EIN: 941582070
UEI: M8KWFZK4SMN1
Audited by: Richardson & Company, LLP
Oversight agency: 10 [Department of Agriculture]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 7, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on March 31, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by October 1, 2025 (342 days ago).
What is a management decision? →The schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) was not complete, and expenditures reported on the SEFA were revised during the single audit. Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F (Uniform Guidance) Section 200.502 states, “The auditee should prepare a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements.” Internal controls over the SEFA should be in place ensure accrual basis expenses incurred under the federal program are properly reported as expenses on the SEFA and are properly reported as revenue in the financial statements prior to the start of the single audit. Cause: SEFA was not fully reconciled and finalized until after the single audit began. Effect: The expenses included on the SEFA for program 97.036, Disaster Grants-Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters), program FEMA-4683-DR-CA, were revised during the single audit and questioned costs in the amount of $131,195 were identified, which could have resulted in the auditor not selecting the correct major program or expenses for testing and could have resulted in the single audit not satisfying the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Context: The District provided cost estimates to the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (CalOES) for the amount of flood damage expenses incurred for FEMA Project 725590 and 710830 that were used by CalOES to reimburse the District. The District did not adequately reconcile the expenses incurred at year-end to expense reports available in the accounting system and did not revise the expense estimates provided to CalOES to the actual amounts incurred during the year, resulting in CalOES overpaying the District and the District using the estimated costs on the SEFA for the single audit. Recommendation: We recommend additional review procedures be implemented to ensure the SEFA is complete and accurate when the single audit begins, which includes reconciling all expenses incurred under each federal award down to the invoice, payroll check and lowest level of other costs claimed, cutting-off each expense at year-end and claiming the reconciled qualifying expenses within 45 days after each quarter end. At year-end, programs should be reviewed for cost adjustments, extensions, and other changes that should be reflected on the SEFA when reconciling expenses for the SEFA. Separate program codes should be used for each grant on the SEFA that summarizes expenses down to the individual invoice level that should be provided to the auditor for the single audit. If overclaimed amounts are identified, the grantor and/or pass-though agency should be contacted to determine whether to return the funds or apply the overclaimed amounts to future claims. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management’s response and planned corrective action is included in the Corrective Action Plan included at the end of the report.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2024-002 – Significant Deficiency Award No.: 97.039 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Passed-through California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services Compliance Requirement: Other compliance requirements. Condition: The schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) was not complete, and expenditures reported on the SEFA were revised during the single audit. Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F (Uniform Guidance) Section 200.502 states, “The auditee should prepare a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements.” Internal controls over the SEFA should be in place ensure accrual basis expenses incurred under the federal program are properly reported as expenses on the SEFA and are properly reported as revenue in the financial statements prior to the start of the single audit. Cause: SEFA was not fully reconciled and finalized until after the single audit began. Effect: The expenses included on the SEFA for program 97.036, Disaster Grants-Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters), program FEMA-4683-DR-CA, were revised during the single audit and questioned costs in the amount of $131,195 were identified, which could have resulted in the auditor not selecting the correct major program or expenses for testing and could have resulted in the single audit not satisfying the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Context: The District provided cost estimates to the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (CalOES) for the amount of flood damage expenses incurred for FEMA Project 725590 and 710830 that were used by CalOES to reimburse the District. The District did not adequately reconcile the expenses incurred at year-end to expense reports available in the accounting system and did not revise the expense estimates provided to CalOES to the actual amounts incurred during the year, resulting in CalOES overpaying the District and the District using the estimated costs on the SEFA for the single audit. Recommendation: We recommend additional review procedures be implemented to ensure the SEFA is complete and accurate when the single audit begins, which includes reconciling all expenses incurred under each federal award down to the invoice, payroll check and lowest level of other costs claimed, cutting-off each expense at year-end and claiming the reconciled qualifying expenses within 45 days after each quarter end. At year-end, programs should be reviewed for cost adjustments, extensions, and other changes that should be reflected on the SEFA when reconciling expenses for the SEFA. Separate program codes should be used for each grant on the SEFA that summarizes expenses down to the individual invoice level that should be provided to the auditor for the single audit. If overclaimed amounts are identified, the grantor and/or pass-though agency should be contacted to determine whether to return the funds or apply the overclaimed amounts to future claims. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management’s response and planned corrective action is included in the Corrective Action Plan included at the end of the report.
