← Back to home

Multnomah Education Service DistrictLocal Government

EIN: 936000829

UEI: RFYAGZ6C8YX4

Audited by: Talbot, Korvola & Warwick, LLP

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

Multnomah Education Service District10 audit years6 findings
10
Audit Years
6
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$3.8M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

$3,801,825 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on January 27, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 27, 2026 (34 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,675,568 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 31, 2024 — management decision was due July 1, 2025.

2024-001
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Views of responsible officials: The District understands and concurs with this finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Views of responsible officials: The District understands and concurs with this finding.

Corrective Action Plan

Indirect rate on a portion of federal grant 84.027 Special Education (IDEA) Cluster funding. a. Type of deficiency: Significant Deficiency i Condition: The District’s controls did not detect and correct an improper indirect cost rate applied to the federal program on a timely basis. A significant deficiency in controls over compliance with allowable cost requirements was identified. ii. Cause: The District changed from being a contractor to a subrecipient for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. This change resulted in a different allowable indirect cost rate. iii. Effect or potential effect: Prior to correcting, the District had $878 of indirect charges in excess of the allowable rate charged to the federal program. iv. Questioned costs: As the District corrected the error, there appears to be no remaining questioned costs. v. Context: The District’s accounting system used an incorrect cost rate for indirect charges prior to correcting. vi. Recommendation : The District should ensure that controls related to indirect cost charges are implemented and operating effectively. b. Plan of acti on: The Grant Manager will be directed to create sufficient internal controls to confirm indirect rates in the accounting system match grant award agreements. c. Date of implementation: November 27, 2024

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2024-002
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Views of responsible officials: The District understands and concurs with this finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Views of responsible officials: The District understands and concurs with this finding.

Corrective Action Plan

Suspension and debarment for purchase with 84.027 Special Education (IDEA) Cluster funds. a. Type of deficiency: Significant Deficiency i. Condition: The District did not verify that an entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in a covered transaction. A significant deficiency in controls over compliance with procurement requirements was identified. ii. Cause: The District utilized a purchase order rather than a contract for a transaction in excess of $25,000. iii. Effect or potential effect: Prior to entering into a covered transaction, the District did not verify that an entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. iv. Questioned costs: Questioned costs, if any, are indeterminable v. Context: Of a population of 2 transactions, 1 transaction did not have documentation that the District verified that the vendor was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in a covered transaction. vi. Recommendation: The District should ensure that controls are implemented to ensure that the District completes a verification that an entity is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded prior to entering into a covered transaction b. Plan of acti on: The District changed its financial system to automatically notify staff that a suspension and debarment check is needed for all POs and contracts that are $25,000 and over, regardless of funding. c. Date of implementation: December 27, 2024

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2024-003
Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

Views of responsible officials: The District understands and concurs with this finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Views of responsible officials: The District understands and concurs with this finding.

Corrective Action Plan

Wage rate requirements for contracts using 84.425 Education Stabilization Funds a. Type of deficiency: Material Weakness i. Condition: The District did not obtain copies of certified payroll and statements of compliance from contractors that worked on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds. A material weakness in controls over compliance with wage rate requirements was identified. ii. Cause: As the District does not typically fund construction projects with federal funds, the District’s staff were unaware of the requirement to obtain copies of certified payroll and statements of compliance from contractors that worked on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds. iii. Effect or potential effect : Without adequate internal controls over wage rate requirements and including the required provisions in construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by ESF funds, the District cannot demonstrate compliance with the wage rate requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act requirements iv. Questioned costs: Questioned costs, if any, are indeterminable. v. Context: Out of a population of 11 contracts, 4 contracts were selected to test wage rate requirements. The District did not obtain copies of certified payroll and statements of compliance for the 4 contracts selected. vi. Recommendation: The District should obtain an understanding of all compliance requirements and implement controls to ensure compliance with federal wage rate requirements. b. District staff representatives from Facilities, Business Services, and Grant Accounting will participate in at least one Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industry (BOLI) seminar titled Prevailing Wage Rate Laws for Public Agencies in Spring 2025. The Grant Manager will be directed to provide prevailing wage training specific for federal grants to Facilities and Grant Accounting staff . c. Date of scheduled BOLI seminars: February 6, 2025, March 19, 2025, and April 29, 2025. Additional training to be done by June 30, 2025.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2023-06-30

$5,209,530 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 11, 2023 — management decision was due June 11, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

$4,047,476 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 12, 2022 — management decision was due June 12, 2023.

