← Back to home

BENTON COUNTYLocal Government

EIN: 936002285

UEI: CJRHV3RXNES1

Audited by: SingerLewak LLP

Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 31, 2026

BENTON COUNTY10 audit years5 findings1 repeat
10
Audit Years
5
Total Findings
1
Repeat Findings
$9.6M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

$9,585,429 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on May 22, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by November 22, 2026 (82 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
2025-001
Reporting
MODIFIED OPINION

The semi-annual progress report and annual SF-425 financial report were not submitted timely. Cause: The semi-annual progress report and annual SF-425 financial report were not submitted within the 30-day and 90-day timeframe, respectively, as required by the Congressional Directives Grant Program Effect or Potential Effect: Late submissions resulted in non-compliance with reporting requirements. Context: There was turnover in the County’s grant administration staff and the information required to access the PMS system was not documented. This resulted in a delay in the County’s ability to access the system to submit the reports. Recommendation: We recommend that the County implement procedures to ensure compliance with filing requirements. Views of Management: Management concurs with the finding. During the fiscal year, staffing transitions and delays in obtaining access to required federal reporting systems contributed to late submission of required reports. In addition, shared responsibilities between program and finance staff resulted in coordination challenges related to grant reporting requirements. The County recognizes the importance of timely grant reporting and is committed to improving internal coordination, documentation, and oversight processes to support compliance with federal reporting requirements. For this finding, while the report was indeed filed late, the County was always aware of the due date but was unable to gain access to the system to complete the report. The inability to access the system was the reason for non-reporting, and the Grantor was made aware the County could not file report until access was gained.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Late Submissions for Financial Reporting Criteria: Per program grant agreement, the recipient must submit annual financial reports no later than 90 calendar days after the reporting period, and semi-annual reports no later than 30 days after the reporting period. Condition: The semi-annual progress report and annual SF-425 financial report were not submitted timely. Cause: The semi-annual progress report and annual SF-425 financial report were not submitted within the 30-day and 90-day timeframe, respectively, as required by the Congressional Directives Grant Program Effect or Potential Effect: Late submissions resulted in non-compliance with reporting requirements. Context: There was turnover in the County’s grant administration staff and the information required to access the PMS system was not documented. This resulted in a delay in the County’s ability to access the system to submit the reports. Recommendation: We recommend that the County implement procedures to ensure compliance with filing requirements. Views of Management: Management concurs with the finding. During the fiscal year, staffing transitions and delays in obtaining access to required federal reporting systems contributed to late submission of required reports. In addition, shared responsibilities between program and finance staff resulted in coordination challenges related to grant reporting requirements. The County recognizes the importance of timely grant reporting and is committed to improving internal coordination, documentation, and oversight processes to support compliance with federal reporting requirements. For this finding, while the report was indeed filed late, the County was always aware of the due date but was unable to gain access to the system to complete the report. The inability to access the system was the reason for non-reporting, and the Grantor was made aware the County could not file report until access was gained.

Corrective Action Plan

BENTON COUNTY MANAGEMENT RESPONSE AND CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN Finding 2025-001 – Late Submissions for Financial Reporting Federal Program: Congressional Directives Grant Program Fiscal Year End: June 30, 2025 Finding Reference: 2025-001 Management Response Management concurs with the finding. During the fiscal year, staffing transitions and delays in obtaining access to required federal reporting systems contributed to late submission of required reports. In addition, shared responsibilities between program and finance staff resulted in coordination challenges related to grant reporting requirements. The County recognizes the importance of timely grant reporting and is committed to improving internal coordination, documentation, and oversight processes to support compliance with federal reporting requirements. For this finding, while the report was indeed filed late, the County was always aware of the due date but was unable to gain access to the system to complete the report. The inability to access the system was the reason for non-reporting, and the Grantor was made aware the County could not file report until access was gained. Corrective Action Plan Benton County will enhance internal processes and coordination efforts between program staff and the Finance Department to support timely completion and submission of required federal reports. Management will continue strengthening procedures related to grant administration, reporting timelines, and continuity of operations to improve overall compliance with reporting requirements. The County will also continue efforts to improve communication, documentation, and oversight associated with grant reporting responsibilities to reduce the risk of late future submissions. Anticipated Completion Date June 30, 2026

About Reporting →

FY 2024-06-30

$7,074,501 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 18, 2025 — management decision was due September 18, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$17,160,970 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 14, 2024 — management decision was due August 14, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$10,336,276 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 17, 2023 — management decision was due February 17, 2024.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$10,615,428 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 25, 2022 — management decision was due March 25, 2023.

