← Back to home

Sovereign Equity FundNon-Profit

EIN: 922247773

UEI: LZHUBAX82H75

Audited by: Forvis Mazars, LLP

Oversight agency: 10 [Department of Agriculture]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Showing data from August 31, 2026 — the Federal Audit Clearinghouse is under high demand right now, so this couldn't be refreshed. This is the most recent data on record, not necessarily today's.

Sovereign Equity Fund1 audit years3 findings
1
Audit Years
3
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$813.1K
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2024)

FY 2024-12-31

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$813,093 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on September 24, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by March 24, 2026 (162 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2024-003
Cash Management
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONQUESTIONED COSTS

Federal Program – American Rescue Plan Technical Assistance Investment Program – Assistance Listing No. 10.234 – Award No. 2023-70504-40441 – Program Year 2024– U.S. Department of Agriculture Criteria or specific requirement – Cash Management, 2 CFR 200.305 Condition – The organization is required to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the Federal agency and the disbursement of funds by the recipient or the subrecipients in accordance with 2 CFR 200.305. If the organization cannot meet the requirements for advance payment, they must use the reimbursement method. The organization, as a pass-through entity, is also responsible for implementing procedures to ensure the time elapsing between the transfer of Federal funds to the subrecipient and the disbursement of such funds for program purposes by the subrecipient is minimized in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.305(b)(1). Cause – The organization did not have appropriate controls in place to ensure compliance with federal requirements to minimize the time elapsing between receiving and disbursing the federal funds. The organization also did not have appropriate controls in place to ensure the time elapsing between the transfer of federal funds to the subrecipient and the disbursement of funds by the subrecipient for program purposes was minimized. Effect – The organization drew funds, but did not disburse them in a timely manner. Additionally, they passed funds to subrecipients and did not ensure the subrecipients spent those funds timely. Questioned costs – Assistance Listing No. 10.234, FAIN No. 20237050440441: $2,855,333. The amount calculated represents the total federal funding the organization received in advance that had not been expensed for program purposes by the end of the reporting period. Assistance Listing No. 10.234: $741,517. The amount calculated represents the total amount of federal funds passed through to subrecipients for the reporting period. Context – There were no cash draws for the reporting period as the majority of the funding awarded was received in advance in the prior year. Out of a population of 8 subrecipients, 2 subrecipients were selected for testing. Of these subrecipients, both received funding in advance; however, both did not disburse funds under the program purposes within a timely manner. Our sample was not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – N/A Recommendation – The organization should put controls in place to ensure that funds are requested and spent timely or move to the reimbursement basis. The organization should put controls in place to ensure that funds passed through to subrecipients are disbursed by the subrecipient for the program within a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions – Management agrees with the finding. Management plans to revise internal procedures to include verification of expenditures for eligible and allowable expenses before initiating a draw request, develop a drawdown checklist and require supporting documentation for incurred costs, retain supporting documentation for all drawdowns, require Executive Director approval prior to all federal drawdowns, and conduct training on federal reimbursement protocols for program and finance staff.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Program – American Rescue Plan Technical Assistance Investment Program – Assistance Listing No. 10.234 – Award No. 2023-70504-40441 – Program Year 2024– U.S. Department of Agriculture Criteria or specific requirement – Cash Management, 2 CFR 200.305 Condition – The organization is required to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the Federal agency and the disbursement of funds by the recipient or the subrecipients in accordance with 2 CFR 200.305. If the organization cannot meet the requirements for advance payment, they must use the reimbursement method. The organization, as a pass-through entity, is also responsible for implementing procedures to ensure the time elapsing between the transfer of Federal funds to the subrecipient and the disbursement of such funds for program purposes by the subrecipient is minimized in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.305(b)(1). Cause – The organization did not have appropriate controls in place to ensure compliance with federal requirements to minimize the time elapsing between receiving and disbursing the federal funds. The organization also did not have appropriate controls in place to ensure the time elapsing between the transfer of federal funds to the subrecipient and the disbursement of funds by the subrecipient for program purposes was minimized. Effect – The organization drew funds, but did not disburse them in a timely manner. Additionally, they passed funds to subrecipients and did not ensure the subrecipients spent those funds timely. Questioned costs – Assistance Listing No. 10.234, FAIN No. 20237050440441: $2,855,333. The amount calculated represents the total federal funding the organization received in advance that had not been expensed for program purposes by the end of the reporting period. Assistance Listing No. 10.234: $741,517. The amount calculated represents the total amount of federal funds passed through to subrecipients for the reporting period. Context – There were no cash draws for the reporting period as the majority of the funding awarded was received in advance in the prior year. Out of a population of 8 subrecipients, 2 subrecipients were selected for testing. Of these subrecipients, both received funding in advance; however, both did not disburse funds under the program purposes within a timely manner. Our sample was not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – N/A Recommendation – The organization should put controls in place to ensure that funds are requested and spent timely or move to the reimbursement basis. The organization should put controls in place to ensure that funds passed through to subrecipients are disbursed by the subrecipient for the program within a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions – Management agrees with the finding. Management plans to revise internal procedures to include verification of expenditures for eligible and allowable expenses before initiating a draw request, develop a drawdown checklist and require supporting documentation for incurred costs, retain supporting documentation for all drawdowns, require Executive Director approval prior to all federal drawdowns, and conduct training on federal reimbursement protocols for program and finance staff.

