← Back to home

Sunnyside Union Elementary School DistrictLocal Government

EIN: 942191905

UEI: LJH1GTBNNLW5

Audited by: Christy White Inc

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 7, 2026

Sunnyside Union Elementary School District42 audit years1 findings
42
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$1.5M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,549,724 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on January 22, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 22, 2026 (52 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
Funder? Track this deadline →

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$92,073,107 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 27, 2026 — management decision was due July 27, 2026.

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,849,589 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 25, 2026 — management decision was due September 25, 2026.

FY 2025-06-30

$33,311,266 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 25, 2026 — management decision was due September 25, 2026.

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,664,215 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 31, 2025 — management decision was due October 1, 2025.

2024-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESSQUESTIONED COSTS

Federal Agency: Corporation of National and Community Service Pass-Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Program Name: AmeriCorps Federal Financial Assistance Listing: 94.006 Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed and Unallowed and Allowable Costs (Indirect Costs) Criteria or Specific Requirements The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to establish indirect cost rates for California’s local education agencies (LEAs). The CDE has been delegated authority to calculate and approve indirect cost rates annually for LEAs. For the programs allowed to charge indirect costs in fiscal year 2023-2024, Education Code Section 38101(c) limits LEA’s indirect costs to the lesser of the LEA’s individual CDE approved indirect cost rate, or the statewide average indirect cost rate. Per the CDE, the Indirect cost rate for the program should be 2.79%. In addition, the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.303 Internal Controls, requires that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain documentation of effective internal controls over Federal awards that provide reasonable assurance that awards are being managed in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition During our audit, we found the District incorrectly overcharged $2,356 of indirect costs to AmeriCorps. The District likely made expenditure transfers after posting the initially calculated indirect cost charges and did not subsequently adjust the calculation and charges. Cause The condition identified above appears to be due to the District not monitoring expenditure adjustments to the program during the closing process that impacted the base expenditure totals that is used to apply the indirect cost rate to determine the allowable amount of indirect costs that are allowable to be charged to the program. In addition, the independent reviewer did not complete a thorough review of the final indirect cost calculations. Effect The District is out of compliance with allowable indirect cost charge requirements of the AmeriCorps program. Questioned Costs The known questioned cost related to this finding is $2,356. Context No sampling was used. The condition was identified through review of the general ledger and indirect cost recalculations for the AmeriCorps program. A total of $2,356 was over charged to the program. Repeat Finding No Recommendation In the 2024-2025 fiscal year, the District should transfer $2,356 from the General Fund unrestricted resource to the General Fund AmeriCorps program. In addition, the District should revamp its internal control procedures over indirect cost calculation to ensure that final amounts charged are not in excess of the approved rate. Corrective Action Plan and Views of Responsible Officials An oversight led to the indirect cost rate calculation error. To prevent future occurrences, a more thorough review process will be implemented to ensure alignment with funding source guidelines and verify totals before closing the ledgers. Additionally, greater diligence will be exercised in the final review of all indirect cost rates. As noted in the report, contributions will be made to the AmeriCorps resource in the 2024-2025 fiscal year to correct the 2023-2024 indirect cost rate calculation error.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Agency: Corporation of National and Community Service Pass-Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Program Name: AmeriCorps Federal Financial Assistance Listing: 94.006 Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed and Unallowed and Allowable Costs (Indirect Costs) Criteria or Specific Requirements The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to establish indirect cost rates for California’s local education agencies (LEAs). The CDE has been delegated authority to calculate and approve indirect cost rates annually for LEAs. For the programs allowed to charge indirect costs in fiscal year 2023-2024, Education Code Section 38101(c) limits LEA’s indirect costs to the lesser of the LEA’s individual CDE approved indirect cost rate, or the statewide average indirect cost rate. Per the CDE, the Indirect cost rate for the program should be 2.79%. In addition, the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.303 Internal Controls, requires that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain documentation of effective internal controls over Federal awards that provide reasonable assurance that awards are being managed in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition During our audit, we found the District incorrectly overcharged $2,356 of indirect costs to AmeriCorps. The District likely made expenditure transfers after posting the initially calculated indirect cost charges and did not subsequently adjust the calculation and charges. Cause The condition identified above appears to be due to the District not monitoring expenditure adjustments to the program during the closing process that impacted the base expenditure totals that is used to apply the indirect cost rate to determine the allowable amount of indirect costs that are allowable to be charged to the program. In addition, the independent reviewer did not complete a thorough review of the final indirect cost calculations. Effect The District is out of compliance with allowable indirect cost charge requirements of the AmeriCorps program. Questioned Costs The known questioned cost related to this finding is $2,356. Context No sampling was used. The condition was identified through review of the general ledger and indirect cost recalculations for the AmeriCorps program. A total of $2,356 was over charged to the program. Repeat Finding No Recommendation In the 2024-2025 fiscal year, the District should transfer $2,356 from the General Fund unrestricted resource to the General Fund AmeriCorps program. In addition, the District should revamp its internal control procedures over indirect cost calculation to ensure that final amounts charged are not in excess of the approved rate. Corrective Action Plan and Views of Responsible Officials An oversight led to the indirect cost rate calculation error. To prevent future occurrences, a more thorough review process will be implemented to ensure alignment with funding source guidelines and verify totals before closing the ledgers. Additionally, greater diligence will be exercised in the final review of all indirect cost rates. As noted in the report, contributions will be made to the AmeriCorps resource in the 2024-2025 fiscal year to correct the 2023-2024 indirect cost rate calculation error.