Finding 2024-002 – Significant Deficiency Award No.: 97.036, Disaster Grants-Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Passed-through California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services, FEMA-4683-DR-CA Compliance Requirement: Other compliance requirements. Condition: The schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) was not complete, and expenditures reported on the SEFA were revised during the single audit. Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F (Uniform Guidance) Section 200.502 states, “The auditee should prepare a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements.” Internal controls over the SEFA should be in place ensure accrual basis expenses incurred under the federal program are properly reported as expenses on the SEFA and are properly reported as revenue in the financial statements prior to the start of the single audit. Cause: SEFA was not fully reconciled and finalized until after the single audit began. Effect: The expenses included on the SEFA for program 97.036, Disaster Grants-Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters), program FEMA-4683-DR-CA, were revised during the single audit and questioned costs in the amount of $131,195 were identified, which could have resulted in the auditor not selecting the correct major program or expenses for testing and could have resulted in the single audit not satisfying the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Context: The District provided cost estimates to the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (CalOES) for the amount of flood damage expenses incurred for FEMA Project 725590 and 710830 that were used by CalOES to reimburse the District. The District did not adequately reconcile the expenses incurred at year-end to expense reports available in the accounting system and did not revise the expense estimates provided to CalOES to the actual amounts incurred during the year, resulting in CalOES overpaying the District and the District using the estimated costs on the SEFA for the single audit. Recommendation: We recommend additional review procedures be implemented to ensure the SEFA is complete and accurate when the single audit begins, which includes reconciling all expenses incurred under each federal award down to the invoice, payroll check and lowest level of other costs claimed, cutting-off each expense at year-end and claiming the reconciled qualifying expenses within 45 days after each quarter end. At year-end, programs should be reviewed for cost adjustments, extensions, and other changes that should be reflected on the SEFA when reconciling expenses for the SEFA. Separate program codes should be used for each grant on the SEFA that summarizes expenses down to the individual invoice level that should be provided to the auditor for the single audit. If overclaimed amounts are identified, the grantor and/or pass-though agency should be contacted to determine whether to return the funds or apply the overclaimed amounts to future claims. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The District will implement a formal reconciliation process to ensure all expenditures incurred under each federal award are accurately recorded before the start of the single audit. A quarterly reconciliation process will be conducted after each quarter-end to review and adjust expenses as necessary. The District will contact FEMA to determine whether the questioned costs may be applied to a future claim or whether the amount needs to be returned to FEMA. Estimated Completion Date of Corrective Action: October 1, 2025
FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2024 — management decision was due September 27, 2024.
