EIN: 936002242
UEI: KH85VH1PD513
Audited by: Dickey and Tremper, LLP
Oversight agency: 20 [Department of Transportation]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 2, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on January 14, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 14, 2026 (51 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on January 15, 2025 — management decision was due July 15, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on February 28, 2024 — management decision was due August 28, 2024.
Condition and criteria: In the Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) required by HUD, there were differences in amounts reported for available funds and expense in the narrative sections of the goals and outcomes and resources and investments. Similar differences were reported in the expected resources in the Annual Action Plan. In addition, the PR26 Financial Summary Report should list the beginning unexpended CDBG funds so that the report does not show a negative available amount at year end. The City has also not been entering amounts in the cash disbursed line in the report, causing the report to show cash on hand that should be zero at fiscal year end. Cause: IDIS does not allow negative amounts, so the report is prepared on the cash basis for revenues and the City has to supplement reporting with remarks detailing status. Context and effect: Adjustments, narratives, and remarks are needed to detail the status of the programs. Auditor's recommendation: We recommend that the City continue to work with HUD and the instruction manual on IDIS reporting and to fill out all applicable sections to alleviate negative amounts and to ensure that the reports are accurately presented. Management response: Management agrees with the auditor's recommendation. Since the audit, the City has made strides to improve its HUD grant reporting with the IDIS system that can better meet the needs of all stakeholders.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Condition and criteria: In the Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) required by HUD, there were differences in amounts reported for available funds and expense in the narrative sections of the goals and outcomes and resources and investments. Similar differences were reported in the expected resources in the Annual Action Plan. In addition, the PR26 Financial Summary Report should list the beginning unexpended CDBG funds so that the report does not show a negative available amount at year end. The City has also not been entering amounts in the cash disbursed line in the report, causing the report to show cash on hand that should be zero at fiscal year end. Cause: IDIS does not allow negative amounts, so the report is prepared on the cash basis for revenues and the City has to supplement reporting with remarks detailing status. Context and effect: Adjustments, narratives, and remarks are needed to detail the status of the programs. Auditor's recommendation: We recommend that the City continue to work with HUD and the instruction manual on IDIS reporting and to fill out all applicable sections to alleviate negative amounts and to ensure that the reports are accurately presented. Management response: Management agrees with the auditor's recommendation. Since the audit, the City has made strides to improve its HUD grant reporting with the IDIS system that can better meet the needs of all stakeholders.
Specific Steps to Correct: Management is aware of the specific changes that need to be made to its reporting to HUD. Management will continue its efforts to monitor/administer the program in accordance with HUD. Anticipated Completion Date: Will incorporate auditor recommendations into the next quarterly/annual reporting provided to HUD, which will occur before June 30, 2024. Name(s) and Title(s) of Responsible Person(s): James Wood, Finance Director
Condition and criteria: The CDBG manual states that program income must be disbursed prior to the drawdown of additional funds of the treasury and there were some drawdowns of additional funds even though there is program income on hand. Program income also includes interest on cash on hand, but the City has not been allocating interest to the CDBG program. Cause: The City sets up activities for each project and program income is allocated as the funding source and when draws are done, they either go against program income or as a request for funds based on the particular project. If a project was set up later and does not have program income allocated as a funding source to spent out first, there will be a request for additional funds, even if there is program income on hand. Context and effect: The City has under $25,000 of program income remaining at fiscal year end, thus it is not considered material non-compliance. There is also an exception for allocating interest to program income when the total from all sources for the program is less than $25,000 but would be required if excess income exceeds that amount. Auditor's recommendation: We recommend that the City perform procedures at year end to determine whether it has excess program income on hand, calculate interest on cash on hand if applicable, and return any excess funds to its line of credit. Management response: Management agrees with the auditor's recommendation. The City has currently exhausted all program income on-hand and will perform year-end testing/monitoring around program income going forward.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Condition and criteria: The CDBG manual states that program income must be disbursed prior to the drawdown of additional funds of the treasury and there were some drawdowns of additional funds even though there is program income on hand. Program income also includes interest on cash on hand, but the City has not been allocating interest to the CDBG program. Cause: The City sets up activities for each project and program income is allocated as the funding source and when draws are done, they either go against program income or as a request for funds based on the particular project. If a project was set up later and does not have program income allocated as a funding source to spent out first, there will be a request for additional funds, even if there is program income on hand. Context and effect: The City has under $25,000 of program income remaining at fiscal year end, thus it is not considered material non-compliance. There is also an exception for allocating interest to program income when the total from all sources for the program is less than $25,000 but would be required if excess income exceeds that amount. Auditor's recommendation: We recommend that the City perform procedures at year end to determine whether it has excess program income on hand, calculate interest on cash on hand if applicable, and return any excess funds to its line of credit. Management response: Management agrees with the auditor's recommendation. The City has currently exhausted all program income on-hand and will perform year-end testing/monitoring around program income going forward.
