← Back to home

Newman-Crows Landing Unified School DistrictLocal Government

EIN: 946002388

UEI: EW82UBKJM166

Audit also covers EIN: 770467526 · unlinked EINs have no separate FAC filing

Audited by: Eide Bailly

Oversight agency: 10 [Department of Agriculture]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 7, 2026

Newman-Crows Landing Unified School District137 audit years3 findings
137
Audit Years
3
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$4.7M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)
FY 2025-06-30FY 2025-06-30FY 2025-06-30FY 2025-06-30FY 2025-06-30FY 2025-06-30FY 2025-06-30FY 2025-06-30FY 2025-06-30FY 2025-06-30FY 2025-06-30FY 2025-06-30FY 2024-06-30FY 2024-06-30FY 2024-06-30FY 2024-06-30FY 2024-06-30FY 2024-06-30FY 2024-06-30FY 2024-06-30FY 2024-06-30FY 2024-06-30FY 2024-06-30FY 2024-06-30FY 2023-06-30FY 2023-06-30FY 2023-06-30FY 2023-06-30FY 2023-06-30FY 2023-06-30FY 2023-06-30FY 2023-06-30FY 2023-06-30FY 2023-06-30FY 2023-06-30FY 2023-06-30FY 2023-06-30FY 2023-06-30FY 2023-06-30FY 2022-06-30FY 2022-06-30FY 2022-06-30FY 2022-06-30FY 2022-06-30FY 2022-06-30FY 2022-06-30FY 2022-06-30FY 2022-06-30FY 2022-06-30FY 2022-06-30FY 2022-06-30FY 2022-06-30FY 2022-06-30FY 2021-06-30FY 2021-06-30FY 2021-06-30FY 2021-06-30FY 2021-06-30FY 2021-06-30FY 2021-06-30FY 2021-06-30FY 2021-06-30FY 2021-06-30FY 2021-06-30FY 2021-06-30FY 2021-06-30FY 2021-06-30FY 2020-06-30FY 2020-06-30FY 2020-06-30FY 2020-06-30FY 2020-06-30FY 2020-06-30FY 2020-06-30FY 2020-06-30FY 2020-06-30FY 2020-06-30FY 2020-06-30FY 2020-06-30FY 2020-06-30FY 2019-06-30FY 2019-06-30FY 2019-06-30FY 2019-06-30FY 2019-06-30FY 2019-06-30FY 2019-06-30FY 2019-06-30FY 2019-06-30FY 2019-06-30FY 2019-06-30FY 2019-06-30FY 2019-06-30FY 2018-06-30FY 2018-06-30FY 2018-06-30FY 2018-06-30FY 2018-06-30FY 2018-06-30FY 2018-06-30FY 2018-06-30FY 2018-06-30FY 2018-06-30FY 2018-06-30FY 2018-06-30FY 2018-06-30FY 2018-06-30FY 2018-06-30FY 2017-06-30FY 2017-06-30FY 2017-06-30FY 2017-06-30FY 2017-06-30FY 2017-06-30FY 2017-06-30FY 2017-06-30FY 2017-06-30FY 2017-06-30FY 2017-06-30FY 2017-06-30FY 2017-06-30FY 2017-06-30FY 2017-06-30FY 2016-06-30FY 2016-06-30FY 2016-06-30FY 2016-06-30FY 2016-06-30FY 2016-06-30FY 2016-06-30FY 2016-06-30FY 2016-06-30FY 2016-06-30FY 2016-06-30FY 2016-06-30FY 2016-06-30FY 2016-06-30

FY 2025-06-30

$4,734,870 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on April 7, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by October 7, 2026 (29 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
Funder? Track this deadline →
2025-002
Reporting
OTHER MATTERS

2025-002 Finding – Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) / Transparency Act Reporting (Timeliness) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Program: Head Start Cluster — Assistance Listing 93.600 (Head Start) Compliance Requirement: Reporting (L) — FFATA / Transparency Act Special Reporting Type of Finding: Compliance (no internal control deficiency) Criteria Under the Transparency Act award term (2 CFR Part 170 Appendix A), recipients must report each first-tier subaward action subject to FFATA in SAM.gov no later than the end of the month following the month in which the subaward obligation was made. Condition During testing of FFATA special reporting under Reporting (L), we noted two first-tier subaward actions that were submitted in SAM.gov after the required reporting timeframe (subaward dates 9/11/2024 and 1/9/2025; SAM.gov submission date 4/16/2025). Based on the nature of the exceptions and the results of expanded procedures, the late submissions appear to be isolated to the period of the federal FSRS-to-SAM.gov transition rather than indicative of a systemic reporting breakdown. Management attributed the delays to federal system conversion issues, including access/role challenges, delayed training, and data migration/report rejection issues that required resolution with SAM.gov support. Accordingly, the noncompliance is limited to timeliness of transparency reporting (no questioned costs) and does not affect allowability of Head Start expenditures. Effect / Potential Effect Late FFATA reporting reduces the timeliness of public transparency and federal oversight information available in SAM.gov/USAspending and may increase the risk of noncompliance with federal reporting requirements; however, the matters noted did not result in questioned costs and did not affect allowability of program expenditures. Cause Management explained that the late submissions were primarily due to the federal FSRS→SAM.gov transition, including delayed federal training (Jan/Feb 2025), difficulties obtaining system access/roles, preloaded data errors in SAM.gov causing report rejections, backlogs in SAM.gov support, and staff turnover, which collectively delayed timely submission. Recommendation We recommend that SCOE continue its current FFATA reporting practices, including timely identification of first‑tier subawards subject to FFATA and submission of required data in SAM.gov, and continue maintaining documentation of reporting efforts (e.g., submission confirmations, rejection notices, and support ticket correspondence) when federal system changes or external access/data issues occur. Based on management’s explanation and the nature of the federal FSRS‑to‑SAM.gov transition challenges encountered during the period, SCOE’s response efforts (including follow‑up with SAM.gov support and corrective resubmissions as needed) appear appropriate; accordingly, no additional process changes are recommended beyond continuing the established procedures and retention of supporting evidence to demonstrate compliance in periods of federal system disruption. Questioned Costs None. Repeat Finding No. Views of Responsible Officials We acknowledge the instances of late FFATA first‑tier subaward reporting identified by the auditors. We believe the delays were primarily attributable to the federal transition from FSRS to SAM.gov, including access/role configuration challenges and system-related issues encountered during the conversion period. We took reasonable and timely steps to submit the required FFATA reports as soon as the federal system issues were resolved and to address any submission rejections or support requests as needed. We consider this condition isolated to the federal system transition period and not indicative of a systemic breakdown in our reporting processes. We intend to continue our existing FFATA reporting procedures and will continue to retain appropriate documentation of submissions and related system communications to support compliance during future federal reporting system changes.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2025-002 Finding – Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) / Transparency Act Reporting (Timeliness) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Program: Head Start Cluster — Assistance Listing 93.600 (Head Start) Compliance Requirement: Reporting (L) — FFATA / Transparency Act Special Reporting Type of Finding: Compliance (no internal control deficiency) Criteria Under the Transparency Act award term (2 CFR Part 170 Appendix A), recipients must report each first-tier subaward action subject to FFATA in SAM.gov no later than the end of the month following the month in which the subaward obligation was made. Condition During testing of FFATA special reporting under Reporting (L), we noted two first-tier subaward actions that were submitted in SAM.gov after the required reporting timeframe (subaward dates 9/11/2024 and 1/9/2025; SAM.gov submission date 4/16/2025). Based on the nature of the exceptions and the results of expanded procedures, the late submissions appear to be isolated to the period of the federal FSRS-to-SAM.gov transition rather than indicative of a systemic reporting breakdown. Management attributed the delays to federal system conversion issues, including access/role challenges, delayed training, and data migration/report rejection issues that required resolution with SAM.gov support. Accordingly, the noncompliance is limited to timeliness of transparency reporting (no questioned costs) and does not affect allowability of Head Start expenditures. Effect / Potential Effect Late FFATA reporting reduces the timeliness of public transparency and federal oversight information available in SAM.gov/USAspending and may increase the risk of noncompliance with federal reporting requirements; however, the matters noted did not result in questioned costs and did not affect allowability of program expenditures. Cause Management explained that the late submissions were primarily due to the federal FSRS→SAM.gov transition, including delayed federal training (Jan/Feb 2025), difficulties obtaining system access/roles, preloaded data errors in SAM.gov causing report rejections, backlogs in SAM.gov support, and staff turnover, which collectively delayed timely submission. Recommendation We recommend that SCOE continue its current FFATA reporting practices, including timely identification of first‑tier subawards subject to FFATA and submission of required data in SAM.gov, and continue maintaining documentation of reporting efforts (e.g., submission confirmations, rejection notices, and support ticket correspondence) when federal system changes or external access/data issues occur. Based on management’s explanation and the nature of the federal FSRS‑to‑SAM.gov transition challenges encountered during the period, SCOE’s response efforts (including follow‑up with SAM.gov support and corrective resubmissions as needed) appear appropriate; accordingly, no additional process changes are recommended beyond continuing the established procedures and retention of supporting evidence to demonstrate compliance in periods of federal system disruption. Questioned Costs None. Repeat Finding No. Views of Responsible Officials We acknowledge the instances of late FFATA first‑tier subaward reporting identified by the auditors. We believe the delays were primarily attributable to the federal transition from FSRS to SAM.gov, including access/role configuration challenges and system-related issues encountered during the conversion period. We took reasonable and timely steps to submit the required FFATA reports as soon as the federal system issues were resolved and to address any submission rejections or support requests as needed. We consider this condition isolated to the federal system transition period and not indicative of a systemic breakdown in our reporting processes. We intend to continue our existing FFATA reporting procedures and will continue to retain appropriate documentation of submissions and related system communications to support compliance during future federal reporting system changes.

Corrective Action Plan

2025-002 Finding – Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA)/Transparency Act Reporting (Timeliness) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Program: Head Start Cluster – Assistance Listing 93.600 (Head Start) Compliance Requirement: Reporting (L) – FFATA/Transparency Act Special Reporting Type of Finding: Compliance (no internal control deficiency) Finding Summary: Two first-tier subaward actions were submitted in SAM.gov after the required reporting timeframe. Based on the nature of the exceptions and the results of expanded procedures, the late submissions appear to be isolated to the period of the federal FSRS-to-SAM.gov transition rather than indicative of a systemic reporting breakdown. Management attributed the delays to federal system conversion issues, including access/role challenges, delayed training, and data migration/report rejection issues that required resolution with SAM.gov support. Accordingly, the noncompliance is limited to timeliness of transparency reporting (no questioned costs) and does not affect allowability of Head Start expenditures. Corrective Action Plan: Delays were primarily attributable to the federal transition from FSRS to SAM.gov, including access/role configuration challenges and system-related issues encountered during the conversion period. Reasonable and timely steps were taken to submit the required FFATA reports as soon as the federal system issues were resolved and to address any submission rejections or support requests as needed. Now that the filing of back logged reports is complete, we will continue with our existing FFATA reporting procedures. We will track contracts needing FFATA submission with an internal ticketing system to ensure that the filings are on time. We will retain appropriate documentation of submissions and related system communications to support compliance. We will submit said documentation to our business office as a secondary measure to ensure that the filing was done prior to processing said contract. Contact Person responsible for corrective action: Anthony Jordan, Division Director Anticipated completion date of Corrective Action Plan: This item is corrected as of 10/01/2025.

About Reporting →

FY 2025-06-30

$23,419,684 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 19, 2025 — management decision was due June 19, 2026.

2025-002
Reporting
OTHER MATTERS

2025-002 Finding – Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) / Transparency Act Reporting (Timeliness) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Program: Head Start Cluster — Assistance Listing 93.600 (Head Start) Compliance Requirement: Reporting (L) — FFATA / Transparency Act Special Reporting Type of Finding: Compliance (no internal control deficiency) Criteria Under the Transparency Act award term (2 CFR Part 170 Appendix A), recipients must report each first-tier subaward action subject to FFATA in SAM.gov no later than the end of the month following the month in which the subaward obligation was made. Condition During testing of FFATA special reporting under Reporting (L), we noted two first-tier subaward actions that were submitted in SAM.gov after the required reporting timeframe (subaward dates 9/11/2024 and 1/9/2025; SAM.gov submission date 4/16/2025). Based on the nature of the exceptions and the results of expanded procedures, the late submissions appear to be isolated to the period of the federal FSRS-to-SAM.gov transition rather than indicative of a systemic reporting breakdown. Management attributed the delays to federal system conversion issues, including access/role challenges, delayed training, and data migration/report rejection issues that required resolution with SAM.gov support. Accordingly, the noncompliance is limited to timeliness of transparency reporting (no questioned costs) and does not affect allowability of Head Start expenditures. Effect / Potential Effect Late FFATA reporting reduces the timeliness of public transparency and federal oversight information available in SAM.gov/USAspending and may increase the risk of noncompliance with federal reporting requirements; however, the matters noted did not result in questioned costs and did not affect allowability of program expenditures. Cause Management explained that the late submissions were primarily due to the federal FSRS→SAM.gov transition, including delayed federal training (Jan/Feb 2025), difficulties obtaining system access/roles, preloaded data errors in SAM.gov causing report rejections, backlogs in SAM.gov support, and staff turnover, which collectively delayed timely submission. Recommendation We recommend that SCOE continue its current FFATA reporting practices, including timely identification of first‑tier subawards subject to FFATA and submission of required data in SAM.gov, and continue maintaining documentation of reporting efforts (e.g., submission confirmations, rejection notices, and support ticket correspondence) when federal system changes or external access/data issues occur. Based on management’s explanation and the nature of the federal FSRS‑to‑SAM.gov transition challenges encountered during the period, SCOE’s response efforts (including follow‑up with SAM.gov support and corrective resubmissions as needed) appear appropriate; accordingly, no additional process changes are recommended beyond continuing the established procedures and retention of supporting evidence to demonstrate compliance in periods of federal system disruption. Questioned Costs None. Repeat Finding No. Views of Responsible Officials We acknowledge the instances of late FFATA first‑tier subaward reporting identified by the auditors. We believe the delays were primarily attributable to the federal transition from FSRS to SAM.gov, including access/role configuration challenges and system-related issues encountered during the conversion period. We took reasonable and timely steps to submit the required FFATA reports as soon as the federal system issues were resolved and to address any submission rejections or support requests as needed. We consider this condition isolated to the federal system transition period and not indicative of a systemic breakdown in our reporting processes. We intend to continue our existing FFATA reporting procedures and will continue to retain appropriate documentation of submissions and related system communications to support compliance during future federal reporting system changes.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2025-002 Finding – Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) / Transparency Act Reporting (Timeliness) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Program: Head Start Cluster — Assistance Listing 93.600 (Head Start) Compliance Requirement: Reporting (L) — FFATA / Transparency Act Special Reporting Type of Finding: Compliance (no internal control deficiency) Criteria Under the Transparency Act award term (2 CFR Part 170 Appendix A), recipients must report each first-tier subaward action subject to FFATA in SAM.gov no later than the end of the month following the month in which the subaward obligation was made. Condition During testing of FFATA special reporting under Reporting (L), we noted two first-tier subaward actions that were submitted in SAM.gov after the required reporting timeframe (subaward dates 9/11/2024 and 1/9/2025; SAM.gov submission date 4/16/2025). Based on the nature of the exceptions and the results of expanded procedures, the late submissions appear to be isolated to the period of the federal FSRS-to-SAM.gov transition rather than indicative of a systemic reporting breakdown. Management attributed the delays to federal system conversion issues, including access/role challenges, delayed training, and data migration/report rejection issues that required resolution with SAM.gov support. Accordingly, the noncompliance is limited to timeliness of transparency reporting (no questioned costs) and does not affect allowability of Head Start expenditures. Effect / Potential Effect Late FFATA reporting reduces the timeliness of public transparency and federal oversight information available in SAM.gov/USAspending and may increase the risk of noncompliance with federal reporting requirements; however, the matters noted did not result in questioned costs and did not affect allowability of program expenditures. Cause Management explained that the late submissions were primarily due to the federal FSRS→SAM.gov transition, including delayed federal training (Jan/Feb 2025), difficulties obtaining system access/roles, preloaded data errors in SAM.gov causing report rejections, backlogs in SAM.gov support, and staff turnover, which collectively delayed timely submission. Recommendation We recommend that SCOE continue its current FFATA reporting practices, including timely identification of first‑tier subawards subject to FFATA and submission of required data in SAM.gov, and continue maintaining documentation of reporting efforts (e.g., submission confirmations, rejection notices, and support ticket correspondence) when federal system changes or external access/data issues occur. Based on management’s explanation and the nature of the federal FSRS‑to‑SAM.gov transition challenges encountered during the period, SCOE’s response efforts (including follow‑up with SAM.gov support and corrective resubmissions as needed) appear appropriate; accordingly, no additional process changes are recommended beyond continuing the established procedures and retention of supporting evidence to demonstrate compliance in periods of federal system disruption. Questioned Costs None. Repeat Finding No. Views of Responsible Officials We acknowledge the instances of late FFATA first‑tier subaward reporting identified by the auditors. We believe the delays were primarily attributable to the federal transition from FSRS to SAM.gov, including access/role configuration challenges and system-related issues encountered during the conversion period. We took reasonable and timely steps to submit the required FFATA reports as soon as the federal system issues were resolved and to address any submission rejections or support requests as needed. We consider this condition isolated to the federal system transition period and not indicative of a systemic breakdown in our reporting processes. We intend to continue our existing FFATA reporting procedures and will continue to retain appropriate documentation of submissions and related system communications to support compliance during future federal reporting system changes.

Corrective Action Plan

2025-002 Finding – Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA)/Transparency Act Reporting (Timeliness) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Program: Head Start Cluster – Assistance Listing 93.600 (Head Start) Compliance Requirement: Reporting (L) – FFATA/Transparency Act Special Reporting Type of Finding: Compliance (no internal control deficiency) Finding Summary: Two first-tier subaward actions were submitted in SAM.gov after the required reporting timeframe. Based on the nature of the exceptions and the results of expanded procedures, the late submissions appear to be isolated to the period of the federal FSRS-to-SAM.gov transition rather than indicative of a systemic reporting breakdown. Management attributed the delays to federal system conversion issues, including access/role challenges, delayed training, and data migration/report rejection issues that required resolution with SAM.gov support. Accordingly, the noncompliance is limited to timeliness of transparency reporting (no questioned costs) and does not affect allowability of Head Start expenditures. Corrective Action Plan: Delays were primarily attributable to the federal transition from FSRS to SAM.gov, including access/role configuration challenges and system-related issues encountered during the conversion period. Reasonable and timely steps were taken to submit the required FFATA reports as soon as the federal system issues were resolved and to address any submission rejections or support requests as needed. Now that the filing of back logged reports is complete, we will continue with our existing FFATA reporting procedures. We will track contracts needing FFATA submission with an internal ticketing system to ensure that the filings are on time. We will retain appropriate documentation of submissions and related system communications to support compliance. We will submit said documentation to our business office as a secondary measure to ensure that the filing was done prior to processing said contract. Contact Person responsible for corrective action: Anthony Jordan, Division Director Anticipated completion date of Corrective Action Plan: This item is corrected as of 10/01/2025.

About Reporting →

FY 2025-06-30

$3,028,150 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 6, 2026 — management decision was due July 6, 2026.

2025-002
Reporting
OTHER MATTERS

2025-002 Finding – Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) / Transparency Act Reporting (Timeliness) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Program: Head Start Cluster — Assistance Listing 93.600 (Head Start) Compliance Requirement: Reporting (L) — FFATA / Transparency Act Special Reporting Type of Finding: Compliance (no internal control deficiency) Criteria Under the Transparency Act award term (2 CFR Part 170 Appendix A), recipients must report each first-tier subaward action subject to FFATA in SAM.gov no later than the end of the month following the month in which the subaward obligation was made. Condition During testing of FFATA special reporting under Reporting (L), we noted two first-tier subaward actions that were submitted in SAM.gov after the required reporting timeframe (subaward dates 9/11/2024 and 1/9/2025; SAM.gov submission date 4/16/2025). Based on the nature of the exceptions and the results of expanded procedures, the late submissions appear to be isolated to the period of the federal FSRS-to-SAM.gov transition rather than indicative of a systemic reporting breakdown. Management attributed the delays to federal system conversion issues, including access/role challenges, delayed training, and data migration/report rejection issues that required resolution with SAM.gov support. Accordingly, the noncompliance is limited to timeliness of transparency reporting (no questioned costs) and does not affect allowability of Head Start expenditures. Effect / Potential Effect Late FFATA reporting reduces the timeliness of public transparency and federal oversight information available in SAM.gov/USAspending and may increase the risk of noncompliance with federal reporting requirements; however, the matters noted did not result in questioned costs and did not affect allowability of program expenditures. Cause Management explained that the late submissions were primarily due to the federal FSRS→SAM.gov transition, including delayed federal training (Jan/Feb 2025), difficulties obtaining system access/roles, preloaded data errors in SAM.gov causing report rejections, backlogs in SAM.gov support, and staff turnover, which collectively delayed timely submission. Recommendation We recommend that SCOE continue its current FFATA reporting practices, including timely identification of first‑tier subawards subject to FFATA and submission of required data in SAM.gov, and continue maintaining documentation of reporting efforts (e.g., submission confirmations, rejection notices, and support ticket correspondence) when federal system changes or external access/data issues occur. Based on management’s explanation and the nature of the federal FSRS‑to‑SAM.gov transition challenges encountered during the period, SCOE’s response efforts (including follow‑up with SAM.gov support and corrective resubmissions as needed) appear appropriate; accordingly, no additional process changes are recommended beyond continuing the established procedures and retention of supporting evidence to demonstrate compliance in periods of federal system disruption. Questioned Costs None. Repeat Finding No. Views of Responsible Officials We acknowledge the instances of late FFATA first‑tier subaward reporting identified by the auditors. We believe the delays were primarily attributable to the federal transition from FSRS to SAM.gov, including access/role configuration challenges and system-related issues encountered during the conversion period. We took reasonable and timely steps to submit the required FFATA reports as soon as the federal system issues were resolved and to address any submission rejections or support requests as needed. We consider this condition isolated to the federal system transition period and not indicative of a systemic breakdown in our reporting processes. We intend to continue our existing FFATA reporting procedures and will continue to retain appropriate documentation of submissions and related system communications to support compliance during future federal reporting system changes.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2025-002 Finding – Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) / Transparency Act Reporting (Timeliness) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Program: Head Start Cluster — Assistance Listing 93.600 (Head Start) Compliance Requirement: Reporting (L) — FFATA / Transparency Act Special Reporting Type of Finding: Compliance (no internal control deficiency) Criteria Under the Transparency Act award term (2 CFR Part 170 Appendix A), recipients must report each first-tier subaward action subject to FFATA in SAM.gov no later than the end of the month following the month in which the subaward obligation was made. Condition During testing of FFATA special reporting under Reporting (L), we noted two first-tier subaward actions that were submitted in SAM.gov after the required reporting timeframe (subaward dates 9/11/2024 and 1/9/2025; SAM.gov submission date 4/16/2025). Based on the nature of the exceptions and the results of expanded procedures, the late submissions appear to be isolated to the period of the federal FSRS-to-SAM.gov transition rather than indicative of a systemic reporting breakdown. Management attributed the delays to federal system conversion issues, including access/role challenges, delayed training, and data migration/report rejection issues that required resolution with SAM.gov support. Accordingly, the noncompliance is limited to timeliness of transparency reporting (no questioned costs) and does not affect allowability of Head Start expenditures. Effect / Potential Effect Late FFATA reporting reduces the timeliness of public transparency and federal oversight information available in SAM.gov/USAspending and may increase the risk of noncompliance with federal reporting requirements; however, the matters noted did not result in questioned costs and did not affect allowability of program expenditures. Cause Management explained that the late submissions were primarily due to the federal FSRS→SAM.gov transition, including delayed federal training (Jan/Feb 2025), difficulties obtaining system access/roles, preloaded data errors in SAM.gov causing report rejections, backlogs in SAM.gov support, and staff turnover, which collectively delayed timely submission. Recommendation We recommend that SCOE continue its current FFATA reporting practices, including timely identification of first‑tier subawards subject to FFATA and submission of required data in SAM.gov, and continue maintaining documentation of reporting efforts (e.g., submission confirmations, rejection notices, and support ticket correspondence) when federal system changes or external access/data issues occur. Based on management’s explanation and the nature of the federal FSRS‑to‑SAM.gov transition challenges encountered during the period, SCOE’s response efforts (including follow‑up with SAM.gov support and corrective resubmissions as needed) appear appropriate; accordingly, no additional process changes are recommended beyond continuing the established procedures and retention of supporting evidence to demonstrate compliance in periods of federal system disruption. Questioned Costs None. Repeat Finding No. Views of Responsible Officials We acknowledge the instances of late FFATA first‑tier subaward reporting identified by the auditors. We believe the delays were primarily attributable to the federal transition from FSRS to SAM.gov, including access/role configuration challenges and system-related issues encountered during the conversion period. We took reasonable and timely steps to submit the required FFATA reports as soon as the federal system issues were resolved and to address any submission rejections or support requests as needed. We consider this condition isolated to the federal system transition period and not indicative of a systemic breakdown in our reporting processes. We intend to continue our existing FFATA reporting procedures and will continue to retain appropriate documentation of submissions and related system communications to support compliance during future federal reporting system changes.

