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees.

Corrective Action Plan

In regards to the referenced finding in the final 2022-23 Fiscal Audit, we acknowledge that our record keeping was not in compliance with the ESSER funds provided to our District. This record keeping was completed in the past in regards to federal funding using PAR forms. Unfortunately, with the change of personnel in the 22-23 SY, this was overlooked. Now that this has been brought to our attention, we will provide training to the proper personnel. Going forward, we will provide PAR forms to the federally funded employees for signature. In turn, we will provide these signed forms to the auditors when requested. It is certainly our intent to always be in compliance with all funding sources. Please contact our district office for any further information

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2023-06-30

$1,636,538 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 8, 2024 — management decision was due August 8, 2024.

2023-001
Cost Allowability
OTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Six of six employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we were able to review alternative documentation to determine that employees charged to the program were allowable. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the District prepares time certification semi‐annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan on following page.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING #2023-001: ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES – TIME AND EFFORT REPORTING (50000) Assistance Listing Number and Title: 84.425 ‐ Education Stabilization Fund Discretionary Grants: Elementary, Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Education; Passed through California Department of Education Criteria: Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, requires an accounting for personnel time on multi‐funded positions by the time spent on each program and to semi‐annually certify positions charged 100% to federal programs. Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: • Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; • Be incorporated into the official records of the non‐Federal entity • Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non‐Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities • Encompass both federally assisted and all other activities compensated by the non‐Federal entity on an integrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non‐Federal entity’s written policy; • Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non‐Federal entity. • Support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non‐Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. • Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards but may be used for interim accounting purposes. Condition: Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Six of six employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we were able to review alternative documentation to determine that employees charged to the program were allowable. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the District prepares time certification semi‐annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan on following page.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING #2023-001 - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles - Time and Effort Reporting Corrective Action Plan: The District will prepare time certifications semi-annually for single-funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2023-001
Cost Allowability
OTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Three of three employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Three of three employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees.

Corrective Action Plan

In regards to the referenced finding in the final 2022-23 Fiscal Audit, we acknowledge that our record keeping was not in compliance with the ESSER funds provided to our District. This record keeping was completed in the past in regards to federal funding using PAR forms. Unfortunately, with the change of personnel in the 22-23 SY, this was overlooked. Now that this has been brought to our attention, we will provide training to the proper personnel. Going forward, we will provide PAR forms to the federally funded employees for signature. In turn, we will provide these signed forms to the auditors when requested. It is certainly our intent to always be in compliance with all funding sources. Please contact our district office for any further information

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,052,659 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 25, 2024 — management decision was due September 25, 2024.

2023-001
Cost Allowability
OTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Six of six employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we were able to review alternative documentation to determine that employees charged to the program were allowable. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the District prepares time certification semi‐annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan on following page.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING #2023-001: ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES – TIME AND EFFORT REPORTING (50000) Assistance Listing Number and Title: 84.425 ‐ Education Stabilization Fund Discretionary Grants: Elementary, Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Education; Passed through California Department of Education Criteria: Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, requires an accounting for personnel time on multi‐funded positions by the time spent on each program and to semi‐annually certify positions charged 100% to federal programs. Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: • Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; • Be incorporated into the official records of the non‐Federal entity • Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non‐Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities • Encompass both federally assisted and all other activities compensated by the non‐Federal entity on an integrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non‐Federal entity’s written policy; • Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non‐Federal entity. • Support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non‐Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. • Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards but may be used for interim accounting purposes. Condition: Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Six of six employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we were able to review alternative documentation to determine that employees charged to the program were allowable. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the District prepares time certification semi‐annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan on following page.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING #2023-001 - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles - Time and Effort Reporting Corrective Action Plan: The District will prepare time certifications semi-annually for single-funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2023-001
Cost Allowability
OTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Three of three employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Three of three employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees.

Corrective Action Plan

In regards to the referenced finding in the final 2022-23 Fiscal Audit, we acknowledge that our record keeping was not in compliance with the ESSER funds provided to our District. This record keeping was completed in the past in regards to federal funding using PAR forms. Unfortunately, with the change of personnel in the 22-23 SY, this was overlooked. Now that this has been brought to our attention, we will provide training to the proper personnel. Going forward, we will provide PAR forms to the federally funded employees for signature. In turn, we will provide these signed forms to the auditors when requested. It is certainly our intent to always be in compliance with all funding sources. Please contact our district office for any further information

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2023-06-30

$2,577,158 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 7, 2024 — management decision was due September 7, 2024.

2023-001
Cost Allowability
OTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Six of six employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we were able to review alternative documentation to determine that employees charged to the program were allowable. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the District prepares time certification semi‐annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan on following page.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING #2023-001: ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES – TIME AND EFFORT REPORTING (50000) Assistance Listing Number and Title: 84.425 ‐ Education Stabilization Fund Discretionary Grants: Elementary, Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Education; Passed through California Department of Education Criteria: Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, requires an accounting for personnel time on multi‐funded positions by the time spent on each program and to semi‐annually certify positions charged 100% to federal programs. Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: • Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; • Be incorporated into the official records of the non‐Federal entity • Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non‐Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities • Encompass both federally assisted and all other activities compensated by the non‐Federal entity on an integrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non‐Federal entity’s written policy; • Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non‐Federal entity. • Support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non‐Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. • Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards but may be used for interim accounting purposes. Condition: Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Six of six employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we were able to review alternative documentation to determine that employees charged to the program were allowable. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the District prepares time certification semi‐annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan on following page.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING #2023-001 - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles - Time and Effort Reporting Corrective Action Plan: The District will prepare time certifications semi-annually for single-funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2023-001
Cost Allowability
OTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Three of three employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Three of three employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees.

