EIN: 942347424
UEI: HLQNKXFHUAF9
Audited by: CHW LLP
Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 28, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on February 13, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 13, 2026 (16 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on March 26, 2025 — management decision was due September 26, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2024 — management decision was due September 29, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on September 26, 2023 — management decision was due March 26, 2024.
The Center has experienced significant delays in the preparation and issuance of the year ended June 30, 2022 financial statements and its Single Audit required under Uniform Guidance. Cause: Due to changes in accounting staff and the impact of a significant unforeseen workload, the Finance Department had difficulty handling the day-to-day operations and perform year-end closing procedures and the required external reporting functions simultaneously in order to provide timely financial statements. Effect: Delays in processing year-end closing procedures caused the financial statements release to be delayed. In addition, the Center is neither in compliance with Uniform Guidance nor is it meeting its current demands for external financial reporting. Questioned Costs: None. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: Not applicable. Recommendation: Finance Department should look at increasing the amount of experienced staff to help facilitate the year-end closing processes and the preparation of basic financial statements. Because the financial statements are the responsibility of the Center, it is in its own best interest to closely monitor the accounting process to ensure that financial position and operating results are accurately and timely reported. The following steps could be used to avoid future delays: ? Assign additional qualified accounting personnel to help process complex transactions; ? Identify crucial due dates and develop a listing of assignments, including department coordinated items, based on available resources to meet those due dates; ? Hold periodic meetings to monitor the progress of assignments and responsibilities
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: Management is responsible for providing timely and accurate financial information. Since the Center has expended over $750,000 of expenditures in federal awards, Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award (Uniform Guidance), states the Center is required to submit the Data Collection Form and the reporting package to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, which include the Financial Statements of the Center, within the earlier of 30 days after receipt of auditors? report, or nine months after the end of the audit period. Condition: The Center has experienced significant delays in the preparation and issuance of the year ended June 30, 2022 financial statements and its Single Audit required under Uniform Guidance. Cause: Due to changes in accounting staff and the impact of a significant unforeseen workload, the Finance Department had difficulty handling the day-to-day operations and perform year-end closing procedures and the required external reporting functions simultaneously in order to provide timely financial statements. Effect: Delays in processing year-end closing procedures caused the financial statements release to be delayed. In addition, the Center is neither in compliance with Uniform Guidance nor is it meeting its current demands for external financial reporting. Questioned Costs: None. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: Not applicable. Recommendation: Finance Department should look at increasing the amount of experienced staff to help facilitate the year-end closing processes and the preparation of basic financial statements. Because the financial statements are the responsibility of the Center, it is in its own best interest to closely monitor the accounting process to ensure that financial position and operating results are accurately and timely reported. The following steps could be used to avoid future delays: ? Assign additional qualified accounting personnel to help process complex transactions; ? Identify crucial due dates and develop a listing of assignments, including department coordinated items, based on available resources to meet those due dates; ? Hold periodic meetings to monitor the progress of assignments and responsibilities
Finding 2022-001 Delay in Financial Reporting Audit Finding: Management is responsible for providing timely and accurate financial information. The Center is required to submit the Data Collection Form and the reporting package to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and the State Controller?s Office, which include the Basic Financial Statements of the Center within the earlier of 30 days after receipt of the auditor?s report, or nine months after the end of the audit period. The Center has experienced delays in the preparation and issuance of the year ended June 30, 2022 basic financial statements and its Single Audit required under Union Guidance. Corrective Action Plan: Due to AVHC's remote location, small size and FQHC status, we have found it extremely challenging to hire accounting staff with the required skills and knowledge to manage our unique organization, so we have successfully outsourced our accounting department for many years. However, when our former outsourced company sold to a large corporation, we began to experience a decline in services. Deadlines were not being met, yet costs were increasing 50% to 100%. In December 2022, a local FQHC began providing accounting services for us under a shared service agreement. Unfortunately, the FY22 audit was not complete at the time of the transition, and though we were under contract with the former consultant to complete the audit work, they were ultimately unable to complete the audit. Staff under the new agreement did