EIN: 931298800
UEI: NVHAJG8FK8E9
Audited by: GENSKE MULDER & CO LLP
Oversight agency: 15 [Department of the Interior]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 7, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on June 23, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by December 23, 2026 (106 days from today).
What is a management decision? →Finding 2025-001: Material Weaknesses in Internal Control Criteria: As a best practice, Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers, Inc. (PUR) should design, implement, and monitor internal control over financial transactions and reporting. Such controls should be based on guidance issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) Framework, as modified to suit the needs, size, and structure of PUR. In addition, 2 CFR 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, requires non-federal entities receiving federal awards to maintain internal controls. Finally, Oregon Revised Statute 65.771 requires Oregon corporations to maintain appropriate accounting records, which has been interpreted by the Oregon Department of Justice to include implementation of meaningful financial controls. Condition and Context: During the audit, we noted several deficiencies in internal control, sufficiently pervasive to call it a material weakness in internal control over financial transactions and reporting. We specifically noted the following deficiencies across our audit procedures: Cash receipts: There was no supervision or other oversight over cash receipts, such as a review of cash receipts to the bank deposits or a review of the monthly bank reconciliation. Cash disbursements: We noted not all general or project disbursements were approved, such as initials indicating approval or a signed purchase order. We also noted some support for disbursements was missing. However, we did find evidence of approval of timesheets throughout the year, email or other communication from project managers indicating authorization for disbursement, and signature of the Executive Director on all checks, thereby indicating tacit authorization for disbursement. Controls over cutoff: We noted in our testing that reimbursements requested for projects were not issued at the end of a period, but were issued as large expenses were presented. Board oversight of financial activity, internal control, and fraud and general risk assessment: We noted the Board of Directors does not take an active role in the oversight of the Organization’s financial operations, including monitoring internal control and performing regular assessments of fraud and general risks to financial operations. Oversight of procurement process: We noted sufficient documentation was not retained to support compliance with the procurement, suspension, and debarment requirements of federal awards. Effective internal control over the procurement process were not designed or implemented sufficient to prevent, or detect and correct, material noncompliance with this federal and state award requirement. Financial statement close: The unadjusted trial balance provided by management at the beginning of the audit contained unreconciled accounts, primarily a result of unreconciled prior year audit adjustments, which created inaccurate amounts on the unadjusted statements of financial position and activities. Questioned Costs: None noted. Cause: Ineffective design and implementation of internal control over financial activities and compliance with federal and state requirements. Effect or Potential Effect: A weak internal control framework enables the potential for misstatements to remain undetected and uncorrected. Such misstatements may be the result of error or fraud, including misappropriation of assets and fraudulent financial reporting. Repeat Finding: Repeat of findings 2024-001 through 2024-004. Recommendations: The Organization should continue to design and implement internal control that is effective for the Organization and its structure. The Organization should document internal control, including controls that mitigate inherent weaknesses in typical internal control measures. Such controls should also include oversight by the Board of Directors. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See Corrective Action Plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2025-001: Material Weaknesses in Internal Control Criteria: As a best practice, Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers, Inc. (PUR) should design, implement, and monitor internal control over financial transactions and reporting. Such controls should be based on guidance issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) Framework, as modified to suit the needs, size, and structure of PUR. In addition, 2 CFR 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, requires non-federal entities receiving federal awards to maintain internal controls. Finally, Oregon Revised Statute 65.771 requires Oregon corporations to maintain appropriate accounting records, which has been interpreted by the Oregon Department of Justice to include implementation of meaningful financial controls. Condition and Context: During the audit, we noted several deficiencies in internal control, sufficiently pervasive to call it a material weakness in internal control over financial transactions and reporting. We specifically noted the following deficiencies across our audit procedures: Cash receipts: There was no supervision or other oversight over cash receipts, such as a review of cash receipts to the bank deposits or a review of the monthly bank reconciliation. Cash disbursements: We noted not all general or project disbursements were approved, such as initials indicating approval or a signed purchase order. We also noted some support for disbursements was missing. However, we did find evidence of approval of timesheets throughout the year, email or other communication from project managers indicating authorization for disbursement, and signature of the Executive Director on all checks, thereby indicating tacit authorization for disbursement. Controls over cutoff: We noted in our testing that reimbursements requested for projects were not issued at the end of a period, but were issued as large expenses were presented. Board oversight of financial activity, internal control, and fraud and general risk assessment: We noted the Board of Directors does not take an active role in the oversight of the Organization’s financial operations, including monitoring internal control and performing regular assessments of fraud and general risks to financial operations. Oversight of procurement process: We noted sufficient documentation was not retained to support compliance with the procurement, suspension, and debarment requirements of federal awards. Effective internal control over the procurement process were not designed or implemented sufficient to prevent, or detect and correct, material noncompliance with this federal and state award requirement. Financial statement close: The unadjusted trial balance provided by management at the beginning of the audit contained unreconciled accounts, primarily a result of unreconciled prior year audit adjustments, which created inaccurate amounts on the unadjusted statements of financial position and activities. Questioned Costs: None noted. Cause: Ineffective design and implementation of internal control over financial activities and compliance with federal and state requirements. Effect or Potential Effect: A weak internal control framework enables the potential for misstatements to remain undetected and uncorrected. Such misstatements may be the result of error or fraud, including misappropriation of assets and fraudulent financial reporting. Repeat Finding: Repeat of findings 2024-001 through 2024-004. Recommendations: The Organization should continue to design and implement internal control that is effective for the Organization and its structure. The Organization should document internal control, including controls that mitigate inherent weaknesses in typical internal control measures. Such controls should also include oversight by the Board of Directors. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2025-001: Material Weaknesses in Internal Control Management’s response: Concur Responsible individual: Finance Manager, Executive Director, Board of Directors Anticipated completion date: March 31, 2026 Management agrees with this finding and will implement the following: • Develop and implement a formal document retention and destruction policy • Develop and implement a formal periodic close and invoicing policy • Develop and implement a formal conflict of interest policy • Develop and implement a formal internal control policy • Develop and implement a formal whistleblower policy • Develop and implement a formal Board code of ethics policy • Develop and implement a formal reporting schedule • Actively recruit Directors with financial experience to participate in Board oversight
2024-001, 2024-002, 2024-003, 2024-004
Finding 2025-002: Material Weaknesses in Internal Control Criteria: As a best practice, Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers, Inc. (PUR) should design, implement, and monitor internal control over financial transactions and reporting. Such controls should be based on guidance issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) Framework, as modified to suit the needs, size, and structure of PUR. In addition, 2 CFR 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, requires non-federal entities receiving federal awards to maintain internal controls. Finally, Oregon Revised Statute 65.771 requires Oregon corporations to maintain appropriate accounting records, which has been interpreted by the Oregon Department of Justice to include implementation of meaningful financial controls. Condition and Context: During the audit, we noted several deficiencies in internal control, sufficiently pervasive to call it a material weakness in internal control over financial transactions and reporting. We specifically noted the following deficiencies across our audit procedures: Cash receipts: There was no supervision or other oversight over cash receipts, such as a review of cash receipts to the bank deposits or a review of the monthly bank reconciliation. Cash disbursements: We noted not all general or project disbursements were approved, such as initials indicating approval or a signed purchase order. We also noted some support for disbursements was missing. We also noted a single signature on some sampled checks over $10,000, even though the Organization requires two signatures on checks over that threshold. However, we did find evidence of approval of timesheets and time allocated to projects throughout the year, some evidence of email or other communication from project managers indicating authorization for disbursement, and signature of the Executive Director on all checks, thereby indicating tacit authorization for disbursement. In our procedures, we noted that large invoices from contractors could be clearly associated with a specific project based on information on the invoices. Although the approval process needs improvement, we did not identify any questioned costs related to this portion of the finding. Controls over cutoff: We noted in our testing that reimbursements requested for projects were not issued at the end of a period, but were issued as large expenses were presented. As related to the major programs tested, we determined that the lack of internal control over cutoff resulted in reporting