JAPANESE GARDEN SOCIETY OF OREGONNon-Profit

EIN: 930511171

UEI: GSA_MIGRATION

Audited by: GARY MCGEE & CO. LLP

Oversight agency: 59 [Small Business Administration]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

JAPANESE GARDEN SOCIETY OF OREGON2 audit years2 findings
2
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$3.6M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2021)

FY 2021-12-31

$3,578,935 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on July 31, 2022. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by January 31, 2023 (1306 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2021-001
Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

While the Society had more than sufficient qualifying costs in excess of the federal award amount, fundraising payroll costs were coded to the federal award. Fundraising costs are not an allowable use of SVOG funds and is further prohibited in line with 2 CFR 200.442. Cause: The Society did not have policies and procedures over cost principles establishing allowability or unallowability of certain items of costs in accordance with 2 CFR sections 200.420 through 200.476. Effect: Noncompliance such as unallowable costs charged to the federal award could occur and not be detected or corrected. Audit Recommendation: We recommend that management implement procedures over the administration of federal awards, including establishing written policies and procedures to ensure compliance with Uniform Guidance cost principles. Management?s Response: The initial draft of our written policies and procedures over cost principles establishing allowability or unallowability of certain costs in accordance with 2 CFR sections 200.420 through 200.476 is in progress and will be completed by July 31, 2022, with the final copy to be in place by August 31, 2022. This will ensure that no unallowable costs could be inadvertently charged to a federal award in the future, and, combined with a review of all charged costs being done by a staff member who is independent of the award tracking and reporting, will ensure compliance with Uniform Guidance cost principles.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding number: 2021-001 Finding type: Federal award finding Federal Assistance Listing No.: 59.075 Program name: COVID-19 ? Shuttered Venue Operators Grant (SVOG) Program Federal agency: U.S. Small Business Administration Pass-through entity: n/a Grant number: n/a Federal award year: 2021 Control deficiency type: Material weakness over compliance Instance of noncompliance: No Compliance requirements: Allowable costs Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Criteria: The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 200.303 requires that nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The organization should have controls to ensure that costs charged to federal awards comply with the cost principles contained in Subpart E ? Cost Principles (2 CFR 200.400). Condition: While the Society had more than sufficient qualifying costs in excess of the federal award amount, fundraising payroll costs were coded to the federal award. Fundraising costs are not an allowable use of SVOG funds and is further prohibited in line with 2 CFR 200.442. Cause: The Society did not have policies and procedures over cost principles establishing allowability or unallowability of certain items of costs in accordance with 2 CFR sections 200.420 through 200.476. Effect: Noncompliance such as unallowable costs charged to the federal award could occur and not be detected or corrected. Audit Recommendation: We recommend that management implement procedures over the administration of federal awards, including establishing written policies and procedures to ensure compliance with Uniform Guidance cost principles. Management?s Response: The initial draft of our written policies and procedures over cost principles establishing allowability or unallowability of certain costs in accordance with 2 CFR sections 200.420 through 200.476 is in progress and will be completed by July 31, 2022, with the final copy to be in place by August 31, 2022. This will ensure that no unallowable costs could be inadvertently charged to a federal award in the future, and, combined with a review of all charged costs being done by a staff member who is independent of the award tracking and reporting, will ensure compliance with Uniform Guidance cost principles.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding no.: 2021-001 Contact person(s) responsible: Diane Freeman, Chief Financial Officer Corrective action planned: The initial draft of our written policies and procedures over cost principles establishing allowability or unallowability of certain costs in accordance with 2 CFR sections 200.420 through 200.476 is in progress and will be completed by July 31, 2022, with the final copy to be in place by August 31, 2022. This will ensure that no unallowable costs could be inadvertently charged to a federal award in the future, and, combined with a review of all charged costs being done by a staff member who is independent of the award tracking and reporting, will ensure compliance with Uniform Guidance cost principles. Anticipated completion date: August 31, 2022

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2020-12-31

$1,331,464 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 23, 2021 — management decision was due March 23, 2022.