Corrective Action Plan

2025-002 Finding – Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA)/Transparency Act Reporting (Timeliness) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Program: Head Start Cluster – Assistance Listing 93.600 (Head Start) Compliance Requirement: Reporting (L) – FFATA/Transparency Act Special Reporting Type of Finding: Compliance (no internal control deficiency) Finding Summary: Two first-tier subaward actions were submitted in SAM.gov after the required reporting timeframe. Based on the nature of the exceptions and the results of expanded procedures, the late submissions appear to be isolated to the period of the federal FSRS-to-SAM.gov transition rather than indicative of a systemic reporting breakdown. Management attributed the delays to federal system conversion issues, including access/role challenges, delayed training, and data migration/report rejection issues that required resolution with SAM.gov support. Accordingly, the noncompliance is limited to timeliness of transparency reporting (no questioned costs) and does not affect allowability of Head Start expenditures. Corrective Action Plan: Delays were primarily attributable to the federal transition from FSRS to SAM.gov, including access/role configuration challenges and system-related issues encountered during the conversion period. Reasonable and timely steps were taken to submit the required FFATA reports as soon as the federal system issues were resolved and to address any submission rejections or support requests as needed. Now that the filing of back logged reports is complete, we will continue with our existing FFATA reporting procedures. We will track contracts needing FFATA submission with an internal ticketing system to ensure that the filings are on time. We will retain appropriate documentation of submissions and related system communications to support compliance. We will submit said documentation to our business office as a secondary measure to ensure that the filing was done prior to processing said contract. Contact Person responsible for corrective action: Anthony Jordan, Division Director Anticipated completion date of Corrective Action Plan: This item is corrected as of 10/01/2025.

About Reporting →

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,020,906 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 10, 2026 — management decision was due August 10, 2026.

2025-002
Reporting
OTHER MATTERS

2025-002 Finding – Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) / Transparency Act Reporting (Timeliness) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Program: Head Start Cluster — Assistance Listing 93.600 (Head Start) Compliance Requirement: Reporting (L) — FFATA / Transparency Act Special Reporting Type of Finding: Compliance (no internal control deficiency) Criteria Under the Transparency Act award term (2 CFR Part 170 Appendix A), recipients must report each first-tier subaward action subject to FFATA in SAM.gov no later than the end of the month following the month in which the subaward obligation was made. Condition During testing of FFATA special reporting under Reporting (L), we noted two first-tier subaward actions that were submitted in SAM.gov after the required reporting timeframe (subaward dates 9/11/2024 and 1/9/2025; SAM.gov submission date 4/16/2025). Based on the nature of the exceptions and the results of expanded procedures, the late submissions appear to be isolated to the period of the federal FSRS-to-SAM.gov transition rather than indicative of a systemic reporting breakdown. Management attributed the delays to federal system conversion issues, including access/role challenges, delayed training, and data migration/report rejection issues that required resolution with SAM.gov support. Accordingly, the noncompliance is limited to timeliness of transparency reporting (no questioned costs) and does not affect allowability of Head Start expenditures. Effect / Potential Effect Late FFATA reporting reduces the timeliness of public transparency and federal oversight information available in SAM.gov/USAspending and may increase the risk of noncompliance with federal reporting requirements; however, the matters noted did not result in questioned costs and did not affect allowability of program expenditures. Cause Management explained that the late submissions were primarily due to the federal FSRS→SAM.gov transition, including delayed federal training (Jan/Feb 2025), difficulties obtaining system access/roles, preloaded data errors in SAM.gov causing report rejections, backlogs in SAM.gov support, and staff turnover, which collectively delayed timely submission. Recommendation We recommend that SCOE continue its current FFATA reporting practices, including timely identification of first‑tier subawards subject to FFATA and submission of required data in SAM.gov, and continue maintaining documentation of reporting efforts (e.g., submission confirmations, rejection notices, and support ticket correspondence) when federal system changes or external access/data issues occur. Based on management’s explanation and the nature of the federal FSRS‑to‑SAM.gov transition challenges encountered during the period, SCOE’s response efforts (including follow‑up with SAM.gov support and corrective resubmissions as needed) appear appropriate; accordingly, no additional process changes are recommended beyond continuing the established procedures and retention of supporting evidence to demonstrate compliance in periods of federal system disruption. Questioned Costs None. Repeat Finding No. Views of Responsible Officials We acknowledge the instances of late FFATA first‑tier subaward reporting identified by the auditors. We believe the delays were primarily attributable to the federal transition from FSRS to SAM.gov, including access/role configuration challenges and system-related issues encountered during the conversion period. We took reasonable and timely steps to submit the required FFATA reports as soon as the federal system issues were resolved and to address any submission rejections or support requests as needed. We consider this condition isolated to the federal system transition period and not indicative of a systemic breakdown in our reporting processes. We intend to continue our existing FFATA reporting procedures and will continue to retain appropriate documentation of submissions and related system communications to support compliance during future federal reporting system changes.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2025-002 Finding – Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) / Transparency Act Reporting (Timeliness) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Program: Head Start Cluster — Assistance Listing 93.600 (Head Start) Compliance Requirement: Reporting (L) — FFATA / Transparency Act Special Reporting Type of Finding: Compliance (no internal control deficiency) Criteria Under the Transparency Act award term (2 CFR Part 170 Appendix A), recipients must report each first-tier subaward action subject to FFATA in SAM.gov no later than the end of the month following the month in which the subaward obligation was made. Condition During testing of FFATA special reporting under Reporting (L), we noted two first-tier subaward actions that were submitted in SAM.gov after the required reporting timeframe (subaward dates 9/11/2024 and 1/9/2025; SAM.gov submission date 4/16/2025). Based on the nature of the exceptions and the results of expanded procedures, the late submissions appear to be isolated to the period of the federal FSRS-to-SAM.gov transition rather than indicative of a systemic reporting breakdown. Management attributed the delays to federal system conversion issues, including access/role challenges, delayed training, and data migration/report rejection issues that required resolution with SAM.gov support. Accordingly, the noncompliance is limited to timeliness of transparency reporting (no questioned costs) and does not affect allowability of Head Start expenditures. Effect / Potential Effect Late FFATA reporting reduces the timeliness of public transparency and federal oversight information available in SAM.gov/USAspending and may increase the risk of noncompliance with federal reporting requirements; however, the matters noted did not result in questioned costs and did not affect allowability of program expenditures. Cause Management explained that the late submissions were primarily due to the federal FSRS→SAM.gov transition, including delayed federal training (Jan/Feb 2025), difficulties obtaining system access/roles, preloaded data errors in SAM.gov causing report rejections, backlogs in SAM.gov support, and staff turnover, which collectively delayed timely submission. Recommendation We recommend that SCOE continue its current FFATA reporting practices, including timely identification of first‑tier subawards subject to FFATA and submission of required data in SAM.gov, and continue maintaining documentation of reporting efforts (e.g., submission confirmations, rejection notices, and support ticket correspondence) when federal system changes or external access/data issues occur. Based on management’s explanation and the nature of the federal FSRS‑to‑SAM.gov transition challenges encountered during the period, SCOE’s response efforts (including follow‑up with SAM.gov support and corrective resubmissions as needed) appear appropriate; accordingly, no additional process changes are recommended beyond continuing the established procedures and retention of supporting evidence to demonstrate compliance in periods of federal system disruption. Questioned Costs None. Repeat Finding No. Views of Responsible Officials We acknowledge the instances of late FFATA first‑tier subaward reporting identified by the auditors. We believe the delays were primarily attributable to the federal transition from FSRS to SAM.gov, including access/role configuration challenges and system-related issues encountered during the conversion period. We took reasonable and timely steps to submit the required FFATA reports as soon as the federal system issues were resolved and to address any submission rejections or support requests as needed. We consider this condition isolated to the federal system transition period and not indicative of a systemic breakdown in our reporting processes. We intend to continue our existing FFATA reporting procedures and will continue to retain appropriate documentation of submissions and related system communications to support compliance during future federal reporting system changes.

Corrective Action Plan

2025-002 Finding – Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA)/Transparency Act Reporting (Timeliness) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Program: Head Start Cluster – Assistance Listing 93.600 (Head Start) Compliance Requirement: Reporting (L) – FFATA/Transparency Act Special Reporting Type of Finding: Compliance (no internal control deficiency) Finding Summary: Two first-tier subaward actions were submitted in SAM.gov after the required reporting timeframe. Based on the nature of the exceptions and the results of expanded procedures, the late submissions appear to be isolated to the period of the federal FSRS-to-SAM.gov transition rather than indicative of a systemic reporting breakdown. Management attributed the delays to federal system conversion issues, including access/role challenges, delayed training, and data migration/report rejection issues that required resolution with SAM.gov support. Accordingly, the noncompliance is limited to timeliness of transparency reporting (no questioned costs) and does not affect allowability of Head Start expenditures. Corrective Action Plan: Delays were primarily attributable to the federal transition from FSRS to SAM.gov, including access/role configuration challenges and system-related issues encountered during the conversion period. Reasonable and timely steps were taken to submit the required FFATA reports as soon as the federal system issues were resolved and to address any submission rejections or support requests as needed. Now that the filing of back logged reports is complete, we will continue with our existing FFATA reporting procedures. We will track contracts needing FFATA submission with an internal ticketing system to ensure that the filings are on time. We will retain appropriate documentation of submissions and related system communications to support compliance. We will submit said documentation to our business office as a secondary measure to ensure that the filing was done prior to processing said contract. Contact Person responsible for corrective action: Anthony Jordan, Division Director Anticipated completion date of Corrective Action Plan: This item is corrected as of 10/01/2025.

About Reporting →

FY 2025-06-30

$3,707,444 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 22, 2025 — management decision was due June 22, 2026.

2025-002
Reporting
OTHER MATTERS

2025-002 Finding – Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) / Transparency Act Reporting (Timeliness) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Program: Head Start Cluster — Assistance Listing 93.600 (Head Start) Compliance Requirement: Reporting (L) — FFATA / Transparency Act Special Reporting Type of Finding: Compliance (no internal control deficiency) Criteria Under the Transparency Act award term (2 CFR Part 170 Appendix A), recipients must report each first-tier subaward action subject to FFATA in SAM.gov no later than the end of the month following the month in which the subaward obligation was made. Condition During testing of FFATA special reporting under Reporting (L), we noted two first-tier subaward actions that were submitted in SAM.gov after the required reporting timeframe (subaward dates 9/11/2024 and 1/9/2025; SAM.gov submission date 4/16/2025). Based on the nature of the exceptions and the results of expanded procedures, the late submissions appear to be isolated to the period of the federal FSRS-to-SAM.gov transition rather than indicative of a systemic reporting breakdown. Management attributed the delays to federal system conversion issues, including access/role challenges, delayed training, and data migration/report rejection issues that required resolution with SAM.gov support. Accordingly, the noncompliance is limited to timeliness of transparency reporting (no questioned costs) and does not affect allowability of Head Start expenditures. Effect / Potential Effect Late FFATA reporting reduces the timeliness of public transparency and federal oversight information available in SAM.gov/USAspending and may increase the risk of noncompliance with federal reporting requirements; however, the matters noted did not result in questioned costs and did not affect allowability of program expenditures. Cause Management explained that the late submissions were primarily due to the federal FSRS→SAM.gov transition, including delayed federal training (Jan/Feb 2025), difficulties obtaining system access/roles, preloaded data errors in SAM.gov causing report rejections, backlogs in SAM.gov support, and staff turnover, which collectively delayed timely submission. Recommendation We recommend that SCOE continue its current FFATA reporting practices, including timely identification of first‑tier subawards subject to FFATA and submission of required data in SAM.gov, and continue maintaining documentation of reporting efforts (e.g., submission confirmations, rejection notices, and support ticket correspondence) when federal system changes or external access/data issues occur. Based on management’s explanation and the nature of the federal FSRS‑to‑SAM.gov transition challenges encountered during the period, SCOE’s response efforts (including follow‑up with SAM.gov support and corrective resubmissions as needed) appear appropriate; accordingly, no additional process changes are recommended beyond continuing the established procedures and retention of supporting evidence to demonstrate compliance in periods of federal system disruption. Questioned Costs None. Repeat Finding No. Views of Responsible Officials We acknowledge the instances of late FFATA first‑tier subaward reporting identified by the auditors. We believe the delays were primarily attributable to the federal transition from FSRS to SAM.gov, including access/role configuration challenges and system-related issues encountered during the conversion period. We took reasonable and timely steps to submit the required FFATA reports as soon as the federal system issues were resolved and to address any submission rejections or support requests as needed. We consider this condition isolated to the federal system transition period and not indicative of a systemic breakdown in our reporting processes. We intend to continue our existing FFATA reporting procedures and will continue to retain appropriate documentation of submissions and related system communications to support compliance during future federal reporting system changes.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2025-002 Finding – Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) / Transparency Act Reporting (Timeliness) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Program: Head Start Cluster — Assistance Listing 93.600 (Head Start) Compliance Requirement: Reporting (L) — FFATA / Transparency Act Special Reporting Type of Finding: Compliance (no internal control deficiency) Criteria Under the Transparency Act award term (2 CFR Part 170 Appendix A), recipients must report each first-tier subaward action subject to FFATA in SAM.gov no later than the end of the month following the month in which the subaward obligation was made. Condition During testing of FFATA special reporting under Reporting (L), we noted two first-tier subaward actions that were submitted in SAM.gov after the required reporting timeframe (subaward dates 9/11/2024 and 1/9/2025; SAM.gov submission date 4/16/2025). Based on the nature of the exceptions and the results of expanded procedures, the late submissions appear to be isolated to the period of the federal FSRS-to-SAM.gov transition rather than indicative of a systemic reporting breakdown. Management attributed the delays to federal system conversion issues, including access/role challenges, delayed training, and data migration/report rejection issues that required resolution with SAM.gov support. Accordingly, the noncompliance is limited to timeliness of transparency reporting (no questioned costs) and does not affect allowability of Head Start expenditures. Effect / Potential Effect Late FFATA reporting reduces the timeliness of public transparency and federal oversight information available in SAM.gov/USAspending and may increase the risk of noncompliance with federal reporting requirements; however, the matters noted did not result in questioned costs and did not affect allowability of program expenditures. Cause Management explained that the late submissions were primarily due to the federal FSRS→SAM.gov transition, including delayed federal training (Jan/Feb 2025), difficulties obtaining system access/roles, preloaded data errors in SAM.gov causing report rejections, backlogs in SAM.gov support, and staff turnover, which collectively delayed timely submission. Recommendation We recommend that SCOE continue its current FFATA reporting practices, including timely identification of first‑tier subawards subject to FFATA and submission of required data in SAM.gov, and continue maintaining documentation of reporting efforts (e.g., submission confirmations, rejection notices, and support ticket correspondence) when federal system changes or external access/data issues occur. Based on management’s explanation and the nature of the federal FSRS‑to‑SAM.gov transition challenges encountered during the period, SCOE’s response efforts (including follow‑up with SAM.gov support and corrective resubmissions as needed) appear appropriate; accordingly, no additional process changes are recommended beyond continuing the established procedures and retention of supporting evidence to demonstrate compliance in periods of federal system disruption. Questioned Costs None. Repeat Finding No. Views of Responsible Officials We acknowledge the instances of late FFATA first‑tier subaward reporting identified by the auditors. We believe the delays were primarily attributable to the federal transition from FSRS to SAM.gov, including access/role configuration challenges and system-related issues encountered during the conversion period. We took reasonable and timely steps to submit the required FFATA reports as soon as the federal system issues were resolved and to address any submission rejections or support requests as needed. We consider this condition isolated to the federal system transition period and not indicative of a systemic breakdown in our reporting processes. We intend to continue our existing FFATA reporting procedures and will continue to retain appropriate documentation of submissions and related system communications to support compliance during future federal reporting system changes.

Corrective Action Plan

2025-002 Finding – Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA)/Transparency Act Reporting (Timeliness) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Program: Head Start Cluster – Assistance Listing 93.600 (Head Start) Compliance Requirement: Reporting (L) – FFATA/Transparency Act Special Reporting Type of Finding: Compliance (no internal control deficiency) Finding Summary: Two first-tier subaward actions were submitted in SAM.gov after the required reporting timeframe. Based on the nature of the exceptions and the results of expanded procedures, the late submissions appear to be isolated to the period of the federal FSRS-to-SAM.gov transition rather than indicative of a systemic reporting breakdown. Management attributed the delays to federal system conversion issues, including access/role challenges, delayed training, and data migration/report rejection issues that required resolution with SAM.gov support. Accordingly, the noncompliance is limited to timeliness of transparency reporting (no questioned costs) and does not affect allowability of Head Start expenditures. Corrective Action Plan: Delays were primarily attributable to the federal transition from FSRS to SAM.gov, including access/role configuration challenges and system-related issues encountered during the conversion period. Reasonable and timely steps were taken to submit the required FFATA reports as soon as the federal system issues were resolved and to address any submission rejections or support requests as needed. Now that the filing of back logged reports is complete, we will continue with our existing FFATA reporting procedures. We will track contracts needing FFATA submission with an internal ticketing system to ensure that the filings are on time. We will retain appropriate documentation of submissions and related system communications to support compliance. We will submit said documentation to our business office as a secondary measure to ensure that the filing was done prior to processing said contract. Contact Person responsible for corrective action: Anthony Jordan, Division Director Anticipated completion date of Corrective Action Plan: This item is corrected as of 10/01/2025.

About Reporting →

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$117,310,088 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 13, 2026 — management decision was due August 13, 2026.

2025-002
Reporting
OTHER MATTERS

2025-002 Finding – Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) / Transparency Act Reporting (Timeliness) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Program: Head Start Cluster — Assistance Listing 93.600 (Head Start) Compliance Requirement: Reporting (L) — FFATA / Transparency Act Special Reporting Type of Finding: Compliance (no internal control deficiency) Criteria Under the Transparency Act award term (2 CFR Part 170 Appendix A), recipients must report each first-tier subaward action subject to FFATA in SAM.gov no later than the end of the month following the month in which the subaward obligation was made. Condition During testing of FFATA special reporting under Reporting (L), we noted two first-tier subaward actions that were submitted in SAM.gov after the required reporting timeframe (subaward dates 9/11/2024 and 1/9/2025; SAM.gov submission date 4/16/2025). Based on the nature of the exceptions and the results of expanded procedures, the late submissions appear to be isolated to the period of the federal FSRS-to-SAM.gov transition rather than indicative of a systemic reporting breakdown. Management attributed the delays to federal system conversion issues, including access/role challenges, delayed training, and data migration/report rejection issues that required resolution with SAM.gov support. Accordingly, the noncompliance is limited to timeliness of transparency reporting (no questioned costs) and does not affect allowability of Head Start expenditures. Effect / Potential Effect Late FFATA reporting reduces the timeliness of public transparency and federal oversight information available in SAM.gov/USAspending and may increase the risk of noncompliance with federal reporting requirements; however, the matters noted did not result in questioned costs and did not affect allowability of program expenditures. Cause Management explained that the late submissions were primarily due to the federal FSRS→SAM.gov transition, including delayed federal training (Jan/Feb 2025), difficulties obtaining system access/roles, preloaded data errors in SAM.gov causing report rejections, backlogs in SAM.gov support, and staff turnover, which collectively delayed timely submission. Recommendation We recommend that SCOE continue its current FFATA reporting practices, including timely identification of first‑tier subawards subject to FFATA and submission of required data in SAM.gov, and continue maintaining documentation of reporting efforts (e.g., submission confirmations, rejection notices, and support ticket correspondence) when federal system changes or external access/data issues occur. Based on management’s explanation and the nature of the federal FSRS‑to‑SAM.gov transition challenges encountered during the period, SCOE’s response efforts (including follow‑up with SAM.gov support and corrective resubmissions as needed) appear appropriate; accordingly, no additional process changes are recommended beyond continuing the established procedures and retention of supporting evidence to demonstrate compliance in periods of federal system disruption. Questioned Costs None. Repeat Finding No. Views of Responsible Officials We acknowledge the instances of late FFATA first‑tier subaward reporting identified by the auditors. We believe the delays were primarily attributable to the federal transition from FSRS to SAM.gov, including access/role configuration challenges and system-related issues encountered during the conversion period. We took reasonable and timely steps to submit the required FFATA reports as soon as the federal system issues were resolved and to address any submission rejections or support requests as needed. We consider this condition isolated to the federal system transition period and not indicative of a systemic breakdown in our reporting processes. We intend to continue our existing FFATA reporting procedures and will continue to retain appropriate documentation of submissions and related system communications to support compliance during future federal reporting system changes.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2025-002 Finding – Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) / Transparency Act Reporting (Timeliness) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Program: Head Start Cluster — Assistance Listing 93.600 (Head Start) Compliance Requirement: Reporting (L) — FFATA / Transparency Act Special Reporting Type of Finding: Compliance (no internal control deficiency) Criteria Under the Transparency Act award term (2 CFR Part 170 Appendix A), recipients must report each first-tier subaward action subject to FFATA in SAM.gov no later than the end of the month following the month in which the subaward obligation was made. Condition During testing of FFATA special reporting under Reporting (L), we noted two first-tier subaward actions that were submitted in SAM.gov after the required reporting timeframe (subaward dates 9/11/2024 and 1/9/2025; SAM.gov submission date 4/16/2025). Based on the nature of the exceptions and the results of expanded procedures, the late submissions appear to be isolated to the period of the federal FSRS-to-SAM.gov transition rather than indicative of a systemic reporting breakdown. Management attributed the delays to federal system conversion issues, including access/role challenges, delayed training, and data migration/report rejection issues that required resolution with SAM.gov support. Accordingly, the noncompliance is limited to timeliness of transparency reporting (no questioned costs) and does not affect allowability of Head Start expenditures. Effect / Potential Effect Late FFATA reporting reduces the timeliness of public transparency and federal oversight information available in SAM.gov/USAspending and may increase the risk of noncompliance with federal reporting requirements; however, the matters noted did not result in questioned costs and did not affect allowability of program expenditures. Cause Management explained that the late submissions were primarily due to the federal FSRS→SAM.gov transition, including delayed federal training (Jan/Feb 2025), difficulties obtaining system access/roles, preloaded data errors in SAM.gov causing report rejections, backlogs in SAM.gov support, and staff turnover, which collectively delayed timely submission. Recommendation We recommend that SCOE continue its current FFATA reporting practices, including timely identification of first‑tier subawards subject to FFATA and submission of required data in SAM.gov, and continue maintaining documentation of reporting efforts (e.g., submission confirmations, rejection notices, and support ticket correspondence) when federal system changes or external access/data issues occur. Based on management’s explanation and the nature of the federal FSRS‑to‑SAM.gov transition challenges encountered during the period, SCOE’s response efforts (including follow‑up with SAM.gov support and corrective resubmissions as needed) appear appropriate; accordingly, no additional process changes are recommended beyond continuing the established procedures and retention of supporting evidence to demonstrate compliance in periods of federal system disruption. Questioned Costs None. Repeat Finding No. Views of Responsible Officials We acknowledge the instances of late FFATA first‑tier subaward reporting identified by the auditors. We believe the delays were primarily attributable to the federal transition from FSRS to SAM.gov, including access/role configuration challenges and system-related issues encountered during the conversion period. We took reasonable and timely steps to submit the required FFATA reports as soon as the federal system issues were resolved and to address any submission rejections or support requests as needed. We consider this condition isolated to the federal system transition period and not indicative of a systemic breakdown in our reporting processes. We intend to continue our existing FFATA reporting procedures and will continue to retain appropriate documentation of submissions and related system communications to support compliance during future federal reporting system changes.