Corrective Action Plan

In regards to the referenced finding in the final 2022-23 Fiscal Audit, we acknowledge that our record keeping was not in compliance with the ESSER funds provided to our District. This record keeping was completed in the past in regards to federal funding using PAR forms. Unfortunately, with the change of personnel in the 22-23 SY, this was overlooked. Now that this has been brought to our attention, we will provide training to the proper personnel. Going forward, we will provide PAR forms to the federally funded employees for signature. In turn, we will provide these signed forms to the auditors when requested. It is certainly our intent to always be in compliance with all funding sources. Please contact our district office for any further information

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2023-06-30

$1,083,842 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 28, 2024 — management decision was due September 28, 2024.

2023-001
Cost Allowability
OTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Six of six employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we were able to review alternative documentation to determine that employees charged to the program were allowable. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the District prepares time certification semi‐annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan on following page.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING #2023-001: ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES – TIME AND EFFORT REPORTING (50000) Assistance Listing Number and Title: 84.425 ‐ Education Stabilization Fund Discretionary Grants: Elementary, Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Education; Passed through California Department of Education Criteria: Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, requires an accounting for personnel time on multi‐funded positions by the time spent on each program and to semi‐annually certify positions charged 100% to federal programs. Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: • Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; • Be incorporated into the official records of the non‐Federal entity • Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non‐Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities • Encompass both federally assisted and all other activities compensated by the non‐Federal entity on an integrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non‐Federal entity’s written policy; • Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non‐Federal entity. • Support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non‐Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. • Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards but may be used for interim accounting purposes. Condition: Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Six of six employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we were able to review alternative documentation to determine that employees charged to the program were allowable. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the District prepares time certification semi‐annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan on following page.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING #2023-001 - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles - Time and Effort Reporting Corrective Action Plan: The District will prepare time certifications semi-annually for single-funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2023-001
Cost Allowability
OTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Three of three employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund. Three of three employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund during the fiscal year did not have any time certifications on file for the 2022-23 year. It is required that the time certifications for single-funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multi- funded employees.

Corrective Action Plan

In regards to the referenced finding in the final 2022-23 Fiscal Audit, we acknowledge that our record keeping was not in compliance with the ESSER funds provided to our District. This record keeping was completed in the past in regards to federal funding using PAR forms. Unfortunately, with the change of personnel in the 22-23 SY, this was overlooked. Now that this has been brought to our attention, we will provide training to the proper personnel. Going forward, we will provide PAR forms to the federally funded employees for signature. In turn, we will provide these signed forms to the auditors when requested. It is certainly our intent to always be in compliance with all funding sources. Please contact our district office for any further information

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$9,623,142 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2023 — management decision was due September 29, 2023.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,925,305 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 19, 2023 — management decision was due July 19, 2023.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,195,871 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 19, 2023 — management decision was due July 19, 2023.

FY 2022-06-30

$1,962,970 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 24, 2023 — management decision was due July 24, 2023.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,859,763 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 1, 2023 — management decision was due August 1, 2023.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,402,818 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 1, 2023 — management decision was due August 1, 2023.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$22,441,540 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 23, 2023 — management decision was due July 23, 2023.

FY 2022-06-30

$2,885,722 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 5, 2023 — management decision was due October 5, 2023.

FY 2022-06-30

$3,558,369 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 9, 2022 — management decision was due June 9, 2023.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,885,165 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 21, 2023 — management decision was due September 21, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$22,326,751 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 14, 2022 — management decision was due August 14, 2022.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,885,310 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 1, 2022 — management decision was due August 1, 2022.

FY 2021-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSEDLOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,724,099 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 24, 2022 — management decision was due August 24, 2022.

FY 2021-06-30

$8,116,171 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 29, 2022 — management decision was due March 29, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,620,996 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 31, 2022 — management decision was due July 31, 2022.

FY 2021-06-30

$4,665,992 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 7, 2022 — management decision was due September 7, 2022.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,571,801 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 19, 2022 — management decision was due July 19, 2022.

FY 2021-06-30

$847,208 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 3, 2022 — management decision was due August 3, 2022.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,809,233 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 31, 2022 — management decision was due July 31, 2022.

FY 2021-06-30

$2,059,670 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 30, 2022 — management decision was due July 30, 2022.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,726,474 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 7, 2022 — management decision was due August 7, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

$1,278,018 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 18, 2021 — management decision was due July 18, 2021.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,002,060 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 12, 2021 — management decision was due October 12, 2021.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$918,284 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 31, 2021 — management decision was due October 1, 2021.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,135,872 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 4, 2021 — management decision was due September 4, 2021.

