EIN: 946001157
UEI: UPBTCLRN9KS5
Audited by: BAKER TILLY US, LLP
Oversight agency: 81 [Department of Energy]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 2, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on August 13, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by February 13, 2027 (164 days from today).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on August 25, 2025 — management decision was due February 25, 2026.
FAC accepted this audit on June 19, 2024 — management decision was due December 19, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on September 18, 2022 — management decision was due March 18, 2023.
Criteria: In accordance with the CAPP Program Notice No. 2021-01, SMUD was to provide financial assistance to active and inactive residential and commercial customer accounts reflecting delinquent balances incurred during the COVID-19 pandemic relief period covering March 4, 2020 through June 15, 2021. Such assistance was to be provided to customers based the following priority: (1) Active residential customers with past due balances and are at risk of disconnection due to nonpayment of balances incurred during the COVID-19 pandemic bill relief period; (2) Active residential customers with past due balances incurred during the COVID-19 pandemic bill relief period; (3) Inactive residential customers with past due balances incurred during COVID-19 pandemic bill relief period; then (4) Commercial customers with past due balances incurred during the COVID-19 pandemic bill relief period. SMUD made determinations based on actual arrearages and status at the time the relief funds were applied to customer accounts in the billing system. Condition/Context: During our testing, we selected a sample of 40 customer accounts whose electric utility bills were credited with CAPP funds and viewed supporting documentation. Of those 40 customer accounts, we noted the following circumstances: 1. One inactive customer account did not have service during the COVID relief period and should not have been eligible for a credit. 2. A city tax credit from August, 2021 was inappropriately classified as a payment when calculating the CAPP Credit amount, which resulted in an underpayment to four customers. 3. A customer made payment prior to the time the relief funds were applied by SMUD, which was not considered in the calculation for their credit resulting in an overapplication of their credit. 4. SMUD was unable to provide documentation supporting one of the credits applied. The sample was not statistically valid. Cause: SMUD did not have sufficient controls in place for review of each individual account credited by someone other than the individual who applied the credits to the accounts. Effect: Due to the lack of sufficient controls for reviewing customer accounts on an individual basis, the customers could be credited with an inaccurate amount. Questioned Cost: None Recommendation: We recommend that SMUD develop and implement controls to review the accuracy of the CAPP credits on an individual basis to identify any inconsistencies with the program. Management?s Response: The criteria and procedures for applying CAPP funding were established by the CSD through a series of program notices (changes and updates to the program), some of which were provided after SMUD had already begun processing the payments. CSD did not provide specific guidance on how to handle application/credits of local taxes, nor how to address payments made by customers between the initial application period and the application of payments to accounts; our intent was to apply the credits in a way that was in the spirit of what the program intended and to be as accurate as possible considering things change daily. We successfully issued credits to more than fifty-nine thousand accounts with limited guidance or strict guidelines to follow other than the priorities and the intent of the funds as described in the program notices. As one of the first utilities to apply for funds and to apply the funds to accounts, SMUD worked closely with CSD to ensure we were following the intent and procedures provided by CSD when available. Data on accounts, balance due, payments made, assistance received, installment plans created, PV settlement data, etc. changes daily; therefore, it is very likely that changes occurred between when we ran files to begin application of funds and when those funds were applied. Considering this is the first time this has ever been done with SMUD or any other utility we feel like this was a huge success; however, there were some lessons learned on things we would do differently. As such SMUD has already formed an internal team (subject matter experts and technical support) to develop and implement internal controls over compliance.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: In accordance with the CAPP Program Notice No. 2021-01, SMUD was to provide financial assistance to active and inactive residential and commercial customer accounts reflecting delinquent balances incurred during the COVID-19 pandemic relief period covering March 4, 2020 through June 15, 2021. Such assistance was to be provided to customers based the following priority: (1) Active residential customers with past due balances and are at risk of disconnection due to nonpayment of balances incurred during the COVID-19 pandemic bill relief period; (2) Active residential customers with past due balances incurred during the COVID-19 pandemic bill relief period; (3) Inactive residential customers with past due balances incurred during COVID-19 pandemic bill relief period; then (4) Commercial customers with past due balances incurred during the COVID-19 pandemic bill relief period. SMUD made determinations based on actual arrearages and status at the time the relief funds were applied to customer accounts in the billing system. Condition/Context: During our testing, we selected a sample of 40 customer accounts whose electric utility bills were credited with CAPP funds and viewed supporting documentation. Of those 40 customer accounts, we noted the following circumstances: 1. One inactive customer account did not have service during the COVID relief period and should not have been eligible for a credit. 2. A city tax credit from August, 2021 was inappropriately classified as a payment when calculating the CAPP Credit amount, which resulted in an underpayment to four customers. 3. A customer made payment prior to the time the relief funds were applied by SMUD, which was not considered in the calculation for their credit resulting in an overapplication of their credit. 4. SMUD was unable to provide documentation supporting one of the credits applied. The sample was not statistically valid. Cause: SMUD did not have sufficient controls in place for review of each individual account credited by someone other than the individual who applied the credits to the accounts. Effect: Due to the lack of sufficient controls for reviewing customer accounts on an individual basis, the customers could be credited with an inaccurate amount. Questioned Cost: None Recommendation: We recommend that SMUD develop and implement controls to review the accuracy of the CAPP credits on an individual basis to identify any inconsistencies with the program. Management?s Response: The criteria and procedures for applying CAPP funding were established by the CSD through a series of program notices (changes and updates to the program), some of which were provided after SMUD had already begun processing the payments. CSD did not provide specific guidance on how to handle application/credits of local taxes, nor how to address payments made by customers between the initial application period and the application of payments to accounts; our intent was to apply the credits in a way that was in the spirit of what the program intended and to be as accurate as possible considering things change daily. We successfully issued credits to more than fifty-nine thousand accounts with limited guidance or strict guidelines to follow other than the priorities and the intent of the funds as described in the program notices. As one of the first utilities to apply for funds and to apply the funds to accounts, SMUD worked closely with CSD to ensure we were following the intent and procedures provided by CSD when available. Data on accounts, balance due, payments made, assistance received, installment plans created, PV settlement data, etc. changes daily; therefore, it is very likely that changes occurred between when we ran files to begin application of funds and when those funds were applied. Considering this is the first time this has ever been done with SMUD or any other utility we feel like this was a huge success; however, there were some lessons learned on things we would do differently. As such SMUD has already formed an internal team (subject matter experts and technical support) to develop and implement internal controls over compliance.
A SMUD team consisting of subject matter and information technology experts have identified a report to be used for any CAPP or other assistance that includes all credits no matter how it is classified or captured to determine accurate arrears reporting including identifying active/inactive accounts. We are currently in the process of performing quality assurance tests to ensure this will address the need and submit any information technology enhancements if needed to address the concern. Additionally, we will test this report prior to implementation and QA after we process accounts Kim Rikalo, Manager Residential & Assistance Delivery, will be responsible for ensuring the Corrective Action Plan is implemented by September/October 2022 depending on the release of the technical solution which will be in time to submit our application for CAPP 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on September 26, 2019 — management decision was due March 26, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on September 27, 2018 — management decision was due March 27, 2019.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in California →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.