EIN: 946000456
UEI: KHFZM43KRD53
Audited by: Smith and Newell CPA's
Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 7, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on March 17, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 17, 2026 (9 days from today).
What is a management decision? →The City did not perform the required monitoring. Cause: There was not adequate monitoring of CDBG filing requirements related to the CDBG Annual Compliance Report. Effect: The City was not incompliance with the CDBG loan requirements. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context: The CDBG loan monitoring report was unavailable. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeating finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the City develop procedures to ensure that the CDBG loan monitoring reports be completed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Refer to separate Management's Corrective Action Plan for views of responsible officials and management's responses.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Name: Community Development Block Grant/State's Program and Non-Entitlement Grants in Hawaii CFDA #: 14.228 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-Through: State Department of Housing and Community Development Award No.: Various Year: 2024/2025 Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions; Criteria: The City is required to monitor loan recipients annually for compliance requirements. Condition: The City did not perform the required monitoring. Cause: There was not adequate monitoring of CDBG filing requirements related to the CDBG Annual Compliance Report. Effect: The City was not incompliance with the CDBG loan requirements. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context: The CDBG loan monitoring report was unavailable. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeating finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the City develop procedures to ensure that the CDBG loan monitoring reports be completed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Refer to separate Management's Corrective Action Plan for views of responsible officials and management's responses.
We recommend that the City develop and maintain policies and procedures regarding loan monitoring and ensure that all documentation of loan monitoring be maintained on an annual basis. Management's Response: The City concurs with the finding. Responsible Individual: Marti Brown, City Manager, and Joei Harrison, Finance Director. Corrective Action Plan: The City will complete all required compliance reporting for CDBG activities in the futures. Anticipated Completion Date: July 2025
FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2025 — management decision was due September 27, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2024 — management decision was due September 29, 2024.
During our test of loan monitoring procedures, we noted that all of the home loans tested did not include verification documentation regarding loan recipients were the home owners during the 2022-2023 fiscal year. We also noted verification that the loan recipients occupied the homes obtained with HOME funding was missing. Cause: The City did not have formalized loan monitoring policies and procedures in place to ensure that loans were monitored on an annual basis in accordance with the loan agreements. Effect: Documentation was not provided to verify that the loan recipients were in compliance with the requirements of their loan agreements. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context: We randomly selected one of the two HOME loan recipients to test loan monitoring procedures. Sampling was a statistically valid sample. We noted that the recipient was not in compliance with the HOME loan agreements. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat of prior year finding 2022-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City develop and maintain policies and procedures regarding loan monitoring and ensure that all documentation of loan monitoring be maintained on an annual basis. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Refer to separate Management's Corrective Action Plan for views of responsible officials and management's responses.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Name: Home Investment Partnership Program CFDA #: 14.239 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-Through: State Department of Housing and Community Development Award No.: Various Year: 2022/2023 Compliance Requirement: Program Income Criteria: The loan documents require that recipients of HOME loans continue to own and reside in their homes that were acquired using HOME funding. Condition: During our test of loan monitoring procedures, we noted that all of the home loans tested did not include verification documentation regarding loan recipients were the home owners during the 2022-2023 fiscal year. We also noted verification that the loan recipients occupied the homes obtained with HOME funding was missing. Cause: The City did not have formalized loan monitoring policies and procedures in place to ensure that loans were monitored on an annual basis in accordance with the loan agreements. Effect: Documentation was not provided to verify that the loan recipients were in compliance with the requirements of their loan agreements. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context: We randomly selected one of the two HOME loan recipients to test loan monitoring procedures. Sampling was a statistically valid sample. We noted that the recipient was not in compliance with the HOME loan agreements. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat of prior year finding 2022-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the City develop and maintain policies and procedures regarding loan monitoring and ensure that all documentation of loan monitoring be maintained on an annual basis. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Refer to separate Management's Corrective Action Plan for views of responsible officials and management's responses.