Corrective Action Plan

An oversight led to the indirect cost rate calculation error. To prevent future occurrences, a more thorough review process will be implemented to ensure alignment with funding source guidelines and verify totals before closing the ledgers. Additionally, greater diligence will be exercised in the final review of all indirect cost rates. As noted in the report, contributions will be made to the AmeriCorps resource in the 2024-2025 fiscal year to correct the 2023-2024 indirect cost rate calculation error.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,278,623 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 19, 2024 — management decision was due June 19, 2025.

2024-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESSQUESTIONED COSTS

Federal Agency: Corporation of National and Community Service Pass-Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Program Name: AmeriCorps Federal Financial Assistance Listing: 94.006 Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed and Unallowed and Allowable Costs (Indirect Costs) Criteria or Specific Requirements The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to establish indirect cost rates for California’s local education agencies (LEAs). The CDE has been delegated authority to calculate and approve indirect cost rates annually for LEAs. For the programs allowed to charge indirect costs in fiscal year 2023-2024, Education Code Section 38101(c) limits LEA’s indirect costs to the lesser of the LEA’s individual CDE approved indirect cost rate, or the statewide average indirect cost rate. Per the CDE, the Indirect cost rate for the program should be 2.79%. In addition, the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.303 Internal Controls, requires that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain documentation of effective internal controls over Federal awards that provide reasonable assurance that awards are being managed in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition During our audit, we found the District incorrectly overcharged $2,356 of indirect costs to AmeriCorps. The District likely made expenditure transfers after posting the initially calculated indirect cost charges and did not subsequently adjust the calculation and charges. Cause The condition identified above appears to be due to the District not monitoring expenditure adjustments to the program during the closing process that impacted the base expenditure totals that is used to apply the indirect cost rate to determine the allowable amount of indirect costs that are allowable to be charged to the program. In addition, the independent reviewer did not complete a thorough review of the final indirect cost calculations. Effect The District is out of compliance with allowable indirect cost charge requirements of the AmeriCorps program. Questioned Costs The known questioned cost related to this finding is $2,356. Context No sampling was used. The condition was identified through review of the general ledger and indirect cost recalculations for the AmeriCorps program. A total of $2,356 was over charged to the program. Repeat Finding No Recommendation In the 2024-2025 fiscal year, the District should transfer $2,356 from the General Fund unrestricted resource to the General Fund AmeriCorps program. In addition, the District should revamp its internal control procedures over indirect cost calculation to ensure that final amounts charged are not in excess of the approved rate. Corrective Action Plan and Views of Responsible Officials An oversight led to the indirect cost rate calculation error. To prevent future occurrences, a more thorough review process will be implemented to ensure alignment with funding source guidelines and verify totals before closing the ledgers. Additionally, greater diligence will be exercised in the final review of all indirect cost rates. As noted in the report, contributions will be made to the AmeriCorps resource in the 2024-2025 fiscal year to correct the 2023-2024 indirect cost rate calculation error.