Specific Steps to Correct: Management has already corrected how it records interest earned on CDBG cash on-hand. Management will review program income on-hand throughout the year to assess its responsibility to return funds to the line of credit. Anticipated Completion Date: Will incorporate the auditor's recommendation into year end processing for fiscal year 2024, which will occur around June 30, 2024. Name(s) and Title(s) of Responsible Person(s): James Wood, Finance Director
FAC accepted this audit on February 23, 2023 — management decision was due August 23, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on January 30, 2022 — management decision was due July 30, 2022.
US DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Airport Improvement Program Compliance and Significant Deficiency ? Reporting 2021-005 Condition and criteria: The City was required to file the 5100-126 Operating and Financial Summary by the December 27, 2020 extended deadline. In our review of the report, it was filed shortly after the extended due date and contained errors in the amounts reported due to additional audit entries posted after the filing date and some errors in the reconciliation schedule. Cause: The prior year audit was performed remotely and was not completed until March 31, 2021 due to COVID-19 and the report was filed with the information available at the time when it discovered that the extension date had passed. Effect: The late reporting of financial information provides inaccurate information to the public. Auditor?s recommendation: We recommend that the report be filed on time in the future and that a secondary review of the amounts and items reported be performed prior to posting. We also recommend that the 2020 report be resubmitted with corrected information, which management has already completed with the filing of their 2021 report. Management?s response: The City understands and concurs with this finding. The City has implemented a secondary review of the amounts and items reported prior to and following the posting of this report. The City submitted corrected amounts for the 2020 report as well as the 2021 report.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴US DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Airport Improvement Program Compliance and Significant Deficiency ? Reporting 2021-005 Condition and criteria: The City was required to file the 5100-126 Operating and Financial Summary by the December 27, 2020 extended deadline. In our review of the report, it was filed shortly after the extended due date and contained errors in the amounts reported due to additional audit entries posted after the filing date and some errors in the reconciliation schedule. Cause: The prior year audit was performed remotely and was not completed until March 31, 2021 due to COVID-19 and the report was filed with the information available at the time when it discovered that the extension date had passed. Effect: The late reporting of financial information provides inaccurate information to the public. Auditor?s recommendation: We recommend that the report be filed on time in the future and that a secondary review of the amounts and items reported be performed prior to posting. We also recommend that the 2020 report be resubmitted with corrected information, which management has already completed with the filing of their 2021 report. Management?s response: The City understands and concurs with this finding. The City has implemented a secondary review of the amounts and items reported prior to and following the posting of this report. The City submitted corrected amounts for the 2020 report as well as the 2021 report.