2021-001
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

The County did not submit the report within the required reporting period. Cause: The report was submitted late because of miscommunication in timing of information to be provided by contractor for reporting. Effect or Potential Effect: The County was not in compliance with the grant reporting requirements. Context: While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the final report was submitted February 16, 2021, which was after the due date for required reporting. Recommendation: We recommend the County implement procedures to ensure required reports are submitted timely. Views of Responsible Officials: The County agrees with the finding and will develop a corrective action plan

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2021-001 21.019 Coronavirus Relief Fund Department of Treasury Passed through Oregon Business Development Department (OBDD) Criteria: The County's grant Agreement with OBDD had stated reporting requirement that the final report be submitted by January 31, 2021. Condition: The County did not submit the report within the required reporting period. Cause: The report was submitted late because of miscommunication in timing of information to be provided by contractor for reporting. Effect or Potential Effect: The County was not in compliance with the grant reporting requirements. Context: While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the final report was submitted February 16, 2021, which was after the due date for required reporting. Recommendation: We recommend the County implement procedures to ensure required reports are submitted timely. Views of Responsible Officials: The County agrees with the finding and will develop a corrective action plan

Corrective Action Plan

Benton County agrees with Finding 2021-001 outlined in the FY 2021 Federal Compliance Report related to the Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF). As identified in your finding, the county failed to meet the reporting deadline of January 31, 2021, outlined in the CRF Grant Agreement with the Oregon Business Development Department (OBDD). The County did correspond with OBDD regarding this missed deadline and submitted the required report on February 16, 2021. Benton County recognizes the importance of complying with state and federal grant requirements. In February 2022, the Financial Services Department received approval from the Board of Commissioners to establish a Grant Manager position to better support grant management throughout the county. This position has been filled and the new staff will begin on October 3, 2022. In response to this finding, the Grant Manager will begin creating an improved system of internal controls that implement procedures and processes that ensure all county departments are meeting reporting deadlines associated with the grants in which they administer. This will be one part of a collective set of actions to help improve internal controls around grant management. These actions will be implemented no later than June 30, 2023.

About Reporting →

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$9,356,195 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 25, 2021 — management decision was due July 25, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,101,759 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 20, 2020 — management decision was due July 20, 2020.

2019-001
Cash Management
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

The County did not properly design or implement internal controls over Cash Management. Cause: One individual within the County developed a methodology for making drawdowns on the grant and made the drawdowns, but internal controls were not present to ensure the draw calculations and methodology were in accordance with the grant document. Effect: The County could have drawn on the grant using a methodology not in accordance with the grant agreement. Questioned costs: None Recommendations: The County should develop internal controls including review and approval over draw requests. Views of responsible officials: The County was short staffed in the business section of the Health Clinics during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2019. This resulted in one person requesting the draw downs without review. The business section is back at full staffing levels and this should not re-occur. The County is also revising its grant management policies and procedures.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Cash Management Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200.303 establishes internal control requirements over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with Federal statutes. Condition: The County did not properly design or implement internal controls over Cash Management. Cause: One individual within the County developed a methodology for making drawdowns on the grant and made the drawdowns, but internal controls were not present to ensure the draw calculations and methodology were in accordance with the grant document. Effect: The County could have drawn on the grant using a methodology not in accordance with the grant agreement. Questioned costs: None Recommendations: The County should develop internal controls including review and approval over draw requests. Views of responsible officials: The County was short staffed in the business section of the Health Clinics during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2019. This resulted in one person requesting the draw downs without review. The business section is back at full staffing levels and this should not re-occur. The County is also revising its grant management policies and procedures.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action Plan: Finding 2019-001 The County did not properly design or implement internal controls over Cash Management The County was short staffed in the business section of the Health Clinics during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2019. This resulted in one person requesting the draw downs without review. The business section is back to full staffing levels and this should not re-occur. The County is also revising its grant management policies and procedures. Mary Otley, the Chief Financial Officer, is ultimately responsible for the corrective action. The Health Clinics resumed reviewing draw down requests and the grant management policies and procedures are drafted and being reviewed.

About Cash Management →

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,572,874 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 15, 2019 — management decision was due July 15, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

$6,370,906 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 8, 2018 — management decision was due July 8, 2018.

2017-002
Cost Allowability
REPEAT OF 2016-001OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-001

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2016-06-30

$5,506,426 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 7, 2017 — management decision was due August 7, 2017.

2016-001
Cost Allowability
OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Oregon

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.