not have access to critical historical data required to complete the last few outstanding items, increasing the amount of time to address them. Since FY22 audit work was not part of the new agreement, adequate staffing was not in place to manage the additional work. Management understands how important it is to meet the annual audit deadline. The plan for attaining and maintaining compliance consists of the following actions, many of which are in place: ? Review monthly processes to ensure workpapers are audit ready and that minimal adjustments are required after June financials have been issued. ? Manage staffing levels to ensure experienced staff are available to work with auditors during the annual audit period. ? Identify staff responsible for assisting with audit preparation and conduct regular training to ensure they can efficiently prepare requested documents and address auditor requests. ? Adhere to a pre-planned schedule with built-in time for unexpected delays. ? Begin planning for each audit six months prior to the end of the fiscal year: o Reach out to the selected auditor in January for an Engagement Letter, a PBC list, and to schedule fieldwork. o o Actively work with vendors to ensure all FY invoices are entered no later than the end of July so that a Trial Balance and other initially requested documents are provided to auditors no later than August 15. o o Staff assigned to assist with audit preparation are directed to prioritize audit work from July 1 until completion of audited financials. They will prioritize all requests from auditors, including document and sample requests and responding to questions. o o Any deviation from interim deadlines is to be communicated between accounting staff and auditors for resource planning on both sides. o o Weekly meetings will be scheduled between Management, accounting staff and audit staff at any point that the audit seems to be falling behind the planned schedule, to work through any issues as efficiently as possible. We are confident that full implementation of, and continuing attention to, these measures will ensure we complete future audits on time, beginning with FY23. Responsible Person: Christie MacVitie, CFO Expected Implementation Date: September 5, 2023
FAC accepted this audit on September 29, 2022 — management decision was due March 29, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on October 20, 2021 — management decision was due April 20, 2022.
During our testing of the Center?s sliding fee discount program, 14 out of 40 sliding fees tested were not sliding fee discount applications but incorrectly using sliding fee scale code. Cause: The Center does not have adequate review process in place to ensure the sliding fee discount applied are accurately determined and applied. Effect or Potential Effect: The deficiency in internal control to review its sliding scale determination put the Center at increased risk in providing patients with sliding fee discounts that are not based on the patients? ability to pay, family size and income for individuals and families. The absence of an appropriate review process may result in the Center not being in compliance with grant requirements. Questioned Costs: No questioned cost noted. Context: Statistical sampling was performed to draw sample selections. See condition above for context of the finding. Identification as a Repeat Finding, If Applicable: 2019-001 Recommendation: We recommend the Center to strengthen its policies and procedures on sliding fee program in order to properly determine and document the patients? eligibility in the program. The Center should have a secondary review on the sliding fee application forms and sliding fee discount applied.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2020-001 Special Test and Provisions ? Internal Control over Sliding Fee Discounts Program Information of the Federal Program: Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance(?CFDA?) Number:93.224 CFDA Title: Health Center Program (Community Health Centers, Migrant Health Centers, Health Care for the Homeless, and Public Housing Primary Care) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through Entity: Not Applicable Federal Award Number and Award Year: H80CS22682; 2020 Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory or Other Citation): Pursuant to OMB August 2020 Compliance Requirement for CFDA 93.224 Health Center Program Cluster, - Special Tests and Provisions ? 1. Sliding Fee Discounts, health centers must prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule (?SFDS?) so that the amounts owed for health center services by eligible patients are adjusted (discounted) based on the patient?s ability to pay, family size and income for individuals and families. Condition: During our testing of the Center?s sliding fee discount program, 14 out of 40 sliding fees tested were not sliding fee discount applications but incorrectly using sliding fee scale code. Cause: The Center does not have adequate review process in place to ensure the sliding fee discount applied are accurately determined and applied. Effect or Potential Effect: The deficiency in internal control to review its sliding scale determination put the Center at increased risk in providing patients with sliding fee discounts that are not based on the patients? ability to pay, family size and income for individuals and families. The absence of an appropriate review process may result in the Center not being in compliance with grant requirements. Questioned Costs: No questioned cost noted. Context: Statistical sampling was performed to draw sample selections. See condition above for context of the finding. Identification as a Repeat Finding, If Applicable: 2019-001 Recommendation: We recommend the Center to strengthen its policies and procedures on sliding fee program in order to properly determine and document the patients? eligibility in the program. The Center should have a secondary review on the sliding fee application forms and sliding fee discount applied.
