← Back to home

Northeastern Rural Health ClinicsNon-Profit

EIN: 942492609

UEI: C6LZNT49F966

Audited by: Baker Tilly US, LLP

Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

Northeastern Rural Health Clinics10 audit years4 findings1 repeat
10
Audit Years
4
Total Findings
1
Repeat Findings
$2.6M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,623,534 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on December 22, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 22, 2026 (69 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,839,411 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 6, 2025 — management decision was due July 6, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,327,228 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 1, 2024 — management decision was due September 1, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

$4,633,671 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 11, 2023 — management decision was due July 11, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

$3,957,671 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 16, 2022 — management decision was due July 16, 2022.

2021-001
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTS

The Center determines the sliding fee discount charged to the patients based on their annual gross income and household size. During our testing of sliding fee discount, we noted the following: Two (2) out of 25 patients selected were given a sliding fee discount when the patient did not qualify for any discount under the program, resulting in overstatement of the sliding fee discount by $70. There was a total of 1,131 patients and the sample procedures were not statistical. Questioned Costs: $70 of the $835 patient charges sampled. Context: The audit findings represent a systematic problem, see condition above. Effect: Patients were given an improper sliding fee discount without documentation to support that the patient qualified based on their income. Cause: The inaccuracies in the application of the sliding fee program discounts were due to inadequate oversight and review. Indication of Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding in the current year. Recommendation: We recommend that the Center?s procedures be strengthened to ensure 1) income is properly verified and adequately documented and 2) the sliding fee discount is properly determined and applied. The Center should strengthen processes surrounding monitoring of the program to ensure the Center?s policies are consistently and properly applied.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: In accordance with the Health Resources & Services Administration Health Center Program Compliance Manual, Chapter 9: Sliding Fee Discount Program, health centers must prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule so that amounts owed for health center services by eligible patients are adjusted based on the patients? ability to pay. In accordance with 42 CFR 56.303, health centers must have a schedule of fees or payments for the provision of their health services consistent with locally prevailing rates or charges and designed to cover their reasonable costs of operation. They are also required to have a corresponding schedule of discounts applied and adjusted based on the patient?s ability to pay. The patient?s ability to pay is determined based on the official poverty guidelines, as revised annually by U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The schedule of discounts must provide for a full discount to individuals and families with annual incomes at or below those set forth in the most recent poverty income guidelines (except that nominal fees for service may be collected from such individuals and families) and for no discount to individuals and families with annual incomes greater than twice those set forth in such guidelines. Condition: The Center determines the sliding fee discount charged to the patients based on their annual gross income and household size. During our testing of sliding fee discount, we noted the following: Two (2) out of 25 patients selected were given a sliding fee discount when the patient did not qualify for any discount under the program, resulting in overstatement of the sliding fee discount by $70. There was a total of 1,131 patients and the sample procedures were not statistical. Questioned Costs: $70 of the $835 patient charges sampled. Context: The audit findings represent a systematic problem, see condition above. Effect: Patients were given an improper sliding fee discount without documentation to support that the patient qualified based on their income. Cause: The inaccuracies in the application of the sliding fee program discounts were due to inadequate oversight and review. Indication of Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding in the current year. Recommendation: We recommend that the Center?s procedures be strengthened to ensure 1) income is properly verified and adequately documented and 2) the sliding fee discount is properly determined and applied. The Center should strengthen processes surrounding monitoring of the program to ensure the Center?s policies are consistently and properly applied.

Corrective Action Plan

As of December 13, 2021 the Center has made a change in Front Office Management. The new manager has a strong knowledge of the requirements of the Sliding Fee Discount Program. The center will incorporate updated training on the program to all front office staff. Additional levels of management review will be added to the process to ensure program compliance. Anticipated completion date: March 1, 2022

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2020-06-30

$2,604,065 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 21, 2021 — management decision was due December 21, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

$2,609,711 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 22, 2020 — management decision was due September 22, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

GOING CONCERN$2,362,176 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on May 28, 2019 — management decision was due November 28, 2019.

2018-004
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Reporting →
2018-005
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2017-001QUESTIONED COSTS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2017-001

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,187,504 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 14, 2018 — management decision was due August 14, 2018.

2017-001
Special Tests & Provisions
QUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,282,914 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 3, 2017 — management decision was due July 3, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.