← Back to home

CITY OF JACKSONLocal Government

EIN: 946000350

UEI: ERQKLDCSKQ78

Audited by: SMITH & NEWELL CPAS

Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

CITY OF JACKSON10 audit years5 findings5 repeat
10
Audit Years
5
Total Findings
5
Repeat Findings
$8.5M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$8,509,195 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on February 11, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 11, 2026 (20 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

$14,573,854 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 11, 2025 — management decision was due September 11, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$7,956,802 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 21, 2024 — management decision was due September 21, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$8,726,049 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 28, 2023 — management decision was due December 28, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$8,859,608 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 26, 2022 — management decision was due July 26, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

$8,752,076 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 8, 2021 — management decision was due September 8, 2021.

2020-001
Program Income
REPEAT OF 2019-002OTHER MATTERS

2020-001 Name: Home Investment Partnerships Program CFDA #: 14.239 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass Through Entity: State Department of Housing and Community Development Award No.: Various Year: 2019/2020 Compliance Requirement: Program Income Criteria Proper grant compliance requires that Home loans be monitored for compliance with the loan provisions regarding default. Condition During our test of ten loan recipients, we noted that the City had not verified that the loan recipients were the owners of the residences, had not vacated for renting purposes and carried insurance for four tested. Cause There was not adequate monitoring of loans receivable to ensure compliance with loan provisions for four loan recipients. Effect The City did not monitor four Home loans for compliance with the loan provisions regarding default. Questioned Cost No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context We randomly selected 10 loan recipients to test loan monitoring procedures. Sampling was a statistically valid sample. We noted 4 of the 10 recipients were not in compliance with the CDBG loan agreements. Repeat Finding This is a repeat of prior year finding 2019-002. Recommendation We recommend that the City develop a program to monitor compliance with the loan provisions in accordance with the City Loan Servicing Policies and Procedures. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action Refer to separate Management?s Corrective Action Plan for views of responsible officials and management?s responses.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2020-001 Name: Home Investment Partnerships Program CFDA #: 14.239 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass Through Entity: State Department of Housing and Community Development Award No.: Various Year: 2019/2020 Compliance Requirement: Program Income Criteria Proper grant compliance requires that Home loans be monitored for compliance with the loan provisions regarding default. Condition During our test of ten loan recipients, we noted that the City had not verified that the loan recipients were the owners of the residences, had not vacated for renting purposes and carried insurance for four tested. Cause There was not adequate monitoring of loans receivable to ensure compliance with loan provisions for four loan recipients. Effect The City did not monitor four Home loans for compliance with the loan provisions regarding default. Questioned Cost No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context We randomly selected 10 loan recipients to test loan monitoring procedures. Sampling was a statistically valid sample. We noted 4 of the 10 recipients were not in compliance with the CDBG loan agreements. Repeat Finding This is a repeat of prior year finding 2019-002. Recommendation We recommend that the City develop a program to monitor compliance with the loan provisions in accordance with the City Loan Servicing Policies and Procedures. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action Refer to separate Management?s Corrective Action Plan for views of responsible officials and management?s responses.

Corrective Action Plan

2020-001 Home Investment Partnerships Program We recommend that the City develop a program to monitor compliance with the loan provisions in accordance with the City Loan Servicing Policies and Procedures. Management?s Response: A plan has been developed and implemented along with hiring a specialized consultant. Responsible Individual: City Manager Corrective Action Plan: City will have a more in-depth conversation with the consultant regarding each and every account prior to audit. Anticipated Completion Date: Completed

Prior Finding References

2019-002

About Program Income →

FY 2019-06-30

$6,447,475 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 20, 2020 — management decision was due July 20, 2020.

2019-002
Program Income
REPEAT OF 2018-004OTHER MATTERS

2019-002 Name: Home Investment Partnerships Program CFDA #: 14.239 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass Through Entity: State Department of Housing and Community Development Award No.: Various Year: 2018/2019 Compliance Requirement: Program Income Criteria Proper grant compliance requires that Home loans be monitored for compliance with the loan provisions regarding default. Condition During our test of ten loan recipients, we noted that the City had not verified that the loan recipients were the owners of the residences, had not vacated for renting purposes and carried insurance for two tested. Cause There was not adequate monitoring of loans receivable to ensure compliance with loan provisions for two loan recipients. Effect The City did not monitor two Home loans for compliance with the loan provisions regarding default. Questioned Cost No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context We randomly selected 10 loan recipients to test loan monitoring procedures. Sampling was a statistically valid sample. We noted 2 of the 10 recipients were not in compliance with the CDBG loan agreements. Repeat Finding This is a repeat of prior year finding 2018-004. Recommendation We recommend that the City develop a program to monitor compliance with the loan provisions in accordance with the City Loan Servicing Policies and Procedures. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action Refer to separate Management?s Corrective Action Plan for views of responsible officials and management?s responses.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2019-002 Name: Home Investment Partnerships Program CFDA #: 14.239 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass Through Entity: State Department of Housing and Community Development Award No.: Various Year: 2018/2019 Compliance Requirement: Program Income Criteria Proper grant compliance requires that Home loans be monitored for compliance with the loan provisions regarding default. Condition During our test of ten loan recipients, we noted that the City had not verified that the loan recipients were the owners of the residences, had not vacated for renting purposes and carried insurance for two tested. Cause There was not adequate monitoring of loans receivable to ensure compliance with loan provisions for two loan recipients. Effect The City did not monitor two Home loans for compliance with the loan provisions regarding default. Questioned Cost No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context We randomly selected 10 loan recipients to test loan monitoring procedures. Sampling was a statistically valid sample. We noted 2 of the 10 recipients were not in compliance with the CDBG loan agreements. Repeat Finding This is a repeat of prior year finding 2018-004. Recommendation We recommend that the City develop a program to monitor compliance with the loan provisions in accordance with the City Loan Servicing Policies and Procedures. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action Refer to separate Management?s Corrective Action Plan for views of responsible officials and management?s responses.

Corrective Action Plan

2019-002 Home Investment Partnerships Program We recommend that the City develop a program to monitor compliance with the loan provisions in accordance with the City Loan Servicing Policies and Procedures. Responsible Individual: City Manager Corrective Action Plan: Hire a consultant to comply with the loan provisions in the Loan Servicing Policies and Procedures. Anticipated Completion Date: Completed

Prior Finding References

2018-004

About Program Income →

FY 2018-06-30

$7,919,192 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 10, 2019 — management decision was due August 10, 2019.

2018-004
Other
REPEAT OF 2017-004OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2017-004

About Other →

FY 2017-06-30

$6,209,366 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 1, 2018 — management decision was due August 1, 2018.

2017-004
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2016-004OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-004

About Other →

FY 2016-06-30

$6,821,883 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 26, 2017 — management decision was due September 26, 2017.

2016-004
Special Tests & Provisions
REPEAT OF 2015-006OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-006

About Special Tests and Provisions →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in California

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.