← Back to home

County of AmadorLocal Government

EIN: 946000505

UEI: SJGRH7XMSBK6

Audited by: Smith & Newel CPAs

Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

County of Amador10 audit years5 findings1 repeat
10
Audit Years
5
Total Findings
1
Repeat Findings
$17.3M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$17,295,779 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 31, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by October 1, 2026 (25 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
2025-001
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Name: Foster Care - Title IV-E Assistance Listing #: 93.658 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through Entity: State Department of Social Services Award No.: 93-Unknown Year: 2024-2025 Compliance Requirement: Internal Control Criteria: State-specific policies (Assembly Bill 403 in California) requires the County to maintain Level of Care Protocol documentation that supports the rate, including the "basic" rate of foster care recipients. Condition During testing of Foster Care (ALN 93.658) maintenance payments, it was noted that several of the case files did not contain a finalized Level of Care Protocol scoring form (SOC 500) to support the basic rate. Cause The County has had specific training related to Level of Care Protocols and are gaining additional information relatedd to documents needed for final Level of Care Protocol assessments. Current onboarding and refresher training for case workers did not sufficiently emphasize the mandatory requirement of the LOCP form for Basic Rate placements, as staff incorrectly prioritized the form only for higher-level or "specialized" care rates. Effect The lack of consistent Level of Care Protocol documentation creates a risk that the County cannot definitively demonstrate that the foster care maintenance payments were made at the correct, state-approved rate. Questioned Cost No questioned costs were identified as a result of our audit procedures. Context: Out of a sample of 37 cases, 30 cases lacked Level of Care Protocol scoring form SOC 500. Repeat Finding This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation We recommend that the Department continues training that requires a completed LOCP scoring form for all placements, including those at the basic rate. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action Refer to separate Management's Corrective Action Plan for views of responsible officials and management's responses.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Name: Foster Care - Title IV-E Assistance Listing #: 93.658 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through Entity: State Department of Social Services Award No.: 93-Unknown Year: 2024-2025 Compliance Requirement: Internal Control Criteria: State-specific policies (Assembly Bill 403 in California) requires the County to maintain Level of Care Protocol documentation that supports the rate, including the "basic" rate of foster care recipients. Condition During testing of Foster Care (ALN 93.658) maintenance payments, it was noted that several of the case files did not contain a finalized Level of Care Protocol scoring form (SOC 500) to support the basic rate. Cause The County has had specific training related to Level of Care Protocols and are gaining additional information relatedd to documents needed for final Level of Care Protocol assessments. Current onboarding and refresher training for case workers did not sufficiently emphasize the mandatory requirement of the LOCP form for Basic Rate placements, as staff incorrectly prioritized the form only for higher-level or "specialized" care rates. Effect The lack of consistent Level of Care Protocol documentation creates a risk that the County cannot definitively demonstrate that the foster care maintenance payments were made at the correct, state-approved rate. Questioned Cost No questioned costs were identified as a result of our audit procedures. Context: Out of a sample of 37 cases, 30 cases lacked Level of Care Protocol scoring form SOC 500. Repeat Finding This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation We recommend that the Department continues training that requires a completed LOCP scoring form for all placements, including those at the basic rate. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action Refer to separate Management's Corrective Action Plan for views of responsible officials and management's responses.

Corrective Action Plan

2025-001 Foster Care - Title IV-E (Significant Deficienty); We recommend the Department continues training that requires a completed LOCP scoring form for all placements, including those at the basic rate.; Management's Response: The County concurs with the finding.; Responsible Individual: CPS Program Manager and Eligibility Manager (or their designated individuals) to review the training materials and include the omitted section relating to Form SOC 500.; Corrective Action Plan: We have reviewed California Assembly Bill 403 and will add to our training plan that a SOC 500 is required for all Foster Youth cases. Additionally, the County has established a Project Committee dedicated to the Foster Care Program that meets each month. The Committee includes CPS Social Worker Supervisors, Eligibility Program Manager, Eligbility Spervisor, Eligbility Specialist III (ES III has the full case load for Foster Care), Eligibility Analyst, the Chief Fiscal Supervisor, and the Director attends as availability follows. The Eligibility Specialist III will set a task for each new case to ensure the SOC 500 is imaged into the CalSAWS system. With that image in place, the fiscal department can vefiry and ensure accuracy as the initial payments are processed as an additional check and balance.; Anticipated Completion Date: Implementation is underway at the issuance of this report with anticipated full roll-out across all units before April 13, 2026, allowing staff time to update their knowledge.