We recommend that the City develop and maintain policies and procedures regarding loan monitoring and ensure that all documentation of loan monitoring be maintained on an annual basis. Management's Response: The City concurs with the finding. Responsible Individual: Marti Brown, City Manager. Corrective Action Plan: Given the strain on resource available among City staff, the City is working to hire an outside consulting firm to assure a consisten loan monitoring program is in place. Anticipated Completion Date: June 2024
2022-001
The City has not filed the CDBG Annual Performance Report by the required date. Cause: There was not adequate monitoring of CDBG filing requirements related to the CDBG Annual Performance Report to ensure that it was filed by the required due date. Effect: The City did not file the CDBG Annual Performance Report by the required due date. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context: The CDBG Annual Performance Report was unavailable for review. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat of prior year finding 2022-002. Recommendation: We recommend that the City develop procedures to ensure that the CDBG Annual Performance Report is filed by the required due date. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Refer to separate Management's Corrective Action Plan for views of responsible officials and management's responses.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Name: Community Development Block Grant/State's Program and Non-Entitlement Grants in Hawaii CFDA #: 14.228 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-Through: State Department of Housing and Community Development Award No.: Various Year: 2022/2023 Compliance Requirement: Program Income Criteria: The CDBG Annual Performance Report was required to be filed with the State Department of Housing and Community Development by September 30, 2023. Condition: The City has not filed the CDBG Annual Performance Report by the required date. Cause: There was not adequate monitoring of CDBG filing requirements related to the CDBG Annual Performance Report to ensure that it was filed by the required due date. Effect: The City did not file the CDBG Annual Performance Report by the required due date. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context: The CDBG Annual Performance Report was unavailable for review. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat of prior year finding 2022-002. Recommendation: We recommend that the City develop procedures to ensure that the CDBG Annual Performance Report is filed by the required due date. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Refer to separate Management's Corrective Action Plan for views of responsible officials and management's responses.
We recommend that the City develop procedures to ensure that the CDBG Annual Performance Report is filed by the required due date. Management's Response: The City concurs with the finding. Responsible Individual: Marti Brown, City Manager. Corrective Action Plan: The City has recently brought on staff to complete the periodic reports required by HCD. It is the intent of the City to have this finding resolved by the end of FY 2023-24. Anticipated Completion Date: June 2024.
2022-002
FAC accepted this audit on February 12, 2023 — management decision was due August 12, 2023.
2022-001 Name: Home Investment Partnership Program CFDA #: 14.239 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass Through Entity: State Department of Housing and Community Development Award No.: Various Year: 2021/2022 Compliance Requirement: Program Income Criteria The loan documents require that recipients of HOME loans continue to own and reside in their homes that were acquired using HOME funding. Condition During our test of loan monitoring procedures, we noted that all of the loans tested did not include verification documentation regarding loan recipients were the home owners during the 2021-2022 fiscal year. We also noted verification that the loan recipients occupied the homes obtained with HOME funding was missing. Cause The City did not have formalized loan monitoring policies and procedures in place to ensure that loans were monitored on an annual basis in accordance with the loan agreements. Effect Documentation was not provided to verify that the loan recipients were in compliance with the requirements of their loan agreements. Questioned Cost No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context We randomly selected one of the two HOME loan recipients to test loan monitoring procedures. Sampling was a statistically valid sample. We noted that the recipient was not in compliance with the HOME loan agreements. Repeat Finding This is a repeat of prior year finding 2021-001. Recommendation We recommend that the City develop and maintain policies and procedures regarding loan monitoring and ensure that all documentation of loan monitoring be maintained on an annual basis. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action Refer to separate Management?s Corrective Action Plan for views of responsible officials and management?s responses.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2022-001 Name: Home Investment Partnership Program CFDA #: 14.239 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass Through Entity: State Department of Housing and Community Development Award No.: Various Year: 2021/2022 Compliance Requirement: Program Income Criteria The loan documents require that recipients of HOME loans continue to own and reside in their homes that were acquired using HOME funding. Condition During our test of loan monitoring procedures, we noted that all of the loans tested did not include verification documentation regarding loan recipients were the home owners during the 2021-2022 fiscal year. We also noted verification that the loan recipients occupied the homes obtained with HOME funding was missing. Cause The City did not have formalized loan monitoring policies and procedures in place to ensure that loans were monitored on an annual basis in accordance with the loan agreements. Effect Documentation was not provided to verify that the loan recipients were in compliance with the requirements of their loan agreements. Questioned Cost No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context We randomly selected one of the two HOME loan recipients to test loan monitoring procedures. Sampling was a statistically valid sample. We noted that the recipient was not in compliance with the HOME loan agreements. Repeat Finding This is a repeat of prior year finding 2021-001. Recommendation We recommend that the City develop and maintain policies and procedures regarding loan monitoring and ensure that all documentation of loan monitoring be maintained on an annual basis. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action Refer to separate Management?s Corrective Action Plan for views of responsible officials and management?s responses.