FY 2020-06-30

$3,926,542 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 30, 2021 — management decision was due March 30, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSEDLOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,126,287 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 11, 2021 — management decision was due September 11, 2021.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,166,306 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 26, 2021 — management decision was due August 26, 2021.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,546,245 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 28, 2021 — management decision was due August 28, 2021.

FY 2020-06-30

$1,823,473 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 3, 2021 — management decision was due July 3, 2021.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$17,032,264 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 31, 2021 — management decision was due October 1, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$21,175,772 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.

2019-004
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

The SPSA did not include the proposed expenditure of funds, allocated to the schools through the consolidated application, to address findings identified in needs assessment. Questioned Cost: None. We determined that Title I, Part A funds were spent on student support teachers and that payroll charges allocated to the Title I, Part A program were supported by time and effort distribution records in accordance with 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1)(vii). Context: The condition was noted at Binkley Elementary and Douglas Whited Elementary charter schools. Effect: The District did not comply with Federal and State requirements related to Title I Schoolwide Programs. Cause: The District office did not review the SPSA prepared by school sites to ensure that they complied with Federal and State requirements. Recommendation: The District office should review the Federal and State guidelines for preparing and documenting activities/expenditures in the SPSA.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

U.S. Department of Education - Passed through California Department of Education Title I Part A CFDA 84.010 2018-19 TITLE I SCHOOLWIDE PROGRAMS Criteria: Title I Schoolwide Programs (SWP) should consider the following general criteria when approving activities or expenditures supported with Title I, Part A funds: ? The activity/expenditure meets a need identified in the comprehensive needs assessment (ESSA Section 1114(b)(6); ? The activity/expenditure is included in the Single Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) (Education Code Section 64001(g)(C)(3). ? The activity/expenditure has been reviewed, approved, and recommended by the Schoolsite Council to the local governing board (Education Code Section 64001(d). Condition: The SPSA did not include the proposed expenditure of funds, allocated to the schools through the consolidated application, to address findings identified in needs assessment. Questioned Cost: None. We determined that Title I, Part A funds were spent on student support teachers and that payroll charges allocated to the Title I, Part A program were supported by time and effort distribution records in accordance with 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1)(vii). Context: The condition was noted at Binkley Elementary and Douglas Whited Elementary charter schools. Effect: The District did not comply with Federal and State requirements related to Title I Schoolwide Programs. Cause: The District office did not review the SPSA prepared by school sites to ensure that they complied with Federal and State requirements. Recommendation: The District office should review the Federal and State guidelines for preparing and documenting activities/expenditures in the SPSA.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action: The District will provide training to all administrative staff responsible for developing the SPSA and also implement a mandatory review process by both the curriculum and business services departments before SPSA are brought to the board for approval. The District will also regularly review all pertinent budgets to ensure expenditures of these funds are consist with the SPSA. Individual Item in Finding: The SPSA plans did not included proposed expenditure of funds allocated to the school through the consolidated application. Proper staff training and a rigorous review process will ensure that future SPSA plans will be compliant.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2019-06-30

$1,526,323 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.

2019-004
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

The SPSA did not include the proposed expenditure of funds, allocated to the schools through the consolidated application, to address findings identified in needs assessment. Questioned Cost: None. We determined that Title I, Part A funds were spent on student support teachers and that payroll charges allocated to the Title I, Part A program were supported by time and effort distribution records in accordance with 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1)(vii). Context: The condition was noted at Binkley Elementary and Douglas Whited Elementary charter schools. Effect: The District did not comply with Federal and State requirements related to Title I Schoolwide Programs. Cause: The District office did not review the SPSA prepared by school sites to ensure that they complied with Federal and State requirements. Recommendation: The District office should review the Federal and State guidelines for preparing and documenting activities/expenditures in the SPSA.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

U.S. Department of Education - Passed through California Department of Education Title I Part A CFDA 84.010 2018-19 TITLE I SCHOOLWIDE PROGRAMS Criteria: Title I Schoolwide Programs (SWP) should consider the following general criteria when approving activities or expenditures supported with Title I, Part A funds: ? The activity/expenditure meets a need identified in the comprehensive needs assessment (ESSA Section 1114(b)(6); ? The activity/expenditure is included in the Single Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) (Education Code Section 64001(g)(C)(3). ? The activity/expenditure has been reviewed, approved, and recommended by the Schoolsite Council to the local governing board (Education Code Section 64001(d). Condition: The SPSA did not include the proposed expenditure of funds, allocated to the schools through the consolidated application, to address findings identified in needs assessment. Questioned Cost: None. We determined that Title I, Part A funds were spent on student support teachers and that payroll charges allocated to the Title I, Part A program were supported by time and effort distribution records in accordance with 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1)(vii). Context: The condition was noted at Binkley Elementary and Douglas Whited Elementary charter schools. Effect: The District did not comply with Federal and State requirements related to Title I Schoolwide Programs. Cause: The District office did not review the SPSA prepared by school sites to ensure that they complied with Federal and State requirements. Recommendation: The District office should review the Federal and State guidelines for preparing and documenting activities/expenditures in the SPSA.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action: The District will provide training to all administrative staff responsible for developing the SPSA and also implement a mandatory review process by both the curriculum and business services departments before SPSA are brought to the board for approval. The District will also regularly review all pertinent budgets to ensure expenditures of these funds are consist with the SPSA. Individual Item in Finding: The SPSA plans did not included proposed expenditure of funds allocated to the school through the consolidated application. Proper staff training and a rigorous review process will ensure that future SPSA plans will be compliant.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,088,387 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.

