← Back to home

PROTEUS INCNon-Profit

EIN: 942184330

UEI: ZDN4L3C65UN5

Audited by: Price Paige & Company

Oversight agency: 17 [Department of Labor]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

PROTEUS INC10 audit years1 findings
10
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$11.1M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

$11,099,559 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on June 25, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by December 25, 2026 (112 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
2025-005
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

During the audit, we identified deficiencies in the Organization’s procedures for recording and allocating payroll expenses to federal grants. Specifically, payroll allocations recorded in the general ledger for certain employees did not agree to the employees’ supporting timesheets or documented time allocations. In several instances, payroll expenses charged to programs and funding sources differed from the actual time reflected on employee timesheets or supporting personnel activity records. Criteria: Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal controls over payroll processing and financial reporting. Payroll costs allocated to grants should be supported by accurate and contemporaneous timekeeping records and reconciled to amounts recorded in the general ledger. In addition, payroll allocations charged to federally funded programs should comply with applicable Uniform Guidance requirements related to allowability and documentation of personnel costs. Cause: The deficiencies appear to be the result of inadequate review and reconciliation procedures between payroll records, timekeeping documentation, and the general ledger. Additionally, formalized processes were not consistently in place to verify that payroll allocations accurately reflected employee time and effort. Effect: As a result of these deficiencies, there is an increased risk that payroll expenses may be improperly allocated among programs and grants, resulting in inaccurate financial reporting and noncompliance with grant requirements. Improper payroll allocations may also result in questioned costs, inaccurate grant reporting, and misstatements in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). Recommendation: We recommend the Organization strengthen its controls over payroll allocations and timekeeping procedures by requiring payroll allocations recorded in the general ledger to be supported by approved employee timesheets or personnel activity records, perform periodic reconciliations between payroll allocation reports, timesheets, and the general ledger, and establish supervisory review procedures to verify payroll expenses are allocated consistently with documented employee activity. Implementation of these procedures would improve the accuracy of payroll allocations, strengthen compliance with grant requirements, and enhance the reliability of financial reporting. Management’s Response: See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2025-005 – Single Audit Payroll Allocations (Significant Deficiency) Condition: During the audit, we identified deficiencies in the Organization’s procedures for recording and allocating payroll expenses to federal grants. Specifically, payroll allocations recorded in the general ledger for certain employees did not agree to the employees’ supporting timesheets or documented time allocations. In several instances, payroll expenses charged to programs and funding sources differed from the actual time reflected on employee timesheets or supporting personnel activity records. Criteria: Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal controls over payroll processing and financial reporting. Payroll costs allocated to grants should be supported by accurate and contemporaneous timekeeping records and reconciled to amounts recorded in the general ledger. In addition, payroll allocations charged to federally funded programs should comply with applicable Uniform Guidance requirements related to allowability and documentation of personnel costs. Cause: The deficiencies appear to be the result of inadequate review and reconciliation procedures between payroll records, timekeeping documentation, and the general ledger. Additionally, formalized processes were not consistently in place to verify that payroll allocations accurately reflected employee time and effort. Effect: As a result of these deficiencies, there is an increased risk that payroll expenses may be improperly allocated among programs and grants, resulting in inaccurate financial reporting and noncompliance with grant requirements. Improper payroll allocations may also result in questioned costs, inaccurate grant reporting, and misstatements in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). Recommendation: We recommend the Organization strengthen its controls over payroll allocations and timekeeping procedures by requiring payroll allocations recorded in the general ledger to be supported by approved employee timesheets or personnel activity records, perform periodic reconciliations between payroll allocation reports, timesheets, and the general ledger, and establish supervisory review procedures to verify payroll expenses are allocated consistently with documented employee activity. Implementation of these procedures would improve the accuracy of payroll allocations, strengthen compliance with grant requirements, and enhance the reliability of financial reporting. Management’s Response: See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Proteus, Inc will implement a reconcilliation process for reconciling our two payroll systems through an automated program reducing manually time involved and data entry errors. Transitioning to a new integrated accounting system will significantly reduce errors and eliminate manual processes. We will also provide additional staff training to assure the accountability over timekeeping.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$13,157,686 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 12, 2025 — management decision was due November 12, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$12,493,776 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 1, 2024 — management decision was due October 1, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$12,108,397 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 21, 2023 — management decision was due September 21, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$14,860,629 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 15, 2022 — management decision was due September 15, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$11,860,108 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 20, 2021 — management decision was due October 20, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$13,092,051 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 30, 2020 — management decision was due December 30, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$13,206,730 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 10, 2019 — management decision was due September 10, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$17,289,634 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 5, 2018 — management decision was due September 5, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$16,008,506 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 2, 2017 — management decision was due September 2, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in California

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.