Corrective Action Plan

2025-002 Finding – Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA)/Transparency Act Reporting (Timeliness) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Program: Head Start Cluster – Assistance Listing 93.600 (Head Start) Compliance Requirement: Reporting (L) – FFATA/Transparency Act Special Reporting Type of Finding: Compliance (no internal control deficiency) Finding Summary: Two first-tier subaward actions were submitted in SAM.gov after the required reporting timeframe. Based on the nature of the exceptions and the results of expanded procedures, the late submissions appear to be isolated to the period of the federal FSRS-to-SAM.gov transition rather than indicative of a systemic reporting breakdown. Management attributed the delays to federal system conversion issues, including access/role challenges, delayed training, and data migration/report rejection issues that required resolution with SAM.gov support. Accordingly, the noncompliance is limited to timeliness of transparency reporting (no questioned costs) and does not affect allowability of Head Start expenditures. Corrective Action Plan: Delays were primarily attributable to the federal transition from FSRS to SAM.gov, including access/role configuration challenges and system-related issues encountered during the conversion period. Reasonable and timely steps were taken to submit the required FFATA reports as soon as the federal system issues were resolved and to address any submission rejections or support requests as needed. Now that the filing of back logged reports is complete, we will continue with our existing FFATA reporting procedures. We will track contracts needing FFATA submission with an internal ticketing system to ensure that the filings are on time. We will retain appropriate documentation of submissions and related system communications to support compliance. We will submit said documentation to our business office as a secondary measure to ensure that the filing was done prior to processing said contract. Contact Person responsible for corrective action: Anthony Jordan, Division Director Anticipated completion date of Corrective Action Plan: This item is corrected as of 10/01/2025.

About Reporting →

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,816,830 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 13, 2026 — management decision was due August 13, 2026.

2025-002
Reporting
OTHER MATTERS

2025-002 Finding – Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) / Transparency Act Reporting (Timeliness) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Program: Head Start Cluster — Assistance Listing 93.600 (Head Start) Compliance Requirement: Reporting (L) — FFATA / Transparency Act Special Reporting Type of Finding: Compliance (no internal control deficiency) Criteria Under the Transparency Act award term (2 CFR Part 170 Appendix A), recipients must report each first-tier subaward action subject to FFATA in SAM.gov no later than the end of the month following the month in which the subaward obligation was made. Condition During testing of FFATA special reporting under Reporting (L), we noted two first-tier subaward actions that were submitted in SAM.gov after the required reporting timeframe (subaward dates 9/11/2024 and 1/9/2025; SAM.gov submission date 4/16/2025). Based on the nature of the exceptions and the results of expanded procedures, the late submissions appear to be isolated to the period of the federal FSRS-to-SAM.gov transition rather than indicative of a systemic reporting breakdown. Management attributed the delays to federal system conversion issues, including access/role challenges, delayed training, and data migration/report rejection issues that required resolution with SAM.gov support. Accordingly, the noncompliance is limited to timeliness of transparency reporting (no questioned costs) and does not affect allowability of Head Start expenditures. Effect / Potential Effect Late FFATA reporting reduces the timeliness of public transparency and federal oversight information available in SAM.gov/USAspending and may increase the risk of noncompliance with federal reporting requirements; however, the matters noted did not result in questioned costs and did not affect allowability of program expenditures. Cause Management explained that the late submissions were primarily due to the federal FSRS→SAM.gov transition, including delayed federal training (Jan/Feb 2025), difficulties obtaining system access/roles, preloaded data errors in SAM.gov causing report rejections, backlogs in SAM.gov support, and staff turnover, which collectively delayed timely submission. Recommendation We recommend that SCOE continue its current FFATA reporting practices, including timely identification of first‑tier subawards subject to FFATA and submission of required data in SAM.gov, and continue maintaining documentation of reporting efforts (e.g., submission confirmations, rejection notices, and support ticket correspondence) when federal system changes or external access/data issues occur. Based on management’s explanation and the nature of the federal FSRS‑to‑SAM.gov transition challenges encountered during the period, SCOE’s response efforts (including follow‑up with SAM.gov support and corrective resubmissions as needed) appear appropriate; accordingly, no additional process changes are recommended beyond continuing the established procedures and retention of supporting evidence to demonstrate compliance in periods of federal system disruption. Questioned Costs None. Repeat Finding No. Views of Responsible Officials We acknowledge the instances of late FFATA first‑tier subaward reporting identified by the auditors. We believe the delays were primarily attributable to the federal transition from FSRS to SAM.gov, including access/role configuration challenges and system-related issues encountered during the conversion period. We took reasonable and timely steps to submit the required FFATA reports as soon as the federal system issues were resolved and to address any submission rejections or support requests as needed. We consider this condition isolated to the federal system transition period and not indicative of a systemic breakdown in our reporting processes. We intend to continue our existing FFATA reporting procedures and will continue to retain appropriate documentation of submissions and related system communications to support compliance during future federal reporting system changes.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2025-002 Finding – Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) / Transparency Act Reporting (Timeliness) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Program: Head Start Cluster — Assistance Listing 93.600 (Head Start) Compliance Requirement: Reporting (L) — FFATA / Transparency Act Special Reporting Type of Finding: Compliance (no internal control deficiency) Criteria Under the Transparency Act award term (2 CFR Part 170 Appendix A), recipients must report each first-tier subaward action subject to FFATA in SAM.gov no later than the end of the month following the month in which the subaward obligation was made. Condition During testing of FFATA special reporting under Reporting (L), we noted two first-tier subaward actions that were submitted in SAM.gov after the required reporting timeframe (subaward dates 9/11/2024 and 1/9/2025; SAM.gov submission date 4/16/2025). Based on the nature of the exceptions and the results of expanded procedures, the late submissions appear to be isolated to the period of the federal FSRS-to-SAM.gov transition rather than indicative of a systemic reporting breakdown. Management attributed the delays to federal system conversion issues, including access/role challenges, delayed training, and data migration/report rejection issues that required resolution with SAM.gov support. Accordingly, the noncompliance is limited to timeliness of transparency reporting (no questioned costs) and does not affect allowability of Head Start expenditures. Effect / Potential Effect Late FFATA reporting reduces the timeliness of public transparency and federal oversight information available in SAM.gov/USAspending and may increase the risk of noncompliance with federal reporting requirements; however, the matters noted did not result in questioned costs and did not affect allowability of program expenditures. Cause Management explained that the late submissions were primarily due to the federal FSRS→SAM.gov transition, including delayed federal training (Jan/Feb 2025), difficulties obtaining system access/roles, preloaded data errors in SAM.gov causing report rejections, backlogs in SAM.gov support, and staff turnover, which collectively delayed timely submission. Recommendation We recommend that SCOE continue its current FFATA reporting practices, including timely identification of first‑tier subawards subject to FFATA and submission of required data in SAM.gov, and continue maintaining documentation of reporting efforts (e.g., submission confirmations, rejection notices, and support ticket correspondence) when federal system changes or external access/data issues occur. Based on management’s explanation and the nature of the federal FSRS‑to‑SAM.gov transition challenges encountered during the period, SCOE’s response efforts (including follow‑up with SAM.gov support and corrective resubmissions as needed) appear appropriate; accordingly, no additional process changes are recommended beyond continuing the established procedures and retention of supporting evidence to demonstrate compliance in periods of federal system disruption. Questioned Costs None. Repeat Finding No. Views of Responsible Officials We acknowledge the instances of late FFATA first‑tier subaward reporting identified by the auditors. We believe the delays were primarily attributable to the federal transition from FSRS to SAM.gov, including access/role configuration challenges and system-related issues encountered during the conversion period. We took reasonable and timely steps to submit the required FFATA reports as soon as the federal system issues were resolved and to address any submission rejections or support requests as needed. We consider this condition isolated to the federal system transition period and not indicative of a systemic breakdown in our reporting processes. We intend to continue our existing FFATA reporting procedures and will continue to retain appropriate documentation of submissions and related system communications to support compliance during future federal reporting system changes.

Corrective Action Plan

2025-002 Finding – Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA)/Transparency Act Reporting (Timeliness) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Program: Head Start Cluster – Assistance Listing 93.600 (Head Start) Compliance Requirement: Reporting (L) – FFATA/Transparency Act Special Reporting Type of Finding: Compliance (no internal control deficiency) Finding Summary: Two first-tier subaward actions were submitted in SAM.gov after the required reporting timeframe. Based on the nature of the exceptions and the results of expanded procedures, the late submissions appear to be isolated to the period of the federal FSRS-to-SAM.gov transition rather than indicative of a systemic reporting breakdown. Management attributed the delays to federal system conversion issues, including access/role challenges, delayed training, and data migration/report rejection issues that required resolution with SAM.gov support. Accordingly, the noncompliance is limited to timeliness of transparency reporting (no questioned costs) and does not affect allowability of Head Start expenditures. Corrective Action Plan: Delays were primarily attributable to the federal transition from FSRS to SAM.gov, including access/role configuration challenges and system-related issues encountered during the conversion period. Reasonable and timely steps were taken to submit the required FFATA reports as soon as the federal system issues were resolved and to address any submission rejections or support requests as needed. Now that the filing of back logged reports is complete, we will continue with our existing FFATA reporting procedures. We will track contracts needing FFATA submission with an internal ticketing system to ensure that the filings are on time. We will retain appropriate documentation of submissions and related system communications to support compliance. We will submit said documentation to our business office as a secondary measure to ensure that the filing was done prior to processing said contract. Contact Person responsible for corrective action: Anthony Jordan, Division Director Anticipated completion date of Corrective Action Plan: This item is corrected as of 10/01/2025.

About Reporting →

FY 2025-06-30

$19,556,275 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 17, 2025 — management decision was due June 17, 2026.

2025-002
Reporting
OTHER MATTERS

2025-002 Finding – Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) / Transparency Act Reporting (Timeliness) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Program: Head Start Cluster — Assistance Listing 93.600 (Head Start) Compliance Requirement: Reporting (L) — FFATA / Transparency Act Special Reporting Type of Finding: Compliance (no internal control deficiency) Criteria Under the Transparency Act award term (2 CFR Part 170 Appendix A), recipients must report each first-tier subaward action subject to FFATA in SAM.gov no later than the end of the month following the month in which the subaward obligation was made. Condition During testing of FFATA special reporting under Reporting (L), we noted two first-tier subaward actions that were submitted in SAM.gov after the required reporting timeframe (subaward dates 9/11/2024 and 1/9/2025; SAM.gov submission date 4/16/2025). Based on the nature of the exceptions and the results of expanded procedures, the late submissions appear to be isolated to the period of the federal FSRS-to-SAM.gov transition rather than indicative of a systemic reporting breakdown. Management attributed the delays to federal system conversion issues, including access/role challenges, delayed training, and data migration/report rejection issues that required resolution with SAM.gov support. Accordingly, the noncompliance is limited to timeliness of transparency reporting (no questioned costs) and does not affect allowability of Head Start expenditures. Effect / Potential Effect Late FFATA reporting reduces the timeliness of public transparency and federal oversight information available in SAM.gov/USAspending and may increase the risk of noncompliance with federal reporting requirements; however, the matters noted did not result in questioned costs and did not affect allowability of program expenditures. Cause Management explained that the late submissions were primarily due to the federal FSRS→SAM.gov transition, including delayed federal training (Jan/Feb 2025), difficulties obtaining system access/roles, preloaded data errors in SAM.gov causing report rejections, backlogs in SAM.gov support, and staff turnover, which collectively delayed timely submission. Recommendation We recommend that SCOE continue its current FFATA reporting practices, including timely identification of first‑tier subawards subject to FFATA and submission of required data in SAM.gov, and continue maintaining documentation of reporting efforts (e.g., submission confirmations, rejection notices, and support ticket correspondence) when federal system changes or external access/data issues occur. Based on management’s explanation and the nature of the federal FSRS‑to‑SAM.gov transition challenges encountered during the period, SCOE’s response efforts (including follow‑up with SAM.gov support and corrective resubmissions as needed) appear appropriate; accordingly, no additional process changes are recommended beyond continuing the established procedures and retention of supporting evidence to demonstrate compliance in periods of federal system disruption. Questioned Costs None. Repeat Finding No. Views of Responsible Officials We acknowledge the instances of late FFATA first‑tier subaward reporting identified by the auditors. We believe the delays were primarily attributable to the federal transition from FSRS to SAM.gov, including access/role configuration challenges and system-related issues encountered during the conversion period. We took reasonable and timely steps to submit the required FFATA reports as soon as the federal system issues were resolved and to address any submission rejections or support requests as needed. We consider this condition isolated to the federal system transition period and not indicative of a systemic breakdown in our reporting processes. We intend to continue our existing FFATA reporting procedures and will continue to retain appropriate documentation of submissions and related system communications to support compliance during future federal reporting system changes.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2025-002 Finding – Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) / Transparency Act Reporting (Timeliness) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Program: Head Start Cluster — Assistance Listing 93.600 (Head Start) Compliance Requirement: Reporting (L) — FFATA / Transparency Act Special Reporting Type of Finding: Compliance (no internal control deficiency) Criteria Under the Transparency Act award term (2 CFR Part 170 Appendix A), recipients must report each first-tier subaward action subject to FFATA in SAM.gov no later than the end of the month following the month in which the subaward obligation was made. Condition During testing of FFATA special reporting under Reporting (L), we noted two first-tier subaward actions that were submitted in SAM.gov after the required reporting timeframe (subaward dates 9/11/2024 and 1/9/2025; SAM.gov submission date 4/16/2025). Based on the nature of the exceptions and the results of expanded procedures, the late submissions appear to be isolated to the period of the federal FSRS-to-SAM.gov transition rather than indicative of a systemic reporting breakdown. Management attributed the delays to federal system conversion issues, including access/role challenges, delayed training, and data migration/report rejection issues that required resolution with SAM.gov support. Accordingly, the noncompliance is limited to timeliness of transparency reporting (no questioned costs) and does not affect allowability of Head Start expenditures. Effect / Potential Effect Late FFATA reporting reduces the timeliness of public transparency and federal oversight information available in SAM.gov/USAspending and may increase the risk of noncompliance with federal reporting requirements; however, the matters noted did not result in questioned costs and did not affect allowability of program expenditures. Cause Management explained that the late submissions were primarily due to the federal FSRS→SAM.gov transition, including delayed federal training (Jan/Feb 2025), difficulties obtaining system access/roles, preloaded data errors in SAM.gov causing report rejections, backlogs in SAM.gov support, and staff turnover, which collectively delayed timely submission. Recommendation We recommend that SCOE continue its current FFATA reporting practices, including timely identification of first‑tier subawards subject to FFATA and submission of required data in SAM.gov, and continue maintaining documentation of reporting efforts (e.g., submission confirmations, rejection notices, and support ticket correspondence) when federal system changes or external access/data issues occur. Based on management’s explanation and the nature of the federal FSRS‑to‑SAM.gov transition challenges encountered during the period, SCOE’s response efforts (including follow‑up with SAM.gov support and corrective resubmissions as needed) appear appropriate; accordingly, no additional process changes are recommended beyond continuing the established procedures and retention of supporting evidence to demonstrate compliance in periods of federal system disruption. Questioned Costs None. Repeat Finding No. Views of Responsible Officials We acknowledge the instances of late FFATA first‑tier subaward reporting identified by the auditors. We believe the delays were primarily attributable to the federal transition from FSRS to SAM.gov, including access/role configuration challenges and system-related issues encountered during the conversion period. We took reasonable and timely steps to submit the required FFATA reports as soon as the federal system issues were resolved and to address any submission rejections or support requests as needed. We consider this condition isolated to the federal system transition period and not indicative of a systemic breakdown in our reporting processes. We intend to continue our existing FFATA reporting procedures and will continue to retain appropriate documentation of submissions and related system communications to support compliance during future federal reporting system changes.

Corrective Action Plan

2025-002 Finding – Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA)/Transparency Act Reporting (Timeliness) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Program: Head Start Cluster – Assistance Listing 93.600 (Head Start) Compliance Requirement: Reporting (L) – FFATA/Transparency Act Special Reporting Type of Finding: Compliance (no internal control deficiency) Finding Summary: Two first-tier subaward actions were submitted in SAM.gov after the required reporting timeframe. Based on the nature of the exceptions and the results of expanded procedures, the late submissions appear to be isolated to the period of the federal FSRS-to-SAM.gov transition rather than indicative of a systemic reporting breakdown. Management attributed the delays to federal system conversion issues, including access/role challenges, delayed training, and data migration/report rejection issues that required resolution with SAM.gov support. Accordingly, the noncompliance is limited to timeliness of transparency reporting (no questioned costs) and does not affect allowability of Head Start expenditures. Corrective Action Plan: Delays were primarily attributable to the federal transition from FSRS to SAM.gov, including access/role configuration challenges and system-related issues encountered during the conversion period. Reasonable and timely steps were taken to submit the required FFATA reports as soon as the federal system issues were resolved and to address any submission rejections or support requests as needed. Now that the filing of back logged reports is complete, we will continue with our existing FFATA reporting procedures. We will track contracts needing FFATA submission with an internal ticketing system to ensure that the filings are on time. We will retain appropriate documentation of submissions and related system communications to support compliance. We will submit said documentation to our business office as a secondary measure to ensure that the filing was done prior to processing said contract. Contact Person responsible for corrective action: Anthony Jordan, Division Director Anticipated completion date of Corrective Action Plan: This item is corrected as of 10/01/2025.

About Reporting →

FY 2025-06-30

$8,699,863 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 14, 2026 — management decision was due July 14, 2026.

2025-002
Reporting
OTHER MATTERS

2025-002 Finding – Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) / Transparency Act Reporting (Timeliness) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Program: Head Start Cluster — Assistance Listing 93.600 (Head Start) Compliance Requirement: Reporting (L) — FFATA / Transparency Act Special Reporting Type of Finding: Compliance (no internal control deficiency) Criteria Under the Transparency Act award term (2 CFR Part 170 Appendix A), recipients must report each first-tier subaward action subject to FFATA in SAM.gov no later than the end of the month following the month in which the subaward obligation was made. Condition During testing of FFATA special reporting under Reporting (L), we noted two first-tier subaward actions that were submitted in SAM.gov after the required reporting timeframe (subaward dates 9/11/2024 and 1/9/2025; SAM.gov submission date 4/16/2025). Based on the nature of the exceptions and the results of expanded procedures, the late submissions appear to be isolated to the period of the federal FSRS-to-SAM.gov transition rather than indicative of a systemic reporting breakdown. Management attributed the delays to federal system conversion issues, including access/role challenges, delayed training, and data migration/report rejection issues that required resolution with SAM.gov support. Accordingly, the noncompliance is limited to timeliness of transparency reporting (no questioned costs) and does not affect allowability of Head Start expenditures. Effect / Potential Effect Late FFATA reporting reduces the timeliness of public transparency and federal oversight information available in SAM.gov/USAspending and may increase the risk of noncompliance with federal reporting requirements; however, the matters noted did not result in questioned costs and did not affect allowability of program expenditures. Cause Management explained that the late submissions were primarily due to the federal FSRS→SAM.gov transition, including delayed federal training (Jan/Feb 2025), difficulties obtaining system access/roles, preloaded data errors in SAM.gov causing report rejections, backlogs in SAM.gov support, and staff turnover, which collectively delayed timely submission. Recommendation We recommend that SCOE continue its current FFATA reporting practices, including timely identification of first‑tier subawards subject to FFATA and submission of required data in SAM.gov, and continue maintaining documentation of reporting efforts (e.g., submission confirmations, rejection notices, and support ticket correspondence) when federal system changes or external access/data issues occur. Based on management’s explanation and the nature of the federal FSRS‑to‑SAM.gov transition challenges encountered during the period, SCOE’s response efforts (including follow‑up with SAM.gov support and corrective resubmissions as needed) appear appropriate; accordingly, no additional process changes are recommended beyond continuing the established procedures and retention of supporting evidence to demonstrate compliance in periods of federal system disruption. Questioned Costs None. Repeat Finding No. Views of Responsible Officials We acknowledge the instances of late FFATA first‑tier subaward reporting identified by the auditors. We believe the delays were primarily attributable to the federal transition from FSRS to SAM.gov, including access/role configuration challenges and system-related issues encountered during the conversion period. We took reasonable and timely steps to submit the required FFATA reports as soon as the federal system issues were resolved and to address any submission rejections or support requests as needed. We consider this condition isolated to the federal system transition period and not indicative of a systemic breakdown in our reporting processes. We intend to continue our existing FFATA reporting procedures and will continue to retain appropriate documentation of submissions and related system communications to support compliance during future federal reporting system changes.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2025-002 Finding – Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) / Transparency Act Reporting (Timeliness) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Program: Head Start Cluster — Assistance Listing 93.600 (Head Start) Compliance Requirement: Reporting (L) — FFATA / Transparency Act Special Reporting Type of Finding: Compliance (no internal control deficiency) Criteria Under the Transparency Act award term (2 CFR Part 170 Appendix A), recipients must report each first-tier subaward action subject to FFATA in SAM.gov no later than the end of the month following the month in which the subaward obligation was made. Condition During testing of FFATA special reporting under Reporting (L), we noted two first-tier subaward actions that were submitted in SAM.gov after the required reporting timeframe (subaward dates 9/11/2024 and 1/9/2025; SAM.gov submission date 4/16/2025). Based on the nature of the exceptions and the results of expanded procedures, the late submissions appear to be isolated to the period of the federal FSRS-to-SAM.gov transition rather than indicative of a systemic reporting breakdown. Management attributed the delays to federal system conversion issues, including access/role challenges, delayed training, and data migration/report rejection issues that required resolution with SAM.gov support. Accordingly, the noncompliance is limited to timeliness of transparency reporting (no questioned costs) and does not affect allowability of Head Start expenditures. Effect / Potential Effect Late FFATA reporting reduces the timeliness of public transparency and federal oversight information available in SAM.gov/USAspending and may increase the risk of noncompliance with federal reporting requirements; however, the matters noted did not result in questioned costs and did not affect allowability of program expenditures. Cause Management explained that the late submissions were primarily due to the federal FSRS→SAM.gov transition, including delayed federal training (Jan/Feb 2025), difficulties obtaining system access/roles, preloaded data errors in SAM.gov causing report rejections, backlogs in SAM.gov support, and staff turnover, which collectively delayed timely submission. Recommendation We recommend that SCOE continue its current FFATA reporting practices, including timely identification of first‑tier subawards subject to FFATA and submission of required data in SAM.gov, and continue maintaining documentation of reporting efforts (e.g., submission confirmations, rejection notices, and support ticket correspondence) when federal system changes or external access/data issues occur. Based on management’s explanation and the nature of the federal FSRS‑to‑SAM.gov transition challenges encountered during the period, SCOE’s response efforts (including follow‑up with SAM.gov support and corrective resubmissions as needed) appear appropriate; accordingly, no additional process changes are recommended beyond continuing the established procedures and retention of supporting evidence to demonstrate compliance in periods of federal system disruption. Questioned Costs None. Repeat Finding No. Views of Responsible Officials We acknowledge the instances of late FFATA first‑tier subaward reporting identified by the auditors. We believe the delays were primarily attributable to the federal transition from FSRS to SAM.gov, including access/role configuration challenges and system-related issues encountered during the conversion period. We took reasonable and timely steps to submit the required FFATA reports as soon as the federal system issues were resolved and to address any submission rejections or support requests as needed. We consider this condition isolated to the federal system transition period and not indicative of a systemic breakdown in our reporting processes. We intend to continue our existing FFATA reporting procedures and will continue to retain appropriate documentation of submissions and related system communications to support compliance during future federal reporting system changes.

Corrective Action Plan

2025-002 Finding – Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA)/Transparency Act Reporting (Timeliness) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Program: Head Start Cluster – Assistance Listing 93.600 (Head Start) Compliance Requirement: Reporting (L) – FFATA/Transparency Act Special Reporting Type of Finding: Compliance (no internal control deficiency) Finding Summary: Two first-tier subaward actions were submitted in SAM.gov after the required reporting timeframe. Based on the nature of the exceptions and the results of expanded procedures, the late submissions appear to be isolated to the period of the federal FSRS-to-SAM.gov transition rather than indicative of a systemic reporting breakdown. Management attributed the delays to federal system conversion issues, including access/role challenges, delayed training, and data migration/report rejection issues that required resolution with SAM.gov support. Accordingly, the noncompliance is limited to timeliness of transparency reporting (no questioned costs) and does not affect allowability of Head Start expenditures. Corrective Action Plan: Delays were primarily attributable to the federal transition from FSRS to SAM.gov, including access/role configuration challenges and system-related issues encountered during the conversion period. Reasonable and timely steps were taken to submit the required FFATA reports as soon as the federal system issues were resolved and to address any submission rejections or support requests as needed. Now that the filing of back logged reports is complete, we will continue with our existing FFATA reporting procedures. We will track contracts needing FFATA submission with an internal ticketing system to ensure that the filings are on time. We will retain appropriate documentation of submissions and related system communications to support compliance. We will submit said documentation to our business office as a secondary measure to ensure that the filing was done prior to processing said contract. Contact Person responsible for corrective action: Anthony Jordan, Division Director Anticipated completion date of Corrective Action Plan: This item is corrected as of 10/01/2025.

About Reporting →

FY 2025-06-30

$1,688,510 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 19, 2025 — management decision was due June 19, 2026.