expenditure of federal awards in different fiscal years for the Organization. The related major programs spanned several years and none of the periods of performance of the related awards ended at June 30, 2025, so we did not identify a lack of compliance with the awards’ periods of performance or budget periods, and, accordingly, no questioned costs related to this portion of the finding. Oversight of procurement process: We noted sufficient documentation was not retained to support compliance with the procurement, suspension, and debarment requirements of federal awards. Effective internal control over the procurement process were not designed or implemented sufficient to prevent, or detect and correct, material noncompliance with this federal and state award requirement. Financial statement close: The unadjusted trial balance provided by management at the beginning of the audit contained unreconciled accounts, primarily a result of unreconciled prior year audit adjustments, which created inaccurate amounts on the statement of financial position and statement of activities. These audit adjustments were recorded against administrative expenses, not federal or state awards, and were corrected by management as part of the current audit. Accordingly, there were no questioned costs related to this portion of the finding. Questioned Costs: None noted. Cause: Ineffective design and implementation of internal control over financial activities and compliance with federal and state requirements. Effect or Potential Effect: A weak internal control framework enables the potential for misstatements to remain undetected and uncorrected. Such misstatements may be the result of error or fraud, including misappropriation of assets and fraudulent financial reporting. Repeat Finding: Repeat of findings 2024-001 through 2024-004. Recommendations: The Organization should continue to design and implement internal control that is effective for the Organization and its structure. The Organization should document internal control, including controls that mitigate inherent weaknesses in typical internal control. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See Corrective Action Plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2025-002: Material Weaknesses in Internal Control Criteria: As a best practice, Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers, Inc. (PUR) should design, implement, and monitor internal control over financial transactions and reporting. Such controls should be based on guidance issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) Framework, as modified to suit the needs, size, and structure of PUR. In addition, 2 CFR 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, requires non-federal entities receiving federal awards to maintain internal controls. Finally, Oregon Revised Statute 65.771 requires Oregon corporations to maintain appropriate accounting records, which has been interpreted by the Oregon Department of Justice to include implementation of meaningful financial controls. Condition and Context: During the audit, we noted several deficiencies in internal control, sufficiently pervasive to call it a material weakness in internal control over financial transactions and reporting. We specifically noted the following deficiencies across our audit procedures: Cash receipts: There was no supervision or other oversight over cash receipts, such as a review of cash receipts to the bank deposits or a review of the monthly bank reconciliation. Cash disbursements: We noted not all general or project disbursements were approved, such as initials indicating approval or a signed purchase order. We also noted some support for disbursements was missing. We also noted a single signature on some sampled checks over $10,000, even though the Organization requires two signatures on checks over that threshold. However, we did find evidence of approval of timesheets and time allocated to projects throughout the year, some evidence of email or other communication from project managers indicating authorization for disbursement, and signature of the Executive Director on all checks, thereby indicating tacit authorization for disbursement. In our procedures, we noted that large invoices from contractors could be clearly associated with a specific project based on information on the invoices. Although the approval process needs improvement, we did not identify any questioned costs related to this portion of the finding. Controls over cutoff: We noted in our testing that reimbursements requested for projects were not issued at the end of a period, but were issued as large expenses were presented. As related to the major programs tested, we determined that the lack of internal control over cutoff resulted in reporting expenditure of federal awards in different fiscal years for the Organization. The related major programs spanned several years and none of the periods of performance of the related awards ended at June 30, 2025, so we did not identify a lack of compliance with the awards’ periods of performance or budget periods, and, accordingly, no questioned costs related to this portion of the finding. Oversight of procurement process: We noted sufficient documentation was not retained to support compliance with the procurement, suspension, and debarment requirements of federal awards. Effective internal control over the procurement process were not designed or implemented sufficient to prevent, or detect and correct, material noncompliance with this federal and state award requirement. Financial statement close: The unadjusted trial balance provided by management at the beginning of the audit contained unreconciled accounts, primarily a result of unreconciled prior year audit adjustments, which created inaccurate amounts on the statement of financial position and statement of activities. These audit adjustments were recorded against administrative expenses, not federal or state awards, and were corrected by management as part of the current audit. Accordingly, there were no questioned costs related to this portion of the finding. Questioned Costs: None noted. Cause: Ineffective design and implementation of internal control over financial activities and compliance with federal and state requirements. Effect or Potential Effect: A weak internal control framework enables the potential for misstatements to remain undetected and uncorrected. Such misstatements may be the result of error or fraud, including misappropriation of assets and fraudulent financial reporting. Repeat Finding: Repeat of findings 2024-001 through 2024-004. Recommendations: The Organization should continue to design and implement internal control that is effective for the Organization and its structure. The Organization should document internal control, including controls that mitigate inherent weaknesses in typical internal control. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2025-002: Material Weaknesses in Internal Control Management’s response: Concur Responsible individual: Finance Manager, Executive Director, Board of Directors Anticipated completion date: March 31, 2026 Management agrees with this finding and will implement the following: • Develop and implement a formal document retention and destruction policy • Develop and implement a formal periodic close and invoicing policy • Develop and implement a formal conflict of interest policy • Develop and implement a formal internal control policy • Develop and implement a formal whistleblower policy • Develop and implement a formal Board code of ethics policy • Develop and implement a formal reporting schedule • Actively recruit Directors with financial experience to participate in Board oversight
2024-001, 2024-002, 2024-003, 2024-004
Finding 2025-003: Inadequate Procurement Documentation Criteria: 2 CFR 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, §§200.317-200.327, requires non-federal entities receiving federal awards to maintain and use documented procedures for procurement transactions under a federal award or subaward. In addition, Oregon Revised Statute 279A generally requires Oregon corporations to comply with the procurement guidance set forth in 2 CFR 200 §§200.317-200.327. Condition and Context: Management was unable to provide documentation in support of proper procurement procedures, to include a bid process and checks for vendor suspension or debarment. Questioned Costs: None noted. Cause: Ineffective design and implementation of an Organization procurement policy. Effect or Potential Effect: An effective procurement policy prevents or detects and corrects potential conflicts of interest and lack of competition in the bidding process. An ineffective procurement policy can potentially result in misuse or misappropriation of federal and state funds. Repeat Finding: Repeat of finding 2024-007. Recommendations: The Organization should continue to design and implement a procurement policy that is effective for the Organization and its structure. The Organization should document the policy, have it reviewed and approved by the Board of Directors, and disseminate the policy to employees with responsibility for finding and overseeing contractors. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See Corrective Action Plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2025-003: Inadequate Procurement Documentation Criteria: 2 CFR 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, §§200.317-200.327, requires non-federal entities receiving federal awards to maintain and use documented procedures for procurement transactions under a federal award or subaward. In addition, Oregon Revised Statute 279A generally requires Oregon corporations to comply with the procurement guidance set forth in 2 CFR 200 §§200.317-200.327. Condition and Context: Management was unable to provide documentation in support of proper procurement procedures, to include a bid process and checks for vendor suspension or debarment. Questioned Costs: None noted. Cause: Ineffective design and implementation of an Organization procurement policy. Effect or Potential Effect: An effective procurement policy prevents or detects and corrects potential conflicts of interest and lack of competition in the bidding process. An ineffective procurement policy can potentially result in misuse or misappropriation of federal and state funds. Repeat Finding: Repeat of finding 2024-007. Recommendations: The Organization should continue to design and implement a procurement policy that is effective for the Organization and its structure. The Organization should document the policy, have it reviewed and approved by the Board of Directors, and disseminate the policy to employees with responsibility for finding and overseeing contractors. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2025-003: Inadequate Procurement Documentation Management’s response: Concur Responsible individual: Finance Manager, Executive Director, Board of Directors Anticipated completion date: March 31, 2026 Management agrees with this finding and will implement the following: • Update procurement policies and procedures to align with 2 CFR 200, including: o Develop and implement standardized procurement checklists o Require cost/price analysis for all qualified transactions o Require suspension/debarment checks for all qualified transactions o Require supervisory review and oversight by Board of Directors o Require adherence to document retention and destruction policy
2024-007
FAC accepted this audit on February 3, 2026 — management decision was due August 3, 2026.
