← Back to home

City of PortervilleLocal Government

EIN: 946000398

UEI: NH6YWTB76QK8

Audited by: CliftonLarsonAllen LLP

Oversight agency: 20 [Department of Transportation]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 7, 2026

City of Porterville9 audit years4 findings
9
Audit Years
4
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$8.3M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2024)

FY 2024-06-30

$8,344,184 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on October 27, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by April 27, 2026 (138 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
Funder? Track this deadline →

FY 2023-06-30

$9,505,960 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 20, 2024 — management decision was due March 20, 2025.

2023-003
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

No SF-425 was submitted as of December 31, 2022. Questioned Costs: None Context: 1 of 1 SF-425 reports tested. Cause: There was a gap in the City's tracking system for submitting reports causing the requirement to submit the SF-425 to be overlooked. Effect: The City was out of compliance with reporting requirements for this grant. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the City review its process for identifying and tracking reporting requirements to ensure that all required reports are submitted timely. Views of Responsible Officials: We acknowledge the single audit finding that the SF-425 report was not submitted as of December 31, 2022. However, we would like to clarify that the project in question did not commence until June 2023. As such, there were no financial activities to report. We recognize the importance of timely submission of financial reports to ensure compliance with federal grant requirements and will ensure the SF-425 report will be appropriately filed. Upon review, we found that this oversight was due to miscommunication with the grantor regarding reporting deadlines. We have been in communication with the grantor and are in the process of completing and filing the required form. To prevent future occurrences, we are revising internal review procedures and establishing automated calendar reminders, to ensure that in the future, SF-425 reports will be submitted for all reporting periods. We are fully committed to maintaining compliance with all federal reporting requirements and will continue to improve our processes to prevent such issues in the future.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2023 – 003: Reporting Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Program Name: Airport Improvement Program Assistance Listing Number: 20.106 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 3-06-0190-019-2022 Award Period: September 12, 2022 to September 22, 2026 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matter Criteria or Specific Requirement: The City's agreement the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration indicates that a SF-425 (Federal Financial Report), should be submitted by December 31st of each year the grant is open. Condition: No SF-425 was submitted as of December 31, 2022. Questioned Costs: None Context: 1 of 1 SF-425 reports tested. Cause: There was a gap in the City's tracking system for submitting reports causing the requirement to submit the SF-425 to be overlooked. Effect: The City was out of compliance with reporting requirements for this grant. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the City review its process for identifying and tracking reporting requirements to ensure that all required reports are submitted timely. Views of Responsible Officials: We acknowledge the single audit finding that the SF-425 report was not submitted as of December 31, 2022. However, we would like to clarify that the project in question did not commence until June 2023. As such, there were no financial activities to report. We recognize the importance of timely submission of financial reports to ensure compliance with federal grant requirements and will ensure the SF-425 report will be appropriately filed. Upon review, we found that this oversight was due to miscommunication with the grantor regarding reporting deadlines. We have been in communication with the grantor and are in the process of completing and filing the required form. To prevent future occurrences, we are revising internal review procedures and establishing automated calendar reminders, to ensure that in the future, SF-425 reports will be submitted for all reporting periods. We are fully committed to maintaining compliance with all federal reporting requirements and will continue to improve our processes to prevent such issues in the future.

Corrective Action Plan

Airport Improvement Program - Assistance Listing No. 20.106 Recommendation: The City should review its process for identifying and tracking Federal Aviation Administration reporting requirements to ensure that all required reports are submitted timely. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: To prevent future occurrences, we are revising internal review procedures and establishing automated calendar reminders, to ensure that in the future, SF-425 reports will be submitted for all reporting periods. We are fully committed to maintaining compliance with all federal reporting requirements and will continue to improve our processes to prevent such issues in the future. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Janie Rodriguez Planned completion date for corrective action plan: September 30, 2024