2025-002
Reporting
OTHER MATTERS

2025-002 Finding – Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) / Transparency Act Reporting (Timeliness) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Program: Head Start Cluster — Assistance Listing 93.600 (Head Start) Compliance Requirement: Reporting (L) — FFATA / Transparency Act Special Reporting Type of Finding: Compliance (no internal control deficiency) Criteria Under the Transparency Act award term (2 CFR Part 170 Appendix A), recipients must report each first-tier subaward action subject to FFATA in SAM.gov no later than the end of the month following the month in which the subaward obligation was made. Condition During testing of FFATA special reporting under Reporting (L), we noted two first-tier subaward actions that were submitted in SAM.gov after the required reporting timeframe (subaward dates 9/11/2024 and 1/9/2025; SAM.gov submission date 4/16/2025). Based on the nature of the exceptions and the results of expanded procedures, the late submissions appear to be isolated to the period of the federal FSRS-to-SAM.gov transition rather than indicative of a systemic reporting breakdown. Management attributed the delays to federal system conversion issues, including access/role challenges, delayed training, and data migration/report rejection issues that required resolution with SAM.gov support. Accordingly, the noncompliance is limited to timeliness of transparency reporting (no questioned costs) and does not affect allowability of Head Start expenditures. Effect / Potential Effect Late FFATA reporting reduces the timeliness of public transparency and federal oversight information available in SAM.gov/USAspending and may increase the risk of noncompliance with federal reporting requirements; however, the matters noted did not result in questioned costs and did not affect allowability of program expenditures. Cause Management explained that the late submissions were primarily due to the federal FSRS→SAM.gov transition, including delayed federal training (Jan/Feb 2025), difficulties obtaining system access/roles, preloaded data errors in SAM.gov causing report rejections, backlogs in SAM.gov support, and staff turnover, which collectively delayed timely submission. Recommendation We recommend that SCOE continue its current FFATA reporting practices, including timely identification of first‑tier subawards subject to FFATA and submission of required data in SAM.gov, and continue maintaining documentation of reporting efforts (e.g., submission confirmations, rejection notices, and support ticket correspondence) when federal system changes or external access/data issues occur. Based on management’s explanation and the nature of the federal FSRS‑to‑SAM.gov transition challenges encountered during the period, SCOE’s response efforts (including follow‑up with SAM.gov support and corrective resubmissions as needed) appear appropriate; accordingly, no additional process changes are recommended beyond continuing the established procedures and retention of supporting evidence to demonstrate compliance in periods of federal system disruption. Questioned Costs None. Repeat Finding No. Views of Responsible Officials We acknowledge the instances of late FFATA first‑tier subaward reporting identified by the auditors. We believe the delays were primarily attributable to the federal transition from FSRS to SAM.gov, including access/role configuration challenges and system-related issues encountered during the conversion period. We took reasonable and timely steps to submit the required FFATA reports as soon as the federal system issues were resolved and to address any submission rejections or support requests as needed. We consider this condition isolated to the federal system transition period and not indicative of a systemic breakdown in our reporting processes. We intend to continue our existing FFATA reporting procedures and will continue to retain appropriate documentation of submissions and related system communications to support compliance during future federal reporting system changes.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2025-002 Finding – Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) / Transparency Act Reporting (Timeliness) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Program: Head Start Cluster — Assistance Listing 93.600 (Head Start) Compliance Requirement: Reporting (L) — FFATA / Transparency Act Special Reporting Type of Finding: Compliance (no internal control deficiency) Criteria Under the Transparency Act award term (2 CFR Part 170 Appendix A), recipients must report each first-tier subaward action subject to FFATA in SAM.gov no later than the end of the month following the month in which the subaward obligation was made. Condition During testing of FFATA special reporting under Reporting (L), we noted two first-tier subaward actions that were submitted in SAM.gov after the required reporting timeframe (subaward dates 9/11/2024 and 1/9/2025; SAM.gov submission date 4/16/2025). Based on the nature of the exceptions and the results of expanded procedures, the late submissions appear to be isolated to the period of the federal FSRS-to-SAM.gov transition rather than indicative of a systemic reporting breakdown. Management attributed the delays to federal system conversion issues, including access/role challenges, delayed training, and data migration/report rejection issues that required resolution with SAM.gov support. Accordingly, the noncompliance is limited to timeliness of transparency reporting (no questioned costs) and does not affect allowability of Head Start expenditures. Effect / Potential Effect Late FFATA reporting reduces the timeliness of public transparency and federal oversight information available in SAM.gov/USAspending and may increase the risk of noncompliance with federal reporting requirements; however, the matters noted did not result in questioned costs and did not affect allowability of program expenditures. Cause Management explained that the late submissions were primarily due to the federal FSRS→SAM.gov transition, including delayed federal training (Jan/Feb 2025), difficulties obtaining system access/roles, preloaded data errors in SAM.gov causing report rejections, backlogs in SAM.gov support, and staff turnover, which collectively delayed timely submission. Recommendation We recommend that SCOE continue its current FFATA reporting practices, including timely identification of first‑tier subawards subject to FFATA and submission of required data in SAM.gov, and continue maintaining documentation of reporting efforts (e.g., submission confirmations, rejection notices, and support ticket correspondence) when federal system changes or external access/data issues occur. Based on management’s explanation and the nature of the federal FSRS‑to‑SAM.gov transition challenges encountered during the period, SCOE’s response efforts (including follow‑up with SAM.gov support and corrective resubmissions as needed) appear appropriate; accordingly, no additional process changes are recommended beyond continuing the established procedures and retention of supporting evidence to demonstrate compliance in periods of federal system disruption. Questioned Costs None. Repeat Finding No. Views of Responsible Officials We acknowledge the instances of late FFATA first‑tier subaward reporting identified by the auditors. We believe the delays were primarily attributable to the federal transition from FSRS to SAM.gov, including access/role configuration challenges and system-related issues encountered during the conversion period. We took reasonable and timely steps to submit the required FFATA reports as soon as the federal system issues were resolved and to address any submission rejections or support requests as needed. We consider this condition isolated to the federal system transition period and not indicative of a systemic breakdown in our reporting processes. We intend to continue our existing FFATA reporting procedures and will continue to retain appropriate documentation of submissions and related system communications to support compliance during future federal reporting system changes.

Corrective Action Plan

2025-002 Finding – Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA)/Transparency Act Reporting (Timeliness) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Program: Head Start Cluster – Assistance Listing 93.600 (Head Start) Compliance Requirement: Reporting (L) – FFATA/Transparency Act Special Reporting Type of Finding: Compliance (no internal control deficiency) Finding Summary: Two first-tier subaward actions were submitted in SAM.gov after the required reporting timeframe. Based on the nature of the exceptions and the results of expanded procedures, the late submissions appear to be isolated to the period of the federal FSRS-to-SAM.gov transition rather than indicative of a systemic reporting breakdown. Management attributed the delays to federal system conversion issues, including access/role challenges, delayed training, and data migration/report rejection issues that required resolution with SAM.gov support. Accordingly, the noncompliance is limited to timeliness of transparency reporting (no questioned costs) and does not affect allowability of Head Start expenditures. Corrective Action Plan: Delays were primarily attributable to the federal transition from FSRS to SAM.gov, including access/role configuration challenges and system-related issues encountered during the conversion period. Reasonable and timely steps were taken to submit the required FFATA reports as soon as the federal system issues were resolved and to address any submission rejections or support requests as needed. Now that the filing of back logged reports is complete, we will continue with our existing FFATA reporting procedures. We will track contracts needing FFATA submission with an internal ticketing system to ensure that the filings are on time. We will retain appropriate documentation of submissions and related system communications to support compliance. We will submit said documentation to our business office as a secondary measure to ensure that the filing was done prior to processing said contract. Contact Person responsible for corrective action: Anthony Jordan, Division Director Anticipated completion date of Corrective Action Plan: This item is corrected as of 10/01/2025.

About Reporting →

FY 2025-06-30

$2,962,144 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 4, 2026 — management decision was due August 4, 2026.

2025-002
Reporting
OTHER MATTERS

2025-002 Finding – Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) / Transparency Act Reporting (Timeliness) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Program: Head Start Cluster — Assistance Listing 93.600 (Head Start) Compliance Requirement: Reporting (L) — FFATA / Transparency Act Special Reporting Type of Finding: Compliance (no internal control deficiency) Criteria Under the Transparency Act award term (2 CFR Part 170 Appendix A), recipients must report each first-tier subaward action subject to FFATA in SAM.gov no later than the end of the month following the month in which the subaward obligation was made. Condition During testing of FFATA special reporting under Reporting (L), we noted two first-tier subaward actions that were submitted in SAM.gov after the required reporting timeframe (subaward dates 9/11/2024 and 1/9/2025; SAM.gov submission date 4/16/2025). Based on the nature of the exceptions and the results of expanded procedures, the late submissions appear to be isolated to the period of the federal FSRS-to-SAM.gov transition rather than indicative of a systemic reporting breakdown. Management attributed the delays to federal system conversion issues, including access/role challenges, delayed training, and data migration/report rejection issues that required resolution with SAM.gov support. Accordingly, the noncompliance is limited to timeliness of transparency reporting (no questioned costs) and does not affect allowability of Head Start expenditures. Effect / Potential Effect Late FFATA reporting reduces the timeliness of public transparency and federal oversight information available in SAM.gov/USAspending and may increase the risk of noncompliance with federal reporting requirements; however, the matters noted did not result in questioned costs and did not affect allowability of program expenditures. Cause Management explained that the late submissions were primarily due to the federal FSRS→SAM.gov transition, including delayed federal training (Jan/Feb 2025), difficulties obtaining system access/roles, preloaded data errors in SAM.gov causing report rejections, backlogs in SAM.gov support, and staff turnover, which collectively delayed timely submission. Recommendation We recommend that SCOE continue its current FFATA reporting practices, including timely identification of first‑tier subawards subject to FFATA and submission of required data in SAM.gov, and continue maintaining documentation of reporting efforts (e.g., submission confirmations, rejection notices, and support ticket correspondence) when federal system changes or external access/data issues occur. Based on management’s explanation and the nature of the federal FSRS‑to‑SAM.gov transition challenges encountered during the period, SCOE’s response efforts (including follow‑up with SAM.gov support and corrective resubmissions as needed) appear appropriate; accordingly, no additional process changes are recommended beyond continuing the established procedures and retention of supporting evidence to demonstrate compliance in periods of federal system disruption. Questioned Costs None. Repeat Finding No. Views of Responsible Officials We acknowledge the instances of late FFATA first‑tier subaward reporting identified by the auditors. We believe the delays were primarily attributable to the federal transition from FSRS to SAM.gov, including access/role configuration challenges and system-related issues encountered during the conversion period. We took reasonable and timely steps to submit the required FFATA reports as soon as the federal system issues were resolved and to address any submission rejections or support requests as needed. We consider this condition isolated to the federal system transition period and not indicative of a systemic breakdown in our reporting processes. We intend to continue our existing FFATA reporting procedures and will continue to retain appropriate documentation of submissions and related system communications to support compliance during future federal reporting system changes.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2025-002 Finding – Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) / Transparency Act Reporting (Timeliness) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Program: Head Start Cluster — Assistance Listing 93.600 (Head Start) Compliance Requirement: Reporting (L) — FFATA / Transparency Act Special Reporting Type of Finding: Compliance (no internal control deficiency) Criteria Under the Transparency Act award term (2 CFR Part 170 Appendix A), recipients must report each first-tier subaward action subject to FFATA in SAM.gov no later than the end of the month following the month in which the subaward obligation was made. Condition During testing of FFATA special reporting under Reporting (L), we noted two first-tier subaward actions that were submitted in SAM.gov after the required reporting timeframe (subaward dates 9/11/2024 and 1/9/2025; SAM.gov submission date 4/16/2025). Based on the nature of the exceptions and the results of expanded procedures, the late submissions appear to be isolated to the period of the federal FSRS-to-SAM.gov transition rather than indicative of a systemic reporting breakdown. Management attributed the delays to federal system conversion issues, including access/role challenges, delayed training, and data migration/report rejection issues that required resolution with SAM.gov support. Accordingly, the noncompliance is limited to timeliness of transparency reporting (no questioned costs) and does not affect allowability of Head Start expenditures. Effect / Potential Effect Late FFATA reporting reduces the timeliness of public transparency and federal oversight information available in SAM.gov/USAspending and may increase the risk of noncompliance with federal reporting requirements; however, the matters noted did not result in questioned costs and did not affect allowability of program expenditures. Cause Management explained that the late submissions were primarily due to the federal FSRS→SAM.gov transition, including delayed federal training (Jan/Feb 2025), difficulties obtaining system access/roles, preloaded data errors in SAM.gov causing report rejections, backlogs in SAM.gov support, and staff turnover, which collectively delayed timely submission. Recommendation We recommend that SCOE continue its current FFATA reporting practices, including timely identification of first‑tier subawards subject to FFATA and submission of required data in SAM.gov, and continue maintaining documentation of reporting efforts (e.g., submission confirmations, rejection notices, and support ticket correspondence) when federal system changes or external access/data issues occur. Based on management’s explanation and the nature of the federal FSRS‑to‑SAM.gov transition challenges encountered during the period, SCOE’s response efforts (including follow‑up with SAM.gov support and corrective resubmissions as needed) appear appropriate; accordingly, no additional process changes are recommended beyond continuing the established procedures and retention of supporting evidence to demonstrate compliance in periods of federal system disruption. Questioned Costs None. Repeat Finding No. Views of Responsible Officials We acknowledge the instances of late FFATA first‑tier subaward reporting identified by the auditors. We believe the delays were primarily attributable to the federal transition from FSRS to SAM.gov, including access/role configuration challenges and system-related issues encountered during the conversion period. We took reasonable and timely steps to submit the required FFATA reports as soon as the federal system issues were resolved and to address any submission rejections or support requests as needed. We consider this condition isolated to the federal system transition period and not indicative of a systemic breakdown in our reporting processes. We intend to continue our existing FFATA reporting procedures and will continue to retain appropriate documentation of submissions and related system communications to support compliance during future federal reporting system changes.

Corrective Action Plan

2025-002 Finding – Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA)/Transparency Act Reporting (Timeliness) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Program: Head Start Cluster – Assistance Listing 93.600 (Head Start) Compliance Requirement: Reporting (L) – FFATA/Transparency Act Special Reporting Type of Finding: Compliance (no internal control deficiency) Finding Summary: Two first-tier subaward actions were submitted in SAM.gov after the required reporting timeframe. Based on the nature of the exceptions and the results of expanded procedures, the late submissions appear to be isolated to the period of the federal FSRS-to-SAM.gov transition rather than indicative of a systemic reporting breakdown. Management attributed the delays to federal system conversion issues, including access/role challenges, delayed training, and data migration/report rejection issues that required resolution with SAM.gov support. Accordingly, the noncompliance is limited to timeliness of transparency reporting (no questioned costs) and does not affect allowability of Head Start expenditures. Corrective Action Plan: Delays were primarily attributable to the federal transition from FSRS to SAM.gov, including access/role configuration challenges and system-related issues encountered during the conversion period. Reasonable and timely steps were taken to submit the required FFATA reports as soon as the federal system issues were resolved and to address any submission rejections or support requests as needed. Now that the filing of back logged reports is complete, we will continue with our existing FFATA reporting procedures. We will track contracts needing FFATA submission with an internal ticketing system to ensure that the filings are on time. We will retain appropriate documentation of submissions and related system communications to support compliance. We will submit said documentation to our business office as a secondary measure to ensure that the filing was done prior to processing said contract. Contact Person responsible for corrective action: Anthony Jordan, Division Director Anticipated completion date of Corrective Action Plan: This item is corrected as of 10/01/2025.

About Reporting →

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$8,638,840 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 10, 2026 — management decision was due August 10, 2026.

2025-002
Reporting
OTHER MATTERS

2025-002 Finding – Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) / Transparency Act Reporting (Timeliness) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Program: Head Start Cluster — Assistance Listing 93.600 (Head Start) Compliance Requirement: Reporting (L) — FFATA / Transparency Act Special Reporting Type of Finding: Compliance (no internal control deficiency) Criteria Under the Transparency Act award term (2 CFR Part 170 Appendix A), recipients must report each first-tier subaward action subject to FFATA in SAM.gov no later than the end of the month following the month in which the subaward obligation was made. Condition During testing of FFATA special reporting under Reporting (L), we noted two first-tier subaward actions that were submitted in SAM.gov after the required reporting timeframe (subaward dates 9/11/2024 and 1/9/2025; SAM.gov submission date 4/16/2025). Based on the nature of the exceptions and the results of expanded procedures, the late submissions appear to be isolated to the period of the federal FSRS-to-SAM.gov transition rather than indicative of a systemic reporting breakdown. Management attributed the delays to federal system conversion issues, including access/role challenges, delayed training, and data migration/report rejection issues that required resolution with SAM.gov support. Accordingly, the noncompliance is limited to timeliness of transparency reporting (no questioned costs) and does not affect allowability of Head Start expenditures. Effect / Potential Effect Late FFATA reporting reduces the timeliness of public transparency and federal oversight information available in SAM.gov/USAspending and may increase the risk of noncompliance with federal reporting requirements; however, the matters noted did not result in questioned costs and did not affect allowability of program expenditures. Cause Management explained that the late submissions were primarily due to the federal FSRS→SAM.gov transition, including delayed federal training (Jan/Feb 2025), difficulties obtaining system access/roles, preloaded data errors in SAM.gov causing report rejections, backlogs in SAM.gov support, and staff turnover, which collectively delayed timely submission. Recommendation We recommend that SCOE continue its current FFATA reporting practices, including timely identification of first‑tier subawards subject to FFATA and submission of required data in SAM.gov, and continue maintaining documentation of reporting efforts (e.g., submission confirmations, rejection notices, and support ticket correspondence) when federal system changes or external access/data issues occur. Based on management’s explanation and the nature of the federal FSRS‑to‑SAM.gov transition challenges encountered during the period, SCOE’s response efforts (including follow‑up with SAM.gov support and corrective resubmissions as needed) appear appropriate; accordingly, no additional process changes are recommended beyond continuing the established procedures and retention of supporting evidence to demonstrate compliance in periods of federal system disruption. Questioned Costs None. Repeat Finding No. Views of Responsible Officials We acknowledge the instances of late FFATA first‑tier subaward reporting identified by the auditors. We believe the delays were primarily attributable to the federal transition from FSRS to SAM.gov, including access/role configuration challenges and system-related issues encountered during the conversion period. We took reasonable and timely steps to submit the required FFATA reports as soon as the federal system issues were resolved and to address any submission rejections or support requests as needed. We consider this condition isolated to the federal system transition period and not indicative of a systemic breakdown in our reporting processes. We intend to continue our existing FFATA reporting procedures and will continue to retain appropriate documentation of submissions and related system communications to support compliance during future federal reporting system changes.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2025-002 Finding – Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) / Transparency Act Reporting (Timeliness) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Program: Head Start Cluster — Assistance Listing 93.600 (Head Start) Compliance Requirement: Reporting (L) — FFATA / Transparency Act Special Reporting Type of Finding: Compliance (no internal control deficiency) Criteria Under the Transparency Act award term (2 CFR Part 170 Appendix A), recipients must report each first-tier subaward action subject to FFATA in SAM.gov no later than the end of the month following the month in which the subaward obligation was made. Condition During testing of FFATA special reporting under Reporting (L), we noted two first-tier subaward actions that were submitted in SAM.gov after the required reporting timeframe (subaward dates 9/11/2024 and 1/9/2025; SAM.gov submission date 4/16/2025). Based on the nature of the exceptions and the results of expanded procedures, the late submissions appear to be isolated to the period of the federal FSRS-to-SAM.gov transition rather than indicative of a systemic reporting breakdown. Management attributed the delays to federal system conversion issues, including access/role challenges, delayed training, and data migration/report rejection issues that required resolution with SAM.gov support. Accordingly, the noncompliance is limited to timeliness of transparency reporting (no questioned costs) and does not affect allowability of Head Start expenditures. Effect / Potential Effect Late FFATA reporting reduces the timeliness of public transparency and federal oversight information available in SAM.gov/USAspending and may increase the risk of noncompliance with federal reporting requirements; however, the matters noted did not result in questioned costs and did not affect allowability of program expenditures. Cause Management explained that the late submissions were primarily due to the federal FSRS→SAM.gov transition, including delayed federal training (Jan/Feb 2025), difficulties obtaining system access/roles, preloaded data errors in SAM.gov causing report rejections, backlogs in SAM.gov support, and staff turnover, which collectively delayed timely submission. Recommendation We recommend that SCOE continue its current FFATA reporting practices, including timely identification of first‑tier subawards subject to FFATA and submission of required data in SAM.gov, and continue maintaining documentation of reporting efforts (e.g., submission confirmations, rejection notices, and support ticket correspondence) when federal system changes or external access/data issues occur. Based on management’s explanation and the nature of the federal FSRS‑to‑SAM.gov transition challenges encountered during the period, SCOE’s response efforts (including follow‑up with SAM.gov support and corrective resubmissions as needed) appear appropriate; accordingly, no additional process changes are recommended beyond continuing the established procedures and retention of supporting evidence to demonstrate compliance in periods of federal system disruption. Questioned Costs None. Repeat Finding No. Views of Responsible Officials We acknowledge the instances of late FFATA first‑tier subaward reporting identified by the auditors. We believe the delays were primarily attributable to the federal transition from FSRS to SAM.gov, including access/role configuration challenges and system-related issues encountered during the conversion period. We took reasonable and timely steps to submit the required FFATA reports as soon as the federal system issues were resolved and to address any submission rejections or support requests as needed. We consider this condition isolated to the federal system transition period and not indicative of a systemic breakdown in our reporting processes. We intend to continue our existing FFATA reporting procedures and will continue to retain appropriate documentation of submissions and related system communications to support compliance during future federal reporting system changes.

Corrective Action Plan

2025-002 Finding – Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA)/Transparency Act Reporting (Timeliness) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Program: Head Start Cluster – Assistance Listing 93.600 (Head Start) Compliance Requirement: Reporting (L) – FFATA/Transparency Act Special Reporting Type of Finding: Compliance (no internal control deficiency) Finding Summary: Two first-tier subaward actions were submitted in SAM.gov after the required reporting timeframe. Based on the nature of the exceptions and the results of expanded procedures, the late submissions appear to be isolated to the period of the federal FSRS-to-SAM.gov transition rather than indicative of a systemic reporting breakdown. Management attributed the delays to federal system conversion issues, including access/role challenges, delayed training, and data migration/report rejection issues that required resolution with SAM.gov support. Accordingly, the noncompliance is limited to timeliness of transparency reporting (no questioned costs) and does not affect allowability of Head Start expenditures. Corrective Action Plan: Delays were primarily attributable to the federal transition from FSRS to SAM.gov, including access/role configuration challenges and system-related issues encountered during the conversion period. Reasonable and timely steps were taken to submit the required FFATA reports as soon as the federal system issues were resolved and to address any submission rejections or support requests as needed. Now that the filing of back logged reports is complete, we will continue with our existing FFATA reporting procedures. We will track contracts needing FFATA submission with an internal ticketing system to ensure that the filings are on time. We will retain appropriate documentation of submissions and related system communications to support compliance. We will submit said documentation to our business office as a secondary measure to ensure that the filing was done prior to processing said contract. Contact Person responsible for corrective action: Anthony Jordan, Division Director Anticipated completion date of Corrective Action Plan: This item is corrected as of 10/01/2025.

About Reporting →

FY 2024-06-30

$30,006,955 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 25, 2024 — management decision was due May 25, 2025.

FY 2024-06-30

$3,202,711 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 3, 2025 — management decision was due July 3, 2025.

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$8,705,497 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 20, 2024 — management decision was due June 20, 2025.

FY 2024-06-30

$13,465,656 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 18, 2025 — management decision was due August 18, 2025.

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$11,470,525 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 29, 2024 — management decision was due June 29, 2025.

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$7,378,816 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 19, 2024 — management decision was due June 19, 2025.

FY 2024-06-30

$5,770,097 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 20, 2024 — management decision was due June 20, 2025.

FY 2024-06-30

$2,883,309 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 2, 2025 — management decision was due July 2, 2025.

FY 2024-06-30

$31,415,896 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 10, 2025 — management decision was due July 10, 2025.

FY 2024-06-30

$5,797,739 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 3, 2025 — management decision was due September 3, 2025.

FY 2024-06-30

$4,819,721 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 27, 2025 — management decision was due August 27, 2025.

FY 2024-06-30

$112,975,344 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 9, 2025 — management decision was due July 9, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

$32,833,009 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 6, 2024 — management decision was due September 6, 2024.