Finding 2020-001 Special Test and Provisions ? Internal Control over Sliding Fee Discounts Program Information of the Federal Program: Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance(?CFDA?) Number:93.224 CFDA Title: Health Center Program (Community Health Centers, Migrant Health Centers, Health Care for the Homeless, and Public Housing Primary Care) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through Entity: Not Applicable Federal Award Number and Award Year: H80CS22682; 2020 Audit Finding: During our testing of the Center?s sliding fee discount program, 14 out of 40 sliding fees tested were not SFS applications but incorrectly using SFS code. Corrective Action Plan: The 14 instances in which the SFC code was incorrectly used followed the implementation of a new policy granting discounts to patients who pay their fees on the day service is provided. Contracted billing consultants incorrectly chose the Sliding Fee Discount adjustment code when recording the credit to the patient accounts, rather than the correct adjustment code. This issue has been addressed via billing huddles and training for our contractors as well as billing staff. The correct code is now being used, though the improperly coded transactions were not retroactively corrected in the system. In addition to the review process in place, Management will now require a quarterly audit of 10% of all Sliding Fee Discount adjustments and will verify the coding posted to eCW during the quarter under audit. The audit will include review of each application to ensure proper approval was obtained and confirmation that the correct discount was applied so that the patient was charged the correct fee. In the event the audit uncovers improper Sliding Fee adjustments were made, an additional 10% of the transactions will be audited, up to 100% of all transactions, and the incorrect adjustments will be corrected. Additionally, all employees authorized to post Sliding Fee Discount adjustments to the system each year will be required to read the Sliding Fee Discount Program Policy and Procedure around April 1, each year, when the new Federal Poverty Guidelines are implemented. Staff will also be required to verify that the system is charging the correct fee to the patient, by verifying the fee calculated by the system against the printed schedule, at the time adjustments are posted. Responsible Person: Chief Operations Officer Expected Implementation Date: November 2021
2019-001
FAC accepted this audit on February 24, 2020 — management decision was due August 24, 2020.
Forty samples were selected for our internal control and compliance testing over sliding fee discounts program. We noted there are two separate instances where the sliding fee discounts were not correctly applied: ? In one instance, a patient was given less sliding fee discount that he/she should have received. Based on the patient?s family size and household income level, the patient was qualified to receive more sliding fee discount and should have been put on a lower sliding scale. However, the patient was incorrectly put on a higher sliding scale. ? In another instance, a patient received more sliding fee discount that he/she should have received. The patient received dental services from the Center. However, the patient was incorrectly charged with the nominal fee associated with medical services. The nominal fee for medical services was lower than the nominal fee for dental services. Cause: The Center does not have adequate review process in place to ensure the sliding fee discount applied are accurately determined and applied. Effect or Potential Effect: The deficiency in internal control to review its sliding scale determination put the Center at increased risk in providing patients with sliding fee discounts that are not based on the patients? ability to pay, family size and income for individuals and families. The absence of an appropriate review process may result in the Center not being in compliance with grant requirements. Questioned Costs: No questioned cost noted. Context: Statistical sampling was performed to draw sample selections. See condition above for context of the finding. Identification as a Repeat Finding, If Applicable: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend the Center to strengthen its policies and procedures on sliding fee program in order to properly determine and document the patients? eligibility in the program. The Center should have a secondary review on the sliding fee application forms and sliding fee discount applied.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2019-001 Special Test and Provisions ? Internal Control over Sliding Fee Discounts Program Information of the Federal Program: Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (?CFDA?) Number: 93.224 CFDA Title: Health Center Program (Community Health Centers, Migrant Health Centers, Health Care for the Homeless, and Public Housing Primary Care) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through Entity: Not Applicable Federal Award Number and Award Year: H80CS22682; 2019 Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory or Other Citation): Pursuant to OMB August 2019 Compliance Requirement for CFDA 93.224 Health Center Program Cluster, -Special Tests and Provisions ? 