About Other →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$12,617,179 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2025 — management decision was due September 29, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$13,588,066 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 28, 2024 — management decision was due September 28, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

$11,732,887 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 28, 2023 — management decision was due September 28, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

$16,937,058 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2022 — management decision was due September 30, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

$8,826,921 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2021 — management decision was due September 30, 2021.

2020-002
Eligibility
OTHER MATTERS

2020-002 Name: Foster Care ? Title IV-E CFDA#: 93.658 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass Through Entity: State Department of Social Services and State Department of Health Care Services Award No.: Various Year: 2019-20 Compliance Requirement: Eligibility Criteria Good internal control over eligibility requires that the required Determination of Federal AFDC-FC Eligibility Form FC 3 signed by the Eligibility Worker and the appropriate box noting Federal eligibility be checked. Condition Federal eligibility requires that the determination of the child?s eligibility for foster care be documented in the case record on the Statement of Facts Supporting Eligibility of AFDC-FC form (the FC 2) and the Determination of Federal AFDC-Eligibility form ( FC 3). The County does document eligibility on the FC 2 and FC 3 by the completion of the form, however, a signature is required on both forms. The Eligibility Worker must sign the FC 2 and FC 3 and check the appropriate box, which indicates the recipient?s eligibility or non-eligibility. In 3 of 23 cases tested, the FC 3 was completed and although the individuals was determined to be eligible, the form was not signed by the Eligibility Worker. Cause Appropriate training or review procedures concerning eligibility were inadequate. Effect Eligibility documentation was not complete for 3 of the 23 cases tested. Questioned Cost There were no questioned costs noted as a result of the audit procedures. Context We randomly selected 23 case files to test eligibility documentation compliance for the Foster Care ? Title IV-E program. Sampling was a statistically valid sample. We noted 3 of the 23 case files did not have the required eligibility documentation. Repeat Finding Not a repeat finding. Recommendation We recommend that the County incorporate procedures into their review process to ensure that all forms are accurately completed and only eligible individuals are provided Federal Care assistance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action Refer to separate Management?s Corrective Action Plan for views of responsible officials and management?s responses.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2020-002 Name: Foster Care ? Title IV-E CFDA#: 93.658 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass Through Entity: State Department of Social Services and State Department of Health Care Services Award No.: Various Year: 2019-20 Compliance Requirement: Eligibility Criteria Good internal control over eligibility requires that the required Determination of Federal AFDC-FC Eligibility Form FC 3 signed by the Eligibility Worker and the appropriate box noting Federal eligibility be checked. Condition Federal eligibility requires that the determination of the child?s eligibility for foster care be documented in the case record on the Statement of Facts Supporting Eligibility of AFDC-FC form (the FC 2) and the Determination of Federal AFDC-Eligibility form ( FC 3). The County does document eligibility on the FC 2 and FC 3 by the completion of the form, however, a signature is required on both forms. The Eligibility Worker must sign the FC 2 and FC 3 and check the appropriate box, which indicates the recipient?s eligibility or non-eligibility. In 3 of 23 cases tested, the FC 3 was completed and although the individuals was determined to be eligible, the form was not signed by the Eligibility Worker. Cause Appropriate training or review procedures concerning eligibility were inadequate. Effect Eligibility documentation was not complete for 3 of the 23 cases tested. Questioned Cost There were no questioned costs noted as a result of the audit procedures. Context We randomly selected 23 case files to test eligibility documentation compliance for the Foster Care ? Title IV-E program. Sampling was a statistically valid sample. We noted 3 of the 23 case files did not have the required eligibility documentation. Repeat Finding Not a repeat finding. Recommendation We recommend that the County incorporate procedures into their review process to ensure that all forms are accurately completed and only eligible individuals are provided Federal Care assistance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action Refer to separate Management?s Corrective Action Plan for views of responsible officials and management?s responses.