During our review of expenditures charged to the federal programs, the entity was unable to provide invoice copies or other sufficient supporting documentation for certain expenditures tested. As a result, we could not verify the allowability, accuracy, and proper approval of these costs in accordance with federal requirements. In addition, records were unavailable for Personnel expenditures that were charged to grant awards, and no support or evidence of time per grant was available. Cause: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers does not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that invoice documentation and other supporting records are retained, centrally filed, and readily available for audit and monitoring purposes. In addition, management did not perform ongoing monitoring to verify that required documentation was maintained prior to reimbursement or reporting. Effect or Potential Effect: because supporting documentation was not available, expenditures from detail documentation could not be substantiated. This increases the risk that the unallowable, unsupported, or inaccurate costs may be charged to the federal program and reported in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). Questioned Cost: Yes, $332,409 related to Personnel costs, equipment and other purchases that were not documented with detailed support. Context: During our audit, it was found that the Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers experienced complete staff turnover in Financial Management for the year being audited. No current finance employees had worked for the organization during the year being audited. No financial files for Accounts Payable, invoices, or reporting were available to the current financial staff. Not adequately retaining supporting documents and invoices to support the expenditures of the general ledger and requests for reimbursement for grants, the organization records may be insufficient for testing and review, for internal controls or meeting federal documentation and reporting requirements. Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: No, Prior- year did not require a Single Audit.Recommendation: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers should implement policies and procedures requiring invoice copies and supporting documentation to be maintained for all grant expenditures. Management should strengthen record retention practices, provide training to staff on documentation requirements, and implement periodic internal reviews to ensure compliance. District Response: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers acknowledges the deficiencies. Corrective Action Plan: _____________ (To be completed by Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers) Planned Implementation Date: _________ Responsible Person: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers Finance Manager
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2024-003 – Lack of Internal Controls over Expenditure Documentation (Material Weakness) Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Federal Program Name: Nonpoint Source Implementation Grants Assistance Listing Numbers: 66.460 Pass-Through Entity: Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Commerce – National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Federal Program Name: Pacific Coast Salmon Recovery Program Assistance Listing Numbers: 11.438, 15.015, 15.244 Pass-Through Entity: State of Oregon – Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board (OWEB) Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: National Fish and Wildlife Foundation Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.665 Pass-Through Entity: U.S. Forest Service Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Natural Resources Conservation ServiceName of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior Federal Program Name: Wildlife, Sport Fish and Restoration Program Assistance Listing Numbers: 15.244 Pass-Through Entity: Bureau of Land Management Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior Federal Program Name: Secure Rural Schools and community Self-Determination – Watershed and water-quality improvements Assistance Listing Numbers: 15.234 Pass-Through Entity: Bureau of Land Management Criteria: Title 2 CFR §200.303 requires nonfederal entities to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Additionally, 2 CFR §200.302(b)(3) requires entities to maintain records that adequately identify the source and application of funds, including supporting documentation for expenditures, and 2 CFR §200.430 requires documentation for compensation for personal services. Condition: During our review of expenditures charged to the federal programs, the entity was unable to provide invoice copies or other sufficient supporting documentation for certain expenditures tested. As a result, we could not verify the allowability, accuracy, and proper approval of these costs in accordance with federal requirements. In addition, records were unavailable for Personnel expenditures that were charged to grant awards, and no support or evidence of time per grant was available. Cause: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers does not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that invoice documentation and other supporting records are retained, centrally filed, and readily available for audit and monitoring purposes. In addition, management did not perform ongoing monitoring to verify that required documentation was maintained prior to reimbursement or reporting. Effect or Potential Effect: because supporting documentation was not available, expenditures from detail documentation could not be substantiated. This increases the risk that the unallowable, unsupported, or inaccurate costs may be charged to the federal program and reported in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). Questioned Cost: Yes, $332,409 related to Personnel costs, equipment and other purchases that were not documented with detailed support. Context: During our audit, it was found that the Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers experienced complete staff turnover in Financial Management for the year being audited. No current finance employees had worked for the organization during the year being audited. No financial files for Accounts Payable, invoices, or reporting were available to the current financial staff. Not adequately retaining supporting documents and invoices to support the expenditures of the general ledger and requests for reimbursement for grants, the organization records may be insufficient for testing and review, for internal controls or meeting federal documentation and reporting requirements. Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: No, Prior- year did not require a Single Audit.Recommendation: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers should implement policies and procedures requiring invoice copies and supporting documentation to be maintained for all grant expenditures. Management should strengthen record retention practices, provide training to staff on documentation requirements, and implement periodic internal reviews to ensure compliance. District Response: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers acknowledges the deficiencies. Corrective Action Plan: _____________ (To be completed by Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers) Planned Implementation Date: _________ Responsible Person: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers Finance Manager
Finding 2024-003 – Lack of Internal Controls over Expenditure Documentation (Material Weakness) Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Federal Program Name: Nonpoint Source Implementation Grants Assistance Listing Numbers: 66.460 Pass-Through Entity: Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Commerce – National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Federal Program Name: Pacific Coast Salmon Recovery Program Assistance Listing Numbers: 11.438, 15.015, 15.244 Pass-Through Entity: State of Oregon – Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board (OWEB) Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: National Fish and Wildlife Foundation Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.665 Pass-Through Entity: U.S. Forest Service Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Natural Resources Conservation ServiceName of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior Federal Program Name: Wildlife, Sport Fish and Restoration Program Assistance Listing Numbers: 15.244 Pass-Through Entity: Bureau of Land Management Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior Federal Program Name: Secure Rural Schools and community Self-Determination – Watershed and water-quality improvements Assistance Listing Numbers: 15.234 Pass-Through Entity: Bureau of Land Management Criteria: Title 2 CFR §200.303 requires nonfederal entities to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Additionally, 2 CFR §200.302(b)(3) requires entities to maintain records that adequately identify the source and application of funds, including supporting documentation for expenditures, and 2 CFR §200.430 requires documentation for compensation for personal services. Condition: During our review of expenditures charged to the federal programs, the entity was unable to provide invoice copies or other sufficient supporting documentation for certain expenditures tested. As a result, we could not verify the allowability, accuracy, and proper approval of these costs in accordance with federal requirements. In addition, records were unavailable for Personnel expenditures that were charged to grant awards, and no support or evidence of time per grant was available. Cause: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers does not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that invoice documentation and other supporting records are retained, centrally filed, and readily available for audit and monitoring purposes. In addition, management did not perform ongoing monitoring to verify that required documentation was maintained prior to reimbursement or reporting. Effect or Potential Effect: because supporting documentation was not available, expenditures from detail documentation could not be substantiated. This increases the risk that the unallowable, unsupported, or inaccurate costs may be charged to the federal program and reported in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). Questioned Cost: Yes, $332,409 related to Personnel costs, equipment and other purchases that were not documented with detailed support. Context: During our audit, it was found that the Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers experienced complete staff turnover in Financial Management for the year being audited. No current finance employees had worked for the organization during the year being audited. No financial files for Accounts Payable, invoices, or reporting were available to the current financial staff. Not adequately retaining supporting documents and invoices to support the expenditures of the general ledger and requests for reimbursement for grants, the organization records may be insufficient for testing and review, for internal controls or meeting federal documentation and reporting requirements. Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: No, Prior- year did not require a Single Audit.Recommendation: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers should implement policies and procedures requiring invoice copies and supporting documentation to be maintained for all grant expenditures. Management should strengthen record retention practices, provide training to staff on documentation requirements, and implement periodic internal reviews to ensure compliance. District Response: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers acknowledges the deficiencies. Corrective Action Plan: _____________ (To be completed by Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers) Planned Implementation Date: _________ Responsible Person: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers Finance Manager
