← Back to home

METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICE, INC.Non-Profit

EIN: 930397825

UEI: NEWBBGLL3XJ5

Audited by: KERN & THOMPSON, LLC

Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 14, 2026

METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICE, INC.10 audit years1 findings
10
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$1.7M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

$1,684,779 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 9, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 9, 2026 (6 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
Funder? Track this deadline →
2025-001
Subrecipient Monitoring
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

2025-001 Finding – Subrecipient Monitoring Type: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance – Subrecipient Monitoring Criteria / Requirement: Under 2 CFR 332 a pass-through entity must verify the subrecipient is not excluded or disqualified from doing business with the federal government, ensure that every subaward is clearly identified with required federal award information, evaluate each subrecipient’s fraud risk and risk of noncompliance, monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subrecipient complies with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the subaward. Condition / Context: The Organization did verify the subrecipient was not suspended nor debarred from doing business with the federal government and clearly identified the award to the subrecipient. While the Organization did assess the fraud risk, risk of noncompliance, and performed monitoring activities, there was no documentation available to support these activities. Additionally, per review of the Subrecipient Monitoring Policy, it is not developed in a way that addresses all potential subrecipient types, it does not give a clear policy on how fraud or noncompliance risk is determined, and it does not provide a prescriptive approach to monitoring. Cause: Procedures were not in place to properly document subrecipient monitoring activities and the Subrecipient Monitoring Policy is insufficient to ensure compliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements. Effect: Subrecipient monitoring was not thoroughly documented. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization implement the necessary internal controls to ensure that subrecipient monitoring is performed and documented. Additionally, we recommend that the Organization revise their Subrecipient Monitoring Policy to address 2 CFR 332 and to give clear directives of how subrecipient monitoring will be performed and documented. Management’s Response: Management concurs with the finding and will implement effective internal controls over Subrecipient Monitoring

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2025-001 Finding – Subrecipient Monitoring Type: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance – Subrecipient Monitoring Criteria / Requirement: Under 2 CFR 332 a pass-through entity must verify the subrecipient is not excluded or disqualified from doing business with the federal government, ensure that every subaward is clearly identified with required federal award information, evaluate each subrecipient’s fraud risk and risk of noncompliance, monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subrecipient complies with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the subaward. Condition / Context: The Organization did verify the subrecipient was not suspended nor debarred from doing business with the federal government and clearly identified the award to the subrecipient. While the Organization did assess the fraud risk, risk of noncompliance, and performed monitoring activities, there was no documentation available to support these activities. Additionally, per review of the Subrecipient Monitoring Policy, it is not developed in a way that addresses all potential subrecipient types, it does not give a clear policy on how fraud or noncompliance risk is determined, and it does not provide a prescriptive approach to monitoring. Cause: Procedures were not in place to properly document subrecipient monitoring activities and the Subrecipient Monitoring Policy is insufficient to ensure compliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements. Effect: Subrecipient monitoring was not thoroughly documented. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization implement the necessary internal controls to ensure that subrecipient monitoring is performed and documented. Additionally, we recommend that the Organization revise their Subrecipient Monitoring Policy to address 2 CFR 332 and to give clear directives of how subrecipient monitoring will be performed and documented. Management’s Response: Management concurs with the finding and will implement effective internal controls over Subrecipient Monitoring

Corrective Action Plan

Metropolitan Family Service respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ending June 30, 2025. Audit: July 1, 2024 – June 30, 2025 The finding from the schedule of findings and questioned cost are discussed below. The finding is numbered with the number assigned in the schedule. 2025-001 FINDING – SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization implement the necessary internal controls to ensure that subrecipient monitoring is performed and documented. Additionally, we recommend that the Organization revise their Subrecipient Monitoring Policy to address 2 CFR 332 and to give clear directives of how subrecipient monitoring will be performed and documented. Explanation of disagreement with audit findings: there is no disagreement with the audit findings. Action Plan: Steps were taken to update MFS’s Subrecipient Monitoring Policy and procedures to better address 2 CFR 332 giving clear directives of how subrecipient monitoring will be performed and documented going forward. Name(s) of the contact people responsible for correction action: Richard Seals, CFO; Nick Clark, Senior Financial Analyst; and the relevant Program Manager/Director Plan completion date for corrective action plan: December 31, 2025

About Subrecipient Monitoring →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,536,139 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 25, 2025 — management decision was due September 25, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,376,451 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 26, 2024 — management decision was due September 26, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,569,444 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 22, 2023 — management decision was due September 22, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,871,882 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 30, 2021 — management decision was due May 30, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,331,550 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 15, 2020 — management decision was due June 15, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,283,589 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,025,774 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 12, 2018 — management decision was due June 12, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$807,402 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 20, 2017 — management decision was due June 20, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,628,375 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 6, 2016 — management decision was due June 6, 2017.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Oregon

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.