Corrective Action Plan

2020-002 Foster Care ? Title IV-E We recommend that the County incorporate procedures into their review process to ensure that only eligible individuals are provided Federal Foster Care assistance. Management?s Response: Upon review of the cases found to be in error, Amador County found that in two of the three cases, the incomplete forms were created over five years ago. There were no written procedures or case review processes in place at that time. Unfortunately, these cases will continue to come up as errors if audited repeatedly. Management?s Response: Case # 2008520: The FC3 in question was completed in 2014. Case # 2008525: The FC3 in question was completed in 2014. Case # 2014079: This is a current case, and procedures are now in place to review all cases prior for errors and completeness prior to authorization. Responsible Individual: Foster Care Eligibility Worker and Staff Services Analyst Corrective Action Plan: Amador County has procedures in the place related to the appropriate forms to use for both Foster Care and AAP cases. The procedures outline the functionality of the forms, how to properly compete them, and where to store the documentation. The County?s previous operating process was for the assigned Foster Care Eligibility Worker to determine and to authorize eligibility under his/her own authority. That procedure has now been modified to include a step of Foster Care Analyst review of all forms, current and existing, as well as a review for Federal eligibility, prior to case authorization. Anticipated Completion Date: Implemented in March 2021

About Eligibility →
2020-003
Eligibility
REPEAT OF 2019-002QUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

2020-003 Name: Adoption Assistance CFDA#: 93.659 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass Through Entity: State Department of Social Services Award No.: Various Year: 2019-20 Compliance Requirement: Eligibility Criteria Good internal control over eligibility requires that the required Eligibility Certification Form AAP-4 be signed by the Authorized Official of the County Welfare Department and the appropriate box noting Federal eligibility be checked. The County should only provide Federal aid to individuals who have been determined to be eligible for Federal benefits. Condition Title 22 California Code of Regulations Section 35331(a) requires that the determination of the child?s eligibility for adoption assistance be documented in the case record on the Eligibility Certification-Adoption Assistance Program form (AAP-4). In 7 of 25 cases tested, the AAP-4 was completed and although the individual was determined to be eligible, the box noting Eligibility for Title IV-E (FFP) was not checked. We also noted one case where the individual was only eligible for State funding. This is a systemic finding. Cause Appropriate training or review procedures concerning eligibility were inadequate Effect Eligibility documentation was not complete for 7 of the 25 cases tested. Also, the County provided benefits to one ineligible individual. Questioned Cost Federal aid in the amount of $6,000 was paid to an ineligible individual during the 2019-2020 fiscal year. Context We randomly selected 25 case files to test eligibility documentation compliance for the Adoption Assistance program. Sampling was a statistically valid sample. We noted 7 of the 25 case files did not have the required eligibility documentation and one case was only eligible for State funding. Repeat Finding This is a repeat of prior year finding 2019-002. Recommendation We recommend that the County incorporate procedures into their review process to ensure that only eligible individuals are provided Federal Adoption Assistance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action Refer to separate Management?s Corrective Action Plan for views of responsible officials and management?s responses.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2020-003 Name: Adoption Assistance CFDA#: 93.659 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass Through Entity: State Department of Social Services Award No.: Various Year: 2019-20 Compliance Requirement: Eligibility Criteria Good internal control over eligibility requires that the required Eligibility Certification Form AAP-4 be signed by the Authorized Official of the County Welfare Department and the appropriate box noting Federal eligibility be checked. The County should only provide Federal aid to individuals who have been determined to be eligible for Federal benefits. Condition Title 22 California Code of Regulations Section 35331(a) requires that the determination of the child?s eligibility for adoption assistance be documented in the case record on the Eligibility Certification-Adoption Assistance Program form (AAP-4). In 7 of 25 cases tested, the AAP-4 was completed and although the individual was determined to be eligible, the box noting Eligibility for Title IV-E (FFP) was not checked. We also noted one case where the individual was only eligible for State funding. This is a systemic finding. Cause Appropriate training or review procedures concerning eligibility were inadequate Effect Eligibility documentation was not complete for 7 of the 25 cases tested. Also, the County provided benefits to one ineligible individual. Questioned Cost Federal aid in the amount of $6,000 was paid to an ineligible individual during the 2019-2020 fiscal year. Context We randomly selected 25 case files to test eligibility documentation compliance for the Adoption Assistance program. Sampling was a statistically valid sample. We noted 7 of the 25 case files did not have the required eligibility documentation and one case was only eligible for State funding. Repeat Finding This is a repeat of prior year finding 2019-002. Recommendation We recommend that the County incorporate procedures into their review process to ensure that only eligible individuals are provided Federal Adoption Assistance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action Refer to separate Management?s Corrective Action Plan for views of responsible officials and management?s responses.