2023-002
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTS

Federal Program Affected Program Name: COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER III) Fund: Learning Loss (Resource 3214), Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: ESSER II State Reserve (Resource 3216), and Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: GEER II (Resource 3217) Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U, 84.425D, 84.425C Pass‐Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Criteria The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to provide funding to LEAs pursuant to the American Rescue Plan of 2021 (ARP Act) to address the learning loss requirement portion of ESSER III funds. Indirect costs for the total ESSER III allocation (Resource 3213 and 3214 combined) should be charged to Resource 3213 only. In addition, indirect cost for the Expanded Learning Opportunities, ESSER II State Reserves program (Resource 3216) and the Expanded Learning Opportunities, GEER II program (Resource 3217) is not allowable. Additional information is available on the on the CDE’s ARP Act Funding web page at https://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/cr/arpact.asp#esseriiialloc. Condition During our audit, we found the District incorrectly charged $24,363 of indirect costs to Resource 3214. The District’s total indirect costs, $42,097, for Resources 3213 and 3214 combined were under the LEA approved rate of 4.96%. In addition, the District incorrectly charged $15,008 of indirect costs to Resource 3216 and $3,440 of indirect costs to Resource 3217, which do not allow indirect costs for those resources. Questioned Costs A total of $42,811 in questioned costs was identified as a result of the conditions identified above. As the total indirect costs charged to resources 3213 and 3214 were under the District’s approved rate, the likely questioned cost is deemed to be $18,448 for resources 3216 (Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (ESSER II) and Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (GEER II). Context The conditions were identified as a result of the auditor’s federal program testing of the District’s indirect cost charges. Effect The District is out of compliance with allowable indirect cost charge requirements of the COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund programs. Cause The condition identified above appears to be due to the District not being familiar with the varying indirect cost requirements for each of the ESF federal programs. Recommendation In the 2023‐2024 fiscal year, the District should transfer $24,363 from the District’s General Fund Resource 3213 to the District’s General Fund Resource 3214, as well as, transferring $15,008 and $3,440 from the District’s General Fund unrestricted resource to Resources 3216 and 3217. In addition, the District should review their procedures to ensure it is only charging indirect costs to those programs that allow it.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Program Affected Program Name: COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER III) Fund: Learning Loss (Resource 3214), Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: ESSER II State Reserve (Resource 3216), and Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: GEER II (Resource 3217) Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U, 84.425D, 84.425C Pass‐Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Criteria The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to provide funding to LEAs pursuant to the American Rescue Plan of 2021 (ARP Act) to address the learning loss requirement portion of ESSER III funds. Indirect costs for the total ESSER III allocation (Resource 3213 and 3214 combined) should be charged to Resource 3213 only. In addition, indirect cost for the Expanded Learning Opportunities, ESSER II State Reserves program (Resource 3216) and the Expanded Learning Opportunities, GEER II program (Resource 3217) is not allowable. Additional information is available on the on the CDE’s ARP Act Funding web page at https://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/cr/arpact.asp#esseriiialloc. Condition During our audit, we found the District incorrectly charged $24,363 of indirect costs to Resource 3214. The District’s total indirect costs, $42,097, for Resources 3213 and 3214 combined were under the LEA approved rate of 4.96%. In addition, the District incorrectly charged $15,008 of indirect costs to Resource 3216 and $3,440 of indirect costs to Resource 3217, which do not allow indirect costs for those resources. Questioned Costs A total of $42,811 in questioned costs was identified as a result of the conditions identified above. As the total indirect costs charged to resources 3213 and 3214 were under the District’s approved rate, the likely questioned cost is deemed to be $18,448 for resources 3216 (Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (ESSER II) and Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (GEER II). Context The conditions were identified as a result of the auditor’s federal program testing of the District’s indirect cost charges. Effect The District is out of compliance with allowable indirect cost charge requirements of the COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund programs. Cause The condition identified above appears to be due to the District not being familiar with the varying indirect cost requirements for each of the ESF federal programs. Recommendation In the 2023‐2024 fiscal year, the District should transfer $24,363 from the District’s General Fund Resource 3213 to the District’s General Fund Resource 3214, as well as, transferring $15,008 and $3,440 from the District’s General Fund unrestricted resource to Resources 3216 and 3217. In addition, the District should review their procedures to ensure it is only charging indirect costs to those programs that allow it.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action Plan and Views of Responsible Officials This audit finding is the result of the CDE changing the guidance on the indirect cost requirements for the COVID‐19‐Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund programs, and not publicizing the update. The Assistant Superintendent of Business Services, monitors the indirect cost charge requirements on annual basis and as new funding sources are identified. A tracking sheet is used to monitor funding deadlines, allowable ICR rates and types of funds. As an added measure, Assistant Superintendent, will consult the SACS query tool for a final review prior to the yearend close to ensure that CDE has not changed or updated the guidance prior to the close of a fiscal year to ensure District compliance.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,003,865 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 8, 2024 — management decision was due September 8, 2024.

2023-002
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTS

Federal Program Affected Program Name: COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER III) Fund: Learning Loss (Resource 3214), Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: ESSER II State Reserve (Resource 3216), and Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: GEER II (Resource 3217) Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U, 84.425D, 84.425C Pass‐Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Criteria The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to provide funding to LEAs pursuant to the American Rescue Plan of 2021 (ARP Act) to address the learning loss requirement portion of ESSER III funds. Indirect costs for the total ESSER III allocation (Resource 3213 and 3214 combined) should be charged to Resource 3213 only. In addition, indirect cost for the Expanded Learning Opportunities, ESSER II State Reserves program (Resource 3216) and the Expanded Learning Opportunities, GEER II program (Resource 3217) is not allowable. Additional information is available on the on the CDE’s ARP Act Funding web page at https://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/cr/arpact.asp#esseriiialloc. Condition During our audit, we found the District incorrectly charged $24,363 of indirect costs to Resource 3214. The District’s total indirect costs, $42,097, for Resources 3213 and 3214 combined were under the LEA approved rate of 4.96%. In addition, the District incorrectly charged $15,008 of indirect costs to Resource 3216 and $3,440 of indirect costs to Resource 3217, which do not allow indirect costs for those resources. Questioned Costs A total of $42,811 in questioned costs was identified as a result of the conditions identified above. As the total indirect costs charged to resources 3213 and 3214 were under the District’s approved rate, the likely questioned cost is deemed to be $18,448 for resources 3216 (Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (ESSER II) and Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (GEER II). Context The conditions were identified as a result of the auditor’s federal program testing of the District’s indirect cost charges. Effect The District is out of compliance with allowable indirect cost charge requirements of the COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund programs. Cause The condition identified above appears to be due to the District not being familiar with the varying indirect cost requirements for each of the ESF federal programs. Recommendation In the 2023‐2024 fiscal year, the District should transfer $24,363 from the District’s General Fund Resource 3213 to the District’s General Fund Resource 3214, as well as, transferring $15,008 and $3,440 from the District’s General Fund unrestricted resource to Resources 3216 and 3217. In addition, the District should review their procedures to ensure it is only charging indirect costs to those programs that allow it.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Program Affected Program Name: COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER III) Fund: Learning Loss (Resource 3214), Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: ESSER II State Reserve (Resource 3216), and Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: GEER II (Resource 3217) Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U, 84.425D, 84.425C Pass‐Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Criteria The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to provide funding to LEAs pursuant to the American Rescue Plan of 2021 (ARP Act) to address the learning loss requirement portion of ESSER III funds. Indirect costs for the total ESSER III allocation (Resource 3213 and 3214 combined) should be charged to Resource 3213 only. In addition, indirect cost for the Expanded Learning Opportunities, ESSER II State Reserves program (Resource 3216) and the Expanded Learning Opportunities, GEER II program (Resource 3217) is not allowable. Additional information is available on the on the CDE’s ARP Act Funding web page at https://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/cr/arpact.asp#esseriiialloc. Condition During our audit, we found the District incorrectly charged $24,363 of indirect costs to Resource 3214. The District’s total indirect costs, $42,097, for Resources 3213 and 3214 combined were under the LEA approved rate of 4.96%. In addition, the District incorrectly charged $15,008 of indirect costs to Resource 3216 and $3,440 of indirect costs to Resource 3217, which do not allow indirect costs for those resources. Questioned Costs A total of $42,811 in questioned costs was identified as a result of the conditions identified above. As the total indirect costs charged to resources 3213 and 3214 were under the District’s approved rate, the likely questioned cost is deemed to be $18,448 for resources 3216 (Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (ESSER II) and Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (GEER II). Context The conditions were identified as a result of the auditor’s federal program testing of the District’s indirect cost charges. Effect The District is out of compliance with allowable indirect cost charge requirements of the COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund programs. Cause The condition identified above appears to be due to the District not being familiar with the varying indirect cost requirements for each of the ESF federal programs. Recommendation In the 2023‐2024 fiscal year, the District should transfer $24,363 from the District’s General Fund Resource 3213 to the District’s General Fund Resource 3214, as well as, transferring $15,008 and $3,440 from the District’s General Fund unrestricted resource to Resources 3216 and 3217. In addition, the District should review their procedures to ensure it is only charging indirect costs to those programs that allow it.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action Plan and Views of Responsible Officials This audit finding is the result of the CDE changing the guidance on the indirect cost requirements for the COVID‐19‐Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund programs, and not publicizing the update. The Assistant Superintendent of Business Services, monitors the indirect cost charge requirements on annual basis and as new funding sources are identified. A tracking sheet is used to monitor funding deadlines, allowable ICR rates and types of funds. As an added measure, Assistant Superintendent, will consult the SACS query tool for a final review prior to the yearend close to ensure that CDE has not changed or updated the guidance prior to the close of a fiscal year to ensure District compliance.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$8,345,945 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 7, 2024 — management decision was due August 7, 2024.

2023-002
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTS

Federal Program Affected Program Name: COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER III) Fund: Learning Loss (Resource 3214), Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: ESSER II State Reserve (Resource 3216), and Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: GEER II (Resource 3217) Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U, 84.425D, 84.425C Pass‐Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Criteria The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to provide funding to LEAs pursuant to the American Rescue Plan of 2021 (ARP Act) to address the learning loss requirement portion of ESSER III funds. Indirect costs for the total ESSER III allocation (Resource 3213 and 3214 combined) should be charged to Resource 3213 only. In addition, indirect cost for the Expanded Learning Opportunities, ESSER II State Reserves program (Resource 3216) and the Expanded Learning Opportunities, GEER II program (Resource 3217) is not allowable. Additional information is available on the on the CDE’s ARP Act Funding web page at https://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/cr/arpact.asp#esseriiialloc. Condition During our audit, we found the District incorrectly charged $24,363 of indirect costs to Resource 3214. The District’s total indirect costs, $42,097, for Resources 3213 and 3214 combined were under the LEA approved rate of 4.96%. In addition, the District incorrectly charged $15,008 of indirect costs to Resource 3216 and $3,440 of indirect costs to Resource 3217, which do not allow indirect costs for those resources. Questioned Costs A total of $42,811 in questioned costs was identified as a result of the conditions identified above. As the total indirect costs charged to resources 3213 and 3214 were under the District’s approved rate, the likely questioned cost is deemed to be $18,448 for resources 3216 (Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (ESSER II) and Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (GEER II). Context The conditions were identified as a result of the auditor’s federal program testing of the District’s indirect cost charges. Effect The District is out of compliance with allowable indirect cost charge requirements of the COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund programs. Cause The condition identified above appears to be due to the District not being familiar with the varying indirect cost requirements for each of the ESF federal programs. Recommendation In the 2023‐2024 fiscal year, the District should transfer $24,363 from the District’s General Fund Resource 3213 to the District’s General Fund Resource 3214, as well as, transferring $15,008 and $3,440 from the District’s General Fund unrestricted resource to Resources 3216 and 3217. In addition, the District should review their procedures to ensure it is only charging indirect costs to those programs that allow it.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Program Affected Program Name: COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER III) Fund: Learning Loss (Resource 3214), Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: ESSER II State Reserve (Resource 3216), and Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: GEER II (Resource 3217) Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U, 84.425D, 84.425C Pass‐Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Criteria The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to provide funding to LEAs pursuant to the American Rescue Plan of 2021 (ARP Act) to address the learning loss requirement portion of ESSER III funds. Indirect costs for the total ESSER III allocation (Resource 3213 and 3214 combined) should be charged to Resource 3213 only. In addition, indirect cost for the Expanded Learning Opportunities, ESSER II State Reserves program (Resource 3216) and the Expanded Learning Opportunities, GEER II program (Resource 3217) is not allowable. Additional information is available on the on the CDE’s ARP Act Funding web page at https://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/cr/arpact.asp#esseriiialloc. Condition During our audit, we found the District incorrectly charged $24,363 of indirect costs to Resource 3214. The District’s total indirect costs, $42,097, for Resources 3213 and 3214 combined were under the LEA approved rate of 4.96%. In addition, the District incorrectly charged $15,008 of indirect costs to Resource 3216 and $3,440 of indirect costs to Resource 3217, which do not allow indirect costs for those resources. Questioned Costs A total of $42,811 in questioned costs was identified as a result of the conditions identified above. As the total indirect costs charged to resources 3213 and 3214 were under the District’s approved rate, the likely questioned cost is deemed to be $18,448 for resources 3216 (Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (ESSER II) and Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (GEER II). Context The conditions were identified as a result of the auditor’s federal program testing of the District’s indirect cost charges. Effect The District is out of compliance with allowable indirect cost charge requirements of the COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund programs. Cause The condition identified above appears to be due to the District not being familiar with the varying indirect cost requirements for each of the ESF federal programs. Recommendation In the 2023‐2024 fiscal year, the District should transfer $24,363 from the District’s General Fund Resource 3213 to the District’s General Fund Resource 3214, as well as, transferring $15,008 and $3,440 from the District’s General Fund unrestricted resource to Resources 3216 and 3217. In addition, the District should review their procedures to ensure it is only charging indirect costs to those programs that allow it.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action Plan and Views of Responsible Officials This audit finding is the result of the CDE changing the guidance on the indirect cost requirements for the COVID‐19‐Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund programs, and not publicizing the update. The Assistant Superintendent of Business Services, monitors the indirect cost charge requirements on annual basis and as new funding sources are identified. A tracking sheet is used to monitor funding deadlines, allowable ICR rates and types of funds. As an added measure, Assistant Superintendent, will consult the SACS query tool for a final review prior to the yearend close to ensure that CDE has not changed or updated the guidance prior to the close of a fiscal year to ensure District compliance.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2023-06-30

$36,206,755 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 7, 2024 — management decision was due September 7, 2024.

2023-002
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTS

Federal Program Affected Program Name: COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER III) Fund: Learning Loss (Resource 3214), Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: ESSER II State Reserve (Resource 3216), and Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: GEER II (Resource 3217) Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U, 84.425D, 84.425C Pass‐Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Criteria The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to provide funding to LEAs pursuant to the American Rescue Plan of 2021 (ARP Act) to address the learning loss requirement portion of ESSER III funds. Indirect costs for the total ESSER III allocation (Resource 3213 and 3214 combined) should be charged to Resource 3213 only. In addition, indirect cost for the Expanded Learning Opportunities, ESSER II State Reserves program (Resource 3216) and the Expanded Learning Opportunities, GEER II program (Resource 3217) is not allowable. Additional information is available on the on the CDE’s ARP Act Funding web page at https://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/cr/arpact.asp#esseriiialloc. Condition During our audit, we found the District incorrectly charged $24,363 of indirect costs to Resource 3214. The District’s total indirect costs, $42,097, for Resources 3213 and 3214 combined were under the LEA approved rate of 4.96%. In addition, the District incorrectly charged $15,008 of indirect costs to Resource 3216 and $3,440 of indirect costs to Resource 3217, which do not allow indirect costs for those resources. Questioned Costs A total of $42,811 in questioned costs was identified as a result of the conditions identified above. As the total indirect costs charged to resources 3213 and 3214 were under the District’s approved rate, the likely questioned cost is deemed to be $18,448 for resources 3216 (Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (ESSER II) and Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (GEER II). Context The conditions were identified as a result of the auditor’s federal program testing of the District’s indirect cost charges. Effect The District is out of compliance with allowable indirect cost charge requirements of the COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund programs. Cause The condition identified above appears to be due to the District not being familiar with the varying indirect cost requirements for each of the ESF federal programs. Recommendation In the 2023‐2024 fiscal year, the District should transfer $24,363 from the District’s General Fund Resource 3213 to the District’s General Fund Resource 3214, as well as, transferring $15,008 and $3,440 from the District’s General Fund unrestricted resource to Resources 3216 and 3217. In addition, the District should review their procedures to ensure it is only charging indirect costs to those programs that allow it.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Program Affected Program Name: COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER III) Fund: Learning Loss (Resource 3214), Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: ESSER II State Reserve (Resource 3216), and Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: GEER II (Resource 3217) Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U, 84.425D, 84.425C Pass‐Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Criteria The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to provide funding to LEAs pursuant to the American Rescue Plan of 2021 (ARP Act) to address the learning loss requirement portion of ESSER III funds. Indirect costs for the total ESSER III allocation (Resource 3213 and 3214 combined) should be charged to Resource 3213 only. In addition, indirect cost for the Expanded Learning Opportunities, ESSER II State Reserves program (Resource 3216) and the Expanded Learning Opportunities, GEER II program (Resource 3217) is not allowable. Additional information is available on the on the CDE’s ARP Act Funding web page at https://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/cr/arpact.asp#esseriiialloc. Condition During our audit, we found the District incorrectly charged $24,363 of indirect costs to Resource 3214. The District’s total indirect costs, $42,097, for Resources 3213 and 3214 combined were under the LEA approved rate of 4.96%. In addition, the District incorrectly charged $15,008 of indirect costs to Resource 3216 and $3,440 of indirect costs to Resource 3217, which do not allow indirect costs for those resources. Questioned Costs A total of $42,811 in questioned costs was identified as a result of the conditions identified above. As the total indirect costs charged to resources 3213 and 3214 were under the District’s approved rate, the likely questioned cost is deemed to be $18,448 for resources 3216 (Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (ESSER II) and Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (GEER II). Context The conditions were identified as a result of the auditor’s federal program testing of the District’s indirect cost charges. Effect The District is out of compliance with allowable indirect cost charge requirements of the COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund programs. Cause The condition identified above appears to be due to the District not being familiar with the varying indirect cost requirements for each of the ESF federal programs. Recommendation In the 2023‐2024 fiscal year, the District should transfer $24,363 from the District’s General Fund Resource 3213 to the District’s General Fund Resource 3214, as well as, transferring $15,008 and $3,440 from the District’s General Fund unrestricted resource to Resources 3216 and 3217. In addition, the District should review their procedures to ensure it is only charging indirect costs to those programs that allow it.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action Plan and Views of Responsible Officials This audit finding is the result of the CDE changing the guidance on the indirect cost requirements for the COVID‐19‐Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund programs, and not publicizing the update. The Assistant Superintendent of Business Services, monitors the indirect cost charge requirements on annual basis and as new funding sources are identified. A tracking sheet is used to monitor funding deadlines, allowable ICR rates and types of funds. As an added measure, Assistant Superintendent, will consult the SACS query tool for a final review prior to the yearend close to ensure that CDE has not changed or updated the guidance prior to the close of a fiscal year to ensure District compliance.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$10,446,442 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 7, 2024 — management decision was due September 7, 2024.

2023-002
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTS

Federal Program Affected Program Name: COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER III) Fund: Learning Loss (Resource 3214), Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: ESSER II State Reserve (Resource 3216), and Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: GEER II (Resource 3217) Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U, 84.425D, 84.425C Pass‐Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Criteria The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to provide funding to LEAs pursuant to the American Rescue Plan of 2021 (ARP Act) to address the learning loss requirement portion of ESSER III funds. Indirect costs for the total ESSER III allocation (Resource 3213 and 3214 combined) should be charged to Resource 3213 only. In addition, indirect cost for the Expanded Learning Opportunities, ESSER II State Reserves program (Resource 3216) and the Expanded Learning Opportunities, GEER II program (Resource 3217) is not allowable. Additional information is available on the on the CDE’s ARP Act Funding web page at https://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/cr/arpact.asp#esseriiialloc. Condition During our audit, we found the District incorrectly charged $24,363 of indirect costs to Resource 3214. The District’s total indirect costs, $42,097, for Resources 3213 and 3214 combined were under the LEA approved rate of 4.96%. In addition, the District incorrectly charged $15,008 of indirect costs to Resource 3216 and $3,440 of indirect costs to Resource 3217, which do not allow indirect costs for those resources. Questioned Costs A total of $42,811 in questioned costs was identified as a result of the conditions identified above. As the total indirect costs charged to resources 3213 and 3214 were under the District’s approved rate, the likely questioned cost is deemed to be $18,448 for resources 3216 (Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (ESSER II) and Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (GEER II). Context The conditions were identified as a result of the auditor’s federal program testing of the District’s indirect cost charges. Effect The District is out of compliance with allowable indirect cost charge requirements of the COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund programs. Cause The condition identified above appears to be due to the District not being familiar with the varying indirect cost requirements for each of the ESF federal programs. Recommendation In the 2023‐2024 fiscal year, the District should transfer $24,363 from the District’s General Fund Resource 3213 to the District’s General Fund Resource 3214, as well as, transferring $15,008 and $3,440 from the District’s General Fund unrestricted resource to Resources 3216 and 3217. In addition, the District should review their procedures to ensure it is only charging indirect costs to those programs that allow it.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Program Affected Program Name: COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER III) Fund: Learning Loss (Resource 3214), Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: ESSER II State Reserve (Resource 3216), and Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: GEER II (Resource 3217) Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U, 84.425D, 84.425C Pass‐Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Criteria The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to provide funding to LEAs pursuant to the American Rescue Plan of 2021 (ARP Act) to address the learning loss requirement portion of ESSER III funds. Indirect costs for the total ESSER III allocation (Resource 3213 and 3214 combined) should be charged to Resource 3213 only. In addition, indirect cost for the Expanded Learning Opportunities, ESSER II State Reserves program (Resource 3216) and the Expanded Learning Opportunities, GEER II program (Resource 3217) is not allowable. Additional information is available on the on the CDE’s ARP Act Funding web page at https://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/cr/arpact.asp#esseriiialloc. Condition During our audit, we found the District incorrectly charged $24,363 of indirect costs to Resource 3214. The District’s total indirect costs, $42,097, for Resources 3213 and 3214 combined were under the LEA approved rate of 4.96%. In addition, the District incorrectly charged $15,008 of indirect costs to Resource 3216 and $3,440 of indirect costs to Resource 3217, which do not allow indirect costs for those resources. Questioned Costs A total of $42,811 in questioned costs was identified as a result of the conditions identified above. As the total indirect costs charged to resources 3213 and 3214 were under the District’s approved rate, the likely questioned cost is deemed to be $18,448 for resources 3216 (Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (ESSER II) and Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (GEER II). Context The conditions were identified as a result of the auditor’s federal program testing of the District’s indirect cost charges. Effect The District is out of compliance with allowable indirect cost charge requirements of the COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund programs. Cause The condition identified above appears to be due to the District not being familiar with the varying indirect cost requirements for each of the ESF federal programs. Recommendation In the 2023‐2024 fiscal year, the District should transfer $24,363 from the District’s General Fund Resource 3213 to the District’s General Fund Resource 3214, as well as, transferring $15,008 and $3,440 from the District’s General Fund unrestricted resource to Resources 3216 and 3217. In addition, the District should review their procedures to ensure it is only charging indirect costs to those programs that allow it.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action Plan and Views of Responsible Officials This audit finding is the result of the CDE changing the guidance on the indirect cost requirements for the COVID‐19‐Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund programs, and not publicizing the update. The Assistant Superintendent of Business Services, monitors the indirect cost charge requirements on annual basis and as new funding sources are identified. A tracking sheet is used to monitor funding deadlines, allowable ICR rates and types of funds. As an added measure, Assistant Superintendent, will consult the SACS query tool for a final review prior to the yearend close to ensure that CDE has not changed or updated the guidance prior to the close of a fiscal year to ensure District compliance.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2023-06-30

$1,033,830 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 9, 2024 — management decision was due August 9, 2024.