2020-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

During our audit, we noted the Society?s lack of proper internal controls over the costs requested from the Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF) grant to cover expenditures. The Society requested CRF to cover expenditures not actually incurred but to cover expenditures that it would have incurred had it not lost earned revenues. Cause: Society staff misunderstood what costs can be covered by the CRF grant, although it had consulted with the pass-through entity. Also, the request for funds from the CRF grant was not reviewed by another independent person. Effect: Noncompliance such as unallowable costs charged to the federal award or requested in excess of allow-able costs could occur and not be detected or corrected. In addition, the misunderstanding resulted in the Society submitting a final report to the pass-through entity with amounts representing reductions in expenditures related to the COVID-19 pandemic, rather than actual costs incurred. The Society was able to perform an after-the-fact analysis to support adequate allowable costs chargeable to the CRF grant. Subsequently, an amended and corrected report was submitted to the pass-through entity. Audit Recommendation: We recommend that management implement procedures over the administration of federal awards, including establishing a proper review and approval of requests of federal awards. We also recommend that all federal awards are reviewed upon receipt for compliance requirements by more than one staff member with the appropriate training and experience. Management?s Response: The Japanese Garden Society of Oregon will develop and implement a process to review all direct and pass-through awards for compliance requirements, determine and assess procedures to meet those compliance requirements, and establish review procedures to be performed by an individual independent of those assigned to meet the compliance requirements. Upon receipt, all Federal awards, and their compliance requirements, will be reviewed by a member of the Development Department, as well as a member of the Finance Department.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding number: 2020-001 Finding type: Federal award finding Federal Assistance Listing No.: 21.019 Program name: COVID-19 ? Coronavirus Relief Fund Federal agency: Department of the Treasury Pass-through entity: Oregon Cultural Trust Grant number: OCTM21055 Federal award year: 2020 Control deficiency type: Significant deficiency over compliance Instance of noncompliance: Yes Compliance requirements: Allowable activities /Allowable costs and Reporting Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Criteria: The Code of Federal Regulations(CFR) Section 200.303 requires that nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Condition: During our audit, we noted the Society?s lack of proper internal controls over the costs requested from the Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF) grant to cover expenditures. The Society requested CRF to cover expenditures not actually incurred but to cover expenditures that it would have incurred had it not lost earned revenues. Cause: Society staff misunderstood what costs can be covered by the CRF grant, although it had consulted with the pass-through entity. Also, the request for funds from the CRF grant was not reviewed by another independent person. Effect: Noncompliance such as unallowable costs charged to the federal award or requested in excess of allow-able costs could occur and not be detected or corrected. In addition, the misunderstanding resulted in the Society submitting a final report to the pass-through entity with amounts representing reductions in expenditures related to the COVID-19 pandemic, rather than actual costs incurred. The Society was able to perform an after-the-fact analysis to support adequate allowable costs chargeable to the CRF grant. Subsequently, an amended and corrected report was submitted to the pass-through entity. Audit Recommendation: We recommend that management implement procedures over the administration of federal awards, including establishing a proper review and approval of requests of federal awards. We also recommend that all federal awards are reviewed upon receipt for compliance requirements by more than one staff member with the appropriate training and experience. Management?s Response: The Japanese Garden Society of Oregon will develop and implement a process to review all direct and pass-through awards for compliance requirements, determine and assess procedures to meet those compliance requirements, and establish review procedures to be performed by an individual independent of those assigned to meet the compliance requirements. Upon receipt, all Federal awards, and their compliance requirements, will be reviewed by a member of the Development Department, as well as a member of the Finance Department.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding no.: 2020-001 Contact person(s) responsible: Diane Freeman, Chief Financial Officer Corrective action planned: Management will develop and implement a process to review all direct and pass-through awards for compliance requirements, determine and assess procedures to meet those compliance requirements, and establish review procedures to be performed by an individual independent of those assigned to meet the compliance requirements. Upon receipt, all Federal awards, and their compliance requirements, will be reviewed by a member of the Development Department, as well as a member of the Finance Department. Anticipated completion date: October 31, 2021

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Reporting →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.