Home Investment Partnership Program We recommend that the City develop and maintain policies and procedures regarding loan monitoring and ensure that all documentation of loan monitoring be maintained on an annual basis. Management?s Response: Responsible Individual: Corrective Action Plan: Anticipated Completion Date:
2021-001
2022-002 Name: Community Development Block Grant/State?s Program and Non- Entitlement Grants in Hawaii CFDA #: 14.228 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass Through Entity: State Department of Housing and Community Development Award No.: Various Year: 2021/2022 Compliance Requirement: Program Income Criteria The CDBG Annual Performance Report was required to be filed with the State Department of Housing and Community Development by August 2, 2022. Condition The City had not filed the CDBG Annual Performance Report, including Attachment A ? Program Income, by the required date. Cause There was not adequate monitoring of CDBG filing requirements related to the CDBG Annual Performance Report to ensure that it was filed by the required due date. Effect The City did not file the CDBG Annual Performance Report by the required due date. Questioned Cost No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context The CDBG Annual Performance Report was unavailable for review. Repeat Finding This is a repeat of prior year finding 2021-002. Recommendation We recommend that the City develop procedures to ensure that the CDBG Annual Performance Report is filed by the required due date. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action Refer to separate Management?s Corrective Action Plan for views of responsible officials and management?s responses.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2022-002 Name: Community Development Block Grant/State?s Program and Non- Entitlement Grants in Hawaii CFDA #: 14.228 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass Through Entity: State Department of Housing and Community Development Award No.: Various Year: 2021/2022 Compliance Requirement: Program Income Criteria The CDBG Annual Performance Report was required to be filed with the State Department of Housing and Community Development by August 2, 2022. Condition The City had not filed the CDBG Annual Performance Report, including Attachment A ? Program Income, by the required date. Cause There was not adequate monitoring of CDBG filing requirements related to the CDBG Annual Performance Report to ensure that it was filed by the required due date. Effect The City did not file the CDBG Annual Performance Report by the required due date. Questioned Cost No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context The CDBG Annual Performance Report was unavailable for review. Repeat Finding This is a repeat of prior year finding 2021-002. Recommendation We recommend that the City develop procedures to ensure that the CDBG Annual Performance Report is filed by the required due date. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action Refer to separate Management?s Corrective Action Plan for views of responsible officials and management?s responses.
Community Development Block Grants/State?s Program and Non-Entitlement Grants in Hawaii We recommend that the City develop procedures to ensure that the CDBG Annual Performance Report is filed by the required due date. Management?s Response: Responsible Individual: Corrective Action Plan: Anticipated Completion Date:
2021-002
FAC accepted this audit on July 6, 2022 — management decision was due January 6, 2023.