During the audit of federal awards, the entity did not demonstrate sufficient skills, knowledge, or experience of the staff and leadership responsible for administering and overseeing federal programs. Specifically: Adequate supporting documentation for federal award expenditures was not maintained or provided. Leadership oversight of federal award compliance activities was limited, and management review of grant activity were not evidenced. These conditions resulted in weaknesses in financial reporting, compliance monitoring, and documentation related to federal awards. Cause: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers has not ensured that staffing levels, qualifications, and experience are sufficient to support federal award administration and compliance. In addition, leadership lacks adequate knowledge of federal award requirements to provide effective governance, oversight, and monitoring of compliance activities. Formal training and documented procedures for federal awards management have not been prioritized. Effect or Potential Effect: As a result of these deficiencies: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers is at increased risk of non-compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements. Federal expenditures may be unsupported, inaccurately reported, or unallowable. Errors or compliance violations may not be detected or corrected in a timely manner. The entity may be subject to questioned costs, repayment of federal funds, or additional scrutiny from grantor agencies. Questioned Cost: None identified Context: During our audit, it was found that the Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers experienced complete staff turnover in Financial Management for the year being audited. No current finance employees had worked for the organization during the year being audited. No financial files for Accounts Payable, invoices, or reporting were available to the current financial staff. Not adequately retaining supporting documents and invoices to support the expenditures of the general ledger and requests for reimbursement for grants, the organization records may be insufficient for testing and review, for internal controls or meeting federal documentation and reporting requirements. Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: No, Prior- year did not require a Single Audit. Recommendation: We recommend that Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers: Ensure staff responsible for federal awards receive appropriate training on Uniform Guidance requirements, grant financial management, documentation, and compliance monitoring. Assign federal award oversight to personnel with sufficient experience and qualification or obtain external grant management and accounting support as needed. Establish written policies and procedures for federal award administration, including expenditure documentation, reconciliation, compliance review, and management approvals. Require leadership to perform and document periodic oversight and monitoring of federal awards, including review of reconciliations reimbursement requests, and compliance metrics. Implement ongoing monitoring and internal control assessments to ensure compliance with federal award requirements. District Response: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers acknowledges the deficiencies. Corrective Action Plan: _____________ (To be completed by Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers) Planned Implementation Date: ___________ Responsible Person: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers Finance Manager
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2024-004 – Insufficient Skills, Knowledge and Training, and Leadership (Material Weakness) Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Federal Program Name: Nonpoint Source Implementation Grants Assistance Listing Numbers: 66.460 Pass-Through Entity: Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Commerce – National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Federal Program Name: Pacific Coast Salmon Recovery Program Assistance Listing Numbers: 11.438, 15.015, 15.244 Pass-Through Entity: State of Oregon – Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board (OWEB) Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: National Fish and Wildlife Foundation Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.665 Pass-Through Entity: U.S. Forest Service Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Natural Resources Conservation Service Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.905 Pass-Through Entity: U.S. Forest Service Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior Federal Program Name: Wildlife, Sport Fish and Restoration Program Assistance Listing Numbers: 15.244 Pass-Through Entity: Bureau of Land Management Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior Federal Program Name: Secure Rural Schools and community Self-Determination – Watershed and water-quality improvements Assistance Listing Numbers: 15.234 Pass-Through Entity: Bureau of Land ManagementCriteria: Under Uniform Guidance 2 CFR §200.303, non-federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the award terms and conditions. This includes ensuring that: Personnel administering federal awards possess adequate skills, knowledge, and experience. Management and leadership provide appropriate oversight of federal award activities. Financial management systems adequately support accurate reporting, documentation, retention, and reconciliation of federal expenditures in accordance with 2 CFR §200.302. Condition: During the audit of federal awards, the entity did not demonstrate sufficient skills, knowledge, or experience of the staff and leadership responsible for administering and overseeing federal programs. Specifically: Adequate supporting documentation for federal award expenditures was not maintained or provided. Leadership oversight of federal award compliance activities was limited, and management review of grant activity were not evidenced. These conditions resulted in weaknesses in financial reporting, compliance monitoring, and documentation related to federal awards. Cause: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers has not ensured that staffing levels, qualifications, and experience are sufficient to support federal award administration and compliance. In addition, leadership lacks adequate knowledge of federal award requirements to provide effective governance, oversight, and monitoring of compliance activities. Formal training and documented procedures for federal awards management have not been prioritized. Effect or Potential Effect: As a result of these deficiencies: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers is at increased risk of non-compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements. Federal expenditures may be unsupported, inaccurately reported, or unallowable. Errors or compliance violations may not be detected or corrected in a timely manner. The entity may be subject to questioned costs, repayment of federal funds, or additional scrutiny from grantor agencies. Questioned Cost: None identified Context: During our audit, it was found that the Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers experienced complete staff turnover in Financial Management for the year being audited. No current finance employees had worked for the organization during the year being audited. No financial files for Accounts Payable, invoices, or reporting were available to the current financial staff. Not adequately retaining supporting documents and invoices to support the expenditures of the general ledger and requests for reimbursement for grants, the organization records may be insufficient for testing and review, for internal controls or meeting federal documentation and reporting requirements. Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: No, Prior- year did not require a Single Audit. Recommendation: We recommend that Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers: Ensure staff responsible for federal awards receive appropriate training on Uniform Guidance requirements, grant financial management, documentation, and compliance monitoring. Assign federal award oversight to personnel with sufficient experience and qualification or obtain external grant management and accounting support as needed. Establish written policies and procedures for federal award administration, including expenditure documentation, reconciliation, compliance review, and management approvals. Require leadership to perform and document periodic oversight and monitoring of federal awards, including review of reconciliations reimbursement requests, and compliance metrics. Implement ongoing monitoring and internal control assessments to ensure compliance with federal award requirements. District Response: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers acknowledges the deficiencies. Corrective Action Plan: _____________ (To be completed by Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers) Planned Implementation Date: ___________ Responsible Person: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers Finance Manager