2022-001
Equipment & Real Property
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

The provisions for the prevailing wage rates requirements were not included in the construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by ESF funds and that the required certified payrolls were not obtained. The related deficiency in internal controls over compliance is considered to be a significant deficiency. Cause: As the District does not typically fund construction projects with federal funds, the District?s staff were unaware of the $2,000 threshold for construction contacts financed by ESF funds to include prevailing wage rates requirements and used a threshold of $50,000, the Oregon Bureau of Labor & Industries? threshold for prevailing wage rate requirements for public works projects in Oregon. Effect or potential effect: Without adequate internal controls over wage rate requirements and including the required provisions in construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by ESF funds, the District cannot demonstrate compliance with the wage rate requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act requirements. Questioned Costs: Questioned costs, if any, are indeterminable. Context: Out of nine capital projects totaling $123,558, a sample of three capital projects was haphazardly selected. The capital projects were between $9,405 and $14,360 and totaled $26,024. Recommendation: The District should obtain an understanding of all compliance requirements and implement controls to ensure compliance with federal wage rate requirements. Views of responsible officials: The District understands and concurs with this finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal program: 84.425 Education Stabilization Fund (ESF) Criteria: Construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds are required to include: a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with the wage rate requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act and the U.S. Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction); and a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). Condition: The provisions for the prevailing wage rates requirements were not included in the construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by ESF funds and that the required certified payrolls were not obtained. The related deficiency in internal controls over compliance is considered to be a significant deficiency. Cause: As the District does not typically fund construction projects with federal funds, the District?s staff were unaware of the $2,000 threshold for construction contacts financed by ESF funds to include prevailing wage rates requirements and used a threshold of $50,000, the Oregon Bureau of Labor & Industries? threshold for prevailing wage rate requirements for public works projects in Oregon. Effect or potential effect: Without adequate internal controls over wage rate requirements and including the required provisions in construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by ESF funds, the District cannot demonstrate compliance with the wage rate requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act requirements. Questioned Costs: Questioned costs, if any, are indeterminable. Context: Out of nine capital projects totaling $123,558, a sample of three capital projects was haphazardly selected. The capital projects were between $9,405 and $14,360 and totaled $26,024. Recommendation: The District should obtain an understanding of all compliance requirements and implement controls to ensure compliance with federal wage rate requirements. Views of responsible officials: The District understands and concurs with this finding.

Corrective Action Plan

November 15, 2022 Oregon Secretary of state, Audits Division 255 Capito! St. NE, Suite #500 Salem, OR 97310 Plan of Action for Multnomah Education Service District The Multnomah Education Service District respectfully submits the following corrective action plan in response to deficiencies reported In our audit of fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. The audit was completed by the independent auditing firm Talbot, Korvola and Warwick, and reported the deficiency listed below. The plan of action was adopted by the governing body at their meeting on November 15, 2022, as indicated by signatures below. Finding 2022.001: Significant deficiency Condition: The provisions for the prevailing wage rates requirements were not included in the construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by ESF funds and that the required certified payrolls were not obtained. The related deficiency in internal controls over compliance is considered to be a significant deficiency. As the District does not typically fund construction projects with federal fund, the District's staff were unaware of the $2,000 threshold for construction contacts financed by ESF funds to include prevailing wage rates requirements and used a threshold of $50,000, the Oregon Bureau of Labor & Industries' threshold for prevailing wage rate requirements for public works projects in Oregon. Cause: Effect or potential effect: Without adequate internal controls over wage rate requirements and Including the required provisions in construrtion contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by ESF funds, the District cannot demonstrate compliance with the wage rate requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act requirements. Questioned Costs: Questioned costs, if any, are indeterminable. Out of nine capital projects totaling $123,558, a sample of three capital projects was haphazardly selected. The capital projects were between $9,405 and $14,360 and totaled $26,024. Context; Recommendation: The District should obtain an understanding of all compliance requirements and implement controls to ensure compliance with federal wage rate requirements. Superintendent Dr. Faul Coakley Board of Directors Jessica Ariate ? Mary Botkin ? Kristin Corniielle < Katrina Doughty ? Dr. Samuel Henry ? Deny.se Peterson ? Helen Ying I !611 NE ??ns\?orth Circle ? Portland. Oregon 97220 ? (502) 255-18^1 ? MultnofiialiESD.org p!an ?? action: The Director oi Business & Operations is responsible for implementing the plan of action. All construction projects are managed by the MESD Facilities office. The Director instructed the MESD Contract and Risk Manager, meet with the Facilities office to inform staff of the Davis-Bacon prevailing wage requirements for construction contracts in excess of $ ? 2,00 . Facilities will include the consideration of Davis-Bacon requirements when reviewing a project request that is or has the potential of being federally funded. Facilities will implement the requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act as needed. Timeframe: The meeting took place on November 2, 2022. Facilities has updated their internal procedures. ? ' Multnora ESD Board Chair, Denyse Peterson Superintendent, Dr. Paul Coakley

