← Back to home

CORVALLIS NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES, INC.Non-Profit

EIN: 931057296

UEI: RWNUFDJVCWR3

Audited by: Clark Nuber PS

Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

CORVALLIS NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES, INC.9 audit years2 findings1 repeat
9
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
1
Repeat Findings
$8.2M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$8,181,507 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on August 13, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by February 13, 2027 (164 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-12-31

$7,371,012 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 4, 2025 — management decision was due March 4, 2026.

FY 2023-12-31

$7,151,864 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 30, 2024 — management decision was due March 30, 2025.

FY 2022-12-31

$7,464,648 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 1, 2023 — management decision was due April 1, 2024.

FY 2021-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,519,388 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on October 2, 2022 — management decision was due April 2, 2023.

2021-001
Other
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2020-001

While performing audit procedures on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA), we noted three errors in the amounts reported as expenditures of federal awards. We also noted two federal awards that were erroneously omitted from the SEFA. We also noted three incorrect assistance listing numbers reported on the SEFA. Cause: The internal controls in place with the intent to report expenditures of federal awards for reporting on the SEFA were not operating effectively. Effect: The SEFA did not accurately reflect the expenditures of federal awards. Questioned Costs: None. Context: In performing procedures over the SEFA, we identified the following errors: We identified three instances where award expenditures reported on the SEFA were erroneously included. For two of the three instances, the funds were not federally sourced and are therefore not considered expenditures of federal awards to be reported on the SEFA. For the third instance, the awarding agency designated the organization as a vendor/contractor, and therefore the funds are not considered expenditures of federal awards to be reported on the SEFA. The original expenditures listed for those three instances was $2,609,405 and those awards were removed from the SEFA.; We identified two instances where the organization had federal award expenditures that were erroneously omitted from the SEFA. The total expenditures for those two awards was $680,000.; We identified three instances where the assistance listing number reported on the SEFA was incorrect. Repeat Finding: Yes. See Finding 2020-001. Recommendation: We recommend management review the current procedures in place for preparation of the SEFA. We recommend that the SEFA be prepared by a qualified individual in the accounting department, perhaps the Controller, and that a separate review is performed by the Chief Financial Officer. We recommend that management identifies key information needed to complete the SEFA (Assistance Listing number; vendor/contractor vs. subrecipient status; etc.) on a monthly basis at the time the organization receives an award in order to facilitate timely follow-up with an awarding agency if those details are not otherwise specified in the original agreement. View of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Program: All. Type of Finding: Material weakness in internal control over compliance. Criteria: Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 508 ? Auditee Responsibilities, requires the auditee to prepare a schedule of expenditures of federal awards. The schedule must provide the total federal awards expended for each individual federal program and the Assistance Listings Number. Condition: While performing audit procedures on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA), we noted three errors in the amounts reported as expenditures of federal awards. We also noted two federal awards that were erroneously omitted from the SEFA. We also noted three incorrect assistance listing numbers reported on the SEFA. Cause: The internal controls in place with the intent to report expenditures of federal awards for reporting on the SEFA were not operating effectively. Effect: The SEFA did not accurately reflect the expenditures of federal awards. Questioned Costs: None. Context: In performing procedures over the SEFA, we identified the following errors: We identified three instances where award expenditures reported on the SEFA were erroneously included. For two of the three instances, the funds were not federally sourced and are therefore not considered expenditures of federal awards to be reported on the SEFA. For the third instance, the awarding agency designated the organization as a vendor/contractor, and therefore the funds are not considered expenditures of federal awards to be reported on the SEFA. The original expenditures listed for those three instances was $2,609,405 and those awards were removed from the SEFA.; We identified two instances where the organization had federal award expenditures that were erroneously omitted from the SEFA. The total expenditures for those two awards was $680,000.; We identified three instances where the assistance listing number reported on the SEFA was incorrect. Repeat Finding: Yes. See Finding 2020-001. Recommendation: We recommend management review the current procedures in place for preparation of the SEFA. We recommend that the SEFA be prepared by a qualified individual in the accounting department, perhaps the Controller, and that a separate review is performed by the Chief Financial Officer. We recommend that management identifies key information needed to complete the SEFA (Assistance Listing number; vendor/contractor vs. subrecipient status; etc.) on a monthly basis at the time the organization receives an award in order to facilitate timely follow-up with an awarding agency if those details are not otherwise specified in the original agreement. View of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