Corrective Action Plan

2020-003 Adoption Assistance We recommend that the County incorporate procedures into their review process to ensure that only eligible individuals are provided Federal Adoption Assistance. Management?s Response: Upon review of the cases found to be in error, Amador found that in the majority of cases, the incomplete forms were created over five years ago. There were no written procedures or case review processes in place at that time. Unfortunately, these cases will continue to come up as errors if audited repeatedly. Case # 47642: The AAP4 in question was completed in 2005. Case # 48389: The AAP4 in question was completed in 2006. Case # 51071: The AAP4 in question was completed in 2009. Case # 51932: The AAP4 in question was completed in 2009. Case # 2002546: The AAP4 in question was completed in 2014. Case # 2009105: State eligibility was determined initially, but an error made when processing CNIs in the following year resulted in an inadvertent switch to Federal eligibility.This was corrected in 2019, and all incorrect months were re-run to change back to State eligibility. Case # 2014087: The AAP4 in question has been a finding in previous audits, and procedures have been updated to address this. The document has been annotated in our imaging system. Management?s Response: Case # 2014323: The AAP4 in question has been a finding in previous audits, and procedures have been updated to address this. The document has been annotated in our imaging system. Responsible Individual: Foster Care Eligibility Worker and Staff Services Analyst Corrective Action Plan: Amador County has procedures in place related to the appropriate forms to use for both Foster Care and AAP cases. The procedures outline the functionality of the forms, how to properly complete them, and where to store the documentation. In the case of incorrect Federal eligibility (case # 2009105), there has been a list in existence since 2019 that tracks the County?s State eligible children. This list is referenced prior to the authorization of annual CNI increases to ensure that this funding error is not repeated. In regards to incomplete AAP4s, a recent CDSS audit (2019) brought this error to the County?s attention, and the County has subsequently changed its procedures related to how the eligibility worker processes AAP cases with the state adoptions worker. They now send the documents back and forth to each other to review for completeness prior to final authorization of benefits. Our previous operating process was for our assigned Foster Care Eligibility Worker to determine and to authorize eligibility under her own authority. Our procedures have been updated to include a step of Foster Care Analyst review of all forms, current and existing, as well as a review for Federal eligibility, prior to case authorization. Anticipated Completion Date: Implemented in March 2021

Prior Finding References

2019-002

About Eligibility →

FY 2019-06-30

$7,465,558 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 22, 2020 — management decision was due September 22, 2020.