2019-004
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

The SPSA did not include the proposed expenditure of funds, allocated to the schools through the consolidated application, to address findings identified in needs assessment. Questioned Cost: None. We determined that Title I, Part A funds were spent on student support teachers and that payroll charges allocated to the Title I, Part A program were supported by time and effort distribution records in accordance with 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1)(vii). Context: The condition was noted at Binkley Elementary and Douglas Whited Elementary charter schools. Effect: The District did not comply with Federal and State requirements related to Title I Schoolwide Programs. Cause: The District office did not review the SPSA prepared by school sites to ensure that they complied with Federal and State requirements. Recommendation: The District office should review the Federal and State guidelines for preparing and documenting activities/expenditures in the SPSA.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

U.S. Department of Education - Passed through California Department of Education Title I Part A CFDA 84.010 2018-19 TITLE I SCHOOLWIDE PROGRAMS Criteria: Title I Schoolwide Programs (SWP) should consider the following general criteria when approving activities or expenditures supported with Title I, Part A funds: ? The activity/expenditure meets a need identified in the comprehensive needs assessment (ESSA Section 1114(b)(6); ? The activity/expenditure is included in the Single Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) (Education Code Section 64001(g)(C)(3). ? The activity/expenditure has been reviewed, approved, and recommended by the Schoolsite Council to the local governing board (Education Code Section 64001(d). Condition: The SPSA did not include the proposed expenditure of funds, allocated to the schools through the consolidated application, to address findings identified in needs assessment. Questioned Cost: None. We determined that Title I, Part A funds were spent on student support teachers and that payroll charges allocated to the Title I, Part A program were supported by time and effort distribution records in accordance with 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1)(vii). Context: The condition was noted at Binkley Elementary and Douglas Whited Elementary charter schools. Effect: The District did not comply with Federal and State requirements related to Title I Schoolwide Programs. Cause: The District office did not review the SPSA prepared by school sites to ensure that they complied with Federal and State requirements. Recommendation: The District office should review the Federal and State guidelines for preparing and documenting activities/expenditures in the SPSA.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action: The District will provide training to all administrative staff responsible for developing the SPSA and also implement a mandatory review process by both the curriculum and business services departments before SPSA are brought to the board for approval. The District will also regularly review all pertinent budgets to ensure expenditures of these funds are consist with the SPSA. Individual Item in Finding: The SPSA plans did not included proposed expenditure of funds allocated to the school through the consolidated application. Proper staff training and a rigorous review process will ensure that future SPSA plans will be compliant.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,242,486 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.

2019-004
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

The SPSA did not include the proposed expenditure of funds, allocated to the schools through the consolidated application, to address findings identified in needs assessment. Questioned Cost: None. We determined that Title I, Part A funds were spent on student support teachers and that payroll charges allocated to the Title I, Part A program were supported by time and effort distribution records in accordance with 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1)(vii). Context: The condition was noted at Binkley Elementary and Douglas Whited Elementary charter schools. Effect: The District did not comply with Federal and State requirements related to Title I Schoolwide Programs. Cause: The District office did not review the SPSA prepared by school sites to ensure that they complied with Federal and State requirements. Recommendation: The District office should review the Federal and State guidelines for preparing and documenting activities/expenditures in the SPSA.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

U.S. Department of Education - Passed through California Department of Education Title I Part A CFDA 84.010 2018-19 TITLE I SCHOOLWIDE PROGRAMS Criteria: Title I Schoolwide Programs (SWP) should consider the following general criteria when approving activities or expenditures supported with Title I, Part A funds: ? The activity/expenditure meets a need identified in the comprehensive needs assessment (ESSA Section 1114(b)(6); ? The activity/expenditure is included in the Single Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) (Education Code Section 64001(g)(C)(3). ? The activity/expenditure has been reviewed, approved, and recommended by the Schoolsite Council to the local governing board (Education Code Section 64001(d). Condition: The SPSA did not include the proposed expenditure of funds, allocated to the schools through the consolidated application, to address findings identified in needs assessment. Questioned Cost: None. We determined that Title I, Part A funds were spent on student support teachers and that payroll charges allocated to the Title I, Part A program were supported by time and effort distribution records in accordance with 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1)(vii). Context: The condition was noted at Binkley Elementary and Douglas Whited Elementary charter schools. Effect: The District did not comply with Federal and State requirements related to Title I Schoolwide Programs. Cause: The District office did not review the SPSA prepared by school sites to ensure that they complied with Federal and State requirements. Recommendation: The District office should review the Federal and State guidelines for preparing and documenting activities/expenditures in the SPSA.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action: The District will provide training to all administrative staff responsible for developing the SPSA and also implement a mandatory review process by both the curriculum and business services departments before SPSA are brought to the board for approval. The District will also regularly review all pertinent budgets to ensure expenditures of these funds are consist with the SPSA. Individual Item in Finding: The SPSA plans did not included proposed expenditure of funds allocated to the school through the consolidated application. Proper staff training and a rigorous review process will ensure that future SPSA plans will be compliant.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,138,214 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.