DevNW Management understands the importance of timely review and accuracy of federal award data and its presentation. Award guidelines were reviewed and implemented with the intent of accurate presentation of information. During 2021, the Finance Department had turnover in a number of critical staff positions. A Senior Staff Accountant and Staff Accountant left our employment by the first quarter of 2021 and we were unable to re-hire these positions until the end of July 2021. We had one final critical staff change at the end of 2021, the departure of our Accounts Payable Specialist, and that position was not rehired until April 2022. We headed into the 2021 audit with a team of dedicated but relatively new staff. While the Finance team still incurred capacity issues related to the training of new staff in 2021, the increase in Finance Staff gave us the ability to segregate functions and allowed for multi- tiered review of end-of-year close and preparation of audit schedules. The Finance staff had a process in place to review contracts, follow up with funders and confirm components of the annual SEFA schedule. New staff were compiling confirmations, these were reviewed by the Controller and then the Controller and CFO reviewed the documents for accuracy prior to distribution to funders. Confirmations were one of the main sources for compiling the SEFA schedule. One funding source included in the 2021 SEFA schedule was from NeighborWorks America. This particular grant was also included on the 2020 SEFA schedule, but it was incorrectly identified as Federal funds (the funds came to NeighborWorks through Wells Fargo Bank) and they should have been excluded from the SEFA schedule. An additional grant contract from Oregon Health Authority that was also recorded as Federal Funds in 2020 came to us in 2021 but the funding source per the contract was from general funds in 2021 and should not have been included in the SEFA schedule. While these funds went through a multiple review process, the confusion of presenting them on the 2020 SEFA caused us to include them in error in the 2021 schedule. A major funder for Community LendingWorks, Lane County, signed a confirmation that noted the funds were federal and listed CLW as a Sub-Recipient. Based on this documentation from the funder, we included it in the SEFA. We later learned that this was an error on the funder?s part as they considered us a Contractor and it should not have been included in the SEFA schedule. Additionally, two debt items were left off of the SEFA schedule, a Small Business Administration Federal loan and a Community Frameworks Loan. Accuracy and compliance are the forefront of department and organization goals. Management and staff?s plan to attain these goals include; Single Audit education, detailed review of the final 2021 SEFA audit schedule, compiling an ongoing SEFA schedule as part of the end-of-month process, and a Finance Team Member added to all contract negotiations will be implemented in 2022 to mitigate these errors in the future. All management involved in negotiating contracts and all Finance staff will attend Single Audit training to clarify those specific components of a contract that must be communicated and properly documented specifically as Federal Funded Awards. Also, the compilation of the grant matrix for each organization will now include a debt schedule to monitor funding received from all sources of federal awards. The SEFA schedule will become an active part of the finance department?s end-of-month process and not compiled annually. Name of contact people responsible for corrective action: Emily Reiman, Chief Executive Officer; Corinne Carmody-Riley, Chief Financial Officer. Anticipated completion date: The above changes will go into effect with the August 31, 2022 closing process performed on September 20, 2022.

Prior Finding References

2020-001

About Other →

FY 2020-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$7,120,870 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 4, 2022 — management decision was due July 4, 2022.

2020-001
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

While performing audit procedures on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA), we noted two errors in the amounts reported as expenditures of federal awards. We also noted that much of the SEFA had been prepared by one individual and a separate review was not conducted of all the information prepared. Cause: The internal controls in place with the intent to report expenditures of federal awards for reporting on the SEFA were not operating effectively. Effect: The SEFA did not accurately reflect the expenditures of federal awards for two programs. Questioned Costs: None. Context: In performing procedures over the SEFA, we identified two programs where the expenditures of federal awards listed on the SEFA were not correct. The original expenditures listed for those two programs was $441,910. The final and correct figures for those two programs was $28,472. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend management review the current procedures in place for preparation of the SEFA. We recommend that the SEFA be prepared by a qualified individual in the accounting department, perhaps the Controller, and that a review is performed by the Chief Financial Officer. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Program: All. Type of Finding: Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance. Criteria: Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 508 ? Auditee Responsibilities, requires the auditee to prepare a schedule of expenditures of federal awards. The schedule must provide the total federal awards expended for each individual federal program and the Assistance Listings Number. Condition: While performing audit procedures on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA), we noted two errors in the amounts reported as expenditures of federal awards. We also noted that much of the SEFA had been prepared by one individual and a separate review was not conducted of all the information prepared. Cause: The internal controls in place with the intent to report expenditures of federal awards for reporting on the SEFA were not operating effectively. Effect: The SEFA did not accurately reflect the expenditures of federal awards for two programs. Questioned Costs: None. Context: In performing procedures over the SEFA, we identified two programs where the expenditures of federal awards listed on the SEFA were not correct. The original expenditures listed for those two programs was $441,910. The final and correct figures for those two programs was $28,472. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend management review the current procedures in place for preparation of the SEFA. We recommend that the SEFA be prepared by a qualified individual in the accounting department, perhaps the Controller, and that a review is performed by the Chief Financial Officer. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

DevNW Management understands the importance of timely review and accuracy of federal award data and its presentation. Award guidelines were reviewed and implemented with the intent of accurate presentation of information. Due to emergency response funding related to the COVID pandemic, the compilation of the 2020 SEFA award schedule was significantly larger (both in number of funding sources and overall dollar amount, representing a 254% increase) than any historical schedule compiled by DevNW, or pre-merger, NEDCO or Willamette Neighborhood Housing Services. Finance staff had a process in place to review contracts, follow up with funders and confirm components of the annual schedule. However, in the process of compiling the schedule for 2020, two funding sources showed the full funds received instead of the funds expended in 2020. This error was not caught prior to submission to our auditors due to an inadequate review process. During the early part of 2021, the Finance team also experienced a 30% reduction in staff due to turnover (and an unusually tight job market that caused a delay in replacing these positions) and this had a significant impact on remaining staff regarding their capacity to maintain day to day department functions, while also managing the details for a larger-than-usual audit ? e.g. the review for our SEFA award schedule. Accuracy and compliance are the forefront of department and organization goals. Management and staff?s plan to attain these goals include; hiring and maintaining qualified staff and implementing a thorough review processes for SEFA compilation. Name of contact people responsible for corrective action: Emily Reiman, Chief Executive Officer; Corinne Carmody-Riley, Chief Financial Officer. Anticipated completion date: The above changes will go into effect with the August 31, 2021 closing process performed on September 22, 2021.

About Other →

FY 2019-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,871,198 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 14, 2020 — management decision was due June 14, 2021.

FY 2018-12-31

$1,569,835 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 31, 2019 — management decision was due January 31, 2020.

FY 2016-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,156,658 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 16, 2017 — management decision was due February 16, 2018.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Washington

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.