The District did not provide project closeout materials to the pass-through agency within 90 days of the end of the period of performance so the pass-through agency could prepare the closeout reporting within 120 days of the end of the period of performance. Criteria: The Notice of Funding Opportunity indicates: “In addition, pass-through entities are responsible for closing out their subawards as described in 2 C.F.R. § 200.344; subrecipients are still required to submit closeout materials within 90 calendar days of the period of performance end date. When a subrecipient completes all closeout requirements, pass-through entities must promptly complete all closeout actions for subawards in time for the recipient to submit all necessary documentation and information to FEMA during the closeout of the prime award.” Cause: The District’s staff were waiting for a requested extension for the period of performance from the pass-through agency and assumed the closeout reporting would not be necessary. Effect: The District is not in compliance with the terms and conditions of the federal award. Recommendation: We understand the District provided the information to the pass-through agency necessary to complete the closeout reporting on November 30, 2023. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management’s response and planned corrective action is included in the Corrective Action Plan included at the end of the report.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2023-002 – Significant Deficiency Assistance List Number: 97.039 – Hazzard Mitigation Grant Pass-through Agency: California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services, FEMA-4344-DR-CA. Compliance Requirement: Reporting. Condition: The District did not provide project closeout materials to the pass-through agency within 90 days of the end of the period of performance so the pass-through agency could prepare the closeout reporting within 120 days of the end of the period of performance. Criteria: The Notice of Funding Opportunity indicates: “In addition, pass-through entities are responsible for closing out their subawards as described in 2 C.F.R. § 200.344; subrecipients are still required to submit closeout materials within 90 calendar days of the period of performance end date. When a subrecipient completes all closeout requirements, pass-through entities must promptly complete all closeout actions for subawards in time for the recipient to submit all necessary documentation and information to FEMA during the closeout of the prime award.” Cause: The District’s staff were waiting for a requested extension for the period of performance from the pass-through agency and assumed the closeout reporting would not be necessary. Effect: The District is not in compliance with the terms and conditions of the federal award. Recommendation: We understand the District provided the information to the pass-through agency necessary to complete the closeout reporting on November 30, 2023. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management’s response and planned corrective action is included in the Corrective Action Plan included at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-002 – Significant Deficiency Assistance List Number: 97.039 – Hazzard Mitigation Grant Pass-through Agency: California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services, FEMA-4344-DR-CA. Compliance Requirement: Reporting. Condition: The District did not provide project closeout materials to the pass-through agency within 90 days of the end of the period of performance so the pass-through agency could prepare the closeout reporting within 120 days of the end of the period of performance. Criteria: The Notice of Funding Opportunity indicates: “In addition, pass-through entities are responsible for closing out their subawards as described in 2 C.F.R. § 200.344; subrecipients are still required to submit closeout materials within 90 calendar days of the period of performance end date. When a subrecipient completes all closeout requirements, pass-through entities must promptly complete all closeout actions for subawards in time for the recipient to submit all necessary documentation and information to FEMA during the closeout of the prime award.” Cause: The District’s staff were waiting for a requested extension for the period of performance from the pass-through agency and assumed the closeout reporting would not be necessary. Effect: The District is not in compliance with the terms and conditions of the federal award. Recommendation: We understand the District provided the information necessary to complete the closeout reporting to the pass-through agency on November 30, 2023. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: As indicated in the recommendation, the District provided the information necessary to complete the closeout reporting to the pass-through agency on November 30, 2023. Furthermore, on March 22, 2024, the District heard from the pass-through agency that FEMA received the requested extension, and it is in the queue for final approval and signature. The corrective action has been completed.
FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2023 — management decision was due September 27, 2023.
Seventeen closing entries and audit adjustments were posted during the audit to report the District?s financial statements in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Criteria: Internal controls over financial reporting should exist to ensure the financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP and limit the opportunity for errors and fraud occurring. Cause: The District?s staff did not have enough time to fully close the District?s books before the start of the audit, due to delays caused by the system conversion and staff turnover. Effect: The adjustments and closing entries posted during the audit increased the likelihood of an error being made in the District?s financial statements. Recommendation: We recommend that management ensure all balance sheet accounts are reviewed for proper cut-off and income statement accounts are reviewed for proper classification during the closing process, focusing on accounts affected by audit adjustments provided to the Finance Department. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management?s response and planned corrective action is included in the Corrective Action Plan included at the end of the report.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Condition: Seventeen closing entries and audit adjustments were posted during the audit to report the District?s financial statements in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Criteria: Internal controls over financial reporting should exist to ensure the financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP and limit the opportunity for errors and fraud occurring. Cause: The District?s staff did not have enough time to fully close the District?s books before the start of the audit, due to delays caused by the system conversion and staff turnover. Effect: The adjustments and closing entries posted during the audit increased the likelihood of an error being made in the District?s financial statements. Recommendation: We recommend that management ensure all balance sheet accounts are reviewed for proper cut-off and income statement accounts are reviewed for proper classification during the closing process, focusing on accounts affected by audit adjustments provided to the Finance Department. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management?s response and planned corrective action is included in the Corrective Action Plan included at the end of the report.