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Agency: Corporation of National and Community Service Pass-Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Program Name: AmeriCorps Federal Financial Assistance Listing: 94.006 Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed and Unallowed and Allowable Costs (Indirect Costs) Criteria or Specific Requirements The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to establish indirect cost rates for California’s local education agencies (LEAs). The CDE has been delegated authority to calculate and approve indirect cost rates annually for LEAs. For the programs allowed to charge indirect costs in fiscal year 2023-2024, Education Code Section 38101(c) limits LEA’s indirect costs to the lesser of the LEA’s individual CDE approved indirect cost rate, or the statewide average indirect cost rate. Per the CDE, the Indirect cost rate for the program should be 2.79%. In addition, the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.303 Internal Controls, requires that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain documentation of effective internal controls over Federal awards that provide reasonable assurance that awards are being managed in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition During our audit, we found the District incorrectly overcharged $2,356 of indirect costs to AmeriCorps. The District likely made expenditure transfers after posting the initially calculated indirect cost charges and did not subsequently adjust the calculation and charges. Cause The condition identified above appears to be due to the District not monitoring expenditure adjustments to the program during the closing process that impacted the base expenditure totals that is used to apply the indirect cost rate to determine the allowable amount of indirect costs that are allowable to be charged to the program. In addition, the independent reviewer did not complete a thorough review of the final indirect cost calculations. Effect The District is out of compliance with allowable indirect cost charge requirements of the AmeriCorps program. Questioned Costs The known questioned cost related to this finding is $2,356. Context No sampling was used. The condition was identified through review of the general ledger and indirect cost recalculations for the AmeriCorps program. A total of $2,356 was over charged to the program. Repeat Finding No Recommendation In the 2024-2025 fiscal year, the District should transfer $2,356 from the General Fund unrestricted resource to the General Fund AmeriCorps program. In addition, the District should revamp its internal control procedures over indirect cost calculation to ensure that final amounts charged are not in excess of the approved rate. Corrective Action Plan and Views of Responsible Officials An oversight led to the indirect cost rate calculation error. To prevent future occurrences, a more thorough review process will be implemented to ensure alignment with funding source guidelines and verify totals before closing the ledgers. Additionally, greater diligence will be exercised in the final review of all indirect cost rates. As noted in the report, contributions will be made to the AmeriCorps resource in the 2024-2025 fiscal year to correct the 2023-2024 indirect cost rate calculation error.

Corrective Action Plan

An oversight led to the indirect cost rate calculation error. To prevent future occurrences, a more thorough review process will be implemented to ensure alignment with funding source guidelines and verify totals before closing the ledgers. Additionally, greater diligence will be exercised in the final review of all indirect cost rates. As noted in the report, contributions will be made to the AmeriCorps resource in the 2024-2025 fiscal year to correct the 2023-2024 indirect cost rate calculation error.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$97,033,413 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 7, 2025 — management decision was due July 7, 2025.