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2021 The audit of the financial statements of City of Redmond, Oregon, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 identified the findings below. The City of Redmond has created a corrective action plan to remediate each finding as follows: Audit Finding: 2021-001 Condition and Criteria: In our review of the Urban Renewal Agency loans receivable, it was discovered that there were prior year costs of $428,948 towards private redevelopment paid under the forgivable loan program, which should have been reported as a receivable in the prior year. Effect: A prior period adjustment on the full accrual basis is needed to correct beginning net position and the receivable at the beginning of the year. Cause: The development project was an ongoing project that started in the prior fiscal year and it was not noticed that there were reimbursements expected until the final note was signed in the current fiscal year. Auditor?s Recommendation: We recommend that costs be reviewed in more detail to determine if receivables should be recorded for expected reimbursements. Specific Steps to Correct: Management has already corrected the error and incorporated the correction into the audited financial statements. Management will review all loan and grant expenses in mor detail to identify amounts that should be recorded as receivables. Anticipated Completion Date: Completed and incorporated into the June 30, 2021 audited financial statements. Names(s) and Title(s) of Responsible Person(s): Brooks Slyter, Accounting & Financial Reporting Director Audit Finding: 2021-002 Condition and Criteria: The City is working on a project funded with grant funding and developer reimbursements for the 6th Street extension project and at the end of the fiscal year the fund was reporting a deficit fund balance and most of the receivables for reimbursable costs had not been recorded. Effect: An adjustment was recorded during the audit to accrue accounts receivable from the developers and a related deferred inflow since the funds were not received in the measurable and available period to be included as revenue. Cause: Management was aware of the project but had not worked out the final amounts due from the grant funds and developers nor received final information form Public Works to complete the accrual. Auditor?s Recommendation: We recommend that costs be reviewed in more detail to determine if receivables should be recorded for expected reimbursements. Specific Steps to Correct: Management has already corrected the error and incorporated the correction into the audited financial statements. Management will review all projects and grants to ensure all receivables are recorded for expected reimbursements. Anticipated Completion Date: Completed and incorporated into the June 30, 2021 audited financial statements. Names(s) and Title(s) of Responsible Person(s): Brooks Slyter, Accounting & Financial Reporting Director Audit Finding: 2021-003 Condition and Criteria: The City is required to account for program income from the Community Development Block Grant program and report it along with other activity to HUD. In addition, program income should be used before drawing additional funds. The City received repayments of two loans and additional program income that had not been reported or included in the notes to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards due to an oversight. Effect: Program income was not property reported or utilized during the year and additional program income will be available to spend in the next fiscal year. $62,476 should have been used from program income in the current year, rather than drawing additional funds. Cause: When the City received repayments of the loans, the payment was posted to the receivable account and was not reflected in the revenue account until reconciling the final deferred inflows for the audit. Management?s normal process focuses on revenues and expenses when reporting under the program. Auditor?s Recommendation: We recommend that program income be reviewed in more detail in the future and that a review of the receivable and deferred inflows be included in the process. Specific Steps to Correct: Management has reported the program income to HUD and will implement more regular reconciliation of loans receivable to ensure the program income is recognized and reported in a timely manner. With recent turnover in the CDBG program administrator position, the Finance department will also continue to coordinate with contracted service provider Resource Consultants and Deputy City Manager, John Roberts to ensure timely reporting of program income and train the new program administrator. Anticipated Completion Date: Will implement at least quarterly reconciliations of loans receivable by March 31, 2022 and will plan to have a new CDBG program administrator onboarded and trained by June 30, 2022. Names(s) and Title(s) of Responsible Person(s): Brooks Slyter, Accounting & Financial Reporting Director; John Roberts, Deputy City Manager Audit Finding: 2021-004 Condition and Criteria: ORS 457.470 requires urban renewal agencies to share tax increment when certain thresholds are met. The threshold is tied to annual tax increment collections in relation to the area?s initial maximum indebtedness. It was discovered during the year that the Agency had over collected property taxes and owed a refund back to other entities. Effect: The Agency has over-collected approximately $1.6 million of tax from fiscal year 2018 to fiscal year 2021, of which $869,040 was from prior fiscal years and considered a correction of an error and prior period adjustment by management. The remaining $708,041 was reported as a special item to refund property taxes collected in the current year. Future taxes will be assessed with the limitation already imposed. Cause: The URA plan was substantially amended in 2012 and became subject to the revenue sharing requirements. At the time of the amendment the new revenue sharing requirements were not identified in the plan or included in financial models. City staff became aware of the requirement while setting up the South Highway 97 Urban Renewal District and hired a consultant to confirm the requirements and calculate the over-collection of tax. Auditor?s Recommendation: The condition was corrected, but we recommend that the City and Agency continue to work with their consultants and the County. Specific Steps to Correct: Management has already corrected the error and incorporated the correction into the audited financial statements. The City will continue to work with consultants and Deschutes County to ensure the property taxes are accurately assessed, collected, and shared, as applicable in compliance with ORS 457.470 in the existing Downtown Urban Renewal District and the newly formed South Highway 97 Urban Renewal District. Anticipated Completion Date: Completed and incorporated into the June 30, 2021 audited financial statements. Names(s) and Title(s) of Responsible Person(s): Brooks Slyter, Accounting & Financial Reporting Director Audit Finding: 2021-005 Condition and criteria: The City was required to file the 5100-126 Operating and Financial Summary by the December 27, 2020 extended deadline. In our review of the report, it was filed shortly after the extended due date and contained errors in the amounts reported due to additional audit entries posted after the filing date and some errors in the reconciliation schedule. Cause: The prior year audit was performed remotely and was not completed until March 31, 2021 due to COVID-19 and the report was filed with the information available at the time when it discovered that the extension date had passed. Effect: The late reporting of financial information provides inaccurate information to the public. Auditor?s Recommendation: We recommend that the report be filed on time in the future and that a secondary review of the amounts and items reported be performed prior to posting. We also recommend that the 2020 report be resubmitted with corrected information, which management has already completed with the filing of their 2021 report. Specific Steps to Correct: Management and City staff have submitted a corrected report for 2020 as well as the 2021 report and have implemented a secondary review of the amounts and items reported prior to and following the submission this report. Anticipated Completion Date: Completed December 28, 2021. Names(s) and Title(s) of Responsible Person(s): Brooks Slyter, Accounting & Financial Reporting Director; Zachary Bass, Airport Director Audit Finding: 2021-006 Condition and criteria: Airlines are required to submit PFC payments to the City?s airport by the end of the following month after they are collected from passengers and reports shall be provided to the airport on or before the last day of the calendar month following the calendar quarter. Boutique Air started providing air service in October 2020 and the City noted in September 2021 that no payments had been made or quarterly reports received. Cause: The air carrier was new to the City and the requirement for payment and tracking of payments was not noticed until the annual reconciliation was performed. Effect: The late submission of payments and reports by Boutique Airlines was not in compliance with PFC requirements. Auditor?s Recommendation: We recommend that Boutique Airlines prepare their reports and submit payment with the report by the last day of the following calendar month and that the airport add procedures to monitor new airlines compliance with requirements. Specific Steps to Correct: The City has worked with Boutique Airlines and in October 2021 received all reports and payments required. As of July 2021, Boutique Airlines is
FAC accepted this audit on April 29, 2021 — management decision was due October 29, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on January 13, 2020 — management decision was due July 13, 2020.
US DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants ? CFDA 14.218 2019-002 Condition and Criteria: The City is required to submit quarterly SF425 Federal Financial Reports and to report expenditures on an ongoing basis into the HUD IDIS system. The City did not require reimbursement of the expenditure due to a large amount of program income on hand, but is still required to report the expenditures and apply them against program income on hand. These reporting requirements were not performed for the last two fiscal quarters of the year until November of 2019. Effect: The late reporting of quarterly financial information and expenditures provides inaccurate information to the grantor during the year and increases the risks related to reimbursable expenditures. Cause: There were changes in staff administering the program during the year and confusion on which team member was responsible for the reporting requirements. The City was allowed to transfer program income of $250,862 from NSP3 to the CDBG Entitlement program and due to the program income on hand, the City did not need reimbursement of expenditures and did not submit the expenditures to the IDIS system. In addition, it takes two people to submit expenditure information into the IDIS system and the second staff did not receive access until October 2019. Auditor?s recommendation: The City should enhance its procedures to ensure that quarterly reports are filed within the timeframe required and that expenditures are reported on an ongoing basis in the HUD IDIS system. An internal secondary review of the reporting should also be performed to verify accuracy of the amounts reported. Management?s response: The City understands and concurs with this finding. The City is also working to provide consistent and knowledgeable staffing to administer the CDBG program.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴US DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants ? CFDA 14.218 2019-002 Condition and Criteria: The City is required to submit quarterly SF425 Federal Financial Reports and to report expenditures on an ongoing basis into the HUD IDIS system. The City did not require reimbursement of the expenditure due to a large amount of program income on hand, but is still required to report the expenditures and apply them against program income on hand. These reporting requirements were not performed for the last two fiscal quarters of the year until November of 2019. Effect: The late reporting of quarterly financial information and expenditures provides inaccurate information to the grantor during the year and increases the risks related to reimbursable expenditures. Cause: There were changes in staff administering the program during the year and confusion on which team member was responsible for the reporting requirements. The City was allowed to transfer program income of $250,862 from NSP3 to the CDBG Entitlement program and due to the program income on hand, the City did not need reimbursement of expenditures and did not submit the expenditures to the IDIS system. In addition, it takes two people to submit expenditure information into the IDIS system and the second staff did not receive access until October 2019. Auditor?s recommendation: The City should enhance its procedures to ensure that quarterly reports are filed within the timeframe required and that expenditures are reported on an ongoing basis in the HUD IDIS system. An internal secondary review of the reporting should also be performed to verify accuracy of the amounts reported. Management?s response: The City understands and concurs with this finding. The City is also working to provide consistent and knowledgeable staffing to administer the CDBG program.
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2019 The audit of the financial statements of City of Redmond, Oregon, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019 identified the findings below. The City of Redmond has created a corrective action plan to remediate each finding as follows: Audit Finding: 2019-002 Condition and Criteria: The City is required to submit quarterly SF425 Federal Financial Reports and to report expenditures on an ongoing basis into the HUD IDIS system. The City did not require reimbursement of the expenditure due to a large amount of program income on hand, but is still required to report the expenditures and apply them against program income on hand. These reporting requirements were not performed for the last two fiscal quarters of the year until November of 2019. Effect: The late reporting of quarterly financial information and expenditures provides inaccurate information to the grantor during the year and increases the risks related to reimbursable expenditures. Cause: There were changes in staff administering the program during the year and confusion on which team member was responsible for the reporting requirements. The City was allowed to transfer program income of $250,862 from NSP3 to the CDBG Entitlement program and due to the program income on hand, the City did not need reimbursement of expenditures and did not submit the expenditures to the IDIS system. In addition, it takes two people to submit expenditure information into the IDIS system and the second staff did not receive access until October 2019. Auditor?s recommendation: The City should enhance its procedures to ensure that quarterly reports are filed within the timeframe required and that expenditures are reported on an ongoing basis in the HUD IDIS system. An internal secondary review of the reporting should also be performed to verify accuracy of the amounts reported. Specific Steps to Correct: Management acknowledges and understands the importance of timely and accurate reporting of financial information related to grants. The CDBG program has continued to experience staff turnover since its inception. The City is contracting with an external consultant to assist with administration of the CDBG program and is working to provide consistent and knowledgeable staffing to administer the CDBG program through the upcoming budget process. Anticipated Completion Date: The City should have an external consultant on contract in early January 2020 to administer the CDBG program. This should enable the City to get current on all reporting and reimbursement requests through the IDIS system in early 2020 and continue compliance through the remainder of the fiscal year and the program. The new consultant will work with Finance staff for reconciliation to the general ledger and accuracy of the amounts reported. Names(s) and Title(s) of Responsible Person(s): Brooks Slyter, Accounting & Financial Reporting Director; Jason Neff, Budget & Financial Planning Director; John Roberts, Assistant City Manager; Keith Witcosky, City Manager
FAC accepted this audit on January 3, 2019 — management decision was due July 3, 2019.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
FAC accepted this audit on January 7, 2018 — management decision was due July 7, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on January 22, 2017 — management decision was due July 22, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Oregon →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.