← Back to home

TECHSOUP GLOBALNon-Profit

EIN: 943070617

UEI: MY1KARMNSJD9

Audited by: MOSS ADAMS LLP

Oversight agency: 19 [Department of State]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

TECHSOUP GLOBAL4 audit years2 findings
4
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$1.2M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2024)

FY 2024-06-30

$1,217,395 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on April 14, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by October 14, 2025 (320 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,074,735 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2022 — management decision was due September 29, 2022.

2021-002
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTS

Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303(a) The non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance with the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be incompliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the Untied States of the ?internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition/Context: During our audit of payroll costs, we identified two employees where the individuals? wage charged to the grant was more than the incurred amount. As a result, the Organization overcharged the grant by $427. There was a separate instance where an individual?s wage charged to the grant was less than the amount incurred for $258. As a result, the net impact was an overcharge to the grant in the amount of $169. In all instances, the hourly rate data used for the payroll expense calculation did not agree to the personnel file. Cause: The Organization did not reconcile the hourly rates per the employees? personnel file to amounts being charged to the grant. Controls in place did not identify the error. Effect: Payroll costs charged to the grant may not be correct. Repeat finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: Management should implement a policy over their processes surrounding the payroll expense calculation, the allocation procedures, and reconcile of pay rates. This should include effective reviews by someone with the appropriate knowledge of allowable cost compliance requirements. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: In light of these findings management will be moving oversight of budget related contract and grant management activities from Development staff to Finance staff. Also, as part of the month close process for contract and grant activities, monthly statements will be reconciled to the General Ledger to ensure accuracy. Management is working to implement these solutions prior to the end of the current fiscal year.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303(a) The non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance with the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be incompliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the Untied States of the ?internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition/Context: During our audit of payroll costs, we identified two employees where the individuals? wage charged to the grant was more than the incurred amount. As a result, the Organization overcharged the grant by $427. There was a separate instance where an individual?s wage charged to the grant was less than the amount incurred for $258. As a result, the net impact was an overcharge to the grant in the amount of $169. In all instances, the hourly rate data used for the payroll expense calculation did not agree to the personnel file. Cause: The Organization did not reconcile the hourly rates per the employees? personnel file to amounts being charged to the grant. Controls in place did not identify the error. Effect: Payroll costs charged to the grant may not be correct. Repeat finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: Management should implement a policy over their processes surrounding the payroll expense calculation, the allocation procedures, and reconcile of pay rates. This should include effective reviews by someone with the appropriate knowledge of allowable cost compliance requirements. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: In light of these findings management will be moving oversight of budget related contract and grant management activities from Development staff to Finance staff. Also, as part of the month close process for contract and grant activities, monthly statements will be reconciled to the General Ledger to ensure accuracy. Management is working to implement these solutions prior to the end of the current fiscal year.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2021-002 - Allowable Costs/ Cost Principles: Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls CFDA: 19.040 Name of Federal Program: Department of State - Public Diplomacy Programs Award Number: N/A Award Year: 2018-2020 Questioned Costs: Actual $169 Likely $2,586 Planned Corrective Actions: In light of these findings management will be moving oversight of budget related contract and grant management activities from Development staff to Finance staff. Also, as part of the month close process for contract and grant activities, monthly statements will be reconciled to the General Ledger to ensure accuracy. Management is working to implement these solutions prior to the end of the current fiscal year.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2020-06-30

$2,351,285 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 8, 2021 — management decision was due August 8, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

$999,365 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 24, 2020 — management decision was due September 24, 2020.

2019-003
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Finding 2019-003 ? Financial Close and Reporting ? Significant Deficiency Criteria: General ledger accounts should be reviewed in a timely manner. Further, external reports such as Form SF 425 and other grant reports should be reviewed before being submitted. Condition/Context: Reviews of reconciliations governments grants related to the accounting and reporting processes had no evidence of review for various selections, made so it was unclear when the reviews had taken place on a timely manner. Further, external reports, such as Form SF 425, were submitted without being reviewed. Cause: Management should implement policy over the review process. Effect: Not having general ledger accounts and reports being reviewed may cause untended errors to go unchecked or inaccurate reporting. Repeat finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: Management should implement a policy over their processes surrounding the accounting and reporting procedures to ensure that appropriate controls are in place. These should include effective reviews by someone with the appropriate knowledge of generally accepted accounting principles. Reconciliations should be prepared and reviewed timely for all general ledger accounts. Furthermore, evidence of review of reconciliations and journal entries should be documented by sign offs. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Although an existing member of the Finance Department is fully dedicated to reviewing and reconciling accounts related to grants (including government grants), the organization is also in the process of adding an additional full time staff member to the Finance Department which should allow for a more timely reconciliation of all the general ledger accounts in the organization. Historically almost all grant reports have been reviewed by multiple knowledgeable employees prior to submission, however, the organization is also in the process of establishing a more formal process where the VP of Finance or a member of the Development Department will review all grant reports (including Form SF 425) prior to submission.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2019-003 ? Financial Close and Reporting ? Significant Deficiency Criteria: General ledger accounts should be reviewed in a timely manner. Further, external reports such as Form SF 425 and other grant reports should be reviewed before being submitted. Condition/Context: Reviews of reconciliations governments grants related to the accounting and reporting processes had no evidence of review for various selections, made so it was unclear when the reviews had taken place on a timely manner. Further, external reports, such as Form SF 425, were submitted without being reviewed. Cause: Management should implement policy over the review process. Effect: Not having general ledger accounts and reports being reviewed may cause untended errors to go unchecked or inaccurate reporting. Repeat finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: Management should implement a policy over their processes surrounding the accounting and reporting procedures to ensure that appropriate controls are in place. These should include effective reviews by someone with the appropriate knowledge of generally accepted accounting principles. Reconciliations should be prepared and reviewed timely for all general ledger accounts. Furthermore, evidence of review of reconciliations and journal entries should be documented by sign offs. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Although an existing member of the Finance Department is fully dedicated to reviewing and reconciling accounts related to grants (including government grants), the organization is also in the process of adding an additional full time staff member to the Finance Department which should allow for a more timely reconciliation of all the general ledger accounts in the organization. Historically almost all grant reports have been reviewed by multiple knowledgeable employees prior to submission, however, the organization is also in the process of establishing a more formal process where the VP of Finance or a member of the Development Department will review all grant reports (including Form SF 425) prior to submission.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2019-003 ? Financial Close and Reporting ? Significant Deficiency CFDA: 19.040 Name of Federal Program: Department of State - Public Diplomacy Programs Award Number: SGECPD18CA0034 Award Year: 2018-2020 Questioned Costs: $0 Planned Corrective Action: Although an existing member of the Finance Department is fully dedicated to reviewing and reconciling accounts related to grants (including government grants), the organization is also in the process of adding an additional full time staff member to the Finance Department which should allow for a more timely reconciliation of all the general ledger accounts in the organization. Historically almost all grant reports have been reviewed by multiple knowledgeable employees prior to submission, however, the organization is also in the process of establishing a more formal process where the Vice President of Finance or a member of the Development Department will review all grant reports (including Form SF 425) prior to submission. Name of Responsible Party: Vice President, Finance or Senior Director & General Manager Anticipated Completion Date: December 31, 2019

About Reporting →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in California

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.