2019-004
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

The SPSA did not include the proposed expenditure of funds, allocated to the schools through the consolidated application, to address findings identified in needs assessment. Questioned Cost: None. We determined that Title I, Part A funds were spent on student support teachers and that payroll charges allocated to the Title I, Part A program were supported by time and effort distribution records in accordance with 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1)(vii). Context: The condition was noted at Binkley Elementary and Douglas Whited Elementary charter schools. Effect: The District did not comply with Federal and State requirements related to Title I Schoolwide Programs. Cause: The District office did not review the SPSA prepared by school sites to ensure that they complied with Federal and State requirements. Recommendation: The District office should review the Federal and State guidelines for preparing and documenting activities/expenditures in the SPSA.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

U.S. Department of Education - Passed through California Department of Education Title I Part A CFDA 84.010 2018-19 TITLE I SCHOOLWIDE PROGRAMS Criteria: Title I Schoolwide Programs (SWP) should consider the following general criteria when approving activities or expenditures supported with Title I, Part A funds: ? The activity/expenditure meets a need identified in the comprehensive needs assessment (ESSA Section 1114(b)(6); ? The activity/expenditure is included in the Single Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) (Education Code Section 64001(g)(C)(3). ? The activity/expenditure has been reviewed, approved, and recommended by the Schoolsite Council to the local governing board (Education Code Section 64001(d). Condition: The SPSA did not include the proposed expenditure of funds, allocated to the schools through the consolidated application, to address findings identified in needs assessment. Questioned Cost: None. We determined that Title I, Part A funds were spent on student support teachers and that payroll charges allocated to the Title I, Part A program were supported by time and effort distribution records in accordance with 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1)(vii). Context: The condition was noted at Binkley Elementary and Douglas Whited Elementary charter schools. Effect: The District did not comply with Federal and State requirements related to Title I Schoolwide Programs. Cause: The District office did not review the SPSA prepared by school sites to ensure that they complied with Federal and State requirements. Recommendation: The District office should review the Federal and State guidelines for preparing and documenting activities/expenditures in the SPSA.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action: The District will provide training to all administrative staff responsible for developing the SPSA and also implement a mandatory review process by both the curriculum and business services departments before SPSA are brought to the board for approval. The District will also regularly review all pertinent budgets to ensure expenditures of these funds are consist with the SPSA. Individual Item in Finding: The SPSA plans did not included proposed expenditure of funds allocated to the school through the consolidated application. Proper staff training and a rigorous review process will ensure that future SPSA plans will be compliant.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2019-06-30

$1,817,057 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 26, 2020 — management decision was due July 26, 2020.

2019-004
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

The SPSA did not include the proposed expenditure of funds, allocated to the schools through the consolidated application, to address findings identified in needs assessment. Questioned Cost: None. We determined that Title I, Part A funds were spent on student support teachers and that payroll charges allocated to the Title I, Part A program were supported by time and effort distribution records in accordance with 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1)(vii). Context: The condition was noted at Binkley Elementary and Douglas Whited Elementary charter schools. Effect: The District did not comply with Federal and State requirements related to Title I Schoolwide Programs. Cause: The District office did not review the SPSA prepared by school sites to ensure that they complied with Federal and State requirements. Recommendation: The District office should review the Federal and State guidelines for preparing and documenting activities/expenditures in the SPSA.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

U.S. Department of Education - Passed through California Department of Education Title I Part A CFDA 84.010 2018-19 TITLE I SCHOOLWIDE PROGRAMS Criteria: Title I Schoolwide Programs (SWP) should consider the following general criteria when approving activities or expenditures supported with Title I, Part A funds: ? The activity/expenditure meets a need identified in the comprehensive needs assessment (ESSA Section 1114(b)(6); ? The activity/expenditure is included in the Single Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) (Education Code Section 64001(g)(C)(3). ? The activity/expenditure has been reviewed, approved, and recommended by the Schoolsite Council to the local governing board (Education Code Section 64001(d). Condition: The SPSA did not include the proposed expenditure of funds, allocated to the schools through the consolidated application, to address findings identified in needs assessment. Questioned Cost: None. We determined that Title I, Part A funds were spent on student support teachers and that payroll charges allocated to the Title I, Part A program were supported by time and effort distribution records in accordance with 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1)(vii). Context: The condition was noted at Binkley Elementary and Douglas Whited Elementary charter schools. Effect: The District did not comply with Federal and State requirements related to Title I Schoolwide Programs. Cause: The District office did not review the SPSA prepared by school sites to ensure that they complied with Federal and State requirements. Recommendation: The District office should review the Federal and State guidelines for preparing and documenting activities/expenditures in the SPSA.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action: The District will provide training to all administrative staff responsible for developing the SPSA and also implement a mandatory review process by both the curriculum and business services departments before SPSA are brought to the board for approval. The District will also regularly review all pertinent budgets to ensure expenditures of these funds are consist with the SPSA. Individual Item in Finding: The SPSA plans did not included proposed expenditure of funds allocated to the school through the consolidated application. Proper staff training and a rigorous review process will ensure that future SPSA plans will be compliant.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$953,862 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.