2024-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESSQUESTIONED COSTS

Federal Agency: Corporation of National and Community Service Pass-Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Program Name: AmeriCorps Federal Financial Assistance Listing: 94.006 Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed and Unallowed and Allowable Costs (Indirect Costs) Criteria or Specific Requirements The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to establish indirect cost rates for California’s local education agencies (LEAs). The CDE has been delegated authority to calculate and approve indirect cost rates annually for LEAs. For the programs allowed to charge indirect costs in fiscal year 2023-2024, Education Code Section 38101(c) limits LEA’s indirect costs to the lesser of the LEA’s individual CDE approved indirect cost rate, or the statewide average indirect cost rate. Per the CDE, the Indirect cost rate for the program should be 2.79%. In addition, the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.303 Internal Controls, requires that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain documentation of effective internal controls over Federal awards that provide reasonable assurance that awards are being managed in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition During our audit, we found the District incorrectly overcharged $2,356 of indirect costs to AmeriCorps. The District likely made expenditure transfers after posting the initially calculated indirect cost charges and did not subsequently adjust the calculation and charges. Cause The condition identified above appears to be due to the District not monitoring expenditure adjustments to the program during the closing process that impacted the base expenditure totals that is used to apply the indirect cost rate to determine the allowable amount of indirect costs that are allowable to be charged to the program. In addition, the independent reviewer did not complete a thorough review of the final indirect cost calculations. Effect The District is out of compliance with allowable indirect cost charge requirements of the AmeriCorps program. Questioned Costs The known questioned cost related to this finding is $2,356. Context No sampling was used. The condition was identified through review of the general ledger and indirect cost recalculations for the AmeriCorps program. A total of $2,356 was over charged to the program. Repeat Finding No Recommendation In the 2024-2025 fiscal year, the District should transfer $2,356 from the General Fund unrestricted resource to the General Fund AmeriCorps program. In addition, the District should revamp its internal control procedures over indirect cost calculation to ensure that final amounts charged are not in excess of the approved rate. Corrective Action Plan and Views of Responsible Officials An oversight led to the indirect cost rate calculation error. To prevent future occurrences, a more thorough review process will be implemented to ensure alignment with funding source guidelines and verify totals before closing the ledgers. Additionally, greater diligence will be exercised in the final review of all indirect cost rates. As noted in the report, contributions will be made to the AmeriCorps resource in the 2024-2025 fiscal year to correct the 2023-2024 indirect cost rate calculation error.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Agency: Corporation of National and Community Service Pass-Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Program Name: AmeriCorps Federal Financial Assistance Listing: 94.006 Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed and Unallowed and Allowable Costs (Indirect Costs) Criteria or Specific Requirements The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to establish indirect cost rates for California’s local education agencies (LEAs). The CDE has been delegated authority to calculate and approve indirect cost rates annually for LEAs. For the programs allowed to charge indirect costs in fiscal year 2023-2024, Education Code Section 38101(c) limits LEA’s indirect costs to the lesser of the LEA’s individual CDE approved indirect cost rate, or the statewide average indirect cost rate. Per the CDE, the Indirect cost rate for the program should be 2.79%. In addition, the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.303 Internal Controls, requires that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain documentation of effective internal controls over Federal awards that provide reasonable assurance that awards are being managed in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition During our audit, we found the District incorrectly overcharged $2,356 of indirect costs to AmeriCorps. The District likely made expenditure transfers after posting the initially calculated indirect cost charges and did not subsequently adjust the calculation and charges. Cause The condition identified above appears to be due to the District not monitoring expenditure adjustments to the program during the closing process that impacted the base expenditure totals that is used to apply the indirect cost rate to determine the allowable amount of indirect costs that are allowable to be charged to the program. In addition, the independent reviewer did not complete a thorough review of the final indirect cost calculations. Effect The District is out of compliance with allowable indirect cost charge requirements of the AmeriCorps program. Questioned Costs The known questioned cost related to this finding is $2,356. Context No sampling was used. The condition was identified through review of the general ledger and indirect cost recalculations for the AmeriCorps program. A total of $2,356 was over charged to the program. Repeat Finding No Recommendation In the 2024-2025 fiscal year, the District should transfer $2,356 from the General Fund unrestricted resource to the General Fund AmeriCorps program. In addition, the District should revamp its internal control procedures over indirect cost calculation to ensure that final amounts charged are not in excess of the approved rate. Corrective Action Plan and Views of Responsible Officials An oversight led to the indirect cost rate calculation error. To prevent future occurrences, a more thorough review process will be implemented to ensure alignment with funding source guidelines and verify totals before closing the ledgers. Additionally, greater diligence will be exercised in the final review of all indirect cost rates. As noted in the report, contributions will be made to the AmeriCorps resource in the 2024-2025 fiscal year to correct the 2023-2024 indirect cost rate calculation error.

