← Back to home

CITY OF PILOT ROCKLocal Government

EIN: 936002235

UEI: GSA_MIGRATION

Audited by: THE RBH GROUP LLC

Oversight agency: 10 [Department of Agriculture]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

CITY OF PILOT ROCK1 audit years2 findings
1
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$5.6M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2021)

FY 2021-06-30

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASIS$5,574,406 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on February 6, 2022. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 6, 2022 (1489 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2021-003
Reporting
OTHER MATTERS

The audited financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2020 were not submitted until September 8, 2021. Cause: The City was unaware of the requirement to provide the financial statements to the USDA. Effect: The late reporting of financial information provides inaccurate information to the grantor during the year. Context: This appears to be an isolated occurrence; while the City did not submit its annual audited financial statements timely, other reports required by the grantor were submitted timely. During the year, 14 reimbursement requests that included budget information were filed with the grantor without exception. Recommendation: The City should enhance its procedures to ensure that annual audits are filed within the timeframe required. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The City officials are in agreement with the condition and will implement procedures to ensure timely reporting.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: The City is required to submit its annual audited financial statements to the USDA within 150 days of year end for fiscal years where no Single Audit is required. Condition: The audited financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2020 were not submitted until September 8, 2021. Cause: The City was unaware of the requirement to provide the financial statements to the USDA. Effect: The late reporting of financial information provides inaccurate information to the grantor during the year. Context: This appears to be an isolated occurrence; while the City did not submit its annual audited financial statements timely, other reports required by the grantor were submitted timely. During the year, 14 reimbursement requests that included budget information were filed with the grantor without exception. Recommendation: The City should enhance its procedures to ensure that annual audits are filed within the timeframe required. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The City officials are in agreement with the condition and will implement procedures to ensure timely reporting.

Corrective Action Plan

The City agrees with the finding and recommended corrective action. The City Recorder will update procedures to include filing the audited financial statements with the USDA within nine months of the close of each fiscal year in years where a Single Audit is required, and within 150 days in years where no Single Audit is required.

About Reporting →
2021-004
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

The SEFA prepared by the City contained errors including incorrect federal program names and Federal Assistance numbers, and incorrect federal expenditure amounts. Cause: Internal controls over the preparation and review process of the SEFA are not adequate to detect SEFA misstatements. Effect: The SEFA underreported some federal expenditures and contained incorrect federal program names and Federal Assistance references. Context: The City has had very few Single Audits performed as its federal expenditures rarely meet the $750,000 threshold, and the staff are unfamiliar with the reporting requirements that a Single Audit requires. The City relies on the auditors? assistance with the preparation of the SEFA and the accompanying notes. Recommendation: When preparing a SEFA to provide to the auditors, the City should review grant agreements for correct program titles and Federal Assistance numbers. Expenditures during the year should match amounts reported on the SEFA. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The City officials are in agreement with the condition and recommendation above and will implement procedures to ensure accurate reporting.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: In years when more that $750,000 of federal funding is expended, the City is required to prepare a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (?SEFA?). The SEFA should include all federal programs with accurate Federal Assistance numbers and total federal expenditures during the year. Condition: The SEFA prepared by the City contained errors including incorrect federal program names and Federal Assistance numbers, and incorrect federal expenditure amounts. Cause: Internal controls over the preparation and review process of the SEFA are not adequate to detect SEFA misstatements. Effect: The SEFA underreported some federal expenditures and contained incorrect federal program names and Federal Assistance references. Context: The City has had very few Single Audits performed as its federal expenditures rarely meet the $750,000 threshold, and the staff are unfamiliar with the reporting requirements that a Single Audit requires. The City relies on the auditors? assistance with the preparation of the SEFA and the accompanying notes. Recommendation: When preparing a SEFA to provide to the auditors, the City should review grant agreements for correct program titles and Federal Assistance numbers. Expenditures during the year should match amounts reported on the SEFA. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The City officials are in agreement with the condition and recommendation above and will implement procedures to ensure accurate reporting.

Corrective Action Plan

The City agrees with the finding and recommended corrective action. When a SEFA is required, the City Recorder will review grant agreements for correct program titles and Federal Assistance numbers. A review of expenditure totals will be performed by the City Recorder as well.

About Reporting →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Oregon

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.