← Back to home

ESTACADA SCHOOL DISTRICTLocal Government

EIN: 936000284

UEI: GSBMFHSSMXE8

Audited by: CLEAR TRAIL CPA'S, LLC

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

ESTACADA SCHOOL DISTRICT10 audit years7 findings
10
Audit Years
7
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$1.7M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

$1,740,246 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 9, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 9, 2026 (2 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
2025-002
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

SA-2025-02 – SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAM: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Child Nutrition Cluster SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT: Federal reimbursement claims are required to be reviewed by a person other than the preparer. CONDITION: During testing of National School Lunch Program (NSLP) reimbursement claims, we noted that claims were submitted without evidence of review prior to submission. In addition, any reviews that may have occurred were not consistently documented. CRITERIA: NSLP reimbursement claims should be reviewed and approved by an individual independent of the preparer prior to submission, and the review should be documented. EFFECT: Without documented controls to ensure NSLP claims are reviewed prior to submission, there is an increased risk that claims may be submitted with errors or inconsistencies, which could impact compliance with federal program requirements. CAUSE: The finance office and food services department experienced turnover during the fiscal year under audit, which contributed to inconsistent review and documentation practices. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend the District assign an individual other than the claim preparer to review NSLP reimbursement claims prior to submission and maintain documentation of that review. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: The District acknowledges the importance of ensuring National School Lunch Program (NSLP) reimbursement claims are reviewed by an individual other than the preparer and that this review is properly documented. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025, staffing turnover and competing workload demands contributed to an inconsistency in the documented review process prior to claim submission. Management agrees with the recommendation and has already implemented corrective actions to strengthen oversight and documentation. The District has assigned an independent reviewer to review NSLP claims prior to submission and has implemented a standardized process to document the review and approval. In addition, the District will continue to reinforce written procedures and cross-training to support consistency and continuity. The District is committed to maintaining compliance with federal program requirements and ensuring these controls remain in place going forward.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

SA-2025-02 – SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAM: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Child Nutrition Cluster SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT: Federal reimbursement claims are required to be reviewed by a person other than the preparer. CONDITION: During testing of National School Lunch Program (NSLP) reimbursement claims, we noted that claims were submitted without evidence of review prior to submission. In addition, any reviews that may have occurred were not consistently documented. CRITERIA: NSLP reimbursement claims should be reviewed and approved by an individual independent of the preparer prior to submission, and the review should be documented. EFFECT: Without documented controls to ensure NSLP claims are reviewed prior to submission, there is an increased risk that claims may be submitted with errors or inconsistencies, which could impact compliance with federal program requirements. CAUSE: The finance office and food services department experienced turnover during the fiscal year under audit, which contributed to inconsistent review and documentation practices. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend the District assign an individual other than the claim preparer to review NSLP reimbursement claims prior to submission and maintain documentation of that review. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: The District acknowledges the importance of ensuring National School Lunch Program (NSLP) reimbursement claims are reviewed by an individual other than the preparer and that this review is properly documented. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025, staffing turnover and competing workload demands contributed to an inconsistency in the documented review process prior to claim submission. Management agrees with the recommendation and has already implemented corrective actions to strengthen oversight and documentation. The District has assigned an independent reviewer to review NSLP claims prior to submission and has implemented a standardized process to document the review and approval. In addition, the District will continue to reinforce written procedures and cross-training to support consistency and continuity. The District is committed to maintaining compliance with federal program requirements and ensuring these controls remain in place going forward.

Corrective Action Plan

Estacada School District submits this Corrective Action Plan in response to audit finding SA-2025-02, included in the District’s audit report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025, related to the Child Nutrition Cluster federal programs. Finding SA-2025-02 – Significant Deficiency Federal Program: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Child Nutrition Cluster Condition: NSLP reimbursement claims were submitted without consistent evidence of independent review and documentation prior to submission. Cause: Staffing turnover and workload demands contributed to inconsistent review practices. Recommendation: Assign an individual other than the preparer to review NSLP reimbursement claims prior to submission and retain documentation of the review. Corrective Action Plan The District has implemented procedures requiring all NSLP reimbursement claims to be reviewed and approved by an individual independent of the preparer prior to submission. A standardized review and documentation process has been implemented to ensure review is consistently completed and retained with claim submission records. Written procedures and cross-training will continue to support consistency and continuity. Implementation Date Corrective actions were implemented during in July 2025 and are currently in place as of February 2026.

About Reporting →

FY 2024-06-30

$2,279,461 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 4, 2025 — management decision was due August 4, 2025.