The Calaveras County Water District respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the Year Ended June 30, 2022. The findings from the June 30, 2022, schedule of findings and questioned costs for the Major Federal Program Award are discussed below. The findings are numbered consistently with the numbers assigned in the schedule. FINDINGS ? MAJOR FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAM Finding 2022-001: Significant Deficiency ? Seventeen closing entries and audit adjustments were posted to report the District?s financial statements in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Management agrees that the closing process during the audit period required numerous closing entries and audit adjustments. Although seventeen entries were posted, this is a significantly decrease from the forty entries in FY 2020-21. District staff has been in transition and was not able complete the review and ensure all entries were correct prior to the start of the audit. The District will continue to evaluate the fiscal year-end closing calendar and procedures to allow sufficient time to reconcile and post all required transactions prior to the start of the audit. Status of Prior Year Findings Finding 2021-001: Significant Deficiency ? Forty closing entries and audit adjustments were posted during the audit to report the District?s financial statements in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Current Status: Seventeen adjustments were posted as part of the audit. See finding 2022-001 which is a continuation of this finding. Finding 2021-002: Significant Deficiency ? Reporting CFDA 97.039, US Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Hazard Mitigation Grant. Current Status: Corrected. The District prepared the Schedule of Expenditures and Federal awards consistent with revenue recognized for each federal program.
2021-001
FAC accepted this audit on October 17, 2022 — management decision was due April 17, 2023.
Forty closing entries and audit adjustments were posted during the audit to report the District?s financial statements in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Criteria: Internal controls over financial reporting should exist to ensure the financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP and limit the opportunity for errors and fraud occurring. Cause: The District?s staff did not have enough time to fully close the District?s books before the start of the audit. Effect: The adjustments and closing entries posted during the audit increased the likelihood of an error being made in the District?s financial statements. Recommendation: We recommend that management ensure all balance sheet accounts are reviewed for proper cut-off and income statement accounts are reviewed for proper classification during the closing process, focusing on accounts affected by audit adjustments provided to the Finance Department. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management?s response and planned corrective action is included in the Corrective Action Plan included at the end of the report. COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS See Finding 2021-002 described under the CURRENT YEAR FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS ? MAJOR FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAM section below.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴CURRENT YEAR FINDINGS ? FINANCIAL STATEMENT AUDIT INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING Finding 2021-001 ? Significant Deficiency Condition: Forty closing entries and audit adjustments were posted during the audit to report the District?s financial statements in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Criteria: Internal controls over financial reporting should exist to ensure the financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP and limit the opportunity for errors and fraud occurring. Cause: The District?s staff did not have enough time to fully close the District?s books before the start of the audit. Effect: The adjustments and closing entries posted during the audit increased the likelihood of an error being made in the District?s financial statements. Recommendation: We recommend that management ensure all balance sheet accounts are reviewed for proper cut-off and income statement accounts are reviewed for proper classification during the closing process, focusing on accounts affected by audit adjustments provided to the Finance Department. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management?s response and planned corrective action is included in the Corrective Action Plan included at the end of the report. COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS See Finding 2021-002 described under the CURRENT YEAR FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS ? MAJOR FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAM section below.