2019-004
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

The SPSA did not include the proposed expenditure of funds, allocated to the schools through the consolidated application, to address findings identified in needs assessment. Questioned Cost: None. We determined that Title I, Part A funds were spent on student support teachers and that payroll charges allocated to the Title I, Part A program were supported by time and effort distribution records in accordance with 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1)(vii). Context: The condition was noted at Binkley Elementary and Douglas Whited Elementary charter schools. Effect: The District did not comply with Federal and State requirements related to Title I Schoolwide Programs. Cause: The District office did not review the SPSA prepared by school sites to ensure that they complied with Federal and State requirements. Recommendation: The District office should review the Federal and State guidelines for preparing and documenting activities/expenditures in the SPSA.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

U.S. Department of Education - Passed through California Department of Education Title I Part A CFDA 84.010 2018-19 TITLE I SCHOOLWIDE PROGRAMS Criteria: Title I Schoolwide Programs (SWP) should consider the following general criteria when approving activities or expenditures supported with Title I, Part A funds: ? The activity/expenditure meets a need identified in the comprehensive needs assessment (ESSA Section 1114(b)(6); ? The activity/expenditure is included in the Single Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) (Education Code Section 64001(g)(C)(3). ? The activity/expenditure has been reviewed, approved, and recommended by the Schoolsite Council to the local governing board (Education Code Section 64001(d). Condition: The SPSA did not include the proposed expenditure of funds, allocated to the schools through the consolidated application, to address findings identified in needs assessment. Questioned Cost: None. We determined that Title I, Part A funds were spent on student support teachers and that payroll charges allocated to the Title I, Part A program were supported by time and effort distribution records in accordance with 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1)(vii). Context: The condition was noted at Binkley Elementary and Douglas Whited Elementary charter schools. Effect: The District did not comply with Federal and State requirements related to Title I Schoolwide Programs. Cause: The District office did not review the SPSA prepared by school sites to ensure that they complied with Federal and State requirements. Recommendation: The District office should review the Federal and State guidelines for preparing and documenting activities/expenditures in the SPSA.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action: The District will provide training to all administrative staff responsible for developing the SPSA and also implement a mandatory review process by both the curriculum and business services departments before SPSA are brought to the board for approval. The District will also regularly review all pertinent budgets to ensure expenditures of these funds are consist with the SPSA. Individual Item in Finding: The SPSA plans did not included proposed expenditure of funds allocated to the school through the consolidated application. Proper staff training and a rigorous review process will ensure that future SPSA plans will be compliant.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2019-06-30

$971,179 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.

2019-004
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

The SPSA did not include the proposed expenditure of funds, allocated to the schools through the consolidated application, to address findings identified in needs assessment. Questioned Cost: None. We determined that Title I, Part A funds were spent on student support teachers and that payroll charges allocated to the Title I, Part A program were supported by time and effort distribution records in accordance with 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1)(vii). Context: The condition was noted at Binkley Elementary and Douglas Whited Elementary charter schools. Effect: The District did not comply with Federal and State requirements related to Title I Schoolwide Programs. Cause: The District office did not review the SPSA prepared by school sites to ensure that they complied with Federal and State requirements. Recommendation: The District office should review the Federal and State guidelines for preparing and documenting activities/expenditures in the SPSA.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

U.S. Department of Education - Passed through California Department of Education Title I Part A CFDA 84.010 2018-19 TITLE I SCHOOLWIDE PROGRAMS Criteria: Title I Schoolwide Programs (SWP) should consider the following general criteria when approving activities or expenditures supported with Title I, Part A funds: ? The activity/expenditure meets a need identified in the comprehensive needs assessment (ESSA Section 1114(b)(6); ? The activity/expenditure is included in the Single Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) (Education Code Section 64001(g)(C)(3). ? The activity/expenditure has been reviewed, approved, and recommended by the Schoolsite Council to the local governing board (Education Code Section 64001(d). Condition: The SPSA did not include the proposed expenditure of funds, allocated to the schools through the consolidated application, to address findings identified in needs assessment. Questioned Cost: None. We determined that Title I, Part A funds were spent on student support teachers and that payroll charges allocated to the Title I, Part A program were supported by time and effort distribution records in accordance with 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1)(vii). Context: The condition was noted at Binkley Elementary and Douglas Whited Elementary charter schools. Effect: The District did not comply with Federal and State requirements related to Title I Schoolwide Programs. Cause: The District office did not review the SPSA prepared by school sites to ensure that they complied with Federal and State requirements. Recommendation: The District office should review the Federal and State guidelines for preparing and documenting activities/expenditures in the SPSA.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action: The District will provide training to all administrative staff responsible for developing the SPSA and also implement a mandatory review process by both the curriculum and business services departments before SPSA are brought to the board for approval. The District will also regularly review all pertinent budgets to ensure expenditures of these funds are consist with the SPSA. Individual Item in Finding: The SPSA plans did not included proposed expenditure of funds allocated to the school through the consolidated application. Proper staff training and a rigorous review process will ensure that future SPSA plans will be compliant.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2019-06-30

$4,018,871 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 25, 2020 — management decision was due September 25, 2020.