Corrective Action Plan

August 15, 2025 United States Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture Awards Management Division 805 Pennsylvania Ave Kansas City, MO 64105 Attention: Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC) Subject: Corrective Action Plan Submission – Finding #3 – Sovereign Equity Fund – Fiscal Year End 12/31/2024 To Whom It May Concern: Funds were drawn down in advance under a reimbursement-based award, potentially violating federal cash management standards (2 CFR §200.305). As referenced and in relation to Finding #2 - Grant funds were drawn in excess of current expenditure needs, which resulted in the Organization being required to return the excess funds to the federal government. 2024-002 – Cash Management, 2 CFR 200.305 (Payment). Corrective Actions: • The Organization has returned the excess funds to the federal government.. • Revise internal procedures to include verification of expenditures for eligible and allowable expenses before initiating a draw request. • Develop a drawdown checklist and require supporting documentation for incurred costs, retain supporting documentation for all drawdowns. • Require Executive Director approval prior to all federal drawdowns. • Conduct training on federal reimbursement protocols for program and finance staff. Responsible Party: Grants Manager / Executive Director Target Completion Date: Policy update within 2 weeks; checklist rollout within 30 days Sincerely, Courtney Chavis Executive Director

About Cash Management →
2024-004
Subrecipient Monitoring
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

Federal Program – American Rescue Plan Technical Assistance Investment Program – Assistance Listing No. 10.234 – Award No. 2023-70504-40441 – Program Year 2024 – U.S. Department of Agriculture Criteria or specific requirement – Subrecipient Monitoring, 2 CFR 200.332(b), (c) and (e) Condition – The pass-through entity is responsible for identifying the award and applicable requirements to the subrecipient at the time of the subaward providing information described in 2 CFR section 200.332 to ensure the subrecipient uses the federal award in accordance with federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. The pass-through entity is responsible for evaluating each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance for purposes of determining appropriate subrecipient monitoring. The pass-through entity is responsible for monitoring the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Cause – While the organization did perform certain monitoring procedures, the organization did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure agreements with subrecipients were in compliance with requirements as well as to ensure appropriate monitoring of the subrecipients’ use of funding in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.332. Effect – The organization failed to have agreements with subrecipients that were inclusive of all applicable requirements outlined within 2 CFR section 200.332. The organization did not have sufficient procedures to appropriately monitor the subrecipients’ use of funds within the reporting period. Questioned costs – N/A Context – Out of a population of 8 subrecipients, 2 subrecipients were selected for testing. For the 2 subrecipients, the agreement with the subrecipient was missing information that is required to be communicated with the subrecipient to ensure compliance with federal requirements. Additionally, for the 2 subrecipients, audit reports were not obtained by the pass-through entity during the reporting period to ensure proper use of funding received and proper monitoring of the subaward. Our sample was not and was not intended to be statistically valid. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – N/A Recommendation – The organization should ensure agreements with subrecipients include all information required to be communicated to the subrecipient for the subaward. The organization should put controls in place to ensure that monitoring activities are tailored to this risk of each subrecipient and appropriately followed in alignment with what is required. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions – Management agrees with finding. Management plans to develop a subrecipient monitoring policy aligned with 2 CFR 200.331-333. Management will also standardize agreement templates to include all required clauses for federal award subrecipient agreements, implement a subrecipient risk assessment tool to determine monitoring frequency and risk level identification, and assign staff for annual subrecipient desk reviews or site visits based on risk levels.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Program – American Rescue Plan Technical Assistance Investment Program – Assistance Listing No. 10.234 – Award No. 2023-70504-40441 – Program Year 2024 – U.S. Department of Agriculture Criteria or specific requirement – Subrecipient Monitoring, 2 CFR 200.332(b), (c) and (e) Condition – The pass-through entity is responsible for identifying the award and applicable requirements to the subrecipient at the time of the subaward providing information described in 2 CFR section 200.332 to ensure the subrecipient uses the federal award in accordance with federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. The pass-through entity is responsible for evaluating each subrecipient’s risk of noncompliance for purposes of determining appropriate subrecipient monitoring. The pass-through entity is responsible for monitoring the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Cause – While the organization did perform certain monitoring procedures, the organization did not have sufficient controls in place to ensure agreements with subrecipients were in compliance with requirements as well as to ensure appropriate monitoring of the subrecipients’ use of funding in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.332. Effect – The organization failed to have agreements with subrecipients that were inclusive of all applicable requirements outlined within 2 CFR section 200.332. The organization did not have sufficient procedures to appropriately monitor the subrecipients’ use of funds within the reporting period. Questioned costs – N/A Context – Out of a population of 8 subrecipients, 2 subrecipients were selected for testing. For the 2 subrecipients, the agreement with the subrecipient was missing information that is required to be communicated with the subrecipient to ensure compliance with federal requirements. Additionally, for the 2 subrecipients, audit reports were not obtained by the pass-through entity during the reporting period to ensure proper use of funding received and proper monitoring of the subaward. Our sample was not and was not intended to be statistically valid. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – N/A Recommendation – The organization should ensure agreements with subrecipients include all information required to be communicated to the subrecipient for the subaward. The organization should put controls in place to ensure that monitoring activities are tailored to this risk of each subrecipient and appropriately followed in alignment with what is required. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions – Management agrees with finding. Management plans to develop a subrecipient monitoring policy aligned with 2 CFR 200.331-333. Management will also standardize agreement templates to include all required clauses for federal award subrecipient agreements, implement a subrecipient risk assessment tool to determine monitoring frequency and risk level identification, and assign staff for annual subrecipient desk reviews or site visits based on risk levels.

