EIN: 946002544
UEI: S63SP9SW2D22
Audited by: Christy White Inc
Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 2, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on February 2, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 2, 2026 (36 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on December 20, 2024 — management decision was due June 20, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on December 21, 2023 — management decision was due June 21, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on January 29, 2023 — management decision was due July 29, 2023.
The SPSA did not include the proposed expenditure of funds, allocated to the schools through the consolidated application, to address the findings identified in needs assessment. Questioned Cost: None. We determined that Title I, Part A funds were spent on student related services, and support teachers, whose payroll charges allocated to the Title I, Part A program were supported by time and effort distribution records in accordance with 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1)(vii). Context: The condition was noted at Wellington M. Smith, Jr. School and Salinas Community School. Effect: The County Office did not comply with Federal and State requirements related to Title I Schoolwide Programs. Cause: The County Office did not review the SPSA prepared by the school sites to ensure that it complied with Federal and State requirements. Recommendation: The County Office should review the Federal and State guidelines for preparing and documenting activities/expenditures in the SPSA. County Response: The Alternative Education Department has established a procedure to ensure that the relationship between the planned supplemental instructional program and the planned expenditures are clearly reflected in the School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA). Annually the department shall evaluate the effectiveness of the SPSA plan. The Alternative Education Department shall monitor student progress and if there is a need to modify the school?s plan in the current year, the Alternative Education Department shall update the SPSA and determine if a budget adjustment is required.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴SECTION III - FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS 2022 - 002 / 50000 U.S. Department of Education - Passed through California Department of Education Title I Part A ALN 84.010 2021-22 TITLE I SCHOOLWIDE PROGRAMS Criteria: Title I Schoolwide Programs (SWP) should always consider the following general criteria when approving activities or expenditures supported with Title I, Part A funds: ? The activity and/or expenditure meets a need identified in the comprehensive needs assessment (ESSA Section 1114(b)(6); ? The activity and/or expenditure is included in the approved Single Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) (Education Code Section 64001(g)(C)(3); ? The activity and/or expenditure has been reviewed, approved, and recommended by the School Site Council to the local governing board (Education Code Section 64001(d). Condition: The SPSA did not include the proposed expenditure of funds, allocated to the schools through the consolidated application, to address the findings identified in needs assessment. Questioned Cost: None. We determined that Title I, Part A funds were spent on student related services, and support teachers, whose payroll charges allocated to the Title I, Part A program were supported by time and effort distribution records in accordance with 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1)(vii). Context: The condition was noted at Wellington M. Smith, Jr. School and Salinas Community School. Effect: The County Office did not comply with Federal and State requirements related to Title I Schoolwide Programs. Cause: The County Office did not review the SPSA prepared by the school sites to ensure that it complied with Federal and State requirements. Recommendation: The County Office should review the Federal and State guidelines for preparing and documenting activities/expenditures in the SPSA. County Response: The Alternative Education Department has established a procedure to ensure that the relationship between the planned supplemental instructional program and the planned expenditures are clearly reflected in the School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA). Annually the department shall evaluate the effectiveness of the SPSA plan. The Alternative Education Department shall monitor student progress and if there is a need to modify the school?s plan in the current year, the Alternative Education Department shall update the SPSA and determine if a budget adjustment is required.
Finding 2022 ? 002/50000 Section III ? Federal Award Findings U.S. Department of Education ? Passed through California Department of Ed (Title I Part A) TITLE I SCHOOLWIDE PROGRAMS County Response: The Alternative Education Department has established a procedure to ensure that the relationship between the planned supplemental instructional program and the planned expenditures are clearly reflected in the School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA). Annually the department shall evaluate the effectiveness of the SPSA plan. The Alternative Education Department shall monitor student progress and if there is a need to modify the school?s plan in the current year, the Alternative Education Department shall update the SPSA and determine if a budget adjustment is required. Contact Person responsible for corrective action: Victoria Sorensen 831.784.4226 Ernesto Vela 831.755.1405 Completion Date: January 15, 2023
FAC accepted this audit on December 13, 2021 — management decision was due June 13, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on January 2, 2021 — management decision was due July 2, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on December 20, 2018 — management decision was due June 20, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on December 19, 2017 — management decision was due June 19, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on February 12, 2017 — management decision was due August 12, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in California →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