2019-004
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

The SPSA did not include the proposed expenditure of funds, allocated to the schools through the consolidated application, to address findings identified in needs assessment. Questioned Cost: None. We determined that Title I, Part A funds were spent on student support teachers and that payroll charges allocated to the Title I, Part A program were supported by time and effort distribution records in accordance with 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1)(vii). Context: The condition was noted at Binkley Elementary and Douglas Whited Elementary charter schools. Effect: The District did not comply with Federal and State requirements related to Title I Schoolwide Programs. Cause: The District office did not review the SPSA prepared by school sites to ensure that they complied with Federal and State requirements. Recommendation: The District office should review the Federal and State guidelines for preparing and documenting activities/expenditures in the SPSA.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

U.S. Department of Education - Passed through California Department of Education Title I Part A CFDA 84.010 2018-19 TITLE I SCHOOLWIDE PROGRAMS Criteria: Title I Schoolwide Programs (SWP) should consider the following general criteria when approving activities or expenditures supported with Title I, Part A funds: ? The activity/expenditure meets a need identified in the comprehensive needs assessment (ESSA Section 1114(b)(6); ? The activity/expenditure is included in the Single Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) (Education Code Section 64001(g)(C)(3). ? The activity/expenditure has been reviewed, approved, and recommended by the Schoolsite Council to the local governing board (Education Code Section 64001(d). Condition: The SPSA did not include the proposed expenditure of funds, allocated to the schools through the consolidated application, to address findings identified in needs assessment. Questioned Cost: None. We determined that Title I, Part A funds were spent on student support teachers and that payroll charges allocated to the Title I, Part A program were supported by time and effort distribution records in accordance with 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1)(vii). Context: The condition was noted at Binkley Elementary and Douglas Whited Elementary charter schools. Effect: The District did not comply with Federal and State requirements related to Title I Schoolwide Programs. Cause: The District office did not review the SPSA prepared by school sites to ensure that they complied with Federal and State requirements. Recommendation: The District office should review the Federal and State guidelines for preparing and documenting activities/expenditures in the SPSA.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action: The District will provide training to all administrative staff responsible for developing the SPSA and also implement a mandatory review process by both the curriculum and business services departments before SPSA are brought to the board for approval. The District will also regularly review all pertinent budgets to ensure expenditures of these funds are consist with the SPSA. Individual Item in Finding: The SPSA plans did not included proposed expenditure of funds allocated to the school through the consolidated application. Proper staff training and a rigorous review process will ensure that future SPSA plans will be compliant.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2019-06-30

$1,038,377 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.

2019-004
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

The SPSA did not include the proposed expenditure of funds, allocated to the schools through the consolidated application, to address findings identified in needs assessment. Questioned Cost: None. We determined that Title I, Part A funds were spent on student support teachers and that payroll charges allocated to the Title I, Part A program were supported by time and effort distribution records in accordance with 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1)(vii). Context: The condition was noted at Binkley Elementary and Douglas Whited Elementary charter schools. Effect: The District did not comply with Federal and State requirements related to Title I Schoolwide Programs. Cause: The District office did not review the SPSA prepared by school sites to ensure that they complied with Federal and State requirements. Recommendation: The District office should review the Federal and State guidelines for preparing and documenting activities/expenditures in the SPSA.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

U.S. Department of Education - Passed through California Department of Education Title I Part A CFDA 84.010 2018-19 TITLE I SCHOOLWIDE PROGRAMS Criteria: Title I Schoolwide Programs (SWP) should consider the following general criteria when approving activities or expenditures supported with Title I, Part A funds: ? The activity/expenditure meets a need identified in the comprehensive needs assessment (ESSA Section 1114(b)(6); ? The activity/expenditure is included in the Single Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) (Education Code Section 64001(g)(C)(3). ? The activity/expenditure has been reviewed, approved, and recommended by the Schoolsite Council to the local governing board (Education Code Section 64001(d). Condition: The SPSA did not include the proposed expenditure of funds, allocated to the schools through the consolidated application, to address findings identified in needs assessment. Questioned Cost: None. We determined that Title I, Part A funds were spent on student support teachers and that payroll charges allocated to the Title I, Part A program were supported by time and effort distribution records in accordance with 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1)(vii). Context: The condition was noted at Binkley Elementary and Douglas Whited Elementary charter schools. Effect: The District did not comply with Federal and State requirements related to Title I Schoolwide Programs. Cause: The District office did not review the SPSA prepared by school sites to ensure that they complied with Federal and State requirements. Recommendation: The District office should review the Federal and State guidelines for preparing and documenting activities/expenditures in the SPSA.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action: The District will provide training to all administrative staff responsible for developing the SPSA and also implement a mandatory review process by both the curriculum and business services departments before SPSA are brought to the board for approval. The District will also regularly review all pertinent budgets to ensure expenditures of these funds are consist with the SPSA. Individual Item in Finding: The SPSA plans did not included proposed expenditure of funds allocated to the school through the consolidated application. Proper staff training and a rigorous review process will ensure that future SPSA plans will be compliant.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2018-06-30

$895,949 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 18, 2018 — management decision was due June 18, 2019.