2019-002
Eligibility
QUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

2019-002 Name: Adoption Assistance CFDA #: 93.659 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass Through Entity: State Department of Social Services Award No.: Various Year: 2018-19 Compliance Requirement: Eligibility Criteria Good internal control over eligibility requires that the required Eligibility Certification Form AAP-4 be signed by the Authorized Official of County Welfare Department? and the appropriate box noting Federal eligibility be checked. The County Should only provide Federal aid to individuals who have been determined to be eligible for Federal benefits. Condition Title 22 California Code of Regulations Section 35331 (a) requires that the determination of the child?s eligibility for adoption assistance be documented in the case record on the Eligibility Certification ? Adoption Assistance Program form (AAP-4). In 15 of 39 cases tested, the Eligibility Certification form AAP-4 was completed and although the individual was determined to be eligible, the form was not signed by the `Authorized Official of County Welfare Department? and/or the box noting Eligibility for Title IV-E (FFP) was not checked. We also noted one case where the individual was only eligible for State funding. This is a systemic finding. Cause Appropriate training or review procedures concerning eligibility were inadequate. Effect Eligibility documentation was inadequate for 15 of the 39 cases tested. Also, the County provided benefits to an ineligible individual. Questioned Cost Federal aid in the amount of $5,760 was paid to an ineligible individual during the 2018/2019 fiscal year. Context We randomly selected 39 case files to test eligibility documentation compliance for the Adoption Assistance Program. Sampling was a statistically valid sample. We noted 15 of the 39 case files did not have the required eligibility documentation. Repeat Finding Not a repeat finding. Recommendation We recommend that the County incorporate procedures into their review process to ensure that only eligible individuals are provided Federal Adoption Assistance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action Refer to separate Management?s Corrective Action Plan for views of responsible officials and management?s responses.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2019-002 Name: Adoption Assistance CFDA #: 93.659 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass Through Entity: State Department of Social Services Award No.: Various Year: 2018-19 Compliance Requirement: Eligibility Criteria Good internal control over eligibility requires that the required Eligibility Certification Form AAP-4 be signed by the Authorized Official of County Welfare Department? and the appropriate box noting Federal eligibility be checked. The County Should only provide Federal aid to individuals who have been determined to be eligible for Federal benefits. Condition Title 22 California Code of Regulations Section 35331 (a) requires that the determination of the child?s eligibility for adoption assistance be documented in the case record on the Eligibility Certification ? Adoption Assistance Program form (AAP-4). In 15 of 39 cases tested, the Eligibility Certification form AAP-4 was completed and although the individual was determined to be eligible, the form was not signed by the `Authorized Official of County Welfare Department? and/or the box noting Eligibility for Title IV-E (FFP) was not checked. We also noted one case where the individual was only eligible for State funding. This is a systemic finding. Cause Appropriate training or review procedures concerning eligibility were inadequate. Effect Eligibility documentation was inadequate for 15 of the 39 cases tested. Also, the County provided benefits to an ineligible individual. Questioned Cost Federal aid in the amount of $5,760 was paid to an ineligible individual during the 2018/2019 fiscal year. Context We randomly selected 39 case files to test eligibility documentation compliance for the Adoption Assistance Program. Sampling was a statistically valid sample. We noted 15 of the 39 case files did not have the required eligibility documentation. Repeat Finding Not a repeat finding. Recommendation We recommend that the County incorporate procedures into their review process to ensure that only eligible individuals are provided Federal Adoption Assistance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action Refer to separate Management?s Corrective Action Plan for views of responsible officials and management?s responses.

Corrective Action Plan

2019-002 Adoption Assistance We recommend that the County incorporate procedures into their review process to ensure that only eligible individuals are provided Federal Adoption Assistance. Management?s Response: The County concurs with the finding. Responsible Individual: Eligibility worker and direct supervisor responsible for updating manual payment increases to AAP cases. Corrective Action Plan: The aid code error has been corrected and a change has been added to procedures to avoid issues in the future. An adjustment was submitted on the December 2019 CA800 claim to correct the amount incorrectly reported. To avoid future processing errors all State Only AAP cases have been flagged as State Only. As part of the new procedures an ADHoc report will be run prior to the manual process of increasing rates bringing special attention to these few cases. As an extra measure the AAP eligibility worker has started a spreadsheet with a list of State Only cases. Anticipated Completion Date: Implemented prior to the issuance of this report.

About Eligibility →

FY 2018-06-30

$10,280,869 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 20, 2019 — management decision was due September 20, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$9,982,888 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 20, 2018 — management decision was due September 20, 2018.

2017-001
Other
OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Other →

FY 2016-06-30

$6,938,005 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 21, 2017 — management decision was due September 21, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in California

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.