Finding 2021-001: Significant Deficiency ? Forty closing entries and audit adjustments were posted during the audit to report the District?s financial statements in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Management agrees that the closing process during the audit period required a number of closing entries. District staff required additional time to ensure all entries were complete and management review to ensure all entries were correct prior to the start of the audit. However, this was not possible, and the audit began with incomplete final expenses. The District will evaluate the current fiscal year-end closing calendar and procedures to ensure sufficient time is given to reconcile and post all required transactions prior to the start of the audit, and that final expenses are consistently reported on the SEFA and audited financial statements. Jeffrey L. Meyer Director of Administrative Services
The final balance of grant expenses reported on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) was not consistent with revenue recognized for each federal program and was not finalized until after the single audit began. Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F (Uniform Guidance) Section 200.502 states, ?The auditee should prepare a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the period covered by the auditee?s financial statements.? Closing procedures should be in place to reconcile grant expenses incurred at year-end, confirm the amount with the grantor, claim the grant revenues on a timely basis and reconcile the claim to the general ledger to ensure the expenses that will be claimed under federal awards are properly reported on the SEFA and audited financial statements prior to the start of the single audit. Cause: It did not appear that the District?s staff had adequate time to reconcile the expenditures reported on the SEFA with claims prior to the start of the audit. Effect: A number of adjustments were needed to properly report expenses in the District?s SEFA. If expenses are not properly reported on the SEFA prior to the start of the single audit, the auditor could select the wrong program to test as a major program, which would result in the District?s single audit not complying with audit standards. Recommendation: We recommend the District add additional review procedures over the SEFA, which may include providing the SEFA to program managers to review for propriety based on their program knowledge prior to the start of the financial statement audit and single audit. The District should continue to ask vendors to use a June 30 cut-off date for the last invoice of the fiscal year and program managers should cut-off claims at June 30 rather than including dates that span two fiscal years to make the reconciliation process easier. The project report from the general ledger should be used to prepare claims and the SEFA since the general ledger would reflect accrual basis expenses. When adding grants to the SEFA, the grant or application that indicates the assistance list number and GL detail that supports the expenditures added to the SEFA should be retained and provided with the SEFA. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management?s response and planned corrective action is included at the end of this report.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴INTERNAL CONTROL OVER COMPLIANCE Finding 2021-002 - Significant Deficiency CFDA: 97.039 Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) Passed-through: California Governor?s Office of Emergency Services Award No.: FEMA-4344-DR-CA, Project #PJ0119, FIPS#009-91002 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Condition: The final balance of grant expenses reported on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) was not consistent with revenue recognized for each federal program and was not finalized until after the single audit began. Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F (Uniform Guidance) Section 200.502 states, ?The auditee should prepare a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the period covered by the auditee?s financial statements.? Closing procedures should be in place to reconcile grant expenses incurred at year-end, confirm the amount with the grantor, claim the grant revenues on a timely basis and reconcile the claim to the general ledger to ensure the expenses that will be claimed under federal awards are properly reported on the SEFA and audited financial statements prior to the start of the single audit. Cause: It did not appear that the District?s staff had adequate time to reconcile the expenditures reported on the SEFA with claims prior to the start of the audit. Effect: A number of adjustments were needed to properly report expenses in the District?s SEFA. If expenses are not properly reported on the SEFA prior to the start of the single audit, the auditor could select the wrong program to test as a major program, which would result in the District?s single audit not complying with audit standards. Recommendation: We recommend the District add additional review procedures over the SEFA, which may include providing the SEFA to program managers to review for propriety based on their program knowledge prior to the start of the financial statement audit and single audit. The District should continue to ask vendors to use a June 30 cut-off date for the last invoice of the fiscal year and program managers should cut-off claims at June 30 rather than including dates that span two fiscal years to make the reconciliation process easier. The project report from the general ledger should be used to prepare claims and the SEFA since the general ledger would reflect accrual basis expenses. When adding grants to the SEFA, the grant or application that indicates the assistance list number and GL detail that supports the expenditures added to the SEFA should be retained and provided with the SEFA. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management?s response and planned corrective action is included at the end of this report.
Finding 2021-002: Significant Deficiency ? Reporting CFDA 97.039, US Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Hazard Mitigation Grant. Management agrees that internal controls over the closing process should be in place to ensure that the District has the ability to reconcile grant expenditures on a timely basis so that expenses claimed under federal awards are properly reported on the SEFA and audited financial statements. Management will evaluate the current fiscal year-end closing calendar and procedures to ensure that sufficient time is given to reconcile and post all required transactions, and that final expenses are consistently reported on the SEFA and audited financial statements. Program managers will be required to submit claims using a year-end cut-off date, which will allow Finance to use accrual basis expenses consistent with the balance sheet date and basis of accounting used in the audited financial statements. Jeffrey L. Meyer Director of Administrative Services
FAC accepted this audit on March 25, 2020 — management decision was due September 25, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on March 26, 2019 — management decision was due September 26, 2019.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2017-001
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2017-002
FAC accepted this audit on June 28, 2018 — management decision was due December 28, 2018.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in California →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.