← Back to home

GREATER ALBANY PUBLIC SCHOOLSLocal Government

EIN: 936002755

UEI: PB98G9K37A65

Audited by: ACCUITY, LLC

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

GREATER ALBANY PUBLIC SCHOOLS10 audit years4 findings1 repeat
10
Audit Years
4
Total Findings
1
Repeat Findings
$10.4M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

$10,353,062 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on February 17, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 17, 2026 (20 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

$13,309,645 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 7, 2025 — management decision was due November 7, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

$18,363,814 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 23, 2024 — management decision was due January 23, 2025.

FY 2022-06-30

$17,406,219 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 20, 2024 — management decision was due August 20, 2024.

FY 2021-06-30

QUALIFIED OPINIONMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$9,292,156 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 20, 2022 — management decision was due September 20, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

QUALIFIED OPINIONMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$7,522,984 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on May 25, 2021 — management decision was due November 25, 2021.

2020-002
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Personnel charged to the program are reviewed periodically and retrospectively to ensure only program related personnel are charged. As part of this review process, payroll transactions for certain personnel were transferred out of the program and to another fund; however, not all of the related benefit expenditures were transferred, resulting in unallowable costs being charged to the program. Context: We noted three individuals whose payroll related benefit charges were erroneously left in the program after transferring the payroll transactions out of the program. Although funds were paid out of the Special Education Cluster for unapproved transactions, the amount was trivial to the program and were subsequently transferred out of the program. Effect: Benefits were being paid out of the Special Education program for personnel not related to the program. Cause: The payroll adjustment utility in the District?s accounting software did not include all related charges when transferring payroll transactions to another fund. The review process involved a review of the payroll distribution reports, which include original allocations of payroll charges, rather than reviewing GL detail of all remaining charges in the program.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: Only allowable costs may be charged to the Special Education Cluster. Condition: Personnel charged to the program are reviewed periodically and retrospectively to ensure only program related personnel are charged. As part of this review process, payroll transactions for certain personnel were transferred out of the program and to another fund; however, not all of the related benefit expenditures were transferred, resulting in unallowable costs being charged to the program. Context: We noted three individuals whose payroll related benefit charges were erroneously left in the program after transferring the payroll transactions out of the program. Although funds were paid out of the Special Education Cluster for unapproved transactions, the amount was trivial to the program and were subsequently transferred out of the program. Effect: Benefits were being paid out of the Special Education program for personnel not related to the program. Cause: The payroll adjustment utility in the District?s accounting software did not include all related charges when transferring payroll transactions to another fund. The review process involved a review of the payroll distribution reports, which include original allocations of payroll charges, rather than reviewing GL detail of all remaining charges in the program.

Corrective Action Plan

Recommendation: We recommend review of the program general ledger detail periodically to identify any residual charges left behind after transferring out unrelated personnel to ensure any errors are identified and corrected in a timely manner. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The District will begin performing a manual review of the grant program?s general ledger detail to ensure all residual charges are identified and corrected in a timely manner. They will also contact the developer of their accounting software to identify the cause of the payroll adjustment utility failure.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2019-06-30

QUALIFIED OPINIONMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$8,045,265 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 16, 2020 — management decision was due May 16, 2021.

2019-001
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONREPEAT OF 2018-001

With the implementation of GASB 73 and 75, actuarial valuations of other post-employment benefits (OPEB) need to be made. Context: The effect of these potential OPEB liabilities on the Statement of Net Position is unknown. Effect: The District's Net Position may be understated or overstated. Cause: Management has not obtained an actuarial valuation of the post-employment benefit obligation related to either stipends or implicit healthcare subsidy in accordance with GASB 73 and 75. Recommendation: We recommend the District contact a 3rd party actuary to obtain an actuarial valuations of the District's OPEB Liabilities in accordance with GASB 73 and 75.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING 2019-001- Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting-Repeat Finding from 2018 Criteria: Financial Statements should be presented in conformance with GAAP to allow the auditor to render an unmodified opinion. Condition: With the implementation of GASB 73 and 75, actuarial valuations of other post-employment benefits (OPEB) need to be made. Context: The effect of these potential OPEB liabilities on the Statement of Net Position is unknown. Effect: The District's Net Position may be understated or overstated. Cause: Management has not obtained an actuarial valuation of the post-employment benefit obligation related to either stipends or implicit healthcare subsidy in accordance with GASB 73 and 75. Recommendation: We recommend the District contact a 3rd party actuary to obtain an actuarial valuations of the District's OPEB Liabilities in accordance with GASB 73 and 75.

Corrective Action Plan

Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The District will consider obtaining an actuarial valuation from an actuarial firm in accordance with GASB 73 and 75 for future fiscal years.

Prior Finding References

2018-001

About Reporting →
2019-002
Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTS

Payroll charges were allocated equitable between federal/nonfederal programs. Context: Although funds were paid out of the Title 1 fund, the amount was well below the materiality total. Effect: Benefits were being paid out of the Title 1 fund even though the person they were tied to was moved to the General fund. This continued on throughout the fiscal year. Cause: When an employee was transferred to a position outside of Title 1, one of her benefits was not transferred with her. It continued to be paid out of the Title l program. Recommendation: Review the payroll records consistently to ensure any errors are caught and corrected.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING 2019-002- Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Title 1 requirements Criteria: Time and Effort Requirements Condition: Payroll charges were allocated equitable between federal/nonfederal programs. Context: Although funds were paid out of the Title 1 fund, the amount was well below the materiality total. Effect: Benefits were being paid out of the Title 1 fund even though the person they were tied to was moved to the General fund. This continued on throughout the fiscal year. Cause: When an employee was transferred to a position outside of Title 1, one of her benefits was not transferred with her. It continued to be paid out of the Title l program. Recommendation: Review the payroll records consistently to ensure any errors are caught and corrected.

Corrective Action Plan

Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Because of this mistake, the District is putting a plan in place to do a manual review of the grant funded payroll employees every quarter. The fund coordinators will review the pay distribution report for accuracy.

About Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking →
2019-003
Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTS

Is there time documentation that conforms to OMB-87 Context: The certification was done, but the paperwork was lost or filled out incorrectly. Effect: Time certification can't be verified for these employees Cause: One employee's certifications were lost during construction work. The other employee did not have a certificate on file for the first period, but had two for the second certification period. Recommendation: Review the attendance list against the qualifying employees to ensure everyone signed off. Scan the certification sheets into the computer to avoid loss of the originals.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING 2019-003- Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Title 1 requirements Criteria: Time and Effort Requirements Condition: Is there time documentation that conforms to OMB-87 Context: The certification was done, but the paperwork was lost or filled out incorrectly. Effect: Time certification can't be verified for these employees Cause: One employee's certifications were lost during construction work. The other employee did not have a certificate on file for the first period, but had two for the second certification period. Recommendation: Review the attendance list against the qualifying employees to ensure everyone signed off. Scan the certification sheets into the computer to avoid loss of the originals.

Corrective Action Plan

Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Copies of the Time and Effort Certifications will be uploaded to the District Share Drive so they can be reviewed for accuracy by the appropriate Administrators who have access to the file.

About Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking →

FY 2018-06-30

QUALIFIED OPINIONMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSEDLOW-RISK AUDITEE$8,176,017 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 21, 2019 — management decision was due July 21, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$7,507,519 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 7, 2018 — management decision was due August 7, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$8,137,331 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 18, 2017 — management decision was due July 18, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Oregon

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.