Corrective Action Plan

August 15, 2025 United States Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture Awards Management Division 805 Pennsylvania Ave Kansas City, MO 64105 Attention: Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC) Subject: Corrective Action Plan Submission – Finding #4 – Sovereign Equity Fund – Fiscal Year End 12/31/2024 To Whom It May Concern: Subrecipient Monitoring - Subrecipient agreements lacked required federal clauses and were not monitored according to risk assessments. Corrective Actions: • Develop a subrecipient monitoring policy aligned with 2 CFR §200.331-333. • Standardize agreement templates to include all required clauses for federal award subrecipient agreements (e.g., audit requirements, FFATA, termination provisions). • Implement a subrecipient risk assessment tool to determine monitoring frequency and risk level identification. • Assign staff for annual subrecipient desk reviews or site visits based on risk levels. Responsible Party: Executive Director / Legal & Compliance Team Target Completion Date: Risk assessment and financial monitoring tool in use and agreement templates updated within 45 days. Sincerely, Courtney Chavis Executive Director

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2024-005
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Federal Program – American Rescue Plan Technical Assistance Investment Program – Assistance Listing No. 10.234 - Award No. 2023-70504-40441 – Program Year 2024 – U.S. Department of Agriculture Criteria or specific requirement – Reporting, 2 CFR 170 Condition – The organization is responsible for completing reports under the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) for all first-tier subawards. Cause – The organization did not have appropriate controls in place to ensure the required reports to be submitted under FFATA were completed and submitted timely. Effect – The organization failed to complete and submit reports for each sub-award that is required under the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act. Questioned costs – N/A Context – Out of a population of 8 subrecipients, 2 subrecipients were selected for testing. No support was able to be provided for the reports required to be submitted under FFATA for each sub-award. Our sample was not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – N/A Recommendation – The organization should put controls and policies in place to ensure that the reports for subawards required under the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act are being completed and submitted within the applicable timeframe. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions – Management agrees with finding. Management plans to designate a responsible party to oversee FFATA compliance. Management will update award tracking system to recognize and implement procedures for all first-tier subawards for FFATA reporting, incorporate FFATA reporting deadlines into grants calendar, and provide FFATA compliance training and ensure timely access to the reporting website.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Program – American Rescue Plan Technical Assistance Investment Program – Assistance Listing No. 10.234 - Award No. 2023-70504-40441 – Program Year 2024 – U.S. Department of Agriculture Criteria or specific requirement – Reporting, 2 CFR 170 Condition – The organization is responsible for completing reports under the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) for all first-tier subawards. Cause – The organization did not have appropriate controls in place to ensure the required reports to be submitted under FFATA were completed and submitted timely. Effect – The organization failed to complete and submit reports for each sub-award that is required under the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act. Questioned costs – N/A Context – Out of a population of 8 subrecipients, 2 subrecipients were selected for testing. No support was able to be provided for the reports required to be submitted under FFATA for each sub-award. Our sample was not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – N/A Recommendation – The organization should put controls and policies in place to ensure that the reports for subawards required under the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act are being completed and submitted within the applicable timeframe. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions – Management agrees with finding. Management plans to designate a responsible party to oversee FFATA compliance. Management will update award tracking system to recognize and implement procedures for all first-tier subawards for FFATA reporting, incorporate FFATA reporting deadlines into grants calendar, and provide FFATA compliance training and ensure timely access to the reporting website.

Corrective Action Plan

August 15, 2025 United States Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture Awards Management Division 805 Pennsylvania Ave Kansas City, MO 64105 Attention: Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC) Subject: Corrective Action Plan Submission – Finding #5 – Sovereign Equity Fund – Fiscal Year End 12/31/2024 To Whom It May Concern: FFATA Reporting - Organization failed to report first-tier subawards in the FSRS system as required under the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act. Corrective Actions: • Designate a responsible party to oversee FFATA compliance. • Update award tracking system to recognize and implement procedures for all first-tier subawards ≥$30,000 for FFATA reporting. • Incorporate FFATA reporting deadlines into grants calendar (due by the end of the month following the award date). • Provide FFATA compliance training and ensure timely access to FSRS.gov. Responsible Party: Executive Director Target Completion Date: Within 14 days; calendar tracking system in use for next subaward Sincerely, Courtney Chavis Executive Director

About Reporting →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in North Dakota

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.