2023-002
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTS

Federal Program Affected Program Name: COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER III) Fund: Learning Loss (Resource 3214), Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: ESSER II State Reserve (Resource 3216), and Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: GEER II (Resource 3217) Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U, 84.425D, 84.425C Pass‐Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Criteria The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to provide funding to LEAs pursuant to the American Rescue Plan of 2021 (ARP Act) to address the learning loss requirement portion of ESSER III funds. Indirect costs for the total ESSER III allocation (Resource 3213 and 3214 combined) should be charged to Resource 3213 only. In addition, indirect cost for the Expanded Learning Opportunities, ESSER II State Reserves program (Resource 3216) and the Expanded Learning Opportunities, GEER II program (Resource 3217) is not allowable. Additional information is available on the on the CDE’s ARP Act Funding web page at https://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/cr/arpact.asp#esseriiialloc. Condition During our audit, we found the District incorrectly charged $24,363 of indirect costs to Resource 3214. The District’s total indirect costs, $42,097, for Resources 3213 and 3214 combined were under the LEA approved rate of 4.96%. In addition, the District incorrectly charged $15,008 of indirect costs to Resource 3216 and $3,440 of indirect costs to Resource 3217, which do not allow indirect costs for those resources. Questioned Costs A total of $42,811 in questioned costs was identified as a result of the conditions identified above. As the total indirect costs charged to resources 3213 and 3214 were under the District’s approved rate, the likely questioned cost is deemed to be $18,448 for resources 3216 (Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (ESSER II) and Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (GEER II). Context The conditions were identified as a result of the auditor’s federal program testing of the District’s indirect cost charges. Effect The District is out of compliance with allowable indirect cost charge requirements of the COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund programs. Cause The condition identified above appears to be due to the District not being familiar with the varying indirect cost requirements for each of the ESF federal programs. Recommendation In the 2023‐2024 fiscal year, the District should transfer $24,363 from the District’s General Fund Resource 3213 to the District’s General Fund Resource 3214, as well as, transferring $15,008 and $3,440 from the District’s General Fund unrestricted resource to Resources 3216 and 3217. In addition, the District should review their procedures to ensure it is only charging indirect costs to those programs that allow it.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Program Affected Program Name: COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER III) Fund: Learning Loss (Resource 3214), Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: ESSER II State Reserve (Resource 3216), and Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: GEER II (Resource 3217) Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U, 84.425D, 84.425C Pass‐Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Criteria The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to provide funding to LEAs pursuant to the American Rescue Plan of 2021 (ARP Act) to address the learning loss requirement portion of ESSER III funds. Indirect costs for the total ESSER III allocation (Resource 3213 and 3214 combined) should be charged to Resource 3213 only. In addition, indirect cost for the Expanded Learning Opportunities, ESSER II State Reserves program (Resource 3216) and the Expanded Learning Opportunities, GEER II program (Resource 3217) is not allowable. Additional information is available on the on the CDE’s ARP Act Funding web page at https://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/cr/arpact.asp#esseriiialloc. Condition During our audit, we found the District incorrectly charged $24,363 of indirect costs to Resource 3214. The District’s total indirect costs, $42,097, for Resources 3213 and 3214 combined were under the LEA approved rate of 4.96%. In addition, the District incorrectly charged $15,008 of indirect costs to Resource 3216 and $3,440 of indirect costs to Resource 3217, which do not allow indirect costs for those resources. Questioned Costs A total of $42,811 in questioned costs was identified as a result of the conditions identified above. As the total indirect costs charged to resources 3213 and 3214 were under the District’s approved rate, the likely questioned cost is deemed to be $18,448 for resources 3216 (Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (ESSER II) and Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (GEER II). Context The conditions were identified as a result of the auditor’s federal program testing of the District’s indirect cost charges. Effect The District is out of compliance with allowable indirect cost charge requirements of the COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund programs. Cause The condition identified above appears to be due to the District not being familiar with the varying indirect cost requirements for each of the ESF federal programs. Recommendation In the 2023‐2024 fiscal year, the District should transfer $24,363 from the District’s General Fund Resource 3213 to the District’s General Fund Resource 3214, as well as, transferring $15,008 and $3,440 from the District’s General Fund unrestricted resource to Resources 3216 and 3217. In addition, the District should review their procedures to ensure it is only charging indirect costs to those programs that allow it.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action Plan and Views of Responsible Officials This audit finding is the result of the CDE changing the guidance on the indirect cost requirements for the COVID‐19‐Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund programs, and not publicizing the update. The Assistant Superintendent of Business Services, monitors the indirect cost charge requirements on annual basis and as new funding sources are identified. A tracking sheet is used to monitor funding deadlines, allowable ICR rates and types of funds. As an added measure, Assistant Superintendent, will consult the SACS query tool for a final review prior to the yearend close to ensure that CDE has not changed or updated the guidance prior to the close of a fiscal year to ensure District compliance.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$8,373,295 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 14, 2024 — management decision was due September 14, 2024.

2023-002
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTS

Federal Program Affected Program Name: COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER III) Fund: Learning Loss (Resource 3214), Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: ESSER II State Reserve (Resource 3216), and Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: GEER II (Resource 3217) Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U, 84.425D, 84.425C Pass‐Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Criteria The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to provide funding to LEAs pursuant to the American Rescue Plan of 2021 (ARP Act) to address the learning loss requirement portion of ESSER III funds. Indirect costs for the total ESSER III allocation (Resource 3213 and 3214 combined) should be charged to Resource 3213 only. In addition, indirect cost for the Expanded Learning Opportunities, ESSER II State Reserves program (Resource 3216) and the Expanded Learning Opportunities, GEER II program (Resource 3217) is not allowable. Additional information is available on the on the CDE’s ARP Act Funding web page at https://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/cr/arpact.asp#esseriiialloc. Condition During our audit, we found the District incorrectly charged $24,363 of indirect costs to Resource 3214. The District’s total indirect costs, $42,097, for Resources 3213 and 3214 combined were under the LEA approved rate of 4.96%. In addition, the District incorrectly charged $15,008 of indirect costs to Resource 3216 and $3,440 of indirect costs to Resource 3217, which do not allow indirect costs for those resources. Questioned Costs A total of $42,811 in questioned costs was identified as a result of the conditions identified above. As the total indirect costs charged to resources 3213 and 3214 were under the District’s approved rate, the likely questioned cost is deemed to be $18,448 for resources 3216 (Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (ESSER II) and Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (GEER II). Context The conditions were identified as a result of the auditor’s federal program testing of the District’s indirect cost charges. Effect The District is out of compliance with allowable indirect cost charge requirements of the COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund programs. Cause The condition identified above appears to be due to the District not being familiar with the varying indirect cost requirements for each of the ESF federal programs. Recommendation In the 2023‐2024 fiscal year, the District should transfer $24,363 from the District’s General Fund Resource 3213 to the District’s General Fund Resource 3214, as well as, transferring $15,008 and $3,440 from the District’s General Fund unrestricted resource to Resources 3216 and 3217. In addition, the District should review their procedures to ensure it is only charging indirect costs to those programs that allow it.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Program Affected Program Name: COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER III) Fund: Learning Loss (Resource 3214), Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: ESSER II State Reserve (Resource 3216), and Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: GEER II (Resource 3217) Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U, 84.425D, 84.425C Pass‐Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Criteria The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to provide funding to LEAs pursuant to the American Rescue Plan of 2021 (ARP Act) to address the learning loss requirement portion of ESSER III funds. Indirect costs for the total ESSER III allocation (Resource 3213 and 3214 combined) should be charged to Resource 3213 only. In addition, indirect cost for the Expanded Learning Opportunities, ESSER II State Reserves program (Resource 3216) and the Expanded Learning Opportunities, GEER II program (Resource 3217) is not allowable. Additional information is available on the on the CDE’s ARP Act Funding web page at https://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/cr/arpact.asp#esseriiialloc. Condition During our audit, we found the District incorrectly charged $24,363 of indirect costs to Resource 3214. The District’s total indirect costs, $42,097, for Resources 3213 and 3214 combined were under the LEA approved rate of 4.96%. In addition, the District incorrectly charged $15,008 of indirect costs to Resource 3216 and $3,440 of indirect costs to Resource 3217, which do not allow indirect costs for those resources. Questioned Costs A total of $42,811 in questioned costs was identified as a result of the conditions identified above. As the total indirect costs charged to resources 3213 and 3214 were under the District’s approved rate, the likely questioned cost is deemed to be $18,448 for resources 3216 (Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (ESSER II) and Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (GEER II). Context The conditions were identified as a result of the auditor’s federal program testing of the District’s indirect cost charges. Effect The District is out of compliance with allowable indirect cost charge requirements of the COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund programs. Cause The condition identified above appears to be due to the District not being familiar with the varying indirect cost requirements for each of the ESF federal programs. Recommendation In the 2023‐2024 fiscal year, the District should transfer $24,363 from the District’s General Fund Resource 3213 to the District’s General Fund Resource 3214, as well as, transferring $15,008 and $3,440 from the District’s General Fund unrestricted resource to Resources 3216 and 3217. In addition, the District should review their procedures to ensure it is only charging indirect costs to those programs that allow it.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action Plan and Views of Responsible Officials This audit finding is the result of the CDE changing the guidance on the indirect cost requirements for the COVID‐19‐Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund programs, and not publicizing the update. The Assistant Superintendent of Business Services, monitors the indirect cost charge requirements on annual basis and as new funding sources are identified. A tracking sheet is used to monitor funding deadlines, allowable ICR rates and types of funds. As an added measure, Assistant Superintendent, will consult the SACS query tool for a final review prior to the yearend close to ensure that CDE has not changed or updated the guidance prior to the close of a fiscal year to ensure District compliance.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2023-06-30

$3,448,457 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 14, 2024 — management decision was due September 14, 2024.

2023-002
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTS

Federal Program Affected Program Name: COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER III) Fund: Learning Loss (Resource 3214), Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: ESSER II State Reserve (Resource 3216), and Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: GEER II (Resource 3217) Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U, 84.425D, 84.425C Pass‐Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Criteria The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to provide funding to LEAs pursuant to the American Rescue Plan of 2021 (ARP Act) to address the learning loss requirement portion of ESSER III funds. Indirect costs for the total ESSER III allocation (Resource 3213 and 3214 combined) should be charged to Resource 3213 only. In addition, indirect cost for the Expanded Learning Opportunities, ESSER II State Reserves program (Resource 3216) and the Expanded Learning Opportunities, GEER II program (Resource 3217) is not allowable. Additional information is available on the on the CDE’s ARP Act Funding web page at https://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/cr/arpact.asp#esseriiialloc. Condition During our audit, we found the District incorrectly charged $24,363 of indirect costs to Resource 3214. The District’s total indirect costs, $42,097, for Resources 3213 and 3214 combined were under the LEA approved rate of 4.96%. In addition, the District incorrectly charged $15,008 of indirect costs to Resource 3216 and $3,440 of indirect costs to Resource 3217, which do not allow indirect costs for those resources. Questioned Costs A total of $42,811 in questioned costs was identified as a result of the conditions identified above. As the total indirect costs charged to resources 3213 and 3214 were under the District’s approved rate, the likely questioned cost is deemed to be $18,448 for resources 3216 (Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (ESSER II) and Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (GEER II). Context The conditions were identified as a result of the auditor’s federal program testing of the District’s indirect cost charges. Effect The District is out of compliance with allowable indirect cost charge requirements of the COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund programs. Cause The condition identified above appears to be due to the District not being familiar with the varying indirect cost requirements for each of the ESF federal programs. Recommendation In the 2023‐2024 fiscal year, the District should transfer $24,363 from the District’s General Fund Resource 3213 to the District’s General Fund Resource 3214, as well as, transferring $15,008 and $3,440 from the District’s General Fund unrestricted resource to Resources 3216 and 3217. In addition, the District should review their procedures to ensure it is only charging indirect costs to those programs that allow it.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Program Affected Program Name: COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER III) Fund: Learning Loss (Resource 3214), Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: ESSER II State Reserve (Resource 3216), and Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: GEER II (Resource 3217) Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U, 84.425D, 84.425C Pass‐Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Criteria The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to provide funding to LEAs pursuant to the American Rescue Plan of 2021 (ARP Act) to address the learning loss requirement portion of ESSER III funds. Indirect costs for the total ESSER III allocation (Resource 3213 and 3214 combined) should be charged to Resource 3213 only. In addition, indirect cost for the Expanded Learning Opportunities, ESSER II State Reserves program (Resource 3216) and the Expanded Learning Opportunities, GEER II program (Resource 3217) is not allowable. Additional information is available on the on the CDE’s ARP Act Funding web page at https://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/cr/arpact.asp#esseriiialloc. Condition During our audit, we found the District incorrectly charged $24,363 of indirect costs to Resource 3214. The District’s total indirect costs, $42,097, for Resources 3213 and 3214 combined were under the LEA approved rate of 4.96%. In addition, the District incorrectly charged $15,008 of indirect costs to Resource 3216 and $3,440 of indirect costs to Resource 3217, which do not allow indirect costs for those resources. Questioned Costs A total of $42,811 in questioned costs was identified as a result of the conditions identified above. As the total indirect costs charged to resources 3213 and 3214 were under the District’s approved rate, the likely questioned cost is deemed to be $18,448 for resources 3216 (Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (ESSER II) and Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (GEER II). Context The conditions were identified as a result of the auditor’s federal program testing of the District’s indirect cost charges. Effect The District is out of compliance with allowable indirect cost charge requirements of the COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund programs. Cause The condition identified above appears to be due to the District not being familiar with the varying indirect cost requirements for each of the ESF federal programs. Recommendation In the 2023‐2024 fiscal year, the District should transfer $24,363 from the District’s General Fund Resource 3213 to the District’s General Fund Resource 3214, as well as, transferring $15,008 and $3,440 from the District’s General Fund unrestricted resource to Resources 3216 and 3217. In addition, the District should review their procedures to ensure it is only charging indirect costs to those programs that allow it.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action Plan and Views of Responsible Officials This audit finding is the result of the CDE changing the guidance on the indirect cost requirements for the COVID‐19‐Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund programs, and not publicizing the update. The Assistant Superintendent of Business Services, monitors the indirect cost charge requirements on annual basis and as new funding sources are identified. A tracking sheet is used to monitor funding deadlines, allowable ICR rates and types of funds. As an added measure, Assistant Superintendent, will consult the SACS query tool for a final review prior to the yearend close to ensure that CDE has not changed or updated the guidance prior to the close of a fiscal year to ensure District compliance.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2023-06-30

$6,287,300 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 20, 2024 — management decision was due September 20, 2024.

2023-002
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTS

Federal Program Affected Program Name: COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER III) Fund: Learning Loss (Resource 3214), Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: ESSER II State Reserve (Resource 3216), and Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: GEER II (Resource 3217) Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U, 84.425D, 84.425C Pass‐Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Criteria The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to provide funding to LEAs pursuant to the American Rescue Plan of 2021 (ARP Act) to address the learning loss requirement portion of ESSER III funds. Indirect costs for the total ESSER III allocation (Resource 3213 and 3214 combined) should be charged to Resource 3213 only. In addition, indirect cost for the Expanded Learning Opportunities, ESSER II State Reserves program (Resource 3216) and the Expanded Learning Opportunities, GEER II program (Resource 3217) is not allowable. Additional information is available on the on the CDE’s ARP Act Funding web page at https://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/cr/arpact.asp#esseriiialloc. Condition During our audit, we found the District incorrectly charged $24,363 of indirect costs to Resource 3214. The District’s total indirect costs, $42,097, for Resources 3213 and 3214 combined were under the LEA approved rate of 4.96%. In addition, the District incorrectly charged $15,008 of indirect costs to Resource 3216 and $3,440 of indirect costs to Resource 3217, which do not allow indirect costs for those resources. Questioned Costs A total of $42,811 in questioned costs was identified as a result of the conditions identified above. As the total indirect costs charged to resources 3213 and 3214 were under the District’s approved rate, the likely questioned cost is deemed to be $18,448 for resources 3216 (Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (ESSER II) and Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (GEER II). Context The conditions were identified as a result of the auditor’s federal program testing of the District’s indirect cost charges. Effect The District is out of compliance with allowable indirect cost charge requirements of the COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund programs. Cause The condition identified above appears to be due to the District not being familiar with the varying indirect cost requirements for each of the ESF federal programs. Recommendation In the 2023‐2024 fiscal year, the District should transfer $24,363 from the District’s General Fund Resource 3213 to the District’s General Fund Resource 3214, as well as, transferring $15,008 and $3,440 from the District’s General Fund unrestricted resource to Resources 3216 and 3217. In addition, the District should review their procedures to ensure it is only charging indirect costs to those programs that allow it.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Program Affected Program Name: COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER III) Fund: Learning Loss (Resource 3214), Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: ESSER II State Reserve (Resource 3216), and Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: GEER II (Resource 3217) Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U, 84.425D, 84.425C Pass‐Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Criteria The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to provide funding to LEAs pursuant to the American Rescue Plan of 2021 (ARP Act) to address the learning loss requirement portion of ESSER III funds. Indirect costs for the total ESSER III allocation (Resource 3213 and 3214 combined) should be charged to Resource 3213 only. In addition, indirect cost for the Expanded Learning Opportunities, ESSER II State Reserves program (Resource 3216) and the Expanded Learning Opportunities, GEER II program (Resource 3217) is not allowable. Additional information is available on the on the CDE’s ARP Act Funding web page at https://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/cr/arpact.asp#esseriiialloc. Condition During our audit, we found the District incorrectly charged $24,363 of indirect costs to Resource 3214. The District’s total indirect costs, $42,097, for Resources 3213 and 3214 combined were under the LEA approved rate of 4.96%. In addition, the District incorrectly charged $15,008 of indirect costs to Resource 3216 and $3,440 of indirect costs to Resource 3217, which do not allow indirect costs for those resources. Questioned Costs A total of $42,811 in questioned costs was identified as a result of the conditions identified above. As the total indirect costs charged to resources 3213 and 3214 were under the District’s approved rate, the likely questioned cost is deemed to be $18,448 for resources 3216 (Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (ESSER II) and Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (GEER II). Context The conditions were identified as a result of the auditor’s federal program testing of the District’s indirect cost charges. Effect The District is out of compliance with allowable indirect cost charge requirements of the COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund programs. Cause The condition identified above appears to be due to the District not being familiar with the varying indirect cost requirements for each of the ESF federal programs. Recommendation In the 2023‐2024 fiscal year, the District should transfer $24,363 from the District’s General Fund Resource 3213 to the District’s General Fund Resource 3214, as well as, transferring $15,008 and $3,440 from the District’s General Fund unrestricted resource to Resources 3216 and 3217. In addition, the District should review their procedures to ensure it is only charging indirect costs to those programs that allow it.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action Plan and Views of Responsible Officials This audit finding is the result of the CDE changing the guidance on the indirect cost requirements for the COVID‐19‐Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund programs, and not publicizing the update. The Assistant Superintendent of Business Services, monitors the indirect cost charge requirements on annual basis and as new funding sources are identified. A tracking sheet is used to monitor funding deadlines, allowable ICR rates and types of funds. As an added measure, Assistant Superintendent, will consult the SACS query tool for a final review prior to the yearend close to ensure that CDE has not changed or updated the guidance prior to the close of a fiscal year to ensure District compliance.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2023-06-30

$109,356,959 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 22, 2024 — management decision was due September 22, 2024.

2023-002
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTS

Federal Program Affected Program Name: COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER III) Fund: Learning Loss (Resource 3214), Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: ESSER II State Reserve (Resource 3216), and Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: GEER II (Resource 3217) Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U, 84.425D, 84.425C Pass‐Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Criteria The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to provide funding to LEAs pursuant to the American Rescue Plan of 2021 (ARP Act) to address the learning loss requirement portion of ESSER III funds. Indirect costs for the total ESSER III allocation (Resource 3213 and 3214 combined) should be charged to Resource 3213 only. In addition, indirect cost for the Expanded Learning Opportunities, ESSER II State Reserves program (Resource 3216) and the Expanded Learning Opportunities, GEER II program (Resource 3217) is not allowable. Additional information is available on the on the CDE’s ARP Act Funding web page at https://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/cr/arpact.asp#esseriiialloc. Condition During our audit, we found the District incorrectly charged $24,363 of indirect costs to Resource 3214. The District’s total indirect costs, $42,097, for Resources 3213 and 3214 combined were under the LEA approved rate of 4.96%. In addition, the District incorrectly charged $15,008 of indirect costs to Resource 3216 and $3,440 of indirect costs to Resource 3217, which do not allow indirect costs for those resources. Questioned Costs A total of $42,811 in questioned costs was identified as a result of the conditions identified above. As the total indirect costs charged to resources 3213 and 3214 were under the District’s approved rate, the likely questioned cost is deemed to be $18,448 for resources 3216 (Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (ESSER II) and Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (GEER II). Context The conditions were identified as a result of the auditor’s federal program testing of the District’s indirect cost charges. Effect The District is out of compliance with allowable indirect cost charge requirements of the COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund programs. Cause The condition identified above appears to be due to the District not being familiar with the varying indirect cost requirements for each of the ESF federal programs. Recommendation In the 2023‐2024 fiscal year, the District should transfer $24,363 from the District’s General Fund Resource 3213 to the District’s General Fund Resource 3214, as well as, transferring $15,008 and $3,440 from the District’s General Fund unrestricted resource to Resources 3216 and 3217. In addition, the District should review their procedures to ensure it is only charging indirect costs to those programs that allow it.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Program Affected Program Name: COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER III) Fund: Learning Loss (Resource 3214), Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: ESSER II State Reserve (Resource 3216), and Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: GEER II (Resource 3217) Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U, 84.425D, 84.425C Pass‐Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Criteria The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to provide funding to LEAs pursuant to the American Rescue Plan of 2021 (ARP Act) to address the learning loss requirement portion of ESSER III funds. Indirect costs for the total ESSER III allocation (Resource 3213 and 3214 combined) should be charged to Resource 3213 only. In addition, indirect cost for the Expanded Learning Opportunities, ESSER II State Reserves program (Resource 3216) and the Expanded Learning Opportunities, GEER II program (Resource 3217) is not allowable. Additional information is available on the on the CDE’s ARP Act Funding web page at https://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/cr/arpact.asp#esseriiialloc. Condition During our audit, we found the District incorrectly charged $24,363 of indirect costs to Resource 3214. The District’s total indirect costs, $42,097, for Resources 3213 and 3214 combined were under the LEA approved rate of 4.96%. In addition, the District incorrectly charged $15,008 of indirect costs to Resource 3216 and $3,440 of indirect costs to Resource 3217, which do not allow indirect costs for those resources. Questioned Costs A total of $42,811 in questioned costs was identified as a result of the conditions identified above. As the total indirect costs charged to resources 3213 and 3214 were under the District’s approved rate, the likely questioned cost is deemed to be $18,448 for resources 3216 (Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (ESSER II) and Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (GEER II). Context The conditions were identified as a result of the auditor’s federal program testing of the District’s indirect cost charges. Effect The District is out of compliance with allowable indirect cost charge requirements of the COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund programs. Cause The condition identified above appears to be due to the District not being familiar with the varying indirect cost requirements for each of the ESF federal programs. Recommendation In the 2023‐2024 fiscal year, the District should transfer $24,363 from the District’s General Fund Resource 3213 to the District’s General Fund Resource 3214, as well as, transferring $15,008 and $3,440 from the District’s General Fund unrestricted resource to Resources 3216 and 3217. In addition, the District should review their procedures to ensure it is only charging indirect costs to those programs that allow it.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action Plan and Views of Responsible Officials This audit finding is the result of the CDE changing the guidance on the indirect cost requirements for the COVID‐19‐Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund programs, and not publicizing the update. The Assistant Superintendent of Business Services, monitors the indirect cost charge requirements on annual basis and as new funding sources are identified. A tracking sheet is used to monitor funding deadlines, allowable ICR rates and types of funds. As an added measure, Assistant Superintendent, will consult the SACS query tool for a final review prior to the yearend close to ensure that CDE has not changed or updated the guidance prior to the close of a fiscal year to ensure District compliance.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2023-06-30

$3,017,812 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 15, 2024 — management decision was due September 15, 2024.

