← Back to home

CITY OF NORTH POLELocal Government

EIN: 926001585

UEI: WFLFBAZG5SN9

Audited by: ELGEE REHFELD, LLC

Oversight agency: 21 [Department of the Treasury]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

CITY OF NORTH POLE7 audit years3 findings
7
Audit Years
3
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$951.3K
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2024)

FY 2024-12-31

$951,326 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on June 25, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by December 25, 2025 (253 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2024-002
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Upon request the City was unable to provide documentation to support whether the required suspended/debarred certification was completed within a timely manner or was received from the vendor when the contract was signed. Although the City, upon our request, checked and found there to be no issues, there was no documentation to indicate a suspended/disbarred verification check was completed prior to entering the contract with the sole vendor used for this program. Cause: Inconsistent implementation of documentation retention controls and staff turnover contributed to the inability to retrieve or verify the required suspended/debarred verification was completed in a timely manner for the contract. Context: Only one vendor was paid by contract and subject to the suspended/debarred procurement requirement in this program. Effect: Lack of consistent implementation of documentation retention controls is considered a control weakness and is reportable as a significant deficiency. As the required verification was completed, although not timely, the noncompliance is considered not material to the program and therefore is reported as an other matter. Recommendation: Management should ensure controls over retaining documentation of compliance with procurement requirements are followed consistently. This should include maintaining evidence of required approvals or reviews and assigning responsibility for recordkeeping, especially during periods of staff transition. View of responsible officials: Management concurs with this finding, see corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2024-002 Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance and Compliance – Procurement – Suspension and Debarment Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Program(s) and Federal Award Listing Number(s): COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN: 21.027 FAIN: None New or Repeat: New Criteria: The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict making subawards and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from receiving or participating in Federal awards. Management is responsible for ensuring it has designed and implemented internal controls over compliance for this requirement as it applies to its federally funded programs. Condition: Upon request the City was unable to provide documentation to support whether the required suspended/debarred certification was completed within a timely manner or was received from the vendor when the contract was signed. Although the City, upon our request, checked and found there to be no issues, there was no documentation to indicate a suspended/disbarred verification check was completed prior to entering the contract with the sole vendor used for this program. Cause: Inconsistent implementation of documentation retention controls and staff turnover contributed to the inability to retrieve or verify the required suspended/debarred verification was completed in a timely manner for the contract. Context: Only one vendor was paid by contract and subject to the suspended/debarred procurement requirement in this program. Effect: Lack of consistent implementation of documentation retention controls is considered a control weakness and is reportable as a significant deficiency. As the required verification was completed, although not timely, the noncompliance is considered not material to the program and therefore is reported as an other matter. Recommendation: Management should ensure controls over retaining documentation of compliance with procurement requirements are followed consistently. This should include maintaining evidence of required approvals or reviews and assigning responsibility for recordkeeping, especially during periods of staff transition. View of responsible officials: Management concurs with this finding, see corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2024-002 - Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance and Compliance - Procurement - Suspension and Debarment. Name of Contact Person: Corrective Action Plan: Proposed Completion Date: Tricia Fogarty, Chief Financial Officer 125 Snowman Ln, North Pole, AK 99705 Mandate documentation, such as a printed screenshot from Sams.gov to be included in the request for council approval Require grant training of key staff, project managers and finance department personnel. 12/1/2025

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2023-12-31

$1,454,951 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 29, 2024 — management decision was due January 29, 2025.

FY 2022-12-31

$2,654,212 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on August 21, 2023 — management decision was due February 21, 2024.

2022-003
Reporting
OTHER MATTERS

Several monthly reports were not filed on a timely basis, and the December total project costs were less than balances reported in the general ledger. Criteria: Task 1.3 of the Cooperative Agreement requires monthly status reports that include funds expended during the reporting period and cumulative to date. Context: The City had personnel changes during the year, affecting the management of the public works department, which caused reporting issues. Cause: The lapse in reporting was due to change in personnel. Effect: The reports for the year ended December 31, 2022 do not reconcile with the yearend general ledger. Recommendation: We recommend the reports be reviewed and reconciled with the general ledger. Adjustments to cumulative cost to date in the report should then be made. Grantee response: See corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