About Reporting →
2023-004
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

The City was unable to provide evidence that suspension and debarment verification was performed. Questioned Costs: None Context: 2 of 5 there was no SAM.gov check available and no certification of non-debarment on a contract with the vendor. For 1 of 5 there was a SAM.gov check available, yet there was no evidence of when the check took place. Cause: Procedures were not in place to retain evidence of debarment status check, and when the check took place. Effect: The City is unable to provide evidence that internal control procedures over suspension and debarment compliance were performed in a timely manner. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the City add a section to its standard contractor and subrecipient contracts for the other party to certify they are not suspended or otherwise debarred. In addition, internal controls should be updated to ensure that evidence of the performance of suspension and debarment compliance is retained for future reference. Views of Responsible Officials: In response to the audit finding regarding the suspension and debarment status for all vendors before contract execution, we have communicated with all relevant staff on the importance of conducting debarment status checks prior to procurement and the requirement of SAM.gov check, with date noted as verification of the check, and evidence be saved in the contract file or the requirement that a certification of non-debarment status clause be included in contracts. To ensure ongoing compliance, we have instituted regular internal audits to verify SAM.gov checks are being conducted and properly documented for all contracts.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2023 – 004: Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: SLFRP1108 - 2021 Award Period: July 1, 2022, to June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. The City should have internal controls designed to ensure compliance with those provisions. Condition: The City was unable to provide evidence that suspension and debarment verification was performed. Questioned Costs: None Context: 2 of 5 there was no SAM.gov check available and no certification of non-debarment on a contract with the vendor. For 1 of 5 there was a SAM.gov check available, yet there was no evidence of when the check took place. Cause: Procedures were not in place to retain evidence of debarment status check, and when the check took place. Effect: The City is unable to provide evidence that internal control procedures over suspension and debarment compliance were performed in a timely manner. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the City add a section to its standard contractor and subrecipient contracts for the other party to certify they are not suspended or otherwise debarred. In addition, internal controls should be updated to ensure that evidence of the performance of suspension and debarment compliance is retained for future reference. Views of Responsible Officials: In response to the audit finding regarding the suspension and debarment status for all vendors before contract execution, we have communicated with all relevant staff on the importance of conducting debarment status checks prior to procurement and the requirement of SAM.gov check, with date noted as verification of the check, and evidence be saved in the contract file or the requirement that a certification of non-debarment status clause be included in contracts. To ensure ongoing compliance, we have instituted regular internal audits to verify SAM.gov checks are being conducted and properly documented for all contracts.

Corrective Action Plan

Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds -Assistance Listing No. 21.027 Recommendation: The City should add a section to its standard contractor and subrecipient contracts for the other party to certify they are not suspended or otherwise debarred. In addition, internal controls should be updated to ensure that evident of the performance of suspension and debarment compliance is retained for future reference. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: In response to the audit finding regarding the suspension and debarment status for all vendor before contract execution, we have communicated with all relevant staff on the importance of conducting debarment status checks prior to procurement and the requirement of SAM.gov check, with date noted as recommended, and evidence be saved in the contract file or the requirement that a certification of non-debarment status clause be included in contracts. To ensure compliance, we have instituted regular internal audits to verify SAM.gov checks are being conducted and properly documented for all contracts. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Janie Rodriguez Planned completion date for corrective action plan: August 27, 2024

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2023-005
Cash Management
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Reimbursement requests were not reviewed by anyone other than the preparer of the requests. Questioned Costs: None Context: 4 of 4 reimbursement requests tested were submitted without someone other than the preparer reviewing them. Cause: Controls for review by someone other than the preparer had not yet been implemented. Effect: Errors in reimbursement requests could go undetected. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that reimbursement requests be reviewed by a supervisory-level person who is not the preparer of the requests. Views of Responsible Officials: We acknowledge the audit finding regarding the absence of supervisory-level review for reimbursement requests to grantors. We have established a mandatory review process where all reimbursement requests must be thoroughly reviewed by a designated Finance staff member who did not prepare the request. A final approver (i.e. supervisor or director) will authorize the reimbursement request before submission to the grantor. We have communicated the importance of this review process to our team to ensure compliance, completeness and accuracy. We will monitor the process to prevent recurrence.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2023 – 005: Cash Management Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Homeland Security Federal Program Name: Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER) Assistance Listing Number: 97.083 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: EMW-2020-FF-01374 - 2020 Award Period: February 27, 2022 to February 26, 2025 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: As a best practice, a supervisory-level person, other than the preparer of a reimbursement request, should review the request to ensure accuracy and completeness of data and information in the request. Condition: Reimbursement requests were not reviewed by anyone other than the preparer of the requests. Questioned Costs: None Context: 4 of 4 reimbursement requests tested were submitted without someone other than the preparer reviewing them. Cause: Controls for review by someone other than the preparer had not yet been implemented. Effect: Errors in reimbursement requests could go undetected. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that reimbursement requests be reviewed by a supervisory-level person who is not the preparer of the requests. Views of Responsible Officials: We acknowledge the audit finding regarding the absence of supervisory-level review for reimbursement requests to grantors. We have established a mandatory review process where all reimbursement requests must be thoroughly reviewed by a designated Finance staff member who did not prepare the request. A final approver (i.e. supervisor or director) will authorize the reimbursement request before submission to the grantor. We have communicated the importance of this review process to our team to ensure compliance, completeness and accuracy. We will monitor the process to prevent recurrence.