2023-002
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTS

Federal Program Affected Program Name: COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER III) Fund: Learning Loss (Resource 3214), Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: ESSER II State Reserve (Resource 3216), and Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: GEER II (Resource 3217) Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U, 84.425D, 84.425C Pass‐Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Criteria The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to provide funding to LEAs pursuant to the American Rescue Plan of 2021 (ARP Act) to address the learning loss requirement portion of ESSER III funds. Indirect costs for the total ESSER III allocation (Resource 3213 and 3214 combined) should be charged to Resource 3213 only. In addition, indirect cost for the Expanded Learning Opportunities, ESSER II State Reserves program (Resource 3216) and the Expanded Learning Opportunities, GEER II program (Resource 3217) is not allowable. Additional information is available on the on the CDE’s ARP Act Funding web page at https://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/cr/arpact.asp#esseriiialloc. Condition During our audit, we found the District incorrectly charged $24,363 of indirect costs to Resource 3214. The District’s total indirect costs, $42,097, for Resources 3213 and 3214 combined were under the LEA approved rate of 4.96%. In addition, the District incorrectly charged $15,008 of indirect costs to Resource 3216 and $3,440 of indirect costs to Resource 3217, which do not allow indirect costs for those resources. Questioned Costs A total of $42,811 in questioned costs was identified as a result of the conditions identified above. As the total indirect costs charged to resources 3213 and 3214 were under the District’s approved rate, the likely questioned cost is deemed to be $18,448 for resources 3216 (Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (ESSER II) and Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (GEER II). Context The conditions were identified as a result of the auditor’s federal program testing of the District’s indirect cost charges. Effect The District is out of compliance with allowable indirect cost charge requirements of the COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund programs. Cause The condition identified above appears to be due to the District not being familiar with the varying indirect cost requirements for each of the ESF federal programs. Recommendation In the 2023‐2024 fiscal year, the District should transfer $24,363 from the District’s General Fund Resource 3213 to the District’s General Fund Resource 3214, as well as, transferring $15,008 and $3,440 from the District’s General Fund unrestricted resource to Resources 3216 and 3217. In addition, the District should review their procedures to ensure it is only charging indirect costs to those programs that allow it.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Program Affected Program Name: COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER III) Fund: Learning Loss (Resource 3214), Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: ESSER II State Reserve (Resource 3216), and Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: GEER II (Resource 3217) Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U, 84.425D, 84.425C Pass‐Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Criteria The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to provide funding to LEAs pursuant to the American Rescue Plan of 2021 (ARP Act) to address the learning loss requirement portion of ESSER III funds. Indirect costs for the total ESSER III allocation (Resource 3213 and 3214 combined) should be charged to Resource 3213 only. In addition, indirect cost for the Expanded Learning Opportunities, ESSER II State Reserves program (Resource 3216) and the Expanded Learning Opportunities, GEER II program (Resource 3217) is not allowable. Additional information is available on the on the CDE’s ARP Act Funding web page at https://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/cr/arpact.asp#esseriiialloc. Condition During our audit, we found the District incorrectly charged $24,363 of indirect costs to Resource 3214. The District’s total indirect costs, $42,097, for Resources 3213 and 3214 combined were under the LEA approved rate of 4.96%. In addition, the District incorrectly charged $15,008 of indirect costs to Resource 3216 and $3,440 of indirect costs to Resource 3217, which do not allow indirect costs for those resources. Questioned Costs A total of $42,811 in questioned costs was identified as a result of the conditions identified above. As the total indirect costs charged to resources 3213 and 3214 were under the District’s approved rate, the likely questioned cost is deemed to be $18,448 for resources 3216 (Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (ESSER II) and Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (GEER II). Context The conditions were identified as a result of the auditor’s federal program testing of the District’s indirect cost charges. Effect The District is out of compliance with allowable indirect cost charge requirements of the COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund programs. Cause The condition identified above appears to be due to the District not being familiar with the varying indirect cost requirements for each of the ESF federal programs. Recommendation In the 2023‐2024 fiscal year, the District should transfer $24,363 from the District’s General Fund Resource 3213 to the District’s General Fund Resource 3214, as well as, transferring $15,008 and $3,440 from the District’s General Fund unrestricted resource to Resources 3216 and 3217. In addition, the District should review their procedures to ensure it is only charging indirect costs to those programs that allow it.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action Plan and Views of Responsible Officials This audit finding is the result of the CDE changing the guidance on the indirect cost requirements for the COVID‐19‐Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund programs, and not publicizing the update. The Assistant Superintendent of Business Services, monitors the indirect cost charge requirements on annual basis and as new funding sources are identified. A tracking sheet is used to monitor funding deadlines, allowable ICR rates and types of funds. As an added measure, Assistant Superintendent, will consult the SACS query tool for a final review prior to the yearend close to ensure that CDE has not changed or updated the guidance prior to the close of a fiscal year to ensure District compliance.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$19,634,596 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 13, 2024 — management decision was due September 13, 2024.

2023-002
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTS

Federal Program Affected Program Name: COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER III) Fund: Learning Loss (Resource 3214), Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: ESSER II State Reserve (Resource 3216), and Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: GEER II (Resource 3217) Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U, 84.425D, 84.425C Pass‐Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Criteria The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to provide funding to LEAs pursuant to the American Rescue Plan of 2021 (ARP Act) to address the learning loss requirement portion of ESSER III funds. Indirect costs for the total ESSER III allocation (Resource 3213 and 3214 combined) should be charged to Resource 3213 only. In addition, indirect cost for the Expanded Learning Opportunities, ESSER II State Reserves program (Resource 3216) and the Expanded Learning Opportunities, GEER II program (Resource 3217) is not allowable. Additional information is available on the on the CDE’s ARP Act Funding web page at https://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/cr/arpact.asp#esseriiialloc. Condition During our audit, we found the District incorrectly charged $24,363 of indirect costs to Resource 3214. The District’s total indirect costs, $42,097, for Resources 3213 and 3214 combined were under the LEA approved rate of 4.96%. In addition, the District incorrectly charged $15,008 of indirect costs to Resource 3216 and $3,440 of indirect costs to Resource 3217, which do not allow indirect costs for those resources. Questioned Costs A total of $42,811 in questioned costs was identified as a result of the conditions identified above. As the total indirect costs charged to resources 3213 and 3214 were under the District’s approved rate, the likely questioned cost is deemed to be $18,448 for resources 3216 (Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (ESSER II) and Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (GEER II). Context The conditions were identified as a result of the auditor’s federal program testing of the District’s indirect cost charges. Effect The District is out of compliance with allowable indirect cost charge requirements of the COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund programs. Cause The condition identified above appears to be due to the District not being familiar with the varying indirect cost requirements for each of the ESF federal programs. Recommendation In the 2023‐2024 fiscal year, the District should transfer $24,363 from the District’s General Fund Resource 3213 to the District’s General Fund Resource 3214, as well as, transferring $15,008 and $3,440 from the District’s General Fund unrestricted resource to Resources 3216 and 3217. In addition, the District should review their procedures to ensure it is only charging indirect costs to those programs that allow it.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Program Affected Program Name: COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER III) Fund: Learning Loss (Resource 3214), Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: ESSER II State Reserve (Resource 3216), and Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: GEER II (Resource 3217) Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U, 84.425D, 84.425C Pass‐Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Criteria The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to provide funding to LEAs pursuant to the American Rescue Plan of 2021 (ARP Act) to address the learning loss requirement portion of ESSER III funds. Indirect costs for the total ESSER III allocation (Resource 3213 and 3214 combined) should be charged to Resource 3213 only. In addition, indirect cost for the Expanded Learning Opportunities, ESSER II State Reserves program (Resource 3216) and the Expanded Learning Opportunities, GEER II program (Resource 3217) is not allowable. Additional information is available on the on the CDE’s ARP Act Funding web page at https://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/cr/arpact.asp#esseriiialloc. Condition During our audit, we found the District incorrectly charged $24,363 of indirect costs to Resource 3214. The District’s total indirect costs, $42,097, for Resources 3213 and 3214 combined were under the LEA approved rate of 4.96%. In addition, the District incorrectly charged $15,008 of indirect costs to Resource 3216 and $3,440 of indirect costs to Resource 3217, which do not allow indirect costs for those resources. Questioned Costs A total of $42,811 in questioned costs was identified as a result of the conditions identified above. As the total indirect costs charged to resources 3213 and 3214 were under the District’s approved rate, the likely questioned cost is deemed to be $18,448 for resources 3216 (Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (ESSER II) and Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (GEER II). Context The conditions were identified as a result of the auditor’s federal program testing of the District’s indirect cost charges. Effect The District is out of compliance with allowable indirect cost charge requirements of the COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund programs. Cause The condition identified above appears to be due to the District not being familiar with the varying indirect cost requirements for each of the ESF federal programs. Recommendation In the 2023‐2024 fiscal year, the District should transfer $24,363 from the District’s General Fund Resource 3213 to the District’s General Fund Resource 3214, as well as, transferring $15,008 and $3,440 from the District’s General Fund unrestricted resource to Resources 3216 and 3217. In addition, the District should review their procedures to ensure it is only charging indirect costs to those programs that allow it.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action Plan and Views of Responsible Officials This audit finding is the result of the CDE changing the guidance on the indirect cost requirements for the COVID‐19‐Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund programs, and not publicizing the update. The Assistant Superintendent of Business Services, monitors the indirect cost charge requirements on annual basis and as new funding sources are identified. A tracking sheet is used to monitor funding deadlines, allowable ICR rates and types of funds. As an added measure, Assistant Superintendent, will consult the SACS query tool for a final review prior to the yearend close to ensure that CDE has not changed or updated the guidance prior to the close of a fiscal year to ensure District compliance.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2023-06-30

$12,291,404 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on April 3, 2024 — management decision was due October 3, 2024.

2023-002
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTS

Federal Program Affected Program Name: COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER III) Fund: Learning Loss (Resource 3214), Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: ESSER II State Reserve (Resource 3216), and Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: GEER II (Resource 3217) Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U, 84.425D, 84.425C Pass‐Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Criteria The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to provide funding to LEAs pursuant to the American Rescue Plan of 2021 (ARP Act) to address the learning loss requirement portion of ESSER III funds. Indirect costs for the total ESSER III allocation (Resource 3213 and 3214 combined) should be charged to Resource 3213 only. In addition, indirect cost for the Expanded Learning Opportunities, ESSER II State Reserves program (Resource 3216) and the Expanded Learning Opportunities, GEER II program (Resource 3217) is not allowable. Additional information is available on the on the CDE’s ARP Act Funding web page at https://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/cr/arpact.asp#esseriiialloc. Condition During our audit, we found the District incorrectly charged $24,363 of indirect costs to Resource 3214. The District’s total indirect costs, $42,097, for Resources 3213 and 3214 combined were under the LEA approved rate of 4.96%. In addition, the District incorrectly charged $15,008 of indirect costs to Resource 3216 and $3,440 of indirect costs to Resource 3217, which do not allow indirect costs for those resources. Questioned Costs A total of $42,811 in questioned costs was identified as a result of the conditions identified above. As the total indirect costs charged to resources 3213 and 3214 were under the District’s approved rate, the likely questioned cost is deemed to be $18,448 for resources 3216 (Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (ESSER II) and Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (GEER II). Context The conditions were identified as a result of the auditor’s federal program testing of the District’s indirect cost charges. Effect The District is out of compliance with allowable indirect cost charge requirements of the COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund programs. Cause The condition identified above appears to be due to the District not being familiar with the varying indirect cost requirements for each of the ESF federal programs. Recommendation In the 2023‐2024 fiscal year, the District should transfer $24,363 from the District’s General Fund Resource 3213 to the District’s General Fund Resource 3214, as well as, transferring $15,008 and $3,440 from the District’s General Fund unrestricted resource to Resources 3216 and 3217. In addition, the District should review their procedures to ensure it is only charging indirect costs to those programs that allow it.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Program Affected Program Name: COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER III) Fund: Learning Loss (Resource 3214), Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: ESSER II State Reserve (Resource 3216), and Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: GEER II (Resource 3217) Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U, 84.425D, 84.425C Pass‐Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Criteria The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to provide funding to LEAs pursuant to the American Rescue Plan of 2021 (ARP Act) to address the learning loss requirement portion of ESSER III funds. Indirect costs for the total ESSER III allocation (Resource 3213 and 3214 combined) should be charged to Resource 3213 only. In addition, indirect cost for the Expanded Learning Opportunities, ESSER II State Reserves program (Resource 3216) and the Expanded Learning Opportunities, GEER II program (Resource 3217) is not allowable. Additional information is available on the on the CDE’s ARP Act Funding web page at https://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/cr/arpact.asp#esseriiialloc. Condition During our audit, we found the District incorrectly charged $24,363 of indirect costs to Resource 3214. The District’s total indirect costs, $42,097, for Resources 3213 and 3214 combined were under the LEA approved rate of 4.96%. In addition, the District incorrectly charged $15,008 of indirect costs to Resource 3216 and $3,440 of indirect costs to Resource 3217, which do not allow indirect costs for those resources. Questioned Costs A total of $42,811 in questioned costs was identified as a result of the conditions identified above. As the total indirect costs charged to resources 3213 and 3214 were under the District’s approved rate, the likely questioned cost is deemed to be $18,448 for resources 3216 (Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (ESSER II) and Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (GEER II). Context The conditions were identified as a result of the auditor’s federal program testing of the District’s indirect cost charges. Effect The District is out of compliance with allowable indirect cost charge requirements of the COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund programs. Cause The condition identified above appears to be due to the District not being familiar with the varying indirect cost requirements for each of the ESF federal programs. Recommendation In the 2023‐2024 fiscal year, the District should transfer $24,363 from the District’s General Fund Resource 3213 to the District’s General Fund Resource 3214, as well as, transferring $15,008 and $3,440 from the District’s General Fund unrestricted resource to Resources 3216 and 3217. In addition, the District should review their procedures to ensure it is only charging indirect costs to those programs that allow it.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action Plan and Views of Responsible Officials This audit finding is the result of the CDE changing the guidance on the indirect cost requirements for the COVID‐19‐Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund programs, and not publicizing the update. The Assistant Superintendent of Business Services, monitors the indirect cost charge requirements on annual basis and as new funding sources are identified. A tracking sheet is used to monitor funding deadlines, allowable ICR rates and types of funds. As an added measure, Assistant Superintendent, will consult the SACS query tool for a final review prior to the yearend close to ensure that CDE has not changed or updated the guidance prior to the close of a fiscal year to ensure District compliance.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2023-06-30

$8,737,957 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on April 15, 2024 — management decision was due October 15, 2024.

2023-002
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTS

Federal Program Affected Program Name: COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER III) Fund: Learning Loss (Resource 3214), Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: ESSER II State Reserve (Resource 3216), and Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: GEER II (Resource 3217) Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U, 84.425D, 84.425C Pass‐Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Criteria The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to provide funding to LEAs pursuant to the American Rescue Plan of 2021 (ARP Act) to address the learning loss requirement portion of ESSER III funds. Indirect costs for the total ESSER III allocation (Resource 3213 and 3214 combined) should be charged to Resource 3213 only. In addition, indirect cost for the Expanded Learning Opportunities, ESSER II State Reserves program (Resource 3216) and the Expanded Learning Opportunities, GEER II program (Resource 3217) is not allowable. Additional information is available on the on the CDE’s ARP Act Funding web page at https://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/cr/arpact.asp#esseriiialloc. Condition During our audit, we found the District incorrectly charged $24,363 of indirect costs to Resource 3214. The District’s total indirect costs, $42,097, for Resources 3213 and 3214 combined were under the LEA approved rate of 4.96%. In addition, the District incorrectly charged $15,008 of indirect costs to Resource 3216 and $3,440 of indirect costs to Resource 3217, which do not allow indirect costs for those resources. Questioned Costs A total of $42,811 in questioned costs was identified as a result of the conditions identified above. As the total indirect costs charged to resources 3213 and 3214 were under the District’s approved rate, the likely questioned cost is deemed to be $18,448 for resources 3216 (Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (ESSER II) and Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (GEER II). Context The conditions were identified as a result of the auditor’s federal program testing of the District’s indirect cost charges. Effect The District is out of compliance with allowable indirect cost charge requirements of the COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund programs. Cause The condition identified above appears to be due to the District not being familiar with the varying indirect cost requirements for each of the ESF federal programs. Recommendation In the 2023‐2024 fiscal year, the District should transfer $24,363 from the District’s General Fund Resource 3213 to the District’s General Fund Resource 3214, as well as, transferring $15,008 and $3,440 from the District’s General Fund unrestricted resource to Resources 3216 and 3217. In addition, the District should review their procedures to ensure it is only charging indirect costs to those programs that allow it.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Program Affected Program Name: COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER III) Fund: Learning Loss (Resource 3214), Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: ESSER II State Reserve (Resource 3216), and Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: GEER II (Resource 3217) Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U, 84.425D, 84.425C Pass‐Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Criteria The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to provide funding to LEAs pursuant to the American Rescue Plan of 2021 (ARP Act) to address the learning loss requirement portion of ESSER III funds. Indirect costs for the total ESSER III allocation (Resource 3213 and 3214 combined) should be charged to Resource 3213 only. In addition, indirect cost for the Expanded Learning Opportunities, ESSER II State Reserves program (Resource 3216) and the Expanded Learning Opportunities, GEER II program (Resource 3217) is not allowable. Additional information is available on the on the CDE’s ARP Act Funding web page at https://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/cr/arpact.asp#esseriiialloc. Condition During our audit, we found the District incorrectly charged $24,363 of indirect costs to Resource 3214. The District’s total indirect costs, $42,097, for Resources 3213 and 3214 combined were under the LEA approved rate of 4.96%. In addition, the District incorrectly charged $15,008 of indirect costs to Resource 3216 and $3,440 of indirect costs to Resource 3217, which do not allow indirect costs for those resources. Questioned Costs A total of $42,811 in questioned costs was identified as a result of the conditions identified above. As the total indirect costs charged to resources 3213 and 3214 were under the District’s approved rate, the likely questioned cost is deemed to be $18,448 for resources 3216 (Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (ESSER II) and Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (GEER II). Context The conditions were identified as a result of the auditor’s federal program testing of the District’s indirect cost charges. Effect The District is out of compliance with allowable indirect cost charge requirements of the COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund programs. Cause The condition identified above appears to be due to the District not being familiar with the varying indirect cost requirements for each of the ESF federal programs. Recommendation In the 2023‐2024 fiscal year, the District should transfer $24,363 from the District’s General Fund Resource 3213 to the District’s General Fund Resource 3214, as well as, transferring $15,008 and $3,440 from the District’s General Fund unrestricted resource to Resources 3216 and 3217. In addition, the District should review their procedures to ensure it is only charging indirect costs to those programs that allow it.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action Plan and Views of Responsible Officials This audit finding is the result of the CDE changing the guidance on the indirect cost requirements for the COVID‐19‐Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund programs, and not publicizing the update. The Assistant Superintendent of Business Services, monitors the indirect cost charge requirements on annual basis and as new funding sources are identified. A tracking sheet is used to monitor funding deadlines, allowable ICR rates and types of funds. As an added measure, Assistant Superintendent, will consult the SACS query tool for a final review prior to the yearend close to ensure that CDE has not changed or updated the guidance prior to the close of a fiscal year to ensure District compliance.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2023-06-30

$3,003,865 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on June 12, 2024 — management decision was due December 12, 2024.

2023-002
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTS

Federal Program Affected Program Name: COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER III) Fund: Learning Loss (Resource 3214), Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: ESSER II State Reserve (Resource 3216), and Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: GEER II (Resource 3217) Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U, 84.425D, 84.425C Pass‐Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Criteria The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to provide funding to LEAs pursuant to the American Rescue Plan of 2021 (ARP Act) to address the learning loss requirement portion of ESSER III funds. Indirect costs for the total ESSER III allocation (Resource 3213 and 3214 combined) should be charged to Resource 3213 only. In addition, indirect cost for the Expanded Learning Opportunities, ESSER II State Reserves program (Resource 3216) and the Expanded Learning Opportunities, GEER II program (Resource 3217) is not allowable. Additional information is available on the on the CDE’s ARP Act Funding web page at https://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/cr/arpact.asp#esseriiialloc. Condition During our audit, we found the District incorrectly charged $24,363 of indirect costs to Resource 3214. The District’s total indirect costs, $42,097, for Resources 3213 and 3214 combined were under the LEA approved rate of 4.96%. In addition, the District incorrectly charged $15,008 of indirect costs to Resource 3216 and $3,440 of indirect costs to Resource 3217, which do not allow indirect costs for those resources. Questioned Costs A total of $42,811 in questioned costs was identified as a result of the conditions identified above. As the total indirect costs charged to resources 3213 and 3214 were under the District’s approved rate, the likely questioned cost is deemed to be $18,448 for resources 3216 (Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (ESSER II) and Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (GEER II). Context The conditions were identified as a result of the auditor’s federal program testing of the District’s indirect cost charges. Effect The District is out of compliance with allowable indirect cost charge requirements of the COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund programs. Cause The condition identified above appears to be due to the District not being familiar with the varying indirect cost requirements for each of the ESF federal programs. Recommendation In the 2023‐2024 fiscal year, the District should transfer $24,363 from the District’s General Fund Resource 3213 to the District’s General Fund Resource 3214, as well as, transferring $15,008 and $3,440 from the District’s General Fund unrestricted resource to Resources 3216 and 3217. In addition, the District should review their procedures to ensure it is only charging indirect costs to those programs that allow it.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Program Affected Program Name: COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER III) Fund: Learning Loss (Resource 3214), Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: ESSER II State Reserve (Resource 3216), and Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO) Grant: GEER II (Resource 3217) Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U, 84.425D, 84.425C Pass‐Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Criteria The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to provide funding to LEAs pursuant to the American Rescue Plan of 2021 (ARP Act) to address the learning loss requirement portion of ESSER III funds. Indirect costs for the total ESSER III allocation (Resource 3213 and 3214 combined) should be charged to Resource 3213 only. In addition, indirect cost for the Expanded Learning Opportunities, ESSER II State Reserves program (Resource 3216) and the Expanded Learning Opportunities, GEER II program (Resource 3217) is not allowable. Additional information is available on the on the CDE’s ARP Act Funding web page at https://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/cr/arpact.asp#esseriiialloc. Condition During our audit, we found the District incorrectly charged $24,363 of indirect costs to Resource 3214. The District’s total indirect costs, $42,097, for Resources 3213 and 3214 combined were under the LEA approved rate of 4.96%. In addition, the District incorrectly charged $15,008 of indirect costs to Resource 3216 and $3,440 of indirect costs to Resource 3217, which do not allow indirect costs for those resources. Questioned Costs A total of $42,811 in questioned costs was identified as a result of the conditions identified above. As the total indirect costs charged to resources 3213 and 3214 were under the District’s approved rate, the likely questioned cost is deemed to be $18,448 for resources 3216 (Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (ESSER II) and Expanding Learning Opportunities Grant (GEER II). Context The conditions were identified as a result of the auditor’s federal program testing of the District’s indirect cost charges. Effect The District is out of compliance with allowable indirect cost charge requirements of the COVID‐19 ‐ Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund programs. Cause The condition identified above appears to be due to the District not being familiar with the varying indirect cost requirements for each of the ESF federal programs. Recommendation In the 2023‐2024 fiscal year, the District should transfer $24,363 from the District’s General Fund Resource 3213 to the District’s General Fund Resource 3214, as well as, transferring $15,008 and $3,440 from the District’s General Fund unrestricted resource to Resources 3216 and 3217. In addition, the District should review their procedures to ensure it is only charging indirect costs to those programs that allow it.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action Plan and Views of Responsible Officials This audit finding is the result of the CDE changing the guidance on the indirect cost requirements for the COVID‐19‐Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund programs, and not publicizing the update. The Assistant Superintendent of Business Services, monitors the indirect cost charge requirements on annual basis and as new funding sources are identified. A tracking sheet is used to monitor funding deadlines, allowable ICR rates and types of funds. As an added measure, Assistant Superintendent, will consult the SACS query tool for a final review prior to the yearend close to ensure that CDE has not changed or updated the guidance prior to the close of a fiscal year to ensure District compliance.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2022-06-30

$10,612,207 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 11, 2024 — management decision was due July 11, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

$4,559,664 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 8, 2023 — management decision was due December 8, 2023.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$18,278,980 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 19, 2023 — management decision was due September 19, 2023.

FY 2022-06-30

$5,891,481 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2023 — management decision was due September 27, 2023.

FY 2022-06-30

$32,175,238 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 17, 2023 — management decision was due August 17, 2023.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,857,101 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2023 — management decision was due September 30, 2023.

FY 2022-06-30

$804,410 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 17, 2023 — management decision was due August 17, 2023.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$8,153,822 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 13, 2023 — management decision was due July 13, 2023.

FY 2022-06-30

$6,359,934 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 10, 2023 — management decision was due December 10, 2023.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,962,412 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 17, 2023 — management decision was due August 17, 2023.

FY 2022-06-30

$111,546,160 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 6, 2023 — management decision was due January 6, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

$2,709,619 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 8, 2023 — management decision was due December 8, 2023.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,975,838 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 23, 2023 — management decision was due September 23, 2023.

FY 2022-06-30

$31,814,275 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 4, 2023 — management decision was due December 4, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,670,659 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on August 16, 2022 — management decision was due February 16, 2023.

2021-003
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded during the month of November to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210). 2/2 employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210) during the month of February 2021 did not have any time certifications on file for the 2020-21 year. It is required that the time certifications for single funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multifunded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we did not find any questionable costs. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend they prepare time certification semi-annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan beginning on Page 70.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING #2021-003: FEDERAL COMPLIANCE ? TIME REPORTING (50000) CFDA Number and Title: 84.425D - Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Education; Passed through California Department of Education Criteria: Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, requires an accounting for personnel time on multi-funded positions by the time spent on each program and to semi-annually certify positions charged 100% to federal programs. Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: ? Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; ? Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity ? Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities ? Encompass both federally assisted and all other activities compensated by the non-Federal entity on an integrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non-Federal entity's written policy; ? Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non-Federal entity ? Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. ? Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards, but may be used for interim accounting purposes. Condition: Auditor selected employees with salaries coded during the month of November to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210). 2/2 employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210) during the month of February 2021 did not have any time certifications on file for the 2020-21 year. It is required that the time certifications for single funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multifunded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we did not find any questionable costs. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend they prepare time certification semi-annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan beginning on Page 70.