1. Sliding Fee Discounts, health centers must prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule (?SFDS?) so that the amounts owed for health center services by eligible patients are adjusted (discounted) based on the patient?s ability to pay, family size and income for individuals and families. Condition: Forty samples were selected for our internal control and compliance testing over sliding fee discounts program. We noted there are two separate instances where the sliding fee discounts were not correctly applied: ? In one instance, a patient was given less sliding fee discount that he/she should have received. Based on the patient?s family size and household income level, the patient was qualified to receive more sliding fee discount and should have been put on a lower sliding scale. However, the patient was incorrectly put on a higher sliding scale. ? In another instance, a patient received more sliding fee discount that he/she should have received. The patient received dental services from the Center. However, the patient was incorrectly charged with the nominal fee associated with medical services. The nominal fee for medical services was lower than the nominal fee for dental services. Cause: The Center does not have adequate review process in place to ensure the sliding fee discount applied are accurately determined and applied. Effect or Potential Effect: The deficiency in internal control to review its sliding scale determination put the Center at increased risk in providing patients with sliding fee discounts that are not based on the patients? ability to pay, family size and income for individuals and families. The absence of an appropriate review process may result in the Center not being in compliance with grant requirements. Questioned Costs: No questioned cost noted. Context: Statistical sampling was performed to draw sample selections. See condition above for context of the finding. Identification as a Repeat Finding, If Applicable: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend the Center to strengthen its policies and procedures on sliding fee program in order to properly determine and document the patients? eligibility in the program. The Center should have a secondary review on the sliding fee application forms and sliding fee discount applied.
2019-001 Special Tests and Provisions ? Internal Control over Sliding Fee Discounts Program Information of the Federal Program: Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (?CFDA?) Number: 93.224 CFDA Title: Health Center Program (Community Health Centers, Migrant Health Centers, Health Care for the Homeless, and Public Housing Primary Care) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through Entity: Not Applicable Federal Award Number and Award Year: H80CS22682; 2019 Audit Finding: During the performance of the year-end audit, we noted there are two separate instances where the sliding fee discounts were not correctly applied: ? In one instance, a patient was given less sliding fee discount that he/she should have received. Based on the patient?s family size and household income level, the patient was qualified to receive more sliding fee discount and should have been put on a lower sliding scale. However, the patient was incorrectly put on a higher sliding scale. ? In another instance, a patient received more sliding fee discount that he/she should have received. The patient received dental services from the Center. However, the patient was incorrectly charged with the nominal fee associated with medical services. The nominal fee for medical services was lower than the nominal fee for dental services. Corrective Action Plan: AVHC includes language in its Financial Policies & Procedures requiring all applications be reviewed by supervisory staff to ensure the accurate Sliding Fee category has been selected; however, this was not practiced consistently throughout FY18-19. AVHC will comply with that provision 100% of the time by routing every Sliding Fee Discount Program application to the COO for review. Further, the COO will also verify that the correct Sliding Fee category is selected in the Practice Management system for each approved applicant. Responsible Person: Fabiola Cornejo, Chief Operations Officer Expected Implementation Date: This was implemented January 1, 2020