About Equipment and Real Property Management →

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,186,797 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 19, 2021 — management decision was due June 19, 2022.

2021-001
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

A material weakness in controls over financial reporting and compliance was identified due to a lack of timely reconciliations and reviews of various account balances, including accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued payroll. Cause: The cause appears to be the lack of timely reconciliations and reviews of accounts balances. Effect or potential effect: There were two audit adjustments, one increasing accounts receivable by $828,594 and another increasing accounts payable by $521,412. Additionally, the lack of timely reconciliations and reviews of accounts balances has the potential to allow other material misstatements due to error or fraud. Questioned Costs: No known or estimated questioned costs identified. Context: The lack of timely reconciliations and reviews of various account balances was identified while obtaining an understanding of the District?s controls over financial reporting and performing audit procedures over significant account balances. Recommendation: The District should implement policies and procedures to ensure that reconciliations and reviews of account balances are performed in a timely manner. Views of responsible officials: The District understands and concurs with this finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal program: Career and Technical Education - Basic Grants to State (Assistance Listing Number 84.048) Criteria: Per Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Subpart D, Section 202.303 (a), a non Federal entity must "establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)." Additionally, the District has the responsibility for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting. Condition: A material weakness in controls over financial reporting and compliance was identified due to a lack of timely reconciliations and reviews of various account balances, including accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued payroll. Cause: The cause appears to be the lack of timely reconciliations and reviews of accounts balances. Effect or potential effect: There were two audit adjustments, one increasing accounts receivable by $828,594 and another increasing accounts payable by $521,412. Additionally, the lack of timely reconciliations and reviews of accounts balances has the potential to allow other material misstatements due to error or fraud. Questioned Costs: No known or estimated questioned costs identified. Context: The lack of timely reconciliations and reviews of various account balances was identified while obtaining an understanding of the District?s controls over financial reporting and performing audit procedures over significant account balances. Recommendation: The District should implement policies and procedures to ensure that reconciliations and reviews of account balances are performed in a timely manner. Views of responsible officials: The District understands and concurs with this finding.

Corrective Action Plan

Plan of Action for Multnomah Education Service District The Multnomah Education Service District respectfully submits the following corrective action plan in response to deficiencies reported in our audit of fiscal year June 30, 2021. The audit was completed by the independent auditing firm Talbot, Korvola and Warwick, and reported the deficiencies listed below. The plan of action was adopted by the governing body at their meeting on December 14, 2021. The deficiency is listed below, including the adopted plan of action and timeframe. Finding 2021-001 Material weakness: A material weakness in controls over financial reporting and compliance was identified while obtaining an understanding of the District's controls over financial reporting and performing audit procedures over significant account balances. The cause appears to be the lack of timely reconciliations and review of various account balances, including accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued payroll. There were two audit adjustments, one increasing accounts receivable by $828,594 and another increasing accounts payable by $521,412. Additionally, the lack of timely reconciliations and review of accounts balances has the potential to allow other material misstatements due to error or fraud. Auditor recommendation: The District should implement policies and procedures to ensure that reconciliation and review of account balances are performed in a timely manner. Plan of action and timeframe Starting January, 2022, the District Senior Accountant will provide a monthly report to the Director, Business & Operations, or designee, showing the status of reconciliation completions, approvals, and ongoing outstanding balances. Acknowledgements of receipt will be kept on file. Status reports will be provided to the Superintendent as requested.

About Reporting →

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,382,795 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 9, 2020 — management decision was due June 9, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,633,614 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,369,190 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 12, 2018 — management decision was due May 12, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,191,429 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 17, 2017 — management decision was due June 17, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,394,101 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 3, 2017 — management decision was due July 3, 2017.

2016-001
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Eligibility →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Oregon

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.