MONTAGE HEALTH AND RELATED CORPORATIONSNon-Profit

EIN: 942789696

UEI: GSA_MIGRATION

Audit also covers 2 related EINs: 264826604, 940760193 · unlinked EINs have no separate FAC filing

Audited by: MOSS ADAMS LLP

Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

MONTAGE HEALTH AND RELATED CORPORATIONS1 audit years1 findings
1
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$13.7M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2021)

FY 2021-12-31

$13,718,451 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on September 29, 2022. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by March 29, 2023 (1249 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2021-001
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Criteria: The Organization should have appropriate internal controls in place to ensure that reporting requirements are met and amounts utilized in reports are calculated accurately and in accordance with 45 CFR 75.342. Condition and Context: The Period 1 Provider Relief Fund (PRF) report submitted during the year ended December 31, 2021 was tested. The Organization elected to use Lost Revenues Option 2 Budgeted Revenue to report lost revenue based on quarterly actuals vs. budget, however, the budgets used to have been approved before March 27, 2020. The 2021 calendar year budget was not approved until after that date. Cause: PRF guidance was not thoroughly reviewed and researched. Effect: There was no impact to total funding received or retained by the Organization due to the error. The Organization?s lost revenue as calculated for the first 2 quarters of 2020 generated more than sufficient lost revenue to justify the total funding received by the entire Organization as reported on the Schedule of Expenditures for Federal Awards (?SEFA?). As such, the total amount of funding recognized on the basis of lost revenue for period 1 was accurate and the amount reported per the SEFA was also accurate. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: Policies and procedures over federal grant reporting should be modified to ensure reports are prepared using complete and accurate information. Review controls should be in place by someone other than the preparer of the report to ensure information is accurate prior to submission of the report.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: The Organization should have appropriate internal controls in place to ensure that reporting requirements are met and amounts utilized in reports are calculated accurately and in accordance with 45 CFR 75.342. Condition and Context: The Period 1 Provider Relief Fund (PRF) report submitted during the year ended December 31, 2021 was tested. The Organization elected to use Lost Revenues Option 2 Budgeted Revenue to report lost revenue based on quarterly actuals vs. budget, however, the budgets used to have been approved before March 27, 2020. The 2021 calendar year budget was not approved until after that date. Cause: PRF guidance was not thoroughly reviewed and researched. Effect: There was no impact to total funding received or retained by the Organization due to the error. The Organization?s lost revenue as calculated for the first 2 quarters of 2020 generated more than sufficient lost revenue to justify the total funding received by the entire Organization as reported on the Schedule of Expenditures for Federal Awards (?SEFA?). As such, the total amount of funding recognized on the basis of lost revenue for period 1 was accurate and the amount reported per the SEFA was also accurate. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: Policies and procedures over federal grant reporting should be modified to ensure reports are prepared using complete and accurate information. Review controls should be in place by someone other than the preparer of the report to ensure information is accurate prior to submission of the report.

Corrective Action Plan

Management?s Response and Corrective Actions: The Organization attempted to correct the error in the Period 3 reporting but was unable to reopen the Phase 1 submitted file within the reporting portal. As such, the Organization will correct the lost revenue submission option to reflect option #3 entitled ?Alternate Reasonable Methodology? at the first opportunity. Despite the error in reporting, there was no impact to total funding received or retained due to the reporting error. Additionally, management will strengthen the review process for attestations with dual review to ensure full understanding of the reporting requirements.

About Reporting →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.