Corrective Action Plan

An oversight led to the indirect cost rate calculation error. To prevent future occurrences, a more thorough review process will be implemented to ensure alignment with funding source guidelines and verify totals before closing the ledgers. Additionally, greater diligence will be exercised in the final review of all indirect cost rates. As noted in the report, contributions will be made to the AmeriCorps resource in the 2024-2025 fiscal year to correct the 2023-2024 indirect cost rate calculation error.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2024-06-30

$51,734,112 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 25, 2025 — management decision was due August 25, 2025.

2024-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESSQUESTIONED COSTS

Federal Agency: Corporation of National and Community Service Pass-Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Program Name: AmeriCorps Federal Financial Assistance Listing: 94.006 Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed and Unallowed and Allowable Costs (Indirect Costs) Criteria or Specific Requirements The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to establish indirect cost rates for California’s local education agencies (LEAs). The CDE has been delegated authority to calculate and approve indirect cost rates annually for LEAs. For the programs allowed to charge indirect costs in fiscal year 2023-2024, Education Code Section 38101(c) limits LEA’s indirect costs to the lesser of the LEA’s individual CDE approved indirect cost rate, or the statewide average indirect cost rate. Per the CDE, the Indirect cost rate for the program should be 2.79%. In addition, the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.303 Internal Controls, requires that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain documentation of effective internal controls over Federal awards that provide reasonable assurance that awards are being managed in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition During our audit, we found the District incorrectly overcharged $2,356 of indirect costs to AmeriCorps. The District likely made expenditure transfers after posting the initially calculated indirect cost charges and did not subsequently adjust the calculation and charges. Cause The condition identified above appears to be due to the District not monitoring expenditure adjustments to the program during the closing process that impacted the base expenditure totals that is used to apply the indirect cost rate to determine the allowable amount of indirect costs that are allowable to be charged to the program. In addition, the independent reviewer did not complete a thorough review of the final indirect cost calculations. Effect The District is out of compliance with allowable indirect cost charge requirements of the AmeriCorps program. Questioned Costs The known questioned cost related to this finding is $2,356. Context No sampling was used. The condition was identified through review of the general ledger and indirect cost recalculations for the AmeriCorps program. A total of $2,356 was over charged to the program. Repeat Finding No Recommendation In the 2024-2025 fiscal year, the District should transfer $2,356 from the General Fund unrestricted resource to the General Fund AmeriCorps program. In addition, the District should revamp its internal control procedures over indirect cost calculation to ensure that final amounts charged are not in excess of the approved rate. Corrective Action Plan and Views of Responsible Officials An oversight led to the indirect cost rate calculation error. To prevent future occurrences, a more thorough review process will be implemented to ensure alignment with funding source guidelines and verify totals before closing the ledgers. Additionally, greater diligence will be exercised in the final review of all indirect cost rates. As noted in the report, contributions will be made to the AmeriCorps resource in the 2024-2025 fiscal year to correct the 2023-2024 indirect cost rate calculation error.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Agency: Corporation of National and Community Service Pass-Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Program Name: AmeriCorps Federal Financial Assistance Listing: 94.006 Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed and Unallowed and Allowable Costs (Indirect Costs) Criteria or Specific Requirements The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to establish indirect cost rates for California’s local education agencies (LEAs). The CDE has been delegated authority to calculate and approve indirect cost rates annually for LEAs. For the programs allowed to charge indirect costs in fiscal year 2023-2024, Education Code Section 38101(c) limits LEA’s indirect costs to the lesser of the LEA’s individual CDE approved indirect cost rate, or the statewide average indirect cost rate. Per the CDE, the Indirect cost rate for the program should be 2.79%. In addition, the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.303 Internal Controls, requires that the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain documentation of effective internal controls over Federal awards that provide reasonable assurance that awards are being managed in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition During our audit, we found the District incorrectly overcharged $2,356 of indirect costs to AmeriCorps. The District likely made expenditure transfers after posting the initially calculated indirect cost charges and did not subsequently adjust the calculation and charges. Cause The condition identified above appears to be due to the District not monitoring expenditure adjustments to the program during the closing process that impacted the base expenditure totals that is used to apply the indirect cost rate to determine the allowable amount of indirect costs that are allowable to be charged to the program. In addition, the independent reviewer did not complete a thorough review of the final indirect cost calculations. Effect The District is out of compliance with allowable indirect cost charge requirements of the AmeriCorps program. Questioned Costs The known questioned cost related to this finding is $2,356. Context No sampling was used. The condition was identified through review of the general ledger and indirect cost recalculations for the AmeriCorps program. A total of $2,356 was over charged to the program. Repeat Finding No Recommendation In the 2024-2025 fiscal year, the District should transfer $2,356 from the General Fund unrestricted resource to the General Fund AmeriCorps program. In addition, the District should revamp its internal control procedures over indirect cost calculation to ensure that final amounts charged are not in excess of the approved rate. Corrective Action Plan and Views of Responsible Officials An oversight led to the indirect cost rate calculation error. To prevent future occurrences, a more thorough review process will be implemented to ensure alignment with funding source guidelines and verify totals before closing the ledgers. Additionally, greater diligence will be exercised in the final review of all indirect cost rates. As noted in the report, contributions will be made to the AmeriCorps resource in the 2024-2025 fiscal year to correct the 2023-2024 indirect cost rate calculation error.

