← Back to home

ONE COMMUNITY HEALTHNon-Profit

EIN: 930910794

UEI: F5DLNFE1DTH8

Audited by: CLIFTONLARSONALLEN, LLP

Oversight agency: 10 [Department of Agriculture]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

ONE COMMUNITY HEALTH10 audit years2 findings
10
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$17.9M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2024)

FY 2024-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$17,878,569 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on September 30, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by March 30, 2026 (157 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2023-12-31

$18,711,490 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 30, 2024 — management decision was due March 30, 2025.

FY 2022-12-31

$20,012,058 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 6, 2024 — management decision was due September 6, 2024.

FY 2022-01-31

$7,483,932 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on October 30, 2022 — management decision was due April 30, 2023.

2022-002
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

CLA identified three instances in which the incentive amount paid to the employee was different than the amount that should have been paid according to the board approved incentive structure. Context: CLA identified three instances in which the incentive amount paid to the employee did not equal the amount that should have been paid according to the board approved incentive structure. OCH Board of Directors approved an incentive be paid to employees twice during the timeframe being audited. One incentive was approved to be calculated and paid based on longevity and the other was approved based on attendance of COVID-19 related events held by OCH. Cause: There was a lack of understanding regarding the incentive structure in the Human Resources Department. Effect: Three instances were noted in which the incentive amount paid to employees was different than the board approved incentive structure and no further approval was documented to support the increase or decrease in the incentive. Recommendation: We recommend management follow its existing internal control process for board approved incentive pay and ensure that any exceptions to the approved incentive pay structure are approved and documented. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2022-002: Program Name/ALN Title: Provider Relief Fund Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.498 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award Period: 4/1/2020 ? 6/30/2021 Federal Award Number: N/A Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: Management is responsible for designing and maintaining a system of internal controls to achieve compliance with provisions of federal awards. Condition: CLA identified three instances in which the incentive amount paid to the employee was different than the amount that should have been paid according to the board approved incentive structure. Context: CLA identified three instances in which the incentive amount paid to the employee did not equal the amount that should have been paid according to the board approved incentive structure. OCH Board of Directors approved an incentive be paid to employees twice during the timeframe being audited. One incentive was approved to be calculated and paid based on longevity and the other was approved based on attendance of COVID-19 related events held by OCH. Cause: There was a lack of understanding regarding the incentive structure in the Human Resources Department. Effect: Three instances were noted in which the incentive amount paid to employees was different than the board approved incentive structure and no further approval was documented to support the increase or decrease in the incentive. Recommendation: We recommend management follow its existing internal control process for board approved incentive pay and ensure that any exceptions to the approved incentive pay structure are approved and documented. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective action plan: OCH Human Resources is reviewing the organization?s bonus policy to include exception, the policy will also include the process for post approval adjustments. Planned completion date is December 31, 2022.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2021-01-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,582,263 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 17, 2022 — management decision was due July 17, 2022.

FY 2020-01-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,370,186 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on August 27, 2020 — management decision was due February 27, 2021.

2020-001
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

During our testing, we identified two instances in which a sliding fee application was not provided, indicating that the sliding fee application review and approval process did not occur. Context: Sliding fee applications are reviewed and approved by the billing department prior to the patient receiving a sliding fee discount. In the two instances noted, the sliding fee application could not be located. Cause: In one instance the sliding fee application was likely misplaced when transferring documents from billing to internal records to be scanned. In the other instance, the sliding fee application was likely never completed. This was caused by front desk employees having access to inadvertently click a verified box in the practice management system for sliding fee applications. Effect: Without proper review and approval over the sliding fee applications prior to applying the sliding fee to a patient accounts, a sliding fee discount can be applied to patient accounts that do not met the FPL scales and result in a loss of revenues. Recommendation: CLA recommends that all sliding fee applications are reviewed and approved by the billing department prior to verification in the practice management system. Further, CLA recommends that all sliding fee applications are retained electronically in the practice management system. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: Health centers must prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule (SFDS) so that the amount owed for health center services by eligible patients are adjusted (discounted) based on the patient?s ability to pay. Condition: During our testing, we identified two instances in which a sliding fee application was not provided, indicating that the sliding fee application review and approval process did not occur. Context: Sliding fee applications are reviewed and approved by the billing department prior to the patient receiving a sliding fee discount. In the two instances noted, the sliding fee application could not be located. Cause: In one instance the sliding fee application was likely misplaced when transferring documents from billing to internal records to be scanned. In the other instance, the sliding fee application was likely never completed. This was caused by front desk employees having access to inadvertently click a verified box in the practice management system for sliding fee applications. Effect: Without proper review and approval over the sliding fee applications prior to applying the sliding fee to a patient accounts, a sliding fee discount can be applied to patient accounts that do not met the FPL scales and result in a loss of revenues. Recommendation: CLA recommends that all sliding fee applications are reviewed and approved by the billing department prior to verification in the practice management system. Further, CLA recommends that all sliding fee applications are retained electronically in the practice management system. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Corrective Action Plan

ONE COMMUNITY HEALTH CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, 2020 Department of Health and Human Services One Community Health respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended January 31, 2020. Audit period: February 01, 2019 - January 31, 2020 The findings from the schedule of findings and questioned costs are discussed below. The findings are numbered consistently with the numbers assigned in the schedule. FINDINGS?FINANCIAL STATEMENT AUDIT None FINDINGS?FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAMS AUDITS 2020-001 Health Center Program Cluster ? CFDA No. 93.224 Recommendation: CLA recommends that all sliding fee applications are reviewed and approved by the billing department prior to verification in the practice management system. Further, CLA recommends that all sliding fee applications are retained electronically in the practice management system. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: To ensure all documentation is collected for the sliding fee applications One Community Health plans to implement the following procedures: ? The logic was updated in the practice management system to ensure the sliding fee applications are only approved when three specific criteria are met. ? One Community Health has modified procedures to allow front desk supervisors or billing department staff to accept patient sliding fee applications. Front desk supervisors have scanners next to their computers to ensure the sliding fee application is uploaded into the chart. The billing department and/or front desk managers review the final criteria to approve or deny the sliding fee discount. The billing team will also perform monthly audits to ensure that all documentation is included in the patient?s chart. Name of the contact person responsible: Belinda Batcha, CFO Planned completion date: November 30, 2020 If the Department of Health and Human Services has questions regarding this plan, please call Belinda Batcha, CFO at 541-386-6380.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2019-01-31

$4,335,803 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 21, 2019 — management decision was due February 21, 2020.

FY 2018-01-31

$4,271,921 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 9, 2018 — management decision was due April 9, 2019.

FY 2017-01-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,035,638 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 30, 2017 — management decision was due April 30, 2018.

FY 2016-01-31

$3,701,639 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 19, 2016 — management decision was due March 19, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Oregon

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.