2018-001
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Eligibility →
2018-001
Cost Allowability / Eligibility / Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Eligibility, Special Tests and Provisions →
2018-002
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2018-06-30

UNMODIFIED OPINION, QUALIFIED OPINION$3,596,483 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 16, 2019 — management decision was due July 16, 2019.

2018-001
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Eligibility →
2018-001
Cost Allowability / Eligibility / Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Eligibility, Special Tests and Provisions →
2018-002
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,505,527 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 26, 2018 — management decision was due June 26, 2019.

2018-001
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Eligibility →
2018-001
Cost Allowability / Eligibility / Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Eligibility, Special Tests and Provisions →
2018-002
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,219,802 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 17, 2018 — management decision was due June 17, 2019.

2018-001
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Eligibility →
2018-001
Cost Allowability / Eligibility / Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Eligibility, Special Tests and Provisions →
2018-002
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2018-06-30

$1,046,706 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 3, 2019 — management decision was due July 3, 2019.

2018-001
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Eligibility →
2018-001
Cost Allowability / Eligibility / Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Eligibility, Special Tests and Provisions →
2018-002
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,950,034 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 14, 2019 — management decision was due July 14, 2019.

2018-001
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Eligibility →
2018-001
Cost Allowability / Eligibility / Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Eligibility, Special Tests and Provisions →
2018-002
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,065,781 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 8, 2019 — management decision was due July 8, 2019.

2018-001
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Eligibility →
2018-001
Cost Allowability / Eligibility / Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Eligibility, Special Tests and Provisions →
2018-002
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$21,553,655 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 20, 2018 — management decision was due June 20, 2019.

2018-001
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Eligibility →
2018-001
Cost Allowability / Eligibility / Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Eligibility, Special Tests and Provisions →
2018-002
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,833,061 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 30, 2019 — management decision was due July 30, 2019.

2018-001
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Eligibility →
2018-001
Cost Allowability / Eligibility / Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Eligibility, Special Tests and Provisions →
2018-002
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,846,229 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 5, 2019 — management decision was due August 5, 2019.

2018-001
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Eligibility →
2018-001
Cost Allowability / Eligibility / Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Eligibility, Special Tests and Provisions →
2018-002
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,360,435 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 18, 2017 — management decision was due June 18, 2018.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,582,338 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 20, 2017 — management decision was due June 20, 2018.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$919,798 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 16, 2018 — management decision was due July 16, 2018.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$19,539,357 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 8, 2018 — management decision was due July 8, 2018.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,126,968 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 4, 2018 — management decision was due August 4, 2018.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,912,452 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 19, 2017 — management decision was due June 19, 2018.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,659,600 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 18, 2019 — management decision was due August 18, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

$1,213,030 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 18, 2017 — management decision was due June 18, 2018.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,951,011 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 11, 2018 — management decision was due July 11, 2018.

FY 2017-06-30

$991,799 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 18, 2017 — management decision was due June 18, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,325,244 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 15, 2016 — management decision was due June 15, 2017.

2016-002
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2015-006

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-006

About Eligibility →
2016-003
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2015-006

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-006

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,126,614 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 7, 2016 — management decision was due June 7, 2017.

2016-002
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2015-006

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-006

About Eligibility →
2016-003
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2015-006

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-006

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,472,987 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2017 — management decision was due September 27, 2017.

2016-002
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2015-006

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-006

About Eligibility →
2016-003
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2015-006

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-006

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$22,517,840 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 19, 2016 — management decision was due June 19, 2017.

2016-002
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2015-006

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-006

About Eligibility →
2016-003
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2015-006

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-006

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2016-06-30

$797,253 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 21, 2016 — management decision was due June 21, 2017.

2016-002
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2015-006

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-006

About Eligibility →
2016-003
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2015-006

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-006

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,322,971 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 26, 2017 — management decision was due July 26, 2017.

2016-002
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2015-006

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-006

About Eligibility →
2016-003
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2015-006

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-006

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2016-06-30

$977,972 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 15, 2016 — management decision was due June 15, 2017.

2016-002
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2015-006

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-006

About Eligibility →
2016-003
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2015-006

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-006

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,402,861 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 15, 2016 — management decision was due June 15, 2017.

2016-002
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2015-006

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-006

About Eligibility →
2016-003
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2015-006

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-006

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,140,448 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 27, 2016 — management decision was due June 27, 2017.

2016-002
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2015-006

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-006

About Eligibility →
2016-003
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2015-006

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-006

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2016-06-30

$1,193,826 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 14, 2016 — management decision was due June 14, 2017.

2016-002
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2015-006

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-006

About Eligibility →
2016-003
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2015-006

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-006

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,151,627 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 18, 2016 — management decision was due June 18, 2017.

2016-002
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2015-006

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-006

About Eligibility →
2016-003
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2015-006

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-006

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,615,474 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 22, 2017 — management decision was due July 22, 2017.

2016-002
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2015-006

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-006

About Eligibility →
2016-003
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2015-006

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-006

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,937,401 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 23, 2017 — management decision was due August 23, 2017.

2016-002
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2015-006

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-006

About Eligibility →
2016-003
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2015-006

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-006

About Special Tests and Provisions →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in California

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.