Corrective Action Plan

Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER) - Assistance Listing No. 97.083 Recommendation: It is recommended that SAFER grant reimbursement requests be reviewed by a supervisory-level person who is not the preparer of the requests. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: We have established a mandatory review process where all reimbursement requests must be thoroughly reviewed by a designated finance staff member who did not prepare the request. A final approver (i.e. supervisor or director) will authorize the reimbursement request before submission to the grantor. We have communicated the importance of this review process to our team to ensure compliance, completeness and accuracy. We will monitor the process to prevent recurrence. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Janie Rodriguez Planned completion date for corrective action plan: August 7, 2024

About Cash Management →
2023-006
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

6 SAFER funded positions were reported while there were only 5 SAFER funded positions and reports were not reviewed by anyone other than the preparer of the reports. Questioned Costs: None Context: Inaccurate reporting was noted on 1 of 2 reports tested and 2 of 2 reports tested were submitted without being reviewed by anyone other than the preparer. Cause: The 6th Firefighter was hired on 6/1/23 but was not coded with the SAFER Grant base account number in payroll at the time of hire. His base account was corrected effective 7/1/23. The report was not reviewed by anyone other than the preparer. If reviewed by someone other than the preparer, the discrepancy may have been noted prior to the report being submitted. Additionally, controls for review by someone other than the preparer had not yet been implemented. Effect: Reporting for the quarter ended 6/30/2023 was inaccurate. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that reports be reviewed by a supervisory-level person who is not the preparer of the report. Views of Responsible Officials: In response to the audit finding of 6 SAFER funded positions reported in the Semi-Annual Performance Report while there were 5 SAFER funded positions in the reimbursement request for quarter ended June 30, 2023, we determined the cause of the discrepancy was due to a 6th Firefighter who was hired in the quarter ended June 30, 2023, that was coded inaccurately in payroll. We have identified and corrected the base account number in payroll and the employee’s salaries and benefits are now accurately recorded under the appropriate account number. We have established a mandatory review process where all reimbursement requests and performance reports must be reviewed and approved by a designated supervisory-level staff member who did not prepare the report before submission to the grantor. We have communicated the importance of this review process in ensuring compliance, completeness and accuracy. We will monitor the process to prevent recurrence.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2023 – 006: Reporting Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Homeland Security Federal Program Name: Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER) Assistance Listing Number: 97.083 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: EMW-2020-FF-01374 - 2020 Award Period: February 27, 2022 to February 26, 2025 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matter Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of reporting program performance. The City should have internal controls designed to ensure compliance with those provisions. Condition: 6 SAFER funded positions were reported while there were only 5 SAFER funded positions and reports were not reviewed by anyone other than the preparer of the reports. Questioned Costs: None Context: Inaccurate reporting was noted on 1 of 2 reports tested and 2 of 2 reports tested were submitted without being reviewed by anyone other than the preparer. Cause: The 6th Firefighter was hired on 6/1/23 but was not coded with the SAFER Grant base account number in payroll at the time of hire. His base account was corrected effective 7/1/23. The report was not reviewed by anyone other than the preparer. If reviewed by someone other than the preparer, the discrepancy may have been noted prior to the report being submitted. Additionally, controls for review by someone other than the preparer had not yet been implemented. Effect: Reporting for the quarter ended 6/30/2023 was inaccurate. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that reports be reviewed by a supervisory-level person who is not the preparer of the report. Views of Responsible Officials: In response to the audit finding of 6 SAFER funded positions reported in the Semi-Annual Performance Report while there were 5 SAFER funded positions in the reimbursement request for quarter ended June 30, 2023, we determined the cause of the discrepancy was due to a 6th Firefighter who was hired in the quarter ended June 30, 2023, that was coded inaccurately in payroll. We have identified and corrected the base account number in payroll and the employee’s salaries and benefits are now accurately recorded under the appropriate account number. We have established a mandatory review process where all reimbursement requests and performance reports must be reviewed and approved by a designated supervisory-level staff member who did not prepare the report before submission to the grantor. We have communicated the importance of this review process in ensuring compliance, completeness and accuracy. We will monitor the process to prevent recurrence.

Corrective Action Plan

Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER) - Assistance Listing No. 97.083 Recommendation: It is recommended that SAFER grant reports be reviewed by a supervisory-level person who is not the preparer of the report. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: We have established a mandatory review process where all reimbursement requests and performance reports must be reviewed and approved by a designated supervisory-level staff member who did not prepare the report before submission to the granter. We have communicated the importance of this review process in ensuring compliance, completeness and accuracy. We will monitor the process to prevent recurrence. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Janie Rodriguez Planned completion date for corrective action plan: August 7, 202

About Reporting →

FY 2022-06-30

$16,194,140 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 15, 2023 — management decision was due September 15, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

$15,473,891 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 23, 2022 — management decision was due October 23, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$15,175,107 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 16, 2021 — management decision was due August 16, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$13,005,853 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 27, 2020 — management decision was due July 27, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$12,693,212 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 14, 2019 — management decision was due July 14, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$12,917,044 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 15, 2018 — management decision was due August 15, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$14,141,503 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 21, 2017 — management decision was due September 21, 2017.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in California

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.