Forty samples were selected for our internal control and compliance testing over non payroll expenditure testing. We noted that one instance where a contractors? medical supplies expense was submitted twice, one on the contractor?s invoice to the Center, and another one as a separate reimbursement request, both has the same invoice attached. The Center did not go through proper review procedure and reimbursed the contractor twice, resulting the Center over-drawing from federal awards. Cause: The Center does not have adequate review process in place to ensure the reimbursement request is accurate and valid before disbursing reimbursement. Effect or Potential Effect: The deficiency in internal control to review its reimbursement request may result in the Center not being in compliance with grant requirements. Questioned Costs: No questioned cost noted. Context: Statistical sampling was performed to draw sample selections. See condition above for context of the finding. Identification as a Repeat Finding, If Applicable: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend the Center to strengthen its policies and procedures on the review of reimbursement request. sliding fee program in order to properly determine and document the patients? eligibility in the program. The Center should have a secondary review on the reimbursement requested submitted.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2019-002 Cash Management ? Internal Control over Reimbursement Information of the Federal Program: Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (?CFDA?) Number: 93.224 CFDA Title: Health Center Program (Community Health Centers, Migrant Health Centers, Health Care for the Homeless, and Public Housing Primary Care) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through Entity: Not Applicable Federal Award Number and Award Year: H80CS22682; 2019 Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory or Other Citation): Pursuant to OMB August 2019 Compliance Requirement, Part 3, C. Cash Management-Recipients Other than States and Subrecipients, 3. Costs for which reimbursement was requested must be paid for prior to the date of the reimbursement. Condition: Forty samples were selected for our internal control and compliance testing over non payroll expenditure testing. We noted that one instance where a contractors? medical supplies expense was submitted twice, one on the contractor?s invoice to the Center, and another one as a separate reimbursement request, both has the same invoice attached. The Center did not go through proper review procedure and reimbursed the contractor twice, resulting the Center over-drawing from federal awards. Cause: The Center does not have adequate review process in place to ensure the reimbursement request is accurate and valid before disbursing reimbursement. Effect or Potential Effect: The deficiency in internal control to review its reimbursement request may result in the Center not being in compliance with grant requirements. Questioned Costs: No questioned cost noted. Context: Statistical sampling was performed to draw sample selections. See condition above for context of the finding. Identification as a Repeat Finding, If Applicable: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend the Center to strengthen its policies and procedures on the review of reimbursement request. sliding fee program in order to properly determine and document the patients? eligibility in the program. The Center should have a secondary review on the reimbursement requested submitted.
2019-002 Cash Management ? Internal Control over Reimbursement Information of the Federal Program: Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (?CFDA?) Number: 93.224 CFDA Title: Health Center Program (Community Health Centers, Migrant Health Centers, Health Care for the Homeless, and Public Housing Primary Care) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through Entity: Not Applicable Federal Award Number and Award Year: H80CS22682; 2019 Audit Finding: During year end single audit testing, we noted a instance where a contractors? medical supplies expense was submitted twice, one on the contractor?s invoice to the Center, and another one as a separate reimbursement request, both has the same invoice attached. The Center did not go through proper review procedure and reimbursed the contractor twice, resulting the Center over-drawing from federal awards. Corrective Action Plan: The same expense was reimbursed twice because they were reimbursed via two separate methods and in two separate amounts. The expense was first claimed on a vendor invoice, with no invoice support attached, and then submitted again on an Expense Report. The amount claimed on the invoice consisted of the base product amount, before sales tax and a discount, while the amount claimed on the Expense Report was for the total amount of the invoice. In order to make it easier to detect these types of situations in the future, AVHC will amend the Financial Policies & Procedures to include the requirements that invoice copies for reimbursement on vendor invoices must be included with the invoice in order to be paid, and that all expense reimbursements, regardless of the means by which they are submitted, will require an original invoice in order to be reimbursed. Responsible Person: Judith Waterman, Chief Financial Officer and Erica Cooperrider, Accounts Payable Expected Implementation Date: This procedure was implemented January 1, 2020, and the updated Financial Policy will be approved during the March Board meeting (March 5, 2020).
FAC accepted this audit on March 4, 2019 — management decision was due September 4, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on March 14, 2018 — management decision was due September 14, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on February 1, 2017 — management decision was due August 1, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.