Finding 2024-004 – Insufficient Skills, Knowledge and Training, and Leadership (Material Weakness) Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Federal Program Name: Nonpoint Source Implementation Grants Assistance Listing Numbers: 66.460 Pass-Through Entity: Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Commerce – National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Federal Program Name: Pacific Coast Salmon Recovery Program Assistance Listing Numbers: 11.438, 15.015, 15.244 Pass-Through Entity: State of Oregon – Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board (OWEB) Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: National Fish and Wildlife Foundation Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.665 Pass-Through Entity: U.S. Forest Service Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Natural Resources Conservation Service Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.905 Pass-Through Entity: U.S. Forest Service Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior Federal Program Name: Wildlife, Sport Fish and Restoration Program Assistance Listing Numbers: 15.244 Pass-Through Entity: Bureau of Land Management Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior Federal Program Name: Secure Rural Schools and community Self-Determination – Watershed and water-quality improvements Assistance Listing Numbers: 15.234 Pass-Through Entity: Bureau of Land ManagementCriteria: Under Uniform Guidance 2 CFR §200.303, non-federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the award terms and conditions. This includes ensuring that: Personnel administering federal awards possess adequate skills, knowledge, and experience. Management and leadership provide appropriate oversight of federal award activities. Financial management systems adequately support accurate reporting, documentation, retention, and reconciliation of federal expenditures in accordance with 2 CFR §200.302. Condition: During the audit of federal awards, the entity did not demonstrate sufficient skills, knowledge, or experience of the staff and leadership responsible for administering and overseeing federal programs. Specifically: Adequate supporting documentation for federal award expenditures was not maintained or provided. Leadership oversight of federal award compliance activities was limited, and management review of grant activity were not evidenced. These conditions resulted in weaknesses in financial reporting, compliance monitoring, and documentation related to federal awards. Cause: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers has not ensured that staffing levels, qualifications, and experience are sufficient to support federal award administration and compliance. In addition, leadership lacks adequate knowledge of federal award requirements to provide effective governance, oversight, and monitoring of compliance activities. Formal training and documented procedures for federal awards management have not been prioritized. Effect or Potential Effect: As a result of these deficiencies: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers is at increased risk of non-compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements. Federal expenditures may be unsupported, inaccurately reported, or unallowable. Errors or compliance violations may not be detected or corrected in a timely manner. The entity may be subject to questioned costs, repayment of federal funds, or additional scrutiny from grantor agencies. Questioned Cost: None identified Context: During our audit, it was found that the Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers experienced complete staff turnover in Financial Management for the year being audited. No current finance employees had worked for the organization during the year being audited. No financial files for Accounts Payable, invoices, or reporting were available to the current financial staff. Not adequately retaining supporting documents and invoices to support the expenditures of the general ledger and requests for reimbursement for grants, the organization records may be insufficient for testing and review, for internal controls or meeting federal documentation and reporting requirements. Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: No, Prior- year did not require a Single Audit. Recommendation: We recommend that Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers: Ensure staff responsible for federal awards receive appropriate training on Uniform Guidance requirements, grant financial management, documentation, and compliance monitoring. Assign federal award oversight to personnel with sufficient experience and qualification or obtain external grant management and accounting support as needed. Establish written policies and procedures for federal award administration, including expenditure documentation, reconciliation, compliance review, and management approvals. Require leadership to perform and document periodic oversight and monitoring of federal awards, including review of reconciliations reimbursement requests, and compliance metrics. Implement ongoing monitoring and internal control assessments to ensure compliance with federal award requirements. District Response: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers acknowledges the deficiencies. Corrective Action Plan: _____________ (To be completed by Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers) Planned Implementation Date: ___________ Responsible Person: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers Finance Manager
During the audit period, the Entity did not retain sufficient procurement documentation for several contracts funded under the above Assistance Listings. Specifically, files lacked one or more of the following: Evidence of the procurement method used. Price or cost analysis. Suspension/debarment checks for vendors where required. Documentation of competition. Conflict-of-interest attestations. Cause: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers procurement procedures were not sufficiently detailed or consistently applied to federal purchases. No evidence of procedures or review for procurement or suspension / debarment was provided to auditors. Turnover and limited training on Uniform Guidance procurement standards contributed to the inconsistent file completeness. Effect or Potential Effect: Without complete procurement documentation, the Entity cannot demonstrate compliance with federal procurement requirements, increasing the risk of: Noncompetitive awards or unreasonable prices. Unallowable costs for the award requirements. Potential disallowance or repayment of federal funds. Findings in federal or pass-through monitoring and future audits. Questioned Cost: Yes, $902,496 related to expenditures that had no procurement support or detail. Context: During our audit, it was found that the Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers had experienced complete staff turnover in Financial Management for the year being audited. No current finance employees had worked for the organization during the year being audited. Award files provided to auditors did not contain information related to procurement, suspension or debarment procedures or processes. Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: No, Prior- year did not require a Single Audit. Recommendation: We recommend that Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers: Update Written Procurement Procedures o Incorporate Uniform Guidance thresholds and methods (§200.320), competition requirements (§200.319), and documentation expectations (history of procurement). o Embed steps for suspension / debarment checks and Appendix II Contract clauses. Standardized Procurement Checklist o Pre-award checklist that verifies: method, competition evidence, cost/price analysis, conflict of interest attestations, SAM exclusion check, and required federal clauses. o Post -award checklist ensuring complete contract file (award memo, bid tab / evaluation, signed agreement, clause verification). Cost/Price Analysis Guidance o Require documented price reasonableness for small purchases, formal cost or price analysis for larger or sole-source awards, per (§200.324). Training & Accountability o Provide targeted training to procurement and program staff on 2 CFR §§200.317- 20.327 and Assistance Listing award conditions. o Implement supervisory pre-award review and periodic file audits. District Response: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers acknowledges the deficiencies. Corrective Action Plan: ____________ (To be completed by Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers) Planned Implementation Date: _____________ Responsible Person: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers Finance Manager
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2024-005 – Inadequate Procurement Documentation (Material Weakness) Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Federal Program Name: Nonpoint Source Implementation Grants Assistance Listing Numbers: 66.460 Pass-Through Entity: Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Commerce – National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Federal Program Name: Pacific Coast Salmon Recovery Program Assistance Listing Numbers: 11.438, 15.015, 15.244 Pass-Through Entity: State of Oregon – Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board (OWEB) Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: National Fish and Wildlife Foundation Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.665 Pass-Through Entity: U.S. Forest Service Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Natural Resources Conservation Service Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.905 Pass-Through Entity: U.S. Forest Service Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior Federal Program Name: Wildlife, Sport Fish and Restoration Program Assistance Listing Numbers: 15.244 Pass-Through Entity: Bureau of Land Management Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the InteriorFederal Program Name: Secure Rural Schools and community Self-Determination – Watershed and water-quality improvements Assistance Listing Numbers: 15.234 Pass-Through Entity: Bureau of Land Management Criteria: Federal procurement standards require non-Federal entities to maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, including the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and basis for the contract price. Competitive procurement must follow the entity’s written procedures consistent with 2 CFR §§200.317-200.327, including: Written procedures for procurement (§200.318(a)). Full and open competition requirements (§200.319). Methods of procurement (sealed bids, proposal requirements, and required documentation (§200.320). Contract cost and price justification, (§200.324). Suspension/debarment verification for covered transactions (§200.214; §200.213). Condition: During the audit period, the Entity did not retain sufficient procurement documentation for several contracts funded under the above Assistance Listings. Specifically, files lacked one or more of the following: Evidence of the procurement method used. Price or cost analysis. Suspension/debarment checks for vendors where required. Documentation of competition. Conflict-of-interest attestations. Cause: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers procurement procedures were not sufficiently detailed or consistently applied to federal purchases. No evidence of procedures or review for procurement or suspension / debarment was provided to auditors. Turnover and limited training on Uniform Guidance procurement standards contributed to the inconsistent file completeness. Effect or Potential Effect: Without complete procurement documentation, the Entity cannot demonstrate compliance with federal procurement requirements, increasing the risk of: Noncompetitive awards or unreasonable prices. Unallowable costs for the award requirements. Potential disallowance or repayment of federal funds. Findings in federal or pass-through monitoring and future audits. Questioned Cost: Yes, $902,496 related to expenditures that had no procurement support or detail. Context: During our audit, it was found that the Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers had experienced complete staff turnover in Financial Management for the year being audited. No current finance employees had worked for the organization during the year being audited. Award files provided to auditors did not contain information related to procurement, suspension or debarment procedures or processes. Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: No, Prior- year did not require a Single Audit. Recommendation: We recommend that Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers: Update Written Procurement Procedures o Incorporate Uniform Guidance thresholds and methods (§200.320), competition requirements (§200.319), and documentation expectations (history of procurement). o Embed steps for suspension / debarment checks and Appendix II Contract clauses. Standardized Procurement Checklist o Pre-award checklist that verifies: method, competition evidence, cost/price analysis, conflict of interest attestations, SAM exclusion check, and required federal clauses. o Post -award checklist ensuring complete contract file (award memo, bid tab / evaluation, signed agreement, clause verification). Cost/Price Analysis Guidance o Require documented price reasonableness for small purchases, formal cost or price analysis for larger or sole-source awards, per (§200.324). Training & Accountability o Provide targeted training to procurement and program staff on 2 CFR §§200.317- 20.327 and Assistance Listing award conditions. o Implement supervisory pre-award review and periodic file audits. District Response: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers acknowledges the deficiencies. Corrective Action Plan: ____________ (To be completed by Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers) Planned Implementation Date: _____________ Responsible Person: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers Finance Manager
Finding 2024-005 – Inadequate Procurement Documentation (Material Weakness) Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Federal Program Name: Nonpoint Source Implementation Grants Assistance Listing Numbers: 66.460 Pass-Through Entity: Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Commerce – National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Federal Program Name: Pacific Coast Salmon Recovery Program Assistance Listing Numbers: 11.438, 15.015, 15.244 Pass-Through Entity: State of Oregon – Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board (OWEB) Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: National Fish and Wildlife Foundation Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.665 Pass-Through Entity: U.S. Forest Service Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Natural Resources Conservation Service Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.905 Pass-Through Entity: U.S. Forest Service Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior Federal Program Name: Wildlife, Sport Fish and Restoration Program Assistance Listing Numbers: 15.244 Pass-Through Entity: Bureau of Land Management Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the InteriorFederal Program Name: Secure Rural Schools and community Self-Determination – Watershed and water-quality improvements Assistance Listing Numbers: 15.234 Pass-Through Entity: Bureau of Land Management Criteria: Federal procurement standards require non-Federal entities to maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, including the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and basis for the contract price. Competitive procurement must follow the entity’s written procedures consistent with 2 CFR §§200.317-200.327, including: Written procedures for procurement (§200.318(a)). Full and open competition requirements (§200.319). Methods of procurement (sealed bids, proposal requirements, and required documentation (§200.320). Contract cost and price justification, (§200.324). Suspension/debarment verification for covered transactions (§200.214; §200.213). Condition: During the audit period, the Entity did not retain sufficient procurement documentation for several contracts funded under the above Assistance Listings. Specifically, files lacked one or more of the following: Evidence of the procurement method used. Price or cost analysis. Suspension/debarment checks for vendors where required. Documentation of competition. Conflict-of-interest attestations. Cause: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers procurement procedures were not sufficiently detailed or consistently applied to federal purchases. No evidence of procedures or review for procurement or suspension / debarment was provided to auditors. Turnover and limited training on Uniform Guidance procurement standards contributed to the inconsistent file completeness. Effect or Potential Effect: Without complete procurement documentation, the Entity cannot demonstrate compliance with federal procurement requirements, increasing the risk of: Noncompetitive awards or unreasonable prices. Unallowable costs for the award requirements. Potential disallowance or repayment of federal funds. Findings in federal or pass-through monitoring and future audits. Questioned Cost: Yes, $902,496 related to expenditures that had no procurement support or detail. Context: During our audit, it was found that the Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers had experienced complete staff turnover in Financial Management for the year being audited. No current finance employees had worked for the organization during the year being audited. Award files provided to auditors did not contain information related to procurement, suspension or debarment procedures or processes. Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: No, Prior- year did not require a Single Audit. Recommendation: We recommend that Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers: Update Written Procurement Procedures o Incorporate Uniform Guidance thresholds and methods (§200.320), competition requirements (§200.319), and documentation expectations (history of procurement). o Embed steps for suspension / debarment checks and Appendix II Contract clauses. Standardized Procurement Checklist o Pre-award checklist that verifies: method, competition evidence, cost/price analysis, conflict of interest attestations, SAM exclusion check, and required federal clauses. o Post -award checklist ensuring complete contract file (award memo, bid tab / evaluation, signed agreement, clause verification). Cost/Price Analysis Guidance o Require documented price reasonableness for small purchases, formal cost or price analysis for larger or sole-source awards, per (§200.324). Training & Accountability o Provide targeted training to procurement and program staff on 2 CFR §§200.317- 20.327 and Assistance Listing award conditions. o Implement supervisory pre-award review and periodic file audits. District Response: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers acknowledges the deficiencies. Corrective Action Plan: ____________ (To be completed by Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers) Planned Implementation Date: _____________ Responsible Person: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers Finance Manager
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024, the auditee could not provide sufficient evidence that required reports for the programs listed were prepared, reviewed, and submitted in accordance with grant terms. Specifically: No provided required financial reports, and Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers lacked copies or evidence of submission, and support for reported amounts requested. Auditors were not provided with performance/progress reports and were instructed that Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers had no retained copies, review sign-offs, or submission confirmation. Where payments were received, support for the required reports or metrics were not retained and could not be supplied to auditors for reconciling to underlying records. Cause: Management has not implemented formal reporting controls, including: A documented reporting calendar with due dates and responsible staff, Reconciliation of report amounts to the accounting records, Retention procedures for report copies, underlying support, and submission confirmations, and Supervisory review evidenced by signatures or workflow approvals. Effect or Potential Effect: Absent evidence of timely, accurate reporting and adequate record retention: The organization is at risk of noncompliance with federal award conditions, Inaccurate financial or performance information may be reported to the funding agency, and The entity may be subject to remedial actions, including heightened monitoring, repayment of questioned amounts, or potential suspension of funding. Questioned Cost: None directly noted, but potential risk if reports were incomplete or inaccurate.Context: During our audit, it was found that the Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers experienced complete staff turnover in Financial Management for the year being audited. No current finance employees had worked for the organization during the year being audited. Award files provided to auditors did not contain information related to reporting of activity, expenditures, or progress of the awards. Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: No, Prior- year did not require a Single Audit. Recommendation: We recommend that Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers: Establish a formal reporting and retention policy aligned with 2 CFR 200 and grant terms. Implement a centralized reporting calendar that tracks due dates, preparers, reviewers, and submission methods. Require reconciliations of financial reports to the general ledger and supporting schedules, retain the reconciliation with the reporting package. Create standard workpapers for performance metrics for each award. Configure the grant portal or document management system to retain submission confirmations, reports, receipts, and version -controlled copies of all reports for awards. Document supervisory review through sign-offs prior to submission and with evidence retained. Provide training to staff on Uniform Guidance requirements and record retention (§200.334). District Response: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers acknowledges the deficiencies. Corrective Action Plan: ____________ (To be completed by Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers) Planned Implementation Date: _____________ Responsible Person: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers Finance Manager