2024-003
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

SA-2024-03 – SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAM: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Child Nutrition Cluster SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT: Federal reimbursement claims are required to be reviewed by a person other than the preparer. CONDITION: We noted in our testing of NSLP claims that claims were not being reviewed before being submitted and any reviews that may have occurred were not documented. CRITERIA: NSLP claims should be reviewed before submission and reviews should be documented. EFFECT: Without controls in place to make sure NSLP claims are properly reviewed before being submitted, there exists the possibility of material misstatements in the financial statements. CAUSE: The finance office experienced turn over in the fiscal year under audit. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend the District use someone other than the claim preparer to review the claims before being submitted, and document said review with initials and date. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: The District did not practice a multi-step review of monthly Child Nutrition Program meal claims to the state. This has since been corrected, with monthly data input and review by the Director of Nutrition Services, and review and submission by the District's Director of Finance/Senior Accountant. This ensures that the numbers that are being submitted to the state are accurate with the numbers that are being recorded on a daily/monthly basis. This was implemented early in fiscal year.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

SA-2024-03 – SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAM: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Child Nutrition Cluster SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT: Federal reimbursement claims are required to be reviewed by a person other than the preparer. CONDITION: We noted in our testing of NSLP claims that claims were not being reviewed before being submitted and any reviews that may have occurred were not documented. CRITERIA: NSLP claims should be reviewed before submission and reviews should be documented. EFFECT: Without controls in place to make sure NSLP claims are properly reviewed before being submitted, there exists the possibility of material misstatements in the financial statements. CAUSE: The finance office experienced turn over in the fiscal year under audit. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend the District use someone other than the claim preparer to review the claims before being submitted, and document said review with initials and date. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: The District did not practice a multi-step review of monthly Child Nutrition Program meal claims to the state. This has since been corrected, with monthly data input and review by the Director of Nutrition Services, and review and submission by the District's Director of Finance/Senior Accountant. This ensures that the numbers that are being submitted to the state are accurate with the numbers that are being recorded on a daily/monthly basis. This was implemented early in fiscal year.

Corrective Action Plan

a. Significant Deficiency | Single Audit – “We recommend the District use someone other than the claim preparer to review the claims before being submitted, and document said review with initials and dates.” b. Plan of Actions – The District will establish a multi-step review process for all NSLP monthly meal claims to ensure accuracy. This process will include data input/review by the Nutrition Services Coordinator and review by the Director of Finance/Senior Accountant before submission to the state. c. Timeframe for (or date of) implementation - The multi-step review process for monthly NSLP meal claims has already been established (started in September 2024).

About Reporting →
2024-004
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

SA-2024-04 - SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAM: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Child Nutrition Cluster SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT: Federal reimbursement claims are required to be recorded to the correctfiscal year in the general ledger.CONDITION: We noted in our testing of NSLP reimbursements, the District recorded the May 2024 and June 2024 claims to the incorrect fiscal year. CRITERIA: NSLP claims should be recorded in the correct fiscal year. EFFECT: Without controls in place to make sure NSLP claims are recorded in the correct fiscal year, there exists the possibility of material misstatement to the financial statement and non compliance to the grant. CAUSE: The finance office experienced turn over in the fiscal year under audit. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend the District record reimbursements in the correct fiscal year. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: Reimbursements from the state for meal claims for the months of May and June were received in July 2024 (in the new fiscal year). Due to turnover in the District's business office, they were recorded when they were received (as revenue) rather than accounts receivable. Moving forward, the District will recognize meal reimbursement revenue in the fiscal year that it is for, and the proper amounts will be applied to the proper accounts, and confirmed via multi-step review. This will take affect starting in fiscal year 24-25.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

SA-2024-04 - SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAM: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Child Nutrition Cluster SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT: Federal reimbursement claims are required to be recorded to the correctfiscal year in the general ledger.CONDITION: We noted in our testing of NSLP reimbursements, the District recorded the May 2024 and June 2024 claims to the incorrect fiscal year. CRITERIA: NSLP claims should be recorded in the correct fiscal year. EFFECT: Without controls in place to make sure NSLP claims are recorded in the correct fiscal year, there exists the possibility of material misstatement to the financial statement and non compliance to the grant. CAUSE: The finance office experienced turn over in the fiscal year under audit. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend the District record reimbursements in the correct fiscal year. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: Reimbursements from the state for meal claims for the months of May and June were received in July 2024 (in the new fiscal year). Due to turnover in the District's business office, they were recorded when they were received (as revenue) rather than accounts receivable. Moving forward, the District will recognize meal reimbursement revenue in the fiscal year that it is for, and the proper amounts will be applied to the proper accounts, and confirmed via multi-step review. This will take affect starting in fiscal year 24-25.

Corrective Action Plan

a. Significant Deficiency | Single Audit – “We recommend the District record reimbursements in the correct fiscal year.” b. Plan of Action – The District will establish a multi-step review process for all NSLP monthly meal claims to ensure accuracy. For the year-end claims (May/June) – should they be received after the end of the fiscal year they were claimed for – a journal entry that recognizes Accounts Receivable for the claim amount will be created and be reviewed for accuracy before being approved. c. Timeframe for (or date of) implementation – The multi-step review process for monthly NSLP meal claims has already been established (started in September 2024). The year-end journal entry process/review will be implemented in June 2025.

About Reporting →

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,278,938 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 9, 2024 — management decision was due August 9, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,648,993 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 15, 2023 — management decision was due August 15, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,712,451 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 28, 2021 — management decision was due June 28, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,491,918 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 9, 2021 — management decision was due September 9, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

$1,474,278 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 3, 2020 — management decision was due August 3, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

$1,361,780 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 10, 2019 — management decision was due August 10, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSEDLOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,249,128 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 28, 2018 — management decision was due July 28, 2018.

2017-001
Eligibility
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Eligibility →
2017-002
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,333,816 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 15, 2017 — management decision was due July 15, 2017.

2016-001
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Eligibility →
2016-002
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Oregon

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.