EIN: 942184330
UEI: ZDN4L3C65UN5
Audited by: Price Paige & Company
Oversight agency: 17 [Department of Labor]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 2, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on June 25, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by December 25, 2026 (112 days from today).
What is a management decision? →During the audit, we identified deficiencies in the Organization’s procedures for recording and allocating payroll expenses to federal grants. Specifically, payroll allocations recorded in the general ledger for certain employees did not agree to the employees’ supporting timesheets or documented time allocations. In several instances, payroll expenses charged to programs and funding sources differed from the actual time reflected on employee timesheets or supporting personnel activity records. Criteria: Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal controls over payroll processing and financial reporting. Payroll costs allocated to grants should be supported by accurate and contemporaneous timekeeping records and reconciled to amounts recorded in the general ledger. In addition, payroll allocations charged to federally funded programs should comply with applicable Uniform Guidance requirements related to allowability and documentation of personnel costs. Cause: The deficiencies appear to be the result of inadequate review and reconciliation procedures between payroll records, timekeeping documentation, and the general ledger. Additionally, formalized processes were not consistently in place to verify that payroll allocations accurately reflected employee time and effort. Effect: As a result of these deficiencies, there is an increased risk that payroll expenses may be improperly allocated among programs and grants, resulting in inaccurate financial reporting and noncompliance with grant requirements. Improper payroll allocations may also result in questioned costs, inaccurate grant reporting, and misstatements in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). Recommendation: We recommend the Organization strengthen its controls over payroll allocations and timekeeping procedures by requiring payroll allocations recorded in the general ledger to be supported by approved employee timesheets or personnel activity records, perform periodic reconciliations between payroll allocation reports, timesheets, and the general ledger, and establish supervisory review procedures to verify payroll expenses are allocated consistently with documented employee activity. Implementation of these procedures would improve the accuracy of payroll allocations, strengthen compliance with grant requirements, and enhance the reliability of financial reporting. Management’s Response: See Corrective Action Plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2025-005 – Single Audit Payroll Allocations (Significant Deficiency) Condition: During the audit, we identified deficiencies in the Organization’s procedures for recording and allocating payroll expenses to federal grants. Specifically, payroll allocations recorded in the general ledger for certain employees did not agree to the employees’ supporting timesheets or documented time allocations. In several instances, payroll expenses charged to programs and funding sources differed from the actual time reflected on employee timesheets or supporting personnel activity records. Criteria: Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal controls over payroll processing and financial reporting. Payroll costs allocated to grants should be supported by accurate and contemporaneous timekeeping records and reconciled to amounts recorded in the general ledger. In addition, payroll allocations charged to federally funded programs should comply with applicable Uniform Guidance requirements related to allowability and documentation of personnel costs. Cause: The deficiencies appear to be the result of inadequate review and reconciliation procedures between payroll records, timekeeping documentation, and the general ledger. Additionally, formalized processes were not consistently in place to verify that payroll allocations accurately reflected employee time and effort. Effect: As a result of these deficiencies, there is an increased risk that payroll expenses may be improperly allocated among programs and grants, resulting in inaccurate financial reporting and noncompliance with grant requirements. Improper payroll allocations may also result in questioned costs, inaccurate grant reporting, and misstatements in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). Recommendation: We recommend the Organization strengthen its controls over payroll allocations and timekeeping procedures by requiring payroll allocations recorded in the general ledger to be supported by approved employee timesheets or personnel activity records, perform periodic reconciliations between payroll allocation reports, timesheets, and the general ledger, and establish supervisory review procedures to verify payroll expenses are allocated consistently with documented employee activity. Implementation of these procedures would improve the accuracy of payroll allocations, strengthen compliance with grant requirements, and enhance the reliability of financial reporting. Management’s Response: See Corrective Action Plan.
Proteus, Inc will implement a reconcilliation process for reconciling our two payroll systems through an automated program reducing manually time involved and data entry errors. Transitioning to a new integrated accounting system will significantly reduce errors and eliminate manual processes. We will also provide additional staff training to assure the accountability over timekeeping.
FAC accepted this audit on May 12, 2025 — management decision was due November 12, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on April 1, 2024 — management decision was due October 1, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on March 21, 2023 — management decision was due September 21, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on March 15, 2022 — management decision was due September 15, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on April 20, 2021 — management decision was due October 20, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on June 30, 2020 — management decision was due December 30, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on March 10, 2019 — management decision was due September 10, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on March 5, 2018 — management decision was due September 5, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on March 2, 2017 — management decision was due September 2, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in California →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.