SECTION III ? FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS U.S. Department of Defense Cooperative Agreement -Water Supply and Distribution Design, Moose Creek, Alaska, and Cooperative Agreement-Remedial Action Construction Phase One North Loop Supply and Distribution System, Moose Creek, Alaska 2022-003 Grant reports were not filed timely or reconciled to the general ledger: Condition: Several monthly reports were not filed on a timely basis, and the December total project costs were less than balances reported in the general ledger. Criteria: Task 1.3 of the Cooperative Agreement requires monthly status reports that include funds expended during the reporting period and cumulative to date. Context: The City had personnel changes during the year, affecting the management of the public works department, which caused reporting issues. Cause: The lapse in reporting was due to change in personnel. Effect: The reports for the year ended December 31, 2022 do not reconcile with the yearend general ledger. Recommendation: We recommend the reports be reviewed and reconciled with the general ledger. Adjustments to cumulative cost to date in the report should then be made. Grantee response: See corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding Number 2022-003 Responsible Individual: Jeffrey J. Jacobson City of North Pole Corrective Action Plan Status: As of today July 25, 2023, necessary corrective actions have been made to the general ledger with the appropriate account balances. The total compensation committee will meet this year on July 28th, August 11th, and 25th 2023 to review current staffing levels responsibility skills and training requirements and any compensation adjustments. This will possible include contracting with Altman and Rogers in the interim to provide training and support to the city employees to monitor grant requirement compliance and reporting to provide an accurate Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The administration and city council will consider adjusting job descriptions responsibilities for 2024 to full fill grant management and monitoring oversight and to enhance separation of fiscal responsibility and to expand checks and balances. In addition, the administration and the city council will consider hiring a CPA mid-year 2024 to assist current financial staff and to facilitate a smooth transaction as senior staff plan to retire in 2025.

About Reporting →
2022-004
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Cooperative Agreements with the U.S, Department of Defense: several monthly reports were not filed on a timely basis, and the December total project costs for the construction grant was $28,352 less than balances reported in the general ledger, and the water supply and distribution design grant was $5,760 less than balances reported in the general ledger. Also, management did not appear to be familiar with the federal regulations which defined eligible use of the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund. Criteria: Adequate internal controls over the management of federal grants are required the U.S, Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Context: The City did not appear to have available staff to monitor grant compliance to include complying with reporting standards. Cause: Insufficient staffing levels. Effect: The reports for the year ended December 31, 2022 were not filed on a timely basis and did not reconcile with the yearend general ledger. Recommendation: We recommend the City evaluate its staffing levels and positions and develop a process where stronger monitoring occurs over the administration of grants. Grantee response: See corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

SECTION III ? FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (CONTINUED) INTERNAL CONTROL WEAKNESSES U.S. Department of Defense Cooperative Agreement -Water Supply and Distribution Design, Moose Creek, Alaska, and Cooperative Agreement-Remedial Action Construction Phase One North Loop Supply and Distribution System, Moose Creek, Alaska U.S. Department of Treasury Passed through Program from: Alaska Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund 2022-004 Inadequate staff to monitor compliance with grant requirements: Condition: Cooperative Agreements with the U.S, Department of Defense: several monthly reports were not filed on a timely basis, and the December total project costs for the construction grant was $28,352 less than balances reported in the general ledger, and the water supply and distribution design grant was $5,760 less than balances reported in the general ledger. Also, management did not appear to be familiar with the federal regulations which defined eligible use of the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund. Criteria: Adequate internal controls over the management of federal grants are required the U.S, Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Context: The City did not appear to have available staff to monitor grant compliance to include complying with reporting standards. Cause: Insufficient staffing levels. Effect: The reports for the year ended December 31, 2022 were not filed on a timely basis and did not reconcile with the yearend general ledger. Recommendation: We recommend the City evaluate its staffing levels and positions and develop a process where stronger monitoring occurs over the administration of grants. Grantee response: See corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding Number 2022-004 Responsible Individual: Jeffrey J. Jacobson City of North Pole Corrective Action Plan Status: As of today July 25, 2023, necessary corrective actions have been made to the general ledger with the appropriate account balances. The total compensation committee will meet this year on July 28th, August 11th, and 25th 2023 to review current staffing levels responsibility skills and training requirements and any compensation adjustments. This will possible include contracting with Altman and Rogers in the interim to provide training and support to the city employees to monitor grant requirement compliance and reporting to provide an accurate Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The administration and city council will consider adjusting job descriptions responsibilities for 2024 to full fill grant management and monitoring oversight and to enhance separation of fiscal responsibility and to expand checks and balances. In addition, the administration and the city council will consider hiring a CPA mid-year 2024 to assist current financial staff and to facilitate a smooth transaction as senior staff plan to retire in 2025.

About Reporting →

FY 2021-12-31

$13,143,883 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 31, 2022 — management decision was due January 31, 2023.

FY 2020-12-31

$30,936,796 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 13, 2021 — management decision was due January 13, 2022.

FY 2019-12-31

$2,814,179 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 22, 2020 — management decision was due January 22, 2021.

FY 2018-12-31

$847,489 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 1, 2019 — management decision was due January 1, 2020.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Alaska

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.