Corrective Action Plan

An oversight led to the indirect cost rate calculation error. To prevent future occurrences, a more thorough review process will be implemented to ensure alignment with funding source guidelines and verify totals before closing the ledgers. Additionally, greater diligence will be exercised in the final review of all indirect cost rates. As noted in the report, contributions will be made to the AmeriCorps resource in the 2024-2025 fiscal year to correct the 2023-2024 indirect cost rate calculation error.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,182,016 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 18, 2024 — management decision was due July 18, 2024.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,249,260 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 26, 2024 — management decision was due September 26, 2024.

FY 2023-06-30

$2,754,143 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 7, 2024 — management decision was due September 7, 2024.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$93,754,823 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 26, 2024 — management decision was due September 26, 2024.

FY 2023-06-30

$64,276,768 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 1, 2024 — management decision was due October 1, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$80,226,122 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 23, 2023 — management decision was due July 23, 2023.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,098,564 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 26, 2023 — management decision was due July 26, 2023.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,416,520 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 5, 2023 — management decision was due August 5, 2023.

FY 2022-06-30

$1,334,105 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 6, 2023 — management decision was due August 6, 2023.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$65,771,212 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 4, 2023 — management decision was due December 4, 2023.

FY 2022-06-30

$2,550,699 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2023 — management decision was due September 30, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,367,043 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 28, 2022 — management decision was due August 28, 2022.

FY 2021-06-30

$1,350,382 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 23, 2022 — management decision was due August 23, 2022.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$77,364,103 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 6, 2022 — management decision was due August 6, 2022.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$42,849,971 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 23, 2022 — management decision was due November 23, 2022.

FY 2021-06-30

$1,232,692 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 19, 2022 — management decision was due November 19, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$67,336,509 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 18, 2021 — management decision was due September 18, 2021.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,533,860 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 11, 2021 — management decision was due August 11, 2021.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$23,580,445 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 28, 2021 — management decision was due October 28, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$65,640,581 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 13, 2020 — management decision was due July 13, 2020.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,410,637 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 22, 2020 — management decision was due July 22, 2020.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$24,455,812 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$21,968,909 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 18, 2018 — management decision was due June 18, 2019.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,278,501 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 21, 2019 — management decision was due July 21, 2019.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,015,151 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 2, 2019 — management decision was due July 2, 2019.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$63,492,546 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 4, 2019 — management decision was due August 4, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,146,274 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 24, 2018 — management decision was due July 24, 2018.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,169,530 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 25, 2017 — management decision was due June 25, 2018.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$21,840,634 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 18, 2017 — management decision was due June 18, 2018.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$61,364,672 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 12, 2018 — management decision was due July 12, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$58,473,210 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 20, 2017 — management decision was due August 20, 2017.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$22,306,035 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 19, 2016 — management decision was due June 19, 2017.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,023,752 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 20, 2016 — management decision was due June 20, 2017.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,132,666 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 8, 2017 — management decision was due July 8, 2017.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in California

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.