Name: Home Investment Partnership Program CFDA #: 14.239 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass Through Entity: State Department of Housing and Community Development Award No.: Various Year: 2020/2021 Compliance Requirement: Program Income Criteria The loan documents require that recipients of HOME loans continue to own and reside in their homes that were acquired using HOME funding. Condition During our test of loan monitoring procedures, we noted that all of the loans tested did not include verification documentation regarding loan recipients were the home owners during the 2020-2021 fiscal year. We also noted verification that the loan recipients occupied the homes obtained with HOME funding was missing. Cause The City did not have formalized loan monitoring policies and procedures in place to ensure that loans were monitored on an annual basis in accordance with the loan agreements. Effect We could not verify that the loan recipients were in compliance with the requirements of their loan agreements. Questioned Cost No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context We randomly selected one of the two HOME loan recipients to test loan monitoring procedures. Sampling was a statistically valid sample. We noted that the recipient was not in compliance with the HOME loan agreements. Repeat Finding This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation We recommend that the City develop and maintain policies and procedures regarding loan monitoring and ensure that all documentation of loan monitoring be maintained on an annual basis. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action Refer to separate Management?s Corrective Action Plan for views of responsible officials and management?s responses.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Name: Home Investment Partnership Program CFDA #: 14.239 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass Through Entity: State Department of Housing and Community Development Award No.: Various Year: 2020/2021 Compliance Requirement: Program Income Criteria The loan documents require that recipients of HOME loans continue to own and reside in their homes that were acquired using HOME funding. Condition During our test of loan monitoring procedures, we noted that all of the loans tested did not include verification documentation regarding loan recipients were the home owners during the 2020-2021 fiscal year. We also noted verification that the loan recipients occupied the homes obtained with HOME funding was missing. Cause The City did not have formalized loan monitoring policies and procedures in place to ensure that loans were monitored on an annual basis in accordance with the loan agreements. Effect We could not verify that the loan recipients were in compliance with the requirements of their loan agreements. Questioned Cost No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context We randomly selected one of the two HOME loan recipients to test loan monitoring procedures. Sampling was a statistically valid sample. We noted that the recipient was not in compliance with the HOME loan agreements. Repeat Finding This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation We recommend that the City develop and maintain policies and procedures regarding loan monitoring and ensure that all documentation of loan monitoring be maintained on an annual basis. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action Refer to separate Management?s Corrective Action Plan for views of responsible officials and management?s responses.
Home Investment Partnership Program We recommend that the City develop and maintain policies and procedures regarding loan monitoring and ensure that all documentation of loan monitoring be maintained on an annual basis. Management?s Response: The City concurs with the finding. Responsible Individual: Marti Brown, City Manager Corrective Action Plan: Given the strain on resource availability among City staff, the City will work with an outside consulting firm to assure a consistent loan monitoring program is in place. Anticipated Completion Date: October 2022
Name: Community Development Block Grant/State?s Program and Non- Entitlement Grants in Hawaii CFDA #: 14.228 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass Through Entity: State Department of Housing and Community Development Award No.: Various Year: 2020/2021 Compliance Requirement: Program Income Criteria The CDBG Annual Performance Report was required to be filed with the State Department of Housing and Community Development by August 2, 2021. Condition The City had not filed the CDBG Annual Performance Report, including Attachment A ? Program Income, by the required date. Cause There was not adequate monitoring of CDBG filing requirements related to the CDBG Annual Performance Report to ensure that it was filed by the required due date. Effect The City did not file the CDBG Annual Performance Report by the required due date. Questioned Cost No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context The CDBG Annual Performance Report was unavailable for review. Repeat Finding This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation We recommend that the City develop procedures to ensure that the CDBG Annual Performance Report is filed by the required due date. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action Refer to separate Management?s Corrective Action Plan for views of responsible officials and management?s responses.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Name: Community Development Block Grant/State?s Program and Non- Entitlement Grants in Hawaii CFDA #: 14.228 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass Through Entity: State Department of Housing and Community Development Award No.: Various Year: 2020/2021 Compliance Requirement: Program Income Criteria The CDBG Annual Performance Report was required to be filed with the State Department of Housing and Community Development by August 2, 2021. Condition The City had not filed the CDBG Annual Performance Report, including Attachment A ? Program Income, by the required date. Cause There was not adequate monitoring of CDBG filing requirements related to the CDBG Annual Performance Report to ensure that it was filed by the required due date. Effect The City did not file the CDBG Annual Performance Report by the required due date. Questioned Cost No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context The CDBG Annual Performance Report was unavailable for review. Repeat Finding This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation We recommend that the City develop procedures to ensure that the CDBG Annual Performance Report is filed by the required due date. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action Refer to separate Management?s Corrective Action Plan for views of responsible officials and management?s responses.
Community Development Block Grants/State?s Program and Non-Entitlement Grants in Hawaii We recommend that the City develop procedures to ensure that the CDBG Annual Performance Report is filed by the required due date. Management?s Response: The City concurs with the finding. Responsible Individual: Marti Brown, City Manager Corrective Action Plan: The City will work with the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to determine which annual reports have not been completed to ensure they are completed. Additionally, the City will work with an outside consulting firm to assure periodic/annual reporting requirements to HCD are met. Anticipated Completion Date: October 2022
FAC accepted this audit on March 21, 2021 — management decision was due September 21, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on December 1, 2020 — management decision was due June 1, 2021.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in California →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.