← Back to home

CALIFORNIA HUMAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONNon-Profit

EIN: 941653023

UEI: FBN8DRRAEJS2

Audited by: WIPFLI LLP

Oversight agency: 17 [Department of Labor]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

CALIFORNIA HUMAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION10 audit years2 findings
10
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$9.6M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

$9,569,357 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on February 23, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 23, 2026 (8 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

$9,601,125 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 6, 2025 — management decision was due September 6, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

$9,645,527 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 28, 2024 — management decision was due August 28, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

$11,416,195 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 20, 2023 — management decision was due September 20, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$10,282,202 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on July 20, 2022 — management decision was due January 20, 2023.

2021-002
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

At times during the year, less than 1/3 of the members of the board of directors of California Human Development Corporation were representative of the low-income individuals and families served by the Organization. Criteria: The CSBG Act at 42 USC 9910(b), requires that public organizations administer CSBG through a Tri-Partite board. This board shall have members selected by the organization and shall be composed so as to assure that no less than one-third (1/3) of the members are representative of the individuals and families served by the organization. Cause: California Human Development Corporation had board vacancies during the year, causing it to not be in compliance with the tri-partite board requirement. Effect: Because of the above conditions, California Human Development Corporation was not in compliance with this compliance requirement and a significant deficiency in internal control over compliance exists. Recommendation: We recommend that California Human Development Corporation establish procedures to ensure the composition of the members of its board of directors meets this requirement. View of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the assessment and has committed to a corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2021-002 ? Tri-Partite Board Composition Department of Health and Human Services AL # 93.569 Community Services Block Grant Federal Grantor/Pass-Through Grantor Grant Number Grant Period California Department of Community Services 20F-3840 03/27/20-05/31/22 California Department of Community Services 21F-4458 06/01/21-05/31/22 California Department of Community Services 21F-4201 01/01/21-12/31/21 California Department of Community Services 20F-3201 01/01/20-05/31/21 Questioned Costs: None How were questioned costs computed: Not applicable Condition: At times during the year, less than 1/3 of the members of the board of directors of California Human Development Corporation were representative of the low-income individuals and families served by the Organization. Criteria: The CSBG Act at 42 USC 9910(b), requires that public organizations administer CSBG through a Tri-Partite board. This board shall have members selected by the organization and shall be composed so as to assure that no less than one-third (1/3) of the members are representative of the individuals and families served by the organization. Cause: California Human Development Corporation had board vacancies during the year, causing it to not be in compliance with the tri-partite board requirement. Effect: Because of the above conditions, California Human Development Corporation was not in compliance with this compliance requirement and a significant deficiency in internal control over compliance exists. Recommendation: We recommend that California Human Development Corporation establish procedures to ensure the composition of the members of its board of directors meets this requirement. View of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the assessment and has committed to a corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2021-002: Tri-Partite Board Composition Corrective Action: The Board's Governance and Membership Committee and CEO will maintain standing agenda item to monitor the board composition at the Committee meetings held approximately every two months. Person Responsible: Chief Executive Officer Timing for Implementation: Tri-Partite Board Composition was in compliance by April 2021 and has been maintained since that time by reviewing Board composition at every Governance and Membership Committee meeting and actively recruiting where needed to maintain the required composition.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$9,076,082 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 3, 2021 — management decision was due September 3, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

$8,927,447 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 3, 2020 — management decision was due September 3, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$9,103,156 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 29, 2019 — management decision was due July 29, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$9,299,138 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on July 26, 2018 — management decision was due January 26, 2019.

2017-001
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Reporting →

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$9,144,364 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 29, 2017 — management decision was due July 29, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in California

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.