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2024-006 – Compliance; Internal Control over Compliance, Reporting (Material Weakness) Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Federal Program Name: Nonpoint Source Implementation Grants Assistance Listing Numbers: 66.460 Pass-Through Entity: Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Commerce – National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Federal Program Name: Pacific Coast Salmon Recovery Program Assistance Listing Numbers: 11.438, 15.015, 15.244 Pass-Through Entity: State of Oregon – Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board (OWEB) Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: National Fish and Wildlife Foundation Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.665 Pass-Through Entity: U.S. Forest Service Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of AgricultureFederal Program Name: Natural Resources Conservation Service Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.905 Pass-Through Entity: U.S. Forest Service Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior Federal Program Name: Wildlife, Sport Fish and Restoration Program Assistance Listing Numbers: 15.244 Pass-Through Entity: Bureau of Land Management Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior Federal Program Name: Secure Rural Schools and community Self-Determination – Watershed and water-quality improvements Assistance Listing Numbers: 15.234 Pass-Through Entity: Bureau of Land Management Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200, recipients must submit performance and financial reports as required by the terms and conditions of the award and must retain records sufficient to demonstrate compliance (see (§200.301Monitoring and reporting program performance, and §200.328 Financial reporting, §200.329 Monitoring and reporting program performance, and §200.334 Retention requirements for records). The grant agreements for awards above require timely submission of performance / progress reports by specified due dates, with documentation maintained to support the submitted information. Condition: For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024, the auditee could not provide sufficient evidence that required reports for the programs listed were prepared, reviewed, and submitted in accordance with grant terms. Specifically: No provided required financial reports, and Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers lacked copies or evidence of submission, and support for reported amounts requested. Auditors were not provided with performance/progress reports and were instructed that Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers had no retained copies, review sign-offs, or submission confirmation. Where payments were received, support for the required reports or metrics were not retained and could not be supplied to auditors for reconciling to underlying records. Cause: Management has not implemented formal reporting controls, including: A documented reporting calendar with due dates and responsible staff, Reconciliation of report amounts to the accounting records, Retention procedures for report copies, underlying support, and submission confirmations, and Supervisory review evidenced by signatures or workflow approvals. Effect or Potential Effect: Absent evidence of timely, accurate reporting and adequate record retention: The organization is at risk of noncompliance with federal award conditions, Inaccurate financial or performance information may be reported to the funding agency, and The entity may be subject to remedial actions, including heightened monitoring, repayment of questioned amounts, or potential suspension of funding. Questioned Cost: None directly noted, but potential risk if reports were incomplete or inaccurate.Context: During our audit, it was found that the Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers experienced complete staff turnover in Financial Management for the year being audited. No current finance employees had worked for the organization during the year being audited. Award files provided to auditors did not contain information related to reporting of activity, expenditures, or progress of the awards. Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: No, Prior- year did not require a Single Audit. Recommendation: We recommend that Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers: Establish a formal reporting and retention policy aligned with 2 CFR 200 and grant terms. Implement a centralized reporting calendar that tracks due dates, preparers, reviewers, and submission methods. Require reconciliations of financial reports to the general ledger and supporting schedules, retain the reconciliation with the reporting package. Create standard workpapers for performance metrics for each award. Configure the grant portal or document management system to retain submission confirmations, reports, receipts, and version -controlled copies of all reports for awards. Document supervisory review through sign-offs prior to submission and with evidence retained. Provide training to staff on Uniform Guidance requirements and record retention (§200.334). District Response: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers acknowledges the deficiencies. Corrective Action Plan: ____________ (To be completed by Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers) Planned Implementation Date: _____________ Responsible Person: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers Finance Manager
Finding 2024-006 – Compliance; Internal Control over Compliance, Reporting (Material Weakness) Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Federal Program Name: Nonpoint Source Implementation Grants Assistance Listing Numbers: 66.460 Pass-Through Entity: Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Commerce – National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Federal Program Name: Pacific Coast Salmon Recovery Program Assistance Listing Numbers: 11.438, 15.015, 15.244 Pass-Through Entity: State of Oregon – Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board (OWEB) Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: National Fish and Wildlife Foundation Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.665 Pass-Through Entity: U.S. Forest Service Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of AgricultureFederal Program Name: Natural Resources Conservation Service Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.905 Pass-Through Entity: U.S. Forest Service Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior Federal Program Name: Wildlife, Sport Fish and Restoration Program Assistance Listing Numbers: 15.244 Pass-Through Entity: Bureau of Land Management Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior Federal Program Name: Secure Rural Schools and community Self-Determination – Watershed and water-quality improvements Assistance Listing Numbers: 15.234 Pass-Through Entity: Bureau of Land Management Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200, recipients must submit performance and financial reports as required by the terms and conditions of the award and must retain records sufficient to demonstrate compliance (see (§200.301Monitoring and reporting program performance, and §200.328 Financial reporting, §200.329 Monitoring and reporting program performance, and §200.334 Retention requirements for records). The grant agreements for awards above require timely submission of performance / progress reports by specified due dates, with documentation maintained to support the submitted information. Condition: For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024, the auditee could not provide sufficient evidence that required reports for the programs listed were prepared, reviewed, and submitted in accordance with grant terms. Specifically: No provided required financial reports, and Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers lacked copies or evidence of submission, and support for reported amounts requested. Auditors were not provided with performance/progress reports and were instructed that Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers had no retained copies, review sign-offs, or submission confirmation. Where payments were received, support for the required reports or metrics were not retained and could not be supplied to auditors for reconciling to underlying records. Cause: Management has not implemented formal reporting controls, including: A documented reporting calendar with due dates and responsible staff, Reconciliation of report amounts to the accounting records, Retention procedures for report copies, underlying support, and submission confirmations, and Supervisory review evidenced by signatures or workflow approvals. Effect or Potential Effect: Absent evidence of timely, accurate reporting and adequate record retention: The organization is at risk of noncompliance with federal award conditions, Inaccurate financial or performance information may be reported to the funding agency, and The entity may be subject to remedial actions, including heightened monitoring, repayment of questioned amounts, or potential suspension of funding. Questioned Cost: None directly noted, but potential risk if reports were incomplete or inaccurate.Context: During our audit, it was found that the Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers experienced complete staff turnover in Financial Management for the year being audited. No current finance employees had worked for the organization during the year being audited. Award files provided to auditors did not contain information related to reporting of activity, expenditures, or progress of the awards. Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: No, Prior- year did not require a Single Audit. Recommendation: We recommend that Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers: Establish a formal reporting and retention policy aligned with 2 CFR 200 and grant terms. Implement a centralized reporting calendar that tracks due dates, preparers, reviewers, and submission methods. Require reconciliations of financial reports to the general ledger and supporting schedules, retain the reconciliation with the reporting package. Create standard workpapers for performance metrics for each award. Configure the grant portal or document management system to retain submission confirmations, reports, receipts, and version -controlled copies of all reports for awards. Document supervisory review through sign-offs prior to submission and with evidence retained. Provide training to staff on Uniform Guidance requirements and record retention (§200.334). District Response: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers acknowledges the deficiencies. Corrective Action Plan: ____________ (To be completed by Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers) Planned Implementation Date: _____________ Responsible Person: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers Finance Manager
The SEFA for fiscal year ended June 30, 2024 was provided after asking for the SEFA repeatedly. When finally received, the SEFA contained incorrect Assistance Listing numbers for multiple programs/awards, which could lead to misclassification of federal awards. Context: The SEFA reported $1,381,646 in federal expenditures across 27 programs/grant agreements. Testing revealed that 23 of the 27 grant awards had incorrect Assistance Listing numbers on the SEFA and were not aligned with agreements or program information. The SEFA was finalized, only after significant auditor follow-up. Cause: Management did not have adequate procedures for compiling and reviewing SEFA information, including verification of Assistance Listing numbers against official sources and award documents. Effect or Potential Effect: Incorrect CFDA / Assistance Listing numbers may: Impair auditor’s ability to properly identify major programs, Result in noncompliance with Uniform Guidance reporting requirements, Increase risk of audit findings and questioned costs in future periods. Questioned Cost: None identified Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: No, Prior- year did not require a Single Audit. Recommendation: We recommend that Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers: Establish a formal SEFA preparation process, including a checklist for verifying Assistance Listing numbers against award documents and official listings, Assign responsibility for timely SEFA submission, and require supervisory review before providing to auditors. Maintain documentation supporting CFDA/ Assistance Listing numbers and program details in a centralized grant file. District Response: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers acknowledges the deficiencies. Corrective Action Plan: ____________ (To be completed by Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers) Planned Implementation Date: ___________ Responsible Person: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers Finance Manager
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2024-007 – Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) – Incorrect CFDA / Assistance Listing Numbers Reporting; Internal Control over Compliance (Significant Deficiency) Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Federal Program Name: Nonpoint Source Implementation Grants Assistance Listing Numbers: 66.460 Pass-Through Entity: Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Commerce – National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Federal Program Name: Pacific Coast Salmon Recovery Program Assistance Listing Numbers: 11.438, 15.015, 15.244 Pass-Through Entity: State of Oregon – Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board (OWEB) Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: National Fish and Wildlife FoundationAssistance Listing Numbers: 10.665 Pass-Through Entity: U.S. Forest Service Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Natural Resources Conservation Service Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.905 Pass-Through Entity: U.S. Forest Service Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior Federal Program Name: Wildlife, Sport Fish and Restoration Program Assistance Listing Numbers: 15.244 Pass-Through Entity: Bureau of Land Management Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior Federal Program Name: Secure Rural Schools and community Self-Determination – Watershed and water-quality improvements Assistance Listing Numbers: 15.234 Pass-Through Entity: Bureau of Land Management Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.510(b), auditees must prepare a complete and accurate SEFA including correct Assistance Listing (formerly CFDA) numbers, program names, and amounts. This is essential for proper identification of federal programs and determination of major programs. Condition: The SEFA for fiscal year ended June 30, 2024 was provided after asking for the SEFA repeatedly. When finally received, the SEFA contained incorrect Assistance Listing numbers for multiple programs/awards, which could lead to misclassification of federal awards. Context: The SEFA reported $1,381,646 in federal expenditures across 27 programs/grant agreements. Testing revealed that 23 of the 27 grant awards had incorrect Assistance Listing numbers on the SEFA and were not aligned with agreements or program information. The SEFA was finalized, only after significant auditor follow-up. Cause: Management did not have adequate procedures for compiling and reviewing SEFA information, including verification of Assistance Listing numbers against official sources and award documents. Effect or Potential Effect: Incorrect CFDA / Assistance Listing numbers may: Impair auditor’s ability to properly identify major programs, Result in noncompliance with Uniform Guidance reporting requirements, Increase risk of audit findings and questioned costs in future periods. Questioned Cost: None identified Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: No, Prior- year did not require a Single Audit. Recommendation: We recommend that Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers: Establish a formal SEFA preparation process, including a checklist for verifying Assistance Listing numbers against award documents and official listings, Assign responsibility for timely SEFA submission, and require supervisory review before providing to auditors. Maintain documentation supporting CFDA/ Assistance Listing numbers and program details in a centralized grant file. District Response: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers acknowledges the deficiencies. Corrective Action Plan: ____________ (To be completed by Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers) Planned Implementation Date: ___________ Responsible Person: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers Finance Manager
Finding 2024-007 – Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) – Incorrect CFDA / Assistance Listing Numbers Reporting; Internal Control over Compliance (Significant Deficiency) Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Federal Program Name: Nonpoint Source Implementation Grants Assistance Listing Numbers: 66.460 Pass-Through Entity: Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Commerce – National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Federal Program Name: Pacific Coast Salmon Recovery Program Assistance Listing Numbers: 11.438, 15.015, 15.244 Pass-Through Entity: State of Oregon – Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board (OWEB) Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: National Fish and Wildlife FoundationAssistance Listing Numbers: 10.665 Pass-Through Entity: U.S. Forest Service Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: Natural Resources Conservation Service Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.905 Pass-Through Entity: U.S. Forest Service Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior Federal Program Name: Wildlife, Sport Fish and Restoration Program Assistance Listing Numbers: 15.244 Pass-Through Entity: Bureau of Land Management Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior Federal Program Name: Secure Rural Schools and community Self-Determination – Watershed and water-quality improvements Assistance Listing Numbers: 15.234 Pass-Through Entity: Bureau of Land Management Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.510(b), auditees must prepare a complete and accurate SEFA including correct Assistance Listing (formerly CFDA) numbers, program names, and amounts. This is essential for proper identification of federal programs and determination of major programs. Condition: The SEFA for fiscal year ended June 30, 2024 was provided after asking for the SEFA repeatedly. When finally received, the SEFA contained incorrect Assistance Listing numbers for multiple programs/awards, which could lead to misclassification of federal awards. Context: The SEFA reported $1,381,646 in federal expenditures across 27 programs/grant agreements. Testing revealed that 23 of the 27 grant awards had incorrect Assistance Listing numbers on the SEFA and were not aligned with agreements or program information. The SEFA was finalized, only after significant auditor follow-up. Cause: Management did not have adequate procedures for compiling and reviewing SEFA information, including verification of Assistance Listing numbers against official sources and award documents. Effect or Potential Effect: Incorrect CFDA / Assistance Listing numbers may: Impair auditor’s ability to properly identify major programs, Result in noncompliance with Uniform Guidance reporting requirements, Increase risk of audit findings and questioned costs in future periods. Questioned Cost: None identified Repeat of a Prior-Year Finding: No, Prior- year did not require a Single Audit. Recommendation: We recommend that Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers: Establish a formal SEFA preparation process, including a checklist for verifying Assistance Listing numbers against award documents and official listings, Assign responsibility for timely SEFA submission, and require supervisory review before providing to auditors. Maintain documentation supporting CFDA/ Assistance Listing numbers and program details in a centralized grant file. District Response: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers acknowledges the deficiencies. Corrective Action Plan: ____________ (To be completed by Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers) Planned Implementation Date: ___________ Responsible Person: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers Finance Manager
FAC accepted this audit on January 12, 2017 — management decision was due July 12, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Oregon →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
