EIN: 946000522
UEI: PR4KNB6J6SS3
Audited by: CliftonLarsonAllen LLP
Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 2, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on August 1, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by February 1, 2026 (215 days ago).
What is a management decision? →During our testing, we noted that management’s review of contracts did not include a review to ensure that the party was not debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded. Questioned costs: None. Context: Audit procedures included a review of the three agreements during the year ended June 30, 2024, which represented the entire population. For all of the items reviewed management did not obtain verification that the party was not debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded, prior to entering into the transactions. However, upon subsequent review, no parties were determined the be debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded. Cause: The County’s procurement process did not include a requirement that required a verification of debarred or suspended status. Effect: Amounts could be paid to parties that are debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend that management enhance the procurement controls to ensure that all required parties are reviewed for suspension and debarment prior to entering the transaction. Views of responsible officials: The County agrees with the findings. Corrective action plan: The County has developed a formal policy, which has been distributed to all departments. The policy is scheduled to take effect in Fiscal Year 2024–2025.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria or specific requirement: Per 2 CFR 200 Appendix II (H) Debarment and Suspension (Executive Orders 12549 and 12689)—A contract award (see 2 CFR 180.220) must not be made to parties listed on the governmentwide exclusions in the System for Award Management (SAM), in accordance with the OMB guidelines at 2 CFR 180 that implement Executive Orders 12549 (3 CFR part 1986 Comp., p. 189) and 12689 (3 CFR part 1989 Comp., p. 235), “Debarment and Suspension.” SAM Exclusions contains the names of parties debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded by agencies, as well as parties declared ineligible under statutory or regulatory authority other than Executive Order 12549. Condition: During our testing, we noted that management’s review of contracts did not include a review to ensure that the party was not debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded. Questioned costs: None. Context: Audit procedures included a review of the three agreements during the year ended June 30, 2024, which represented the entire population. For all of the items reviewed management did not obtain verification that the party was not debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded, prior to entering into the transactions. However, upon subsequent review, no parties were determined the be debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded. Cause: The County’s procurement process did not include a requirement that required a verification of debarred or suspended status. Effect: Amounts could be paid to parties that are debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend that management enhance the procurement controls to ensure that all required parties are reviewed for suspension and debarment prior to entering the transaction. Views of responsible officials: The County agrees with the findings. Corrective action plan: The County has developed a formal policy, which has been distributed to all departments. The policy is scheduled to take effect in Fiscal Year 2024–2025.
Suspension & Debarment Recommendation: As part of its procurement process, the County should obtain verification that the vendor or subrecipient is not suspended or debarred. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action planned in response to finding: While several departments at the County have been checking this internally, we will work on a more formal procedure that will require the departments to show proof of verification that the vendor or subrecipient is not suspended or debarred prior to release of payment. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Stephanie Wellemeyer, Auditor/Clerk Planned completion date for corrective action plan: During fiscal year 2024/2025.
2023-001
FAC accepted this audit on October 25, 2024 — management decision was due April 25, 2025.
During our testing, we noted that management’s review of contracts did not include a review to ensure that the party was not debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded. Questioned costs: None. Context: Audit procedures included a review of the five agreements during the year ended June 30, 2023, which represented the entire population. For all of the items reviewed management did not obtain verification that the party was not debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded, prior to entering into the transactions. However, upon subsequent review, no parties were determined the be debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded. Cause: The County’s procurement process did not include a requirement that required a verification of debarred or suspended status. Effect: Amounts could be paid to parties that are debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that management enhance the procurement controls to ensure that all required parties are reviewed for suspension and debarment prior to entering the transaction. Views of responsible officials: The County agrees with the findings. Corrective action plan: While several departments at the County have been checking this internally, we will work on a more formal procedure that will require the departments to show proof of verification that the vendor or subrecipient is not suspended or debarred prior to release of payment.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Title: COVID-19 Epidemiology and Laboratory for Capacity Testing ALN: 93.323 Pass-Through Agency: State of California Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Number and Period: N/A Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria or specific requirement: Per 2 CFR 200 Appendix II (H) Debarment and Suspension (Executive Orders 12549 and 12689)—A contract award (see 2 CFR 180.220) must not be made to parties listed on the governmentwide exclusions in the System for Award Management (SAM), in accordance with the OMB guidelines at 2 CFR 180 that implement Executive Orders 12549 (3 CFR part 1986 Comp., p. 189) and 12689 (3 CFR part 1989 Comp., p. 235), “Debarment and Suspension.” SAM Exclusions contains the names of parties debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded by agencies, as well as parties declared ineligible under statutory or regulatory authority other than Executive Order 12549. Condition: During our testing, we noted that management’s review of contracts did not include a review to ensure that the party was not debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded. Questioned costs: None. Context: Audit procedures included a review of the five agreements during the year ended June 30, 2023, which represented the entire population. For all of the items reviewed management did not obtain verification that the party was not debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded, prior to entering into the transactions. However, upon subsequent review, no parties were determined the be debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded. Cause: The County’s procurement process did not include a requirement that required a verification of debarred or suspended status. Effect: Amounts could be paid to parties that are debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that management enhance the procurement controls to ensure that all required parties are reviewed for suspension and debarment prior to entering the transaction. Views of responsible officials: The County agrees with the findings. Corrective action plan: While several departments at the County have been checking this internally, we will work on a more formal procedure that will require the departments to show proof of verification that the vendor or subrecipient is not suspended or debarred prior to release of payment.
Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Title: COVID-19 Epidemiology and Laboratory for Capacity Testing ALN: 93.323 Pass-Through Agency: State of California Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Number and Period: N/A Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria or specific requirement: Per 2 CFR 200 Appendix II (H) Debarment and Suspension (Executive Orders 12549 and 12689)—A contract award (see 2 CFR 180.220) must not be made to parties listed on the governmentwide exclusions in the System for Award Management (SAM), in accordance with the OMB guidelines at 2 CFR 180 that implement Executive Orders 12549 (3 CFR part 1986 Comp., p. 189) and 12689 (3 CFR part 1989 Comp., p. 235), “Debarment and Suspension.” SAM Exclusions contains the names of parties debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded by agencies, as well as parties declared ineligible under statutory or regulatory authority other than Executive Order 12549. Condition: During our testing, we noted that management’s review of contracts did not include a review to ensure that the party was not debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded. Questioned costs: None. Context: Audit procedures included a review of the five agreements during the year ended June 30, 2023, which represented the entire population. For all of the items reviewed management did not obtain verification that the party was not debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded, prior to entering into the transactions. However, upon subsequent review, no parties were determined the be debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded. Cause: The County’s procurement process did not include a requirement that required a verification of debarred or suspended status. Effect: Amounts could be paid to parties that are debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that management enhance the procurement controls to ensure that all required parties are reviewed for suspension and debarment prior to entering the transaction. Views of responsible officials: The County agrees with the findings. Corrective action plan: While several departments at the County have been checking this internally, we will work on a more formal procedure that will require the departments to show proof of verification that the vendor or subrecipient is not suspended or debarred prior to release of payment.
FAC accepted this audit on January 29, 2024 — management decision was due July 29, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on September 29, 2022 — management decision was due March 29, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on December 7, 2021 — management decision was due June 7, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on July 19, 2021 — management decision was due January 19, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on October 8, 2020 — management decision was due April 8, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on February 24, 2020 — management decision was due August 24, 2020.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2016-005
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2016-006
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2016-007
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2016-008
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
FAC accepted this audit on July 29, 2019 — management decision was due January 29, 2020.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2015-005
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2015-006
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2015-007
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2015-009
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in California →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