Corrective Action Plan

The Business Office in coordination with the HR Department is developing a time certification document from examples provided by the audit staff at Christy White, Inc. and other samples collected from other districts. Any employee paid from federal funds, whether they are 100% federally funded or less will be required to sign the document twice a year. This will be done once at the beginning of the school year, and once at the end of the school year, on or before May 15th .

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,428,968 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on April 25, 2022 — management decision was due October 25, 2022.

2021-003
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded during the month of November to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210). 2/2 employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210) during the month of February 2021 did not have any time certifications on file for the 2020-21 year. It is required that the time certifications for single funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multifunded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we did not find any questionable costs. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend they prepare time certification semi-annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan beginning on Page 70.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING #2021-003: FEDERAL COMPLIANCE ? TIME REPORTING (50000) CFDA Number and Title: 84.425D - Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Education; Passed through California Department of Education Criteria: Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, requires an accounting for personnel time on multi-funded positions by the time spent on each program and to semi-annually certify positions charged 100% to federal programs. Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: ? Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; ? Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity ? Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities ? Encompass both federally assisted and all other activities compensated by the non-Federal entity on an integrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non-Federal entity's written policy; ? Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non-Federal entity ? Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. ? Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards, but may be used for interim accounting purposes. Condition: Auditor selected employees with salaries coded during the month of November to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210). 2/2 employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210) during the month of February 2021 did not have any time certifications on file for the 2020-21 year. It is required that the time certifications for single funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multifunded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we did not find any questionable costs. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend they prepare time certification semi-annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan beginning on Page 70.

Corrective Action Plan

The Business Office in coordination with the HR Department is developing a time certification document from examples provided by the audit staff at Christy White, Inc. and other samples collected from other districts. Any employee paid from federal funds, whether they are 100% federally funded or less will be required to sign the document twice a year. This will be done once at the beginning of the school year, and once at the end of the school year, on or before May 15th .

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,491,268 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on May 17, 2022 — management decision was due November 17, 2022.

2021-003
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded during the month of November to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210). 2/2 employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210) during the month of February 2021 did not have any time certifications on file for the 2020-21 year. It is required that the time certifications for single funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multifunded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we did not find any questionable costs. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend they prepare time certification semi-annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan beginning on Page 70.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING #2021-003: FEDERAL COMPLIANCE ? TIME REPORTING (50000) CFDA Number and Title: 84.425D - Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Education; Passed through California Department of Education Criteria: Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, requires an accounting for personnel time on multi-funded positions by the time spent on each program and to semi-annually certify positions charged 100% to federal programs. Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: ? Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; ? Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity ? Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities ? Encompass both federally assisted and all other activities compensated by the non-Federal entity on an integrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non-Federal entity's written policy; ? Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non-Federal entity ? Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. ? Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards, but may be used for interim accounting purposes. Condition: Auditor selected employees with salaries coded during the month of November to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210). 2/2 employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210) during the month of February 2021 did not have any time certifications on file for the 2020-21 year. It is required that the time certifications for single funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multifunded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we did not find any questionable costs. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend they prepare time certification semi-annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan beginning on Page 70.

Corrective Action Plan

The Business Office in coordination with the HR Department is developing a time certification document from examples provided by the audit staff at Christy White, Inc. and other samples collected from other districts. Any employee paid from federal funds, whether they are 100% federally funded or less will be required to sign the document twice a year. This will be done once at the beginning of the school year, and once at the end of the school year, on or before May 15th .

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$7,365,712 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 15, 2022 — management decision was due September 15, 2022.

2021-003
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded during the month of November to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210). 2/2 employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210) during the month of February 2021 did not have any time certifications on file for the 2020-21 year. It is required that the time certifications for single funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multifunded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we did not find any questionable costs. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend they prepare time certification semi-annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan beginning on Page 70.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING #2021-003: FEDERAL COMPLIANCE ? TIME REPORTING (50000) CFDA Number and Title: 84.425D - Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Education; Passed through California Department of Education Criteria: Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, requires an accounting for personnel time on multi-funded positions by the time spent on each program and to semi-annually certify positions charged 100% to federal programs. Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: ? Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; ? Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity ? Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities ? Encompass both federally assisted and all other activities compensated by the non-Federal entity on an integrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non-Federal entity's written policy; ? Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non-Federal entity ? Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. ? Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards, but may be used for interim accounting purposes. Condition: Auditor selected employees with salaries coded during the month of November to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210). 2/2 employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210) during the month of February 2021 did not have any time certifications on file for the 2020-21 year. It is required that the time certifications for single funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multifunded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we did not find any questionable costs. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend they prepare time certification semi-annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan beginning on Page 70.

Corrective Action Plan

The Business Office in coordination with the HR Department is developing a time certification document from examples provided by the audit staff at Christy White, Inc. and other samples collected from other districts. Any employee paid from federal funds, whether they are 100% federally funded or less will be required to sign the document twice a year. This will be done once at the beginning of the school year, and once at the end of the school year, on or before May 15th .

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$34,267,714 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on August 10, 2022 — management decision was due February 10, 2023.

2021-003
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded during the month of November to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210). 2/2 employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210) during the month of February 2021 did not have any time certifications on file for the 2020-21 year. It is required that the time certifications for single funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multifunded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we did not find any questionable costs. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend they prepare time certification semi-annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan beginning on Page 70.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING #2021-003: FEDERAL COMPLIANCE ? TIME REPORTING (50000) CFDA Number and Title: 84.425D - Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Education; Passed through California Department of Education Criteria: Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, requires an accounting for personnel time on multi-funded positions by the time spent on each program and to semi-annually certify positions charged 100% to federal programs. Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: ? Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; ? Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity ? Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities ? Encompass both federally assisted and all other activities compensated by the non-Federal entity on an integrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non-Federal entity's written policy; ? Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non-Federal entity ? Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. ? Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards, but may be used for interim accounting purposes. Condition: Auditor selected employees with salaries coded during the month of November to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210). 2/2 employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210) during the month of February 2021 did not have any time certifications on file for the 2020-21 year. It is required that the time certifications for single funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multifunded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we did not find any questionable costs. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend they prepare time certification semi-annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan beginning on Page 70.

Corrective Action Plan

The Business Office in coordination with the HR Department is developing a time certification document from examples provided by the audit staff at Christy White, Inc. and other samples collected from other districts. Any employee paid from federal funds, whether they are 100% federally funded or less will be required to sign the document twice a year. This will be done once at the beginning of the school year, and once at the end of the school year, on or before May 15th .

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,176,477 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 21, 2022 — management decision was due September 21, 2022.

2021-003
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded during the month of November to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210). 2/2 employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210) during the month of February 2021 did not have any time certifications on file for the 2020-21 year. It is required that the time certifications for single funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multifunded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we did not find any questionable costs. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend they prepare time certification semi-annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan beginning on Page 70.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING #2021-003: FEDERAL COMPLIANCE ? TIME REPORTING (50000) CFDA Number and Title: 84.425D - Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Education; Passed through California Department of Education Criteria: Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, requires an accounting for personnel time on multi-funded positions by the time spent on each program and to semi-annually certify positions charged 100% to federal programs. Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: ? Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; ? Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity ? Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities ? Encompass both federally assisted and all other activities compensated by the non-Federal entity on an integrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non-Federal entity's written policy; ? Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non-Federal entity ? Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. ? Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards, but may be used for interim accounting purposes. Condition: Auditor selected employees with salaries coded during the month of November to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210). 2/2 employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210) during the month of February 2021 did not have any time certifications on file for the 2020-21 year. It is required that the time certifications for single funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multifunded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we did not find any questionable costs. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend they prepare time certification semi-annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan beginning on Page 70.

Corrective Action Plan

The Business Office in coordination with the HR Department is developing a time certification document from examples provided by the audit staff at Christy White, Inc. and other samples collected from other districts. Any employee paid from federal funds, whether they are 100% federally funded or less will be required to sign the document twice a year. This will be done once at the beginning of the school year, and once at the end of the school year, on or before May 15th .

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2021-06-30

$801,789 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 15, 2022 — management decision was due September 15, 2022.

2021-003
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded during the month of November to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210). 2/2 employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210) during the month of February 2021 did not have any time certifications on file for the 2020-21 year. It is required that the time certifications for single funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multifunded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we did not find any questionable costs. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend they prepare time certification semi-annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan beginning on Page 70.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING #2021-003: FEDERAL COMPLIANCE ? TIME REPORTING (50000) CFDA Number and Title: 84.425D - Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Education; Passed through California Department of Education Criteria: Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, requires an accounting for personnel time on multi-funded positions by the time spent on each program and to semi-annually certify positions charged 100% to federal programs. Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: ? Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; ? Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity ? Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities ? Encompass both federally assisted and all other activities compensated by the non-Federal entity on an integrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non-Federal entity's written policy; ? Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non-Federal entity ? Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. ? Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards, but may be used for interim accounting purposes. Condition: Auditor selected employees with salaries coded during the month of November to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210). 2/2 employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210) during the month of February 2021 did not have any time certifications on file for the 2020-21 year. It is required that the time certifications for single funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multifunded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we did not find any questionable costs. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend they prepare time certification semi-annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan beginning on Page 70.

Corrective Action Plan

The Business Office in coordination with the HR Department is developing a time certification document from examples provided by the audit staff at Christy White, Inc. and other samples collected from other districts. Any employee paid from federal funds, whether they are 100% federally funded or less will be required to sign the document twice a year. This will be done once at the beginning of the school year, and once at the end of the school year, on or before May 15th .

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$91,108,221 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 1, 2022 — management decision was due March 1, 2023.

2021-003
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded during the month of November to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210). 2/2 employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210) during the month of February 2021 did not have any time certifications on file for the 2020-21 year. It is required that the time certifications for single funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multifunded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we did not find any questionable costs. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend they prepare time certification semi-annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan beginning on Page 70.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING #2021-003: FEDERAL COMPLIANCE ? TIME REPORTING (50000) CFDA Number and Title: 84.425D - Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Education; Passed through California Department of Education Criteria: Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, requires an accounting for personnel time on multi-funded positions by the time spent on each program and to semi-annually certify positions charged 100% to federal programs. Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: ? Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; ? Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity ? Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities ? Encompass both federally assisted and all other activities compensated by the non-Federal entity on an integrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non-Federal entity's written policy; ? Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non-Federal entity ? Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. ? Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards, but may be used for interim accounting purposes. Condition: Auditor selected employees with salaries coded during the month of November to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210). 2/2 employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210) during the month of February 2021 did not have any time certifications on file for the 2020-21 year. It is required that the time certifications for single funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multifunded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we did not find any questionable costs. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend they prepare time certification semi-annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan beginning on Page 70.

Corrective Action Plan

The Business Office in coordination with the HR Department is developing a time certification document from examples provided by the audit staff at Christy White, Inc. and other samples collected from other districts. Any employee paid from federal funds, whether they are 100% federally funded or less will be required to sign the document twice a year. This will be done once at the beginning of the school year, and once at the end of the school year, on or before May 15th .

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2021-06-30

$18,546,806 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on June 29, 2022 — management decision was due December 29, 2022.

2021-003
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded during the month of November to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210). 2/2 employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210) during the month of February 2021 did not have any time certifications on file for the 2020-21 year. It is required that the time certifications for single funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multifunded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we did not find any questionable costs. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend they prepare time certification semi-annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan beginning on Page 70.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING #2021-003: FEDERAL COMPLIANCE ? TIME REPORTING (50000) CFDA Number and Title: 84.425D - Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Education; Passed through California Department of Education Criteria: Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, requires an accounting for personnel time on multi-funded positions by the time spent on each program and to semi-annually certify positions charged 100% to federal programs. Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: ? Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; ? Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity ? Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities ? Encompass both federally assisted and all other activities compensated by the non-Federal entity on an integrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non-Federal entity's written policy; ? Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non-Federal entity ? Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. ? Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards, but may be used for interim accounting purposes. Condition: Auditor selected employees with salaries coded during the month of November to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210). 2/2 employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210) during the month of February 2021 did not have any time certifications on file for the 2020-21 year. It is required that the time certifications for single funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multifunded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we did not find any questionable costs. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend they prepare time certification semi-annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan beginning on Page 70.

Corrective Action Plan

The Business Office in coordination with the HR Department is developing a time certification document from examples provided by the audit staff at Christy White, Inc. and other samples collected from other districts. Any employee paid from federal funds, whether they are 100% federally funded or less will be required to sign the document twice a year. This will be done once at the beginning of the school year, and once at the end of the school year, on or before May 15th .

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,277,774 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 24, 2022 — management decision was due August 24, 2022.

2021-003
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded during the month of November to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210). 2/2 employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210) during the month of February 2021 did not have any time certifications on file for the 2020-21 year. It is required that the time certifications for single funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multifunded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we did not find any questionable costs. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend they prepare time certification semi-annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan beginning on Page 70.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING #2021-003: FEDERAL COMPLIANCE ? TIME REPORTING (50000) CFDA Number and Title: 84.425D - Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Education; Passed through California Department of Education Criteria: Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, requires an accounting for personnel time on multi-funded positions by the time spent on each program and to semi-annually certify positions charged 100% to federal programs. Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: ? Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; ? Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity ? Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities ? Encompass both federally assisted and all other activities compensated by the non-Federal entity on an integrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non-Federal entity's written policy; ? Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non-Federal entity ? Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. ? Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards, but may be used for interim accounting purposes. Condition: Auditor selected employees with salaries coded during the month of November to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210). 2/2 employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210) during the month of February 2021 did not have any time certifications on file for the 2020-21 year. It is required that the time certifications for single funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multifunded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we did not find any questionable costs. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend they prepare time certification semi-annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan beginning on Page 70.

Corrective Action Plan

The Business Office in coordination with the HR Department is developing a time certification document from examples provided by the audit staff at Christy White, Inc. and other samples collected from other districts. Any employee paid from federal funds, whether they are 100% federally funded or less will be required to sign the document twice a year. This will be done once at the beginning of the school year, and once at the end of the school year, on or before May 15th .

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$8,401,629 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 9, 2022 — management decision was due August 9, 2022.

2021-003
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded during the month of November to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210). 2/2 employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210) during the month of February 2021 did not have any time certifications on file for the 2020-21 year. It is required that the time certifications for single funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multifunded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we did not find any questionable costs. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend they prepare time certification semi-annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan beginning on Page 70.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING #2021-003: FEDERAL COMPLIANCE ? TIME REPORTING (50000) CFDA Number and Title: 84.425D - Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Education; Passed through California Department of Education Criteria: Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, requires an accounting for personnel time on multi-funded positions by the time spent on each program and to semi-annually certify positions charged 100% to federal programs. Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: ? Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; ? Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity ? Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities ? Encompass both federally assisted and all other activities compensated by the non-Federal entity on an integrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non-Federal entity's written policy; ? Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non-Federal entity ? Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. ? Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards, but may be used for interim accounting purposes. Condition: Auditor selected employees with salaries coded during the month of November to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210). 2/2 employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210) during the month of February 2021 did not have any time certifications on file for the 2020-21 year. It is required that the time certifications for single funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multifunded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we did not find any questionable costs. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend they prepare time certification semi-annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan beginning on Page 70.

Corrective Action Plan

The Business Office in coordination with the HR Department is developing a time certification document from examples provided by the audit staff at Christy White, Inc. and other samples collected from other districts. Any employee paid from federal funds, whether they are 100% federally funded or less will be required to sign the document twice a year. This will be done once at the beginning of the school year, and once at the end of the school year, on or before May 15th .

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$7,570,067 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 2, 2022 — management decision was due September 2, 2022.

2021-003
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded during the month of November to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210). 2/2 employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210) during the month of February 2021 did not have any time certifications on file for the 2020-21 year. It is required that the time certifications for single funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multifunded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we did not find any questionable costs. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend they prepare time certification semi-annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan beginning on Page 70.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING #2021-003: FEDERAL COMPLIANCE ? TIME REPORTING (50000) CFDA Number and Title: 84.425D - Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Education; Passed through California Department of Education Criteria: Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, requires an accounting for personnel time on multi-funded positions by the time spent on each program and to semi-annually certify positions charged 100% to federal programs. Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: ? Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; ? Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity ? Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities ? Encompass both federally assisted and all other activities compensated by the non-Federal entity on an integrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non-Federal entity's written policy; ? Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non-Federal entity ? Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. ? Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards, but may be used for interim accounting purposes. Condition: Auditor selected employees with salaries coded during the month of November to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210). 2/2 employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210) during the month of February 2021 did not have any time certifications on file for the 2020-21 year. It is required that the time certifications for single funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multifunded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we did not find any questionable costs. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend they prepare time certification semi-annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan beginning on Page 70.

Corrective Action Plan

The Business Office in coordination with the HR Department is developing a time certification document from examples provided by the audit staff at Christy White, Inc. and other samples collected from other districts. Any employee paid from federal funds, whether they are 100% federally funded or less will be required to sign the document twice a year. This will be done once at the beginning of the school year, and once at the end of the school year, on or before May 15th .

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$14,404,348 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 8, 2022 — management decision was due August 8, 2022.

2021-003
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded during the month of November to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210). 2/2 employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210) during the month of February 2021 did not have any time certifications on file for the 2020-21 year. It is required that the time certifications for single funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multifunded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we did not find any questionable costs. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend they prepare time certification semi-annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan beginning on Page 70.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING #2021-003: FEDERAL COMPLIANCE ? TIME REPORTING (50000) CFDA Number and Title: 84.425D - Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Education; Passed through California Department of Education Criteria: Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, requires an accounting for personnel time on multi-funded positions by the time spent on each program and to semi-annually certify positions charged 100% to federal programs. Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: ? Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; ? Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity ? Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities ? Encompass both federally assisted and all other activities compensated by the non-Federal entity on an integrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non-Federal entity's written policy; ? Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non-Federal entity ? Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. ? Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards, but may be used for interim accounting purposes. Condition: Auditor selected employees with salaries coded during the month of November to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210). 2/2 employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210) during the month of February 2021 did not have any time certifications on file for the 2020-21 year. It is required that the time certifications for single funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multifunded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we did not find any questionable costs. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend they prepare time certification semi-annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan beginning on Page 70.

Corrective Action Plan

The Business Office in coordination with the HR Department is developing a time certification document from examples provided by the audit staff at Christy White, Inc. and other samples collected from other districts. Any employee paid from federal funds, whether they are 100% federally funded or less will be required to sign the document twice a year. This will be done once at the beginning of the school year, and once at the end of the school year, on or before May 15th .

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$23,798,390 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on May 16, 2022 — management decision was due November 16, 2022.

2021-003
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Auditor selected employees with salaries coded during the month of November to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210). 2/2 employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210) during the month of February 2021 did not have any time certifications on file for the 2020-21 year. It is required that the time certifications for single funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multifunded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we did not find any questionable costs. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend they prepare time certification semi-annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan beginning on Page 70.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING #2021-003: FEDERAL COMPLIANCE ? TIME REPORTING (50000) CFDA Number and Title: 84.425D - Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Education; Passed through California Department of Education Criteria: Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, requires an accounting for personnel time on multi-funded positions by the time spent on each program and to semi-annually certify positions charged 100% to federal programs. Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: ? Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; ? Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity ? Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities ? Encompass both federally assisted and all other activities compensated by the non-Federal entity on an integrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non-Federal entity's written policy; ? Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non-Federal entity ? Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. ? Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards, but may be used for interim accounting purposes. Condition: Auditor selected employees with salaries coded during the month of November to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210). 2/2 employees tested with salaries coded to the Education Stabilization Fund (Resource 3210) during the month of February 2021 did not have any time certifications on file for the 2020-21 year. It is required that the time certifications for single funded employees be prepared twice a year and monthly for multifunded employees. Cause: The District has not been following its policy for proper time accounting. Effect: The District is not in compliance. Questioned Costs: Although the District was not in compliance, we did not find any questionable costs. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend they prepare time certification semi-annually for single funded employees and monthly for multi-funded employees. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan beginning on Page 70.

Corrective Action Plan

The Business Office in coordination with the HR Department is developing a time certification document from examples provided by the audit staff at Christy White, Inc. and other samples collected from other districts. Any employee paid from federal funds, whether they are 100% federally funded or less will be required to sign the document twice a year. This will be done once at the beginning of the school year, and once at the end of the school year, on or before May 15th .

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,476,789 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 13, 2021 — management decision was due October 13, 2021.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$15,432,697 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 4, 2021 — management decision was due October 4, 2021.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$7,648,825 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 11, 2021 — management decision was due October 11, 2021.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,353,381 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 15, 2021 — management decision was due September 15, 2021.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,400,085 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 2, 2021 — management decision was due August 2, 2021.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,783,197 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 4, 2021 — management decision was due October 4, 2021.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,729,498 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 13, 2021 — management decision was due October 13, 2021.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,388,091 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 11, 2021 — management decision was due February 11, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$12,424,398 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 27, 2021 — management decision was due October 27, 2021.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,766,269 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 16, 2021 — management decision was due August 16, 2021.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$83,088,637 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 19, 2021 — management decision was due September 19, 2021.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,890,497 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 26, 2021 — management decision was due October 26, 2021.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,285,927 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 4, 2021 — management decision was due October 4, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$7,783,760 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 6, 2020 — management decision was due July 6, 2020.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,671,006 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,098,225 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 24, 2020 — management decision was due September 24, 2020.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$17,436,844 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,855,858 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 1, 2020 — management decision was due July 1, 2020.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,852,714 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$92,362,377 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 15, 2020 — management decision was due July 15, 2020.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,090,218 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,493,501 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,880,869 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,924,595 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,507,049 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$15,465,994 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,597,171 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 17, 2018 — management decision was due June 17, 2019.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$7,416,473 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 10, 2019 — management decision was due July 10, 2019.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,170,195 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 16, 2018 — management decision was due June 16, 2019.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$867,964 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 19, 2018 — management decision was due June 19, 2019.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,676,469 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 17, 2018 — management decision was due June 17, 2019.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,551,456 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 4, 2019 — management decision was due August 4, 2019.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,202,493 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 17, 2018 — management decision was due June 17, 2019.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,212,453 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 19, 2018 — management decision was due June 19, 2019.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,211,926 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 18, 2018 — management decision was due June 18, 2019.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$15,028,266 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 15, 2018 — management decision was due June 15, 2019.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$17,350,324 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 18, 2018 — management decision was due June 18, 2019.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$89,162,608 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 7, 2019 — management decision was due July 7, 2019.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,128,238 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 15, 2018 — management decision was due June 15, 2019.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,238,488 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 16, 2018 — management decision was due June 16, 2019.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,566,536 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 7, 2019 — management decision was due August 7, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,356,820 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 3, 2018 — management decision was due July 3, 2018.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,465,231 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 20, 2017 — management decision was due June 20, 2018.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$76,635,877 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 11, 2018 — management decision was due July 11, 2018.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,775,618 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 17, 2017 — management decision was due June 17, 2018.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,990,495 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 10, 2018 — management decision was due July 10, 2018.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$13,297,172 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 19, 2017 — management decision was due June 19, 2018.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,483,935 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 11, 2018 — management decision was due July 11, 2018.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,497,105 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 19, 2017 — management decision was due June 19, 2018.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,196,536 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 17, 2017 — management decision was due June 17, 2018.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$17,587,319 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 17, 2017 — management decision was due June 17, 2018.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$833,587 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 17, 2017 — management decision was due June 17, 2018.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,609,753 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 17, 2017 — management decision was due June 17, 2018.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,280,034 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 17, 2017 — management decision was due June 17, 2018.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,191,390 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 18, 2017 — management decision was due June 18, 2018.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,726,918 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 14, 2018 — management decision was due August 14, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,331,307 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 21, 2016 — management decision was due June 21, 2017.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,031,205 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 21, 2016 — management decision was due June 21, 2017.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,701,157 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 20, 2016 — management decision was due June 20, 2017.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$74,303,644 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 12, 2017 — management decision was due July 12, 2017.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,999,769 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 21, 2017 — management decision was due July 21, 2017.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,164,217 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 21, 2016 — management decision was due June 21, 2017.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$13,028,835 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 19, 2016 — management decision was due June 19, 2017.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$16,253,460 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 18, 2016 — management decision was due June 18, 2017.

FY 2016-06-30

$5,670,017 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 2, 2017 — management decision was due July 2, 2017.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,445,302 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 31, 2017 — management decision was due July 31, 2017.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$808,852 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 27, 2016 — management decision was due June 27, 2017.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,003,106 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 18, 2016 — management decision was due June 18, 2017.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,751,983 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 27, 2016 — management decision was due June 27, 2017.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,045,620 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 21, 2016 